Dergiler / Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar / 2023 / Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1

Çevrimiçi Aldatmayı Etkileyen Faktörler: Bir Gözden Geçirme

Factors Affecting Online Infidelity: A Review

Mücahit Mustafa Kaya(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ, SOSYAL BİLİMLER ENSTİTÜSÜ, AİLE DANIŞMANLIĞI ANABİLİM DALI (DİSİPLİNLERARASI))0000-0002-1936-6921
Mehmet Şakiroğlu(AYDIN ADNAN MENDERES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-8990-621X
Sayfa
29–37
Yayın Tarihi
2023-03-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Çevrimiçi aldatmaya etki eden faktörleri inceleyen sekiz çalışma incelenmiş ve bu araştırmaların bulguları değerlendirilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Çevrimiçi aldatma son yirmi yılda insanların gündemine girmiş bir problemdir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Mevcut tarama çalışması çevrimiçi aldatmayı etkileyen faktörleri Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis yönergeleri doğrultusunda incelemektedir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çevrimiçi aldatmaya etki eden faktörleri inceleyen sekiz çalışma incelenmiş ve bu araştırmaların bulguları değerlendirilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Sadakatsizlik · Online sadakatsizlik · Kişisel faktörler

Özet

Çevrimiçi aldatma son yirmi yılda insanların gündemine girmiş bir problemdir. Bu sebeple güncel çalışmaların da gündemine dahil olmakla beraber faktörleri henüz yeteri düzeyde netleştirilememiştir. Mevcut tarama çalışması çevrimiçi aldatmayı etkileyen faktörleri Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis yönergeleri doğrultusunda incelemektedir. İncelen araştırmalar (i) ampirik bir çalışma olması, (ii) Türkçe ve İngilizce dillerinde yazılmış olması, (iii) akran denetimine tabi dergilerde yayınlanmış olması (iv), çevrimiçi aldatmaya etki edebilecek en az bir faktörü değerlendirmiş olması kriterleri gözetilerek tarama çalışmasına dahil edilmiştir. Çevrimiçi aldatmaya etki eden faktörleri inceleyen sekiz çalışma incelenmiş ve bu araştırmaların bulguları değerlendirilmiştir. Aldatmaya dair daha olumlu tutum, daha düşük ilişki bağlılığı, daha yüksek kalitede alternatif partnerler, düşük evlilik kalitesi, yüksek yalnızlık, daha düşük ilişki tatmini, daha yüksek ilişki belirsizliği, kaygılı ve kaçıngan bağlanma ve güçlü konumda olma çevrimiçi aldatmayla anlamlı düzeyde ilişkili bulunmuştur.

Abstract

Online infidelity has been a topic of discussion for the past two decades. Hence, while it is on the agenda of current researches, the associated factors of online infidelity have not yet been sufficiently clarified. The current review examines factors affecting online infidelity in line with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis guidelines. In the review the studies were included considering the criteria of (i) being an empirical study, (ii) being written in Turkish or English, (iii) being published in peer-reviewed journals (iv), evaluating at least one factor that may affect online infidelity. Eight studies which include factors affecting online infidelity were examined and the findings of these studies were evaluated. More positive attitudes towards infidelity, lower relationship commitment, higher quality of alternative partners, lower marital quality, higher loneliness, lower relationship satisfaction, higher relationship uncertainty, anxious and avoidant attachment, and being in a strong position were found significantly associated with online infidelity.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kaya, M. M., Şakiroğlu, M., *, M. M. K. (2023). Çevrimiçi Aldatmayı Etkileyen Faktörler: Bir Gözden Geçirme. Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 1, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.18863/pgy.1070731

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (32)

