KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Sakarya University Journal of Education / 2026 / Volume: 12 Issue: 3

Mobil Destekli Okumanın İngilizce Öğrenenlerin Kelime Bilgisi Gelişimi Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılması

Investigating the Impacts of Mobile Assisted Reading on EFL Learners’ Vocabulary Knowledge Development

Mohammadreza Valizadeh(Department of Translation and Interpretation (English), Faculty of Humanities, Cappadocia University, Cappadocia, Turkey)0000-0002-4312-9731
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2022-12-15
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Katılımcıların kelime kazanımları ön ve son testlerde karşılaştırıldı ve bulgular iki grubun kelime bilgisini geliştirdiğini, ancak deney grubunun daha fazla kelime öğrendiğini ve son testte kontrol grubundan daha iyi performans gösterdiğini gösterdi.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Son yıllarda, mobil teknolojilerin yaygınlaşması, dünya çapında eğitim uygulamalarını dönüştürüyor.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu bağlamda öğrenciler, okuma ve yazma etkinliklerinin çoğunu yaptıkları derslere mobil veya tablet cihazları ile katılmaktadırlar.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Katılımcıların kelime kazanımları ön ve son testlerde karşılaştırıldı ve bulgular iki grubun kelime bilgisini geliştirdiğini, ancak deney grubunun daha fazla kelime öğrendiğini ve son testte kontrol grubundan daha iyi performans gösterdiğini gösterdi.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:: MALL · Reading · Vocabulary

Özet

Son yıllarda, mobil teknolojilerin yaygınlaşması, dünya çapında eğitim uygulamalarını dönüştürüyor. Bu bağlamda öğrenciler, okuma ve yazma etkinliklerinin çoğunu yaptıkları derslere mobil veya tablet cihazları ile katılmaktadırlar. Bu, okuryazarlığın çok modlu, akışkan, sosyokültürel ve dinamik sosyal uygulamalar olarak yeni bir anlayışla sonuçlanmıştır. Bu arada, mobil destekli dil öğrenimi katlanarak gelişti ve uygulamasının geleneksel materyallere kıyasla dil eğitiminde genel olarak etkili olduğu bildirildi. Bu araştırma kapsamında, mevcut çalışma, mobil destekli okumanın İngilizce öğrenenlerin kelime hazinesi gelişimi üzerindeki etkilerini inceledi. Araştırmanın katılımcıları, bir deney ve bir kontrol grubuna ayrılmış 52 yetişkin dil öğrenicisidir. Deney grubundaki katılımcılar, bir dizi seçilmiş ve basitleştirilmiş haber raporlarını okumak için mobil cihazlar kullandılar, ancak kontrol grubu, 10 hafta boyunca aynı içeriği okumak için geleneksel basılı materyalleri kullandı. Katılımcıların kelime kazanımları ön ve son testlerde karşılaştırıldı ve bulgular iki grubun kelime bilgisini geliştirdiğini, ancak deney grubunun daha fazla kelime öğrendiğini ve son testte kontrol grubundan daha iyi performans gösterdiğini gösterdi. Bulgular, cep telefonlarının yabanci dil okumasını iyileştirmedeki önemli katkısını ve kelime hazinesi gelişimi üzerindeki ilişkili etkileri vurguladı. Çalışmanın dil öğretmenleri ve diğer dilleri konuşanlara İngilizce öğretiminde materyal geliştirme için çıkarımları vardır.

Abstract

Abstract. In recent years, the proliferation of mobile technologies is transforming educational practices around the world. In this regard, students are attending classes with their mobile or tablet devices, on which they do most of their reading and writing activities. This has resulted in new understanding of literacy as being multimodal, fluid, sociocultural, and dynamic social practices. Meanwhile, mobile-assisted language learning developed exponentially, and its implementation has been reported to be generally effective in language education compared to traditional materials. Within this line of research, the current study examined the impacts of mobile assisted reading on English language learners’ vocabulary development. The participants of the research were 52 adult language learners divided into one experimental and one control groups. The participants in the experimental group employed mobile devices for reading a number of selected and simplified news reports, however, the control group used traditional print-based materials for reading the same content over the course of 10 weeks. The participants’ vocabulary gains were compared in pre- and post-tests and the findings indicated that the two groups improved their vocabulary knowledge, but the experimental group learned more vocabulary items and outperformed the control group on post-test. The findings highlighted the significant contribution of mobile phones in improving second language reading with associated impacts on vocabulary development. The study has implications for language teachers and materials development in teaching English to speakers of other languages.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Valizadeh, M. (2022). Mobil Destekli Okumanın İngilizce Öğrenenlerin Kelime Bilgisi Gelişimi Üzerindeki Etkilerinin Araştırılması. Sakarya University Journal of Education, Volume: 12 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1105559

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (59)

