Dergiler / Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions / 2020 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

Determinants of Cigarette Consumption in Turkey: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach

Sayfa
74–80
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The tobacco control policies have not yet had a reducing effect on the cigarette consumption.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The purpose of this study is to examine the determinants of cigarette consumption during 1960-2016 in Turkey by employing the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The variables of real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, real price of cigarettes, tertiary school enrollment (gross %), urban population (% of total), and tobacco control were adapted as the independent variables.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The tobacco control policies have not yet had a reducing effect on the cigarette consumption.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Özet

The purpose of this study is to examine the determinants of cigarette consumption during 1960-2016 in Turkey by employing the Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) bounds testing approach. The variables of real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita, real price of cigarettes, tertiary school enrollment (gross %), urban population (% of total), and tobacco control were adapted as the independent variables. The estimation results reveal that real GDP per capita, urbanization, and tobacco controls positively affect the cigarette consumption while the cigarette prices and level of education negatively affect smoking. Urbanization is the most impactful variable on cigarette consumption, followed respectively by tertiary school enrollment, real GDP per capita, real price of cigarettes, and tobacco control. The estimation results also suggest that controlling the cigarette prices and educating people about the hazardous effects of smoking are important policies for reducing cigarette consumption. The tobacco control policies have not yet had a reducing effect on the cigarette consumption.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YILDIZ, F. (2020). Determinants of Cigarette Consumption in Turkey: An ARDL Bounds Testing Approach. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 74–80. https://ajindex.com/articles/125139

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (5)

  1. Adioetomo, S. M., & Djutaharta, T. (2005). Cigarette consumption, taxation, and household income: Indonesia case study. Arslanhan, S., Caner, A., Helvacioglu, K., Saglam, I., & Teksoz, T. (2012). An economic analysis of tobacco elimination policies in Turkey. Health Policy, 106(2), 149-160. [Crossref] Baek, J., & Kim, H. S. (2013). Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea. Energy Economics, 36, 744-749. [Crossref] Becker, G. S., Grossman, M., & Murphy, K. M. (1990). An empirical analysis of cigarette addiction (No. w3322). National Bureau of Economic Research. [Crossref] Bilir, N., Çakır, B., Dağlı, E., Ergüder, T., & Önder, Z. (2009). Tobacco control in Turkey. Who Europe, 43-5.
  2. Blecher, E. (2008). The impact of tobacco advertising bans on consumption in developing countries. Journal of Health Economics, 27(4), 930-942. [Crossref] Cergibozan, R. (2017). Testing for the rational addiction hypothesis in Turkish cigarette and alcohol consumption. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5, 55−65. http://dx.doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.1.0055.
  3. Chaloupka, F. J., & Wechsler, H. (1997). Price, tobacco control policies and smoking among young adults. Journal of Health Economics, 16(3), 359-373. [Crossref] Çobaner, A. A. (2013). Türkiye’de tütün kontrolü politikalar kapsamında iletişim faaliyetleri ve tütün kontrolü haberleri. Sağlıkta Performans ve Kalite Dergisi, 5(1), 123-139.
  4. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American statistical association, 74(366a), 427-431. [Crossref] Dikmen, N. (2005). Türkiye’de sigara tüketimi ve tüketimi etkileyen değişkenler üzerine bir model çalışması. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 19(1), 1-19.
  5. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica: journal of the Econometric Society, 55(2), 251-276. [Crossref] Gallus, S., Schiaffino, A., La Vecchia, C., Townsend, J., & Fernandez, E. (2006). Price and cigarette consumption in Europe. Tobacco control, 15(2), 114-119. [Crossref] Giskes, K., Kunst, A. E., Benach, J., Borrell, C., Costa, G., Dahl, E.,. & Lahelma, E. (2005). Trends in smoking behaviour between 1985 and 2000 in nine European countries by education. Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health, 59(5), 395-401. [Crossref] Johansen, S. (1988). Statistical analysis of cointegration