  1. Abbasi, I. S. (2018). Falling prey to online romantic alternatives: Evaluating social media alternative partners in committed versus dating relationships. Social Science Computer Review, 37(6), 723–733. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439318793947
  2. Abbasi, I. S. (2019). Social Media Addiction in romantic relationships: Does user's age influence vulnerability to social media infidelity? Personality and Individual Differences, 139, 277–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.038
  3. Alexopoulos, C., Timmermans, E., & McNallie, J. (2020). Swiping more, committing less: Unraveling the links among dating app use, dating app success, and intention to commit infidelity. Computers in Human Behavior, 102, 172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.009
  4. Beltrán-Morillas, A. M., Valor-Segura, I., & Expósito, F. (2019). Unforgiveness motivations in romantic relationships experiencing infidelity: Negative affect and anxious attachment to the partner as predictors. Frontiers in Psychology, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00434
  5. Botnen, E. O., Bendixen, M., Grøntvedt, T. V., & Kennair, L. E. (2018). Individual differences in sociosexuality predict picture-based mobile dating app use. Personality and Individual Differences, 131, 67–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.021
  6. Cravens, J. D., & Whiting, J. B. (2015). Fooling around on Facebook: The perceptions of infidelity behavior on social networking sites. Journal of Couple & Relationship Therapy, 15(3), 213–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332691.2014.1003670
  7. Dijkstra, P., Barelds, D. P., & Groothof, H. A. (2013). Jealousy in response to online and offline infidelity: The role of sex and sexual orientation. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 54(4), 328–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.12055
  8. Ferron, A., Lussier, Y., Sabourin, S., & Brassard, A. (2017). The role of internet pornography use and cyber infidelity in the associations between personality, attachment, and couple and sexual satisfaction. Social Networking, 06(01), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.4236/sn.2017.61001
  9. González-Rivera, J. A., Aquino-Serrano, F., & Pérez-Torres, E. M. (2019). Relationship satisfaction and infidelity-related behaviors on social networks: A preliminary online study of hispanic women. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 10(1), 297–309. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe10010023
  10. Groothof, H. A., Dijkstra, P., & Barelds, D. P. (2009). Sex differences in jealousy: The case of internet infidelity. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 26(8), 1119–1129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407509348003
  11. Henline, B. H., Lamke, L. K., & Howard, M. D. (2007). Exploring perceptions of online infidelity. Personal Relationships, 14(1), 113–128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.2006.00144.x
  12. Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2006). Internet infidelity: A critical review of the literature. The Family Journal, 14(4), 366–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480706290508
  13. Hertlein, K. M., & Piercy, F. P. (2008). Therapists’ assessment and treatment of internet infidelity cases. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 34(4), 481–497. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2008.00090.x
  14. Hertlein, K. M., Chang, J., VanYperen, A., Fatkin, K., & Nakamura, S. (2021). Experiences after infidelity via internet communication: Surveillance, ambivalence, and termination. Sexual and Relationship Therapy, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2021.1907568
  15. Hertlein, K. M., & Stevenson, A. (2010). The seven “As” contributing to Internet-related intimacy problems: A literature review. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 4(1). Isanejad, O., & Bagheri, A. (2018). Marital quality, loneliness, and internet infidelity. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 21(9), 542–548. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0602
  16. Li, D., & Zheng, L. (2017). Relationship quality predicts online sexual activities among Chinese heterosexual men and women in committed relationships. Computers in Human Behavior, 70, 244–250. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.075
  17. Martins, A., Pereira, M., Andrade, R., Dattilio, F. M., Narciso, I., & Canavarro, M. C. (2015). Infidelity in dating relationships: Gender-specific correlates of face-to-face and online extradyadic involvement. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 45(1), 193–205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0576-3
  18. McDaniel, B. T., Drouin, M., & Cravens, J. D. (2017). Do you have anything to hide? infidelity-related behaviors on social media sites and marital satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 66, 88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.031
  19. Mileham, B. L. (2007). Online infidelity in internet chat rooms: An ethnographic exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 11–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2004.03.033
  20. Moller, N. P., & Vossler, A. (2014). Defining infidelity in research and couple counseling: A qualitative study. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy, 41(5), 487–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623x.2014.931314
  21. Negy, C., Plaza, D., Reig-Ferrer, A., & Fernandez-Pascual, M. D. (2018). Is viewing sexually explicit material cheating on your partner? A comparison between the United States and Spain. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 47(3), 737–745. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1125-z
  22. Orosz, G., Tóth-Király, I., Bőthe, B., & Melher, D. (2016). Too many swipes for today: The development of the problematic tinder use scale (PTUS). Journal of Behavioral Addictions, 5(3), 518–523. https://doi.org/10.1556/2006.5.2016.016
  23. Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., Shamseer, L., Tetzlaff, J. M., Akl, E. A., Brennan, S. E., Chou, R., Glanville, J., Grimshaw, J. M., Hróbjartsson, A., Lalu, M. M., Li, T., Loder, E. W., Mayo-Wilson, E., McDonald, S., … Moher, D. (2021). The Prisma 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
  24. Schneider, J. P., Weiss, R., & Samenow, C. (2012). Is it really cheating? understanding the emotional reactions and clinical treatment of spouses and partners affected by cybersex infidelity. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 19(1-2), 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720162.2012.658344
  25. Shapiro, G. K., Tatar, O., Sutton, A., Fisher, W., Naz, A., Perez, S., & Rosberger, Z. (2017). Correlates of tinder use and risky sexual behaviors in young adults. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 20(12), 727–734. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2017.0279
  26. Thompson, A. E., & O’Sullivan, L. F. (2015). Drawing the line: The development of a comprehensive assessment of infidelity judgments. The Journal of Sex Research, 53(8), 910–926. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2015.1062840
  27. Underwood, H., & Findlay, B. (2004). Internet relationships and their impact on primary relationships. Behaviour Change, 21(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1375/bech.21.2.127.55422
  28. Vossler, A. (2016). Internet infidelity 10 years on: A Critical Review of the Literature. The Family Journal, 24(4), 359–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480716663191
  29. Wen, G., & Zheng, L. (2019). The influence of power on online sexual activities among Chinese men and women in committed relationships. Personality and Individual Differences, 149, 88–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2019.05.032
  30. Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men's and women's attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(6), 569–579. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493103322725342
  31. Wysocki, D. K., & Childers, C. D. (2011). “let my fingers do the talking”: Sexting and infidelity in Cyberspace. Sexuality & Culture, 15(3), 217–239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-011-9091-4
  32. Young, K. S., Griffin-shelley, E., Cooper, A., O'mara, J., & Buchanan, J. (2000). Online infidelity: A new dimension in couple relationships with implications for evaluation and treatment. Sexual Addiction & Compulsivity, 7(1-2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/10720160008400207