Dergiler / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2019 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

The Relationships among Academic Procrastination, Self-Control, and Problematic Mobile Use: Considering the Differences over Personalities

Sayfa
449–470
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This study is believed to contribute to the field as it offers measures on taking self-control into account in order to prevent problematic mobile phone use and academic procrastination in people with various personality traits.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Only a few studies in the literature have dwelt on the relationships among problematic mobile phone use, academic procrastination, and self-control based on personality traits and how these three affect one another.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Data have been collected from 571 university students.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This study is believed to contribute to the field as it offers measures on taking self-control into account in order to prevent problematic mobile phone use and academic procrastination in people with various personality traits.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

Only a few studies in the literature have dwelt on the relationships among problematic mobile phone use, academic procrastination, and self-control based on personality traits and how these three affect one another. In this sense, the purpose of this study is to reveal how the relationships among the variables of problematic mobile use, self-control, and academic procrastination change based on the Big Five personality traits. Data have been collected from 571 university students. The Academic Procrastination Scale, Problematic Mobile Phone Use Scale, Self-Control Scale, and Adjective-Based Personality Test have been used as data collection tools. Path analysis is used for analyzing the data. Firstly, descriptive statistics for the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis values have been calculated for each variable in the model. Secondly, the data set of the study is examined in terms of multivariate normality. Thirdly, the path model is estimated using the IBM Statistical Packages for the Analysis of Moment Structures. As a result of the data analysis, the negative effect of experiential self-control on problematic mobile use has been seen to be significantly higher in the more neurotic. Also, the negative effect of experiential self-control on academic procrastination has been found to be significantly higher in the less extraverted and less agreeable individuals. The negative effect of reformative self-control on academic procrastination has been determined to be statistically higher for those with lower conscientiousness and openness. The significant positive effect of redressive self-control on academic procrastination has been identified to be higher in the less neurotic and the less conscientious individuals. This study is believed to contribute to the field as it offers measures on taking self-control into account in order to prevent problematic mobile phone use and academic procrastination in people with various personality traits.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ÇEBİ, A., REİSOĞLU, İ., BAHÇEKAPILI, T. (2019). The Relationships among Academic Procrastination, Self-Control, and Problematic Mobile Use: Considering the Differences over Personalities. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 449–470. https://ajindex.com/articles/125926

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Andreassen, C. S., Griffiths, M. D., Gjertsen, S. R., Krossbakken, E., Kvam, S., & Pallesen, S. (2013). The relationships between behavioral addictions and the five-factor model of personality. Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 2(2), 90–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/JBA.2.2013.003
  2. Aremu, A. O., Williams, T. M., & Adesina, F. (2011). Influence of academic procrastination and personality types on academic achievement and efficacy of in-school adolescents in Ibadan. IFE PsychologIA: An International Journal, 19(1), 93113. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ifep.v19i1.64591
  3. Bacanlı, H., İlhan, T., & Aslan, S. (2009). Beş faktör kuramına dayalı bir kişilik ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Sıfatlara dayalı kişilik testi (SDKT) [Development of a personality scale based on five-factor theory: Adjective based personality test (ABPT)]. The Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 7(2), 261–279.
  4. Bianchi, A., & Phillips, J. G. (2005). Psychological predictors of problem mobile phone use. Cyber Psychology & Behavior, 8(1), 39-51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cpb.2005.8.39
  5. Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the big-five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17(1), 69–81. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2007.02.001 Boysan, M., & Kiral, E. (2017). Associations between procrastination, personality, perfectionism, self-esteem and locus of control. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 45(3), 284–296. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2016.1213374
  6. Butt, S., & Phillips, J. G. (2008). Personality and self reported mobile phone use. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(2), 346–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2007.01.019
  7. Chi-Ying, C. (2018). Smartphone addiction: Psychological and social factors predict the use and abuse of a social mobile application. Information, Communication & Society. Advance Online Publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2018.1518469
  8. Clariana, M. (2013). Personality, procrastination and cheating in students from different university degree programs. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 11(2), 451–472. http://dx.doi.org/10.14204/ejrep.30.13030
  9. Coetzee, S., & Cilliers, F. (2001). Psychofortology: Explaining coping behaviour in organizations. The Industrial-Organizational Psychologist, 38(4), 62–68.
  10. Cloninger, C. R., Svrakic, D. M., & Przybeck, T. R. (1998). A psychobiological model of temperament and character. In J. Richter, M. Eisemann, K. Bollow, & D. Schla