KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama / 2026 / Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1

Duymanın Ötesinde: İleri Düzey İngilizce Dil Öğrenenlerin Bilişsel ve Meta Bilişsel Dinleme Stratejisi Eğitimi Yolculuğu

Beyond Hearing: Advanced English Language Learners' Journey Through Cognitive and Metacognitive Listening Strategy Training

Kübra Şık Keser(Abdullah Gül Üniversitesi)0000-0003-1492-5883
Salim Razı(Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi)0000-0003-2136-4391
Sayfa
35–50
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bulgular, öğrencilerin bilişsel ve meta-bilişsel stratejileri anlama ve uygulama becerilerini önemli ölçüde geliştirdiğini, LSTP'nin dinleme becerilerini güçlendirmek için daha fazla strateji kullanımını teşvik ettiğini ortaya koydu.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Özet Bu çalışmanın amacı bilişsel ve meta-bilişsel dinleme stratejisi eğitim programını (LSTP) geliştirmek ve değerlendirmek ve Türkiye'deki ileri düzey İngilizce öğrenenlerin dinleme stratejileri üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ana araştırma sorusu, LSTP'nin öğrencilerin bilişsel ve meta-bilişsel dinleme stratejilerini kullanımını artırıp artıramayacağını araştırmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bulgular, öğrencilerin bilişsel ve meta-bilişsel stratejileri anlama ve uygulama becerilerini önemli ölçüde geliştirdiğini, LSTP'nin dinleme becerilerini güçlendirmek için daha fazla strateji kullanımını teşvik ettiğini ortaya koydu.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:10 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:Dinleme Stratejileri · Bilişsel Stratejiler · Metabilişsel Stratejiler

Özet

Özet Bu çalışmanın amacı bilişsel ve meta-bilişsel dinleme stratejisi eğitim programını (LSTP) geliştirmek ve değerlendirmek ve Türkiye'deki ileri düzey İngilizce öğrenenlerin dinleme stratejileri üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Ana araştırma sorusu, LSTP'nin öğrencilerin bilişsel ve meta-bilişsel dinleme stratejilerini kullanımını artırıp artıramayacağını araştırmıştır. Umut vadeden bir pilot çalışmadan sonra, birincil çalışma, yerleşik teori metodolojisini kullanan 10 katılımcıyı içeriyordu. Veriler, ön ve son testler, öğrenci görüşmeleri, öğretim oturumlarının video kayıtları ve haftalık öğrenci günlükleri aracılığıyla toplandı. Bulgular, öğrencilerin bilişsel ve meta-bilişsel stratejileri anlama ve uygulama becerilerini önemli ölçüde geliştirdiğini, LSTP'nin dinleme becerilerini güçlendirmek için daha fazla strateji kullanımını teşvik ettiğini ortaya koydu. Program ayrıca katılımcıların bildirimsel, prosedürel ve koşullu bilgi konusundaki farkındalıklarını artırdı. Bu çalışma, yapılandırılmış strateji eğitiminin öğrencilerin etkili dinleme becerileri geliştirmelerine, özerkliği teşvik etmelerine ve dil yeterliliğini artırmalarına yardımcı olabileceğini öne sürerek İngilizce dil eğitimcileri ve müfredat tasarımcıları için pratik çıkarımlara sahiptir. Özellikle ileri düzey öğrenciler için yararlı olsa da, yaklaşım karmaşık dinleme görevleriyle karşı karşıya kalan orta düzey öğrencilere de fayda sağlayabilir. Genel olarak bu bulgular, öğrencilere çeşitli bağlamlarda aktarılabilir stratejiler kazandırarak daha kapsamlı bir dil öğrenme ortamını desteklemektedir.

Abstract

Abstract This study aimed to develop and evaluate a cognitive and metacognitive listening strategy training program (LSTP) and examine its effects on the listening strategies of advanced English learners in Türkiye. The main research question explored whether the LSTP could enhance learners' use of cognitive and metacognitive listening strategies. After a promising pilot study, the primary study involved 10 participants, using grounded theory methodology. Data were collected through pre- and post-tests, student interviews, video recordings of instructional sessions, and weekly student diaries. Findings revealed that students significantly improved their understanding and application of cognitive and metacognitive strategies, with the LSTP fostering greater strategy use to strengthen listening skills. The program also heightened participants' awareness of declarative, procedural, and conditional knowledge. This study has practical implications for English language educators and curriculum designers, suggesting that structured strategy training can support learners in developing effective listening skills, promoting autonomy, and enhancing language proficiency. While particularly useful for advanced learners, the approach may also benefit intermediate students facing complex listening tasks. Overall, these findings support a more comprehensive language learning environment, equipping students with strategies transferable across varied contexts.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Keser, K. Ş., Razı, S. (2025). Duymanın Ötesinde: İleri Düzey İngilizce Dil Öğrenenlerin Bilişsel ve Meta Bilişsel Dinleme Stratejisi Eğitimi Yolculuğu. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, Cilt: 21 Sayı: 1, 35–50. https://doi.org/10.17244/eku.1622784

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (68)

  1. Brooks-Lewis, K. A. (2009). Adult learners’ perceptions of the incorporation of their L1 in foreign language teaching and learning. Applied Linguistics, 30(2), 216-235. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn051
  2. Bryant, A. (2002). Re-grounding grounded theory. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 4(1), 7. https://aisel.aisnet.org/jitta/vol4/iss1/7
  3. Carrell, P. L., Dunkel, P. A., & Mollaun, P. (2004). The effects of notetaking, lecture length, and topic on a computer-based test of ESL listening comprehension. Applied Language Learning, 14(1), 83-105. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/161450/
  4. Chamot, A. U. (2005). Language learning strategy instruction: Current issues and research. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 112-130. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190505000061
  5. Chamot, A. U. (1994). A model for learning strategies instruction in the foreign language classroom. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics (GURT) 1994: Educational linguistics, cross-cultural communication, and global interdependence (pp. 323). Georgetown University Press.
  6. Chamot, A. U., & O’Malley, J. M. (1987). The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 227-249. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586733
  7. Chen, Y. (2005). Barriers to acquiring listening strategies for EFL learners and their pedagogical implications. TESL-EJ, 8(4), 2-15. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1068095.pdf
  8. Chen, C. W. Y. (2019). Guided listening with listening journals and curated materials: A metacognitive approach. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 13(2), 133-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2017.1381104
  9. Chien, C. N., & Wei, L. (1998). The strategy use in listening comprehension for EFL learners in Taiwan. RELC Journal, 29(1), 66-91. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900105
  10. Cohen, A. D., & Weaver, S. J. (2006). Styles and strategies-based instruction: A teachers’ guide. Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.
  11. Costa, A. L. (2001). Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development: London.
  12. Coşkun, A. (2010). The effect of metacognitive strategy training on the listening performance of beginner students. Novitas-ROYAL (Research on Youth and Language), 4(1), 35–50. https://novitasroyal.org/all-volumes-and-issues/?wpdmc=volume-4-issue-1#
  13. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Edwards Brothers.
  14. Cross, J., & Vandergrift, L. (2018). Metacognitive listening strategies. The TESOL encyclopedia of English language teaching, 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0589
  15. Duy, V. H., & Quan, N. H. (2021). Vietnamese English-majored students’ use of listening strategies. European Journal of English Language Teaching, 6(6), 116-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.46827/ejel.v6i6.3955
  16. ETS. (2012). The official guide to TOEFL test (4th ed.). McGraw Hill.
  17. Feyten, C. M. (1991). The power of listening ability: An overlooked dimension in language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 75(2), 173-180. https://doi.org/10.2307/328825
  18. Field, J. (2008). Listening in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press.
  19. Friedman, D. A. (2011). How to collect and analyze qualitative data. Research methods in second language acquisition: A practical guide, 180-200. Fujiwara, B. (1990). Learner training in listening strategies. JALT Journal, 12(2), 203-217. https://jalt-publications.org/sites/default/files/pdf-article/jj-12.2-art3.pdf
  20. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L.(1967). The discovery of grounded theory; strategies for qualitative research. Nursing research, 17(4), 364.
  21. Goh, C., & Taib, Y. (2006). Metacognitive instruction in listening for young learners. ELT Journal, 60, 222–232. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccl002
  22. Goh, C. (2008). Metacognitive instruction for second language listening development: Theory, practice and research implications. RELC journal, 39(2), 188-213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688208092184
  23. Golchi, M. M. (2012). Listening anxiety and its relationship with listening strategy use and listening comprehension among Iranian IELTS learners. International Journal of English Linguistics, 2(4), 115. https://10.0.11.175/assehr.k.200306.034
  24. Graham, S. (2006). Listening comprehension: The learners’ perspective. System, 34(2), 165-182. https://10.0.3.248/j.system.2005.11.001
  25. Graham, S., & Macaro, E. (2008). Designing year 12 strategy training in listening and writing: From theory to practice. The Language Learning Journal, 35(2), 153-173. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571730701599203
  26. Graham, S., & Santos, D. (2015). Strategies for second language listening: Current scenarios and improved pedagogy. Palgrave Macmillan.
  27. Hall, G., & Cook, G. (2014). Own language use in ELT: Exploring global practices and attitudes. Language Issues: The ESOL Journal, 25(1), 35-43.
  28. Harmer, J. (2009). The practice of English language teaching. Longman.
  29. Ivone, F. M., & Renandya, W. A. (2019). Extensive listening and viewing in ELT. Teflin Journal, 30(2), 237-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v30i2/237-256
  30. Jarvis, A. K. L., & Guan, G. (2020). Academic listening strategy use at an English-medium university. Asian ESP Journal, 16(3), 8-29.
  31. Jung, J., & Lee, M. (2022). Second language reading and recall processes under different reading purposes: an eye-tracking, keystroke-logging, and stimulated recall study. Language Awareness, 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09658416.2022.2069251
  32. Kobayashi, A. (2018). Investigating the effects of metacognitive instruction in listening for EFL learners. The Journal of Asia TEFL, 15(2), 310–328. https://doi.org/10.18823/asiatefl.2018.15.2.4.310
  33. Kök, İ. (2018). Relationship between listening comprehension strategy use and listening comprehension proficiency. International journal of Listening, 32(3), 163-179. https://doi.org/10.1080/10904018.2016.1276457
  34. Lam, W., & Wong, J. (2000). “The effects of strategy training on developing discussion skills in an ESL classroom”. ELT Journal, 54(3), 245-255. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.3.245
  35. Li, J. & Qin, X. (2006). Language learning styles and learning strategies of tertiary- level English learners in China. RELC Journal, 37(1), 67-90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688206063475
  36. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  37. McAndrews, M. (2021). The effects of prosody instruction on listening comprehension in an EAP classroom context. Language Teaching Research, 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168821990346
  38. Mendelsohn, D. J. (1984). There ARE strategies for listening. TEAL Occasional Papers, 8(1), 63-76.
  39. Mendelsohn, D. (2006). Learning how to listen using listening strategies. In E. Uso-Juan & A. Martinez-Flor (Eds.), Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills (pp. 75–90). Mouton de Gruyter.
  40. Merilia, S. (2019). Investigating metacognitive listening strategy and listening problems encountered by English learners. Journal of Linguistics and Applied Linguistics, 1(1), 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.32493/ljlal.v1i1.2485
  41. Miller, G. A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 63(2), 81-97. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0043158
  42. Milliner, B., & Dimoski, B. (2021). The effects of a metacognitive intervention on lower-proficiency EFL learners’ listening comprehension and listening self-efficacy. Language Teaching Research, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.1177/13621688211004646
  43. Morse, J. M., Barrett, M., Mayan, M., Olson, K., & Spiers, J. (2002). “Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research”. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13-22.
  44. O’Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.
  45. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Cambridge University Press.
  46. Park, G. P. (2008). Differential item functioning on an English listening test across gender. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 115-123. https://doi.org/10.2307/40264430
  47. Polit, D. F., & Beck, C. T. (2008). Nursing Research: Generating And Assessing Evidence For Nursing Practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: London.
  48. Ponton, M. K., Derrick, M. G., & Carr, P. B. (2005). The relationship between resourcefulness and persistence in adult autonomous learning. Adult Education Quarterly, 55(2), 116-128. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741713604271848
  49. Prodromou, L. (2000). From mother tongue to other tongue. TESOL Greece Newsletter, 6(7), 7-8. http://www.shareeducation.com.ar/pastissues3/236/1.htm
  50. Rao, Z. (2012). Language learning strategies and English proficiency: interpretations from information-processing theory. The Language Learning Journal, 44(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/09571736.2012.733886 Ridgway, T. (2000). Listening strategies—I beg your pardon? ELT Journal, 54(2), 179-185. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.179
  51. Rost, M. (1990). Listening in language learning. Longman.
  52. Rubin, J. (1994). A review of second language listening comprehension research. The Modern Language Journal, 78(2), 199-221. https://doi.org/10.2307/329010
  53. Scarcella, R. C., & Oxford, R. L. (1992). The tapestry of language learning: The individual in the communicative classroom. Heinle & Heinle.
  54. Schmidt, A. (2016). Listening journals for extensive and intensive listening practice. English Teaching Forum 54(2), 2–11. https://americanenglish.state.gov/files/ae/resource_files/etf_54_2_pg02-11.pdf Siegel, J. (2015). A pedagogic cycle for EFL note-taking. ELT Journal, 70(3), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.1093/ELT/CCV073
  55. Sime, D. (2006). What do learners make of teachers' gestures in the language classroom?., 44(2), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.009
  56. Singh, N. U., Roy, A., & Tripathi, A. K. (2013). Non parametric tests: Hands on SPSS. ICAR Research.
  57. Sioson, I. C. (2011). Language learning strategies, beliefs, and anxiety in academic speaking task. Philippine ESL Journal, 7(1), 3-27.
  58. Soumokil, J. C., Nikijuluw, R. C., & Lekatompessy, F. M. (2021). Students’ perception toward the use of note-taking strategy in listening class. Journal of Applied Linguistics, Literature and Culture, 1(1), 17-32. https://doi.org/10.30598/huele.v1.i1.p17-32
  59. Stern, H. H. (1975). What can we learn from the good language learner?. Canadian Modern Language Review, 31(4), 304-319.
  60. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research (2nd ed.). SAGE.
  61. Vandergrift, L. (1997). The comprehension strategies of second language (French) listeners: A descriptive study. Foreign Language Annals, 30(3), 387-409. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.1997.tb02362.x
  62. Vandergrift, L. (2004). Listening to learn or learn to listen? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 3-25. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190504000017
  63. Vandergrift, L., & Goh, C. C. M. (2012). Teaching and learning second language listening: Metacognition in action. Routledge.
  64. Vandergrift, L., & Tafaghodtari, M. H. (2010). Teaching L2 learners how to listen does make a difference: An empirical study, Language Learning, 60(2), 470-497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00559.x
  65. Wenden, A. L. (1998). Metacognitive knowledge and language learning. Applied Linguistics, 19(4), 515-537. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/19.4.515
  66. Yeldham, M. (2021). Examining the interaction between two process‐based L2 listening instruction methods and listener proficiency level: Which form of instruction most benefits which learners? TESOL Quarterly, 56(2), 666-712. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.3089
  67. Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance: Graduate center of city university of new york. In Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 63-78). Routledge
  68. Sime, D. (2006). What do learners make of teachers' gestures in the language classroom?., 44(2), 211-230. https://doi.org/10.1515/IRAL.2006.009