  1. AbuSa’aleek, A. O. (2014). A Review of Emerging Technologies: Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL). Asian Journal of Education and E-Learning, 2(6), 469–475.
  2. Auer, N. (2014). Reading on Tablets: Students’ awareness and use of foreign language reading strategies. In R. Ørngreen & K. T. Levinsen (Eds.), Proceedings of the 13th European Conference on e‐Learning ECEL‐2014 (pp. 624–633). Academic Conferences and Publishing International Limited.
  3. Benson, P. (2011). Teaching and Researching Autonomy in Language Learning (2nd ed.). Routledge.
  4. Burston, J. (2013). Mobile-assisted language learning: A selected annotated bibliography of implementation studies 1994–2012. Language Learning & Technology, 17(3), 157–225. https://doi.org/10125/44344
  5. Burston, J. (2014). MALL: the pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539
  6. Chapelle, C. A. (2009). The Relationship Between Second Language Acquisition Theory and Computer-Assisted Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 741–753. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00970.x
  7. Chen, H.-I. (2013). Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language, Learning and Technology, 17(2), 143–170. https://doi.org/10125/44328
  8. Chen, Z., Chen, W., Jia, J., & An, H. (2020). The effects of using mobile devices on language learning: a meta-analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 1769–1789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09801-5
  9. Chwo, G. S. M., Marek, M. W., & Wu, W.-C. V. (2018). Meta-analysis of MALL research and design. System, 74, 62–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.02.009
  10. Cole, J., & Vanderplank, R. (2016). Comparing autonomous and class-based learners in Brazil: Evidence for the present-day advantages of informal, out-of-class learning. System, 61, 31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.07.007
  11. Demouy, V., & Kukulska‐Hulme, A. (2010). On the spot: using mobile devices for listening and speaking practice on a French language programme. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 25(3), 217–232. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2010.511955
  12. Dörnyei, Z. (2009). The L2 Motivational Self System. In Z. Dörnyei & E. Ushioda (Eds.), Motivation, Language Identity and the L2 Self (pp. 9–42). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781847691293-003
  13. Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2017). Writing with 21st century social tools in the L2 classroom: New literacies, genres, and writing practices. Journal of Second Language Writing, 36, 52–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2017.04.002
  14. Farr, F., & Murray, L. (2016). Introduction: Language learning and technology. In F. Farr & L. Murray (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language Learning and Technology (pp. 1–6). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315657899-10
  15. Garrett, N. (2009). Technology in the Service of Language Learning: Trends and Issues. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 697–718. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00968.x
  16. Gheytasi, M., Azizifar, A., & Gowhary, H. (2015). The Effect of Smartphone on the Reading Comprehension Proficiency of Iranian EFL Learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 199, 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.510
  17. Godwin-Jones, R. (2011). Mobile apps for language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 15(2), 2–11.
  18. Godwin-Jones, R. (2017). Smartphones and language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 21(2), 3–17.
  19. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70–105. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2012.700315
  20. Grigoryan, T. (2020). Investigating the effectiveness of iPad based language learning in the UAE context. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1718488
  21. Gutiérrez-Colón, M., Frumuselu, A. D., & Curell, H. (2020). Mobile-assisted Language learning to enhance L2 reading comprehension: a selection of implementation studies between 2012–2017. Interactive Learning Environments, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1813179
  22. Hamdan, K., & Amorri, A. (2014). Means of Enhancing Students’ Reading Proficiency Using Mobile Learning. EDULEARN14 Proceedings: 6th International Conference on Education and New Learning Technologies, 5135–5145.
  23. Hsu, C.-K., Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, C.-K. (2013). A personalized recommendation-based mobile learning approach to improving the reading performance of EFL students. Computers & Education, 63, 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.004
  24. Hwang, G.-J., & Fu, Q.-K. (2019). Trends in the research design and application of mobile language learning: a review of 2007–2016 publications in selected SSCI journals. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(4), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2018.1486861
  25. Ishikawa, Y., Smith, C., Kondo, M., Akano, I., Maher, K., & Wada, N. (2014). Development and Use of an EFL Reading Practice Application for an Android Tablet Computer. International Journal of Mobile and Blended Learning, 6(3), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijmbl.2014070103
  26. Kessler, G. (2018). Technology and the future of language teaching. Foreign Language Annals, 51(1), 205–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12318
  27. Khubyari, L., & Narafshan, M. H. (2016). A Study on the Impact of MALL (Mobile Assisted Language Learning) on EFL learners’ Reading comprehension. International Journal of English Language Teaching, 4(2), 58–69.
  28. Lafford, B. A. (2009). Toward an Ecological CALL: Update to Garrett (1991). The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00966.x
  29. Lai, A. (2016). Mobile immersion: an experiment using mobile instant messenger to support second-language learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 277–290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1113706
  30. Levy, M. (2009). Technologies in Use for Second Language Learning. The Modern Language Journal, 93(s1), 769–782. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00972.x
  31. Lin, C. (2014). Learning English reading in a mobile-assisted extensive reading program. Computers & Education, 78, 48–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.004
  32. Lin, C. (2017). Learning English with electronic textbooks on tablet PCs. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(8), 1035–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1242505
  33. Lin, J.-J., & Lin, H. (2019). Mobile-assisted ESL/EFL vocabulary learning: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(8), 878–919. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1541359
  34. Liu, G.-Z., Hwang, G.-J., Kuo, Y.-L., & Lee, C.-Y. (2014). Designing dynamic English: a creative reading system in a context-aware fitness centre using a smart phone and QR codes. Digital Creativity, 25(2), 169–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/14626268.2013.836110
  35. Meskill, C., & Quah, J. (2012). Researching Language Learning in the Age of Social Media. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 39–54). Bloomsbury Academic.
  36. Morris, L., & Cobb, T. (2004). Vocabulary profiles as predictors of the academic performance of Teaching English as a Second Language trainees. System, 32(1), 75–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2003.05.001
  37. Nation, I. S. P. (2012). The BNC/COCA word family lists. https://www.victoria.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/1689349/Information-on-the-BNC_COCA-word-family-lists-20180705.pdf
  38. Nation, I. S. P. (2013). Learning Vocabulary in Another Language (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858656
  39. Nazari, M., & Xodabande, I. (2020). L2 Teachers’ Mobile-related Beliefs and Practices: Contributions of a Professional Development Initiative. Computer Assisted Language Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2020.1799825
  40. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). Routledge.
  41. Pennington, M. C. (2003). The impact of the computer in second language writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the Dynamics of Second Language Writing (pp. 287–310). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524810.019
  42. Plana, M. G.-C., Gimeno, A., Appel, C., Hopkins, J., Escofet, M. I. G., & Figueras, I. T. (2016). Improving Learners’ Reading Skills Through Instant Short Messages: A Sample Study Using WhatsApp. In A. Gimeno, M. Levy, F. Blin, & D. Barr (Eds.), WorldCALL: Sustainability and Computer-Assisted Language Learning (1st ed., pp. 266–281). Bloomsbury Academic.
  43. Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the Relationship Between Vocabulary Knowledge and Academic Reading Performance: An Assessment Perspective. Language Learning, 52(3), 513–536. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00193
  44. Richards, J. C. (2015). The Changing Face of Language Learning: Learning Beyond the Classroom. RELC Journal, 46(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688214561621
  45. Rosell-Aguilar, F. (2018). Autonomous language learning through a mobile application: a user evaluation of the busuu app. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(8), 854–881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1456465
  46. Schmitt, N., Cobb, T., Horst, M., & Schmitt, D. (2017). How much vocabulary is needed to use English? Replication of van Zeeland & Schmitt (2012), Nation (2006) and Cobb (2007). Language Teaching, 50(2), 212–226. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444815000075
  47. Schmitt, N., Jiang, X., & Grabe, W. (2011). The Percentage of Words Known in a Text and Reading Comprehension. The Modern Language Journal, 95(i), 26–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2011.01146.x
  48. Shraim, K. Y. (2014). A Case Study of Mobile Technology-enabled English Language Learning: the Amazon Kindle e-Reader Initiative in Palestine. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (IJIM), 8(3), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijim.v8i3.3770
  49. Stockwell, G. (2013). Mobile-Assisted Language Learning. In M. Thomas, H. Reinders, & M. Warschauer (Eds.), Contemporary Computer-Assisted Language Learning (pp. 201–216). Bloomsbury Academic.
  50. Sung, Y.-T., Chang, K.-E., & Yang, J.-M. (2015). How effective are mobile devices for language learning? A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 16, 68–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.09.001
  51. Taj, I. H., Ali, F., Sipra, M., & Ahmad, W. (2017). Effect of Technology Enhanced Language Learning on EFL Reading Comprehension at Tertiary Level. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 8(1), 108–129.
  52. Webb, S., & Nation, I. S. P. (2017). How Vocabulary is Learned. Oxford University Press.
  53. Webb, S., Sasao, Y., & Ballance, O. J. (2017). The updated Vocabulary Levels Test: Developing and validating two new forms of the VLT. ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 168(1), 33–69. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.168.1.02web
  54. Wong, L.-H., & Looi, C.-K. (2011). What seams do we remove in mobile-assisted seamless learning? A critical review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2364–2381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.007
  55. Wrigglesworth, J., & Harvor, F. (2018). Making their own landscape: smartphones and student designed language learning environments. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 31(4), 437–458. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1412986
  56. Wu, Q. (2015a). Designing a smartphone app to teach English (L2) vocabulary. Computers & Education, 85, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.02.013
  57. Wu, Q. (2015b). Pulling Mobile Assisted Language Learning (MALL) into the Mainstream: MALL in Broad Practice. PLoS ONE, 10(5), e0128762. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128762
  58. Xodabande, I., & Atai, M. R. (2020). Using mobile applications for self-directed learning of academic vocabulary among university students. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1847061
  59. Plana, M. G.-C., Gimeno, A., Appel, C., Hopkins, J., Escofet, M. I. G., & Figueras, I. T. (2016). Improving Learners’ Reading Skills Through Instant Short Messages: A Sample Study Using WhatsApp. In A. Gimeno, M. Levy, F. Blin, & D. Barr (Eds.), WorldCALL: Sustainability and Computer-Assisted Language Learning (1st ed., pp. 266–281). Bloomsbury Academic.