KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Issue: 1

Effects of Different Seedbed Preparation on Some Phenological Characteristics and Weed Count in Chickpea

Murat Balaban(TARLA BİTKİLERİ MERKEZ ARