Dergiler / Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology / 2026 / Volume: 35 Issue: 1

Crepis purpurea Subsp. gulderenae (Asteraceae: Cichorieae), A New Subspecies from Türkiye

Yuliya Krasylenko(Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Palacký University Olomouc)0000-0001-7349-2999
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-02-05
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

A comprehensive description, distribution map, habitat and ecological preferences, IUCN category, and diagnostic key for Crepis purpurea subsp. gulderenae are presented.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Crepis purpurea subsp. gulderenae is described and illustrated as a new subspecies belonging to tribe Cichorieae of family Asteraceae.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:It is morphologically similar to the typical C. purpurea from Crimea (Ukraine) but differs in leaf and bract size, peduncle and involucral hair types, inner involucral bract size, bracteole shape and size as well as length of corolla, stamen, anther, filament, stigma, ovary size, and width of sterile achene.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:A comprehensive description, distribution map, habitat and ecological preferences, IUCN category, and diagnostic key for Crepis purpurea subsp. gulderenae are presented.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:atpB-rbcL · Crepidinae · Endemic

Abstract

Crepis purpurea subsp. gulderenae is described and illustrated as a new subspecies belonging to tribe Cichorieae of family Asteraceae. It is morphologically similar to the typical C. purpurea from Crimea (Ukraine) but differs in leaf and bract size, peduncle and involucral hair types, inner involucral bract size, bracteole shape and size as well as length of corolla, stamen, anther, filament, stigma, ovary size, and width of sterile achene. Crepis purpurea subsp. gulderenae is distributed in the marly and gypsiferous soils around the Aysantı pass in the Ayaş district in the northwest of Ankara province, Türkiye. This region is an important plant biodiversity hotspot, where many newly discovered endemic species reside. Previously Crepis purpurea subsp. gulderenae was known as C. purpurea in Türkiye, and its taxonomy was updated based on field surveys data and macro- and micromorphological studies. Two DNA regions were examined: nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacers (nrITS) which was identical for typical and new subspecies of C. purpurea and chloroplast region atpB-rbcL which was also very similar. A comprehensive description, distribution map, habitat and ecological preferences, IUCN category, and diagnostic key for Crepis purpurea subsp. gulderenae are presented.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Başköse, İ., Ayyıldız, G., Krasylenko, Y., Yaprak, A. E. (2026). Crepis purpurea Subsp. gulderenae (Asteraceae: Cichorieae), A New Subspecies from Türkiye. Communications Faculty of Sciences University of Ankara Series C Biology, Volume: 35 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53447/communc.1779317

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (41)

  1. Linnaeus, C. Species Plantarum, part 2. Impensis Laurentii Salvii, Holmiae, 1753.
  2. Babcock, E.B., The Genus Crepis. Part I. The Taxonomy, Phylogeny, Distribution, and Evolution of Crepis. University of California Publications in Botany, 21 (1947a), 1–198.
  3. Enke, N., Gemeinholzer, B., Babcock revisited: new insights into generic delimitation and character evolution in Crepis L. (Compositae: Cichorieae) from ITS and matK sequence data. Taxon, 57 (2008), 756-768. https://www.jstor.org/ stable/27756706.
  4. Hoffmann, O. Compositae. In: Engler, A., Prantl, K. Editors. Die natürlichen Pflanzenfamilien, vol. 5. Engelmann, Leipzig, (1889), 373-374.
  5. Cassini, H. Tableau synoptique des Synantherees. In: Cuvier, F. Editor. Dictionnaire des sciences naturelles dans lequel on traite methodiquement des differents etres de la nature, ed. 2., Vol. 60. Levrault, Strass burg; Le Normant, Paris, (1830) 566–587.
  6. Bentham, G., Hooker, J.D. Genera Plantarum, Vol. 2. Lowell Reeve, London, 1873.
  7. Babcock, E.B., The Genus Crepis, Part two: Systematic Treatment 22. University of California Publications in Botany, 22 (1947b), 199–1030.
  8. Sell, P.D. Crepis L. In: Tutin, G.T., Heywood, V. H., Burges, N.A., Moore, D.M., Valentine, D.H., Walters, S.M., Webb, D.A. Editors. Flora Europaea, vol. IV. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, (1976), 332–343.
  9. Rechinger, K.H. Crepis L. In: Rechinger K.H. Editor. Flora Iranica (CompositaeLactuceae.) No: 122. Naturhistorisches Museum, Graz, (1977), 298–338.
  10. Mosiakin, S.L., Fedoronchuk, M.M. Vascular plants of Ukraine. A nomenclatural checklist. MH Kholodnyi Institute of Botany, Kyiv, 1999.
  11. Yena, A.V. Spontaneous flora of the Crimean Peninsula. Simferopol: N. Orianda, 2012.
  12. Czerepanov, S.K. Crepis L. In: Bobrov, E.G., Tzvelev, N.N. Editors. Flora of the USSR (Compositae: tribe Cichorieae) Vol. 29. Smithsonian Institution Libraries, Washington, (2000), 585–691.
  13. Shi, Z., Ge, X.J., Kilian, N., Kirschner, J., Stepanek, J., Sukhorukov, A.P., Mavrodiev, E.V., Gottschlich, G. Cichorieae. In: Wu, Z.Y., Raven, P.H., Hong, D.Y. Editors. Flora of China, vol. 20. Science Press, Beijing & Missouri Botanical Garden Press, St. Louis, (2011), 195-353.
  14. Yıldırımlı, Ş., A new species, Crepis vuralii Yıld. (Asteraceae) from Turkey. Ot Sistematik Botanik Dergisi, 28 (2021), 149–156.
  15. Lamond, J.M. Crepis L. In: Davis P.H. Editor. Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands, vol. 5. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, (1975) 814–841.
  16. Kilian, N., Gemeinholzer, B., Lack, H.W. Cichorieae. In: Funk, V.A., Susana, A., Stuessy, T.F. Bayer, R.J. Editors. Systematics, Evolution and Biogeography of the Compositae. IAPT. Vienna, (2009) 343–383.
  17. Enke, N., Contributions towards a revised infrageneric classification of Crepis (Cichorieae, Compositae). Willdenowia, 39 (2009), 229-245. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.39.39202
  18. Willdenow, C. L. Species Plantarum. Editio Quarta. Berolini [Berlin], 1803.
  19. Bieberstein, F.M. Flora Taurico-Caucasica exhibens stirpes phaenogamas, in Chersoneso Taurica et regionibus caucasicis sponte crescentes. Charkouiae, 1819.
  20. Boissier, E. Flora Orientalis, vol.3. H. Georg, Basel & Genève, 1875.
  21. Bieberstein, F.M. Flora Taurico-Caucasica, Charkoviae: Typis Academicis. Tome 2, 1808.
  22. Thiers, B. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden‘s Virtual Herbarium. (2024). Available online: http://sweetgum.nybg.org/ih/ (Accessed on 2 December 2024).
  23. Mouterde, P. Nouvelle Flore du Liban et de la Syrie. Tome III. Éditions de l'Imprimerie Catholique, 1983.
  24. IUCN standards and petitions subcommittee. Guidelines for Using the IUCN red list categories and criteria. Version 16, (2024). Available from: https://www.iucnredlist.org/ resources/redlistguidelines/ RedList Guidelines.pdf (accessed 6 May 2024).
  25. Oxelman, B., RAPD patterns, nrDNA ITS sequences and morphological patterns in Silene section Sedoideae (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Systematics and Evolution, 201 (1996), 93–116. https://www.jstor.org/stable/23642957
  26. Popp, M., Erixon, P., Eggens, F., Oxelman, B., Origin and evolution of a circumpolar polyploid species complex in Silene (Caryophyllaceae) inferred from low copy nuclear RNA polymerase introns, rDNA, and chloroplast DNA. Systematic Botany, 30 (2005), 302–313. https://doi.org/10.1600/0363644054223648
  27. Xu, F.L., Tian, J., Li, M.L., Ding, L.S., Wu, F.E., Sesquiterpene lactones from Notoseris porphyrolepis. Chinese Chemical Letters, 11 (2000), 905-908.
  28. Davis, P.H., Sorger, F., A new Campanula from Anatolia. Notes from the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, 37 (1979), 265–266.
  29. Çiçek, M., Yaprak, A.E., Scutellaria yildirimlii (Lamiaceae), a new species from Turkey. Phytotaxa, 132 (2013), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.132.1.5
  30. Vural, M., Adıgüzel, N., A new species from Central Anatolia – Aethionema dumanii (Brassicaceae). Turkish Journal of Botany, 19 (1995), 481–483.
  31. Ertuğrul, K., Hamzaoğlu, E., Demirelma, H, Uysal., T., Bozkurt, M., Şirin, E., Yılma-Çıtak, B., AlShehbaz, I.A., Aethionema aytachii (Brassicaceae): A new species from central Anatolia, Turkey. Turkish Journal of Botany, 45 (2021), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-2104-31
  32. Duman, H., Aytaç, Z., A new Aethionema from Central Anatolia. Karaca Arboretum Magazine, 1 (1991), 71–73.
  33. Sümbül, H., Ten new species from Anatolia and two new records for the Flora of Turkey. Edinburgh Journal of Botany, 48 (1991), 27-40. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960428600003577
  34. Lamarck, J.B.P. Encyclopedie Methodique. Botanique, Tome Premier. Paris, 1783.
  35. Ekim, T., Aytaç, Z., Duman, H., Some new taxa of Astragalus L. and comments on Turkish Caragana Lam. Thaiszia, 1 (1991), 17–29.
  36. Aksu-Kalmuk, N., İnceer, H., İmamoğlu, K.V., Achene micromorphology of 26 Crepis L. (Asteraceae) taxa from Turkey with notes on its systematic and ecological significance. Botany Letters, 165 (2018), 292-306. https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2018.1452167
  37. Cordova, C.E., The Mediterraneanization of Crimea. Physical and cultural processes in landscape transformation. Méditerranée. Revue géographique des pays méditerranéens. Journal of Mediterranean geography, 126 (2016), 25–36. https://doi.org/10.4000/mediterranee.8179
  38. Didukh, Y., Romo, A., Boratyñski, A., On five rare vascular plant species reported from Crimea, Ukraine. Willdenowia, 34 (2004), 407–410. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.34.34207
  39. Linnaeus, C. Systema Naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus, differentiis, synonymis, locis (in Latin). Vol. 1 (10th ed.). Holmiae (Stockholm). Laurentii Salvii, 1758.
  40. Anonymous. European Union Management Plan 2009-2011. Technical Report - 2009 – 032, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, 2009.
  41. Tsvelykh, A.N., Revision of late pleistocene and holocene galliformes fauna from the Crimean Mountains. Biology Bulletin, 44 (2017), 761–768. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1062359017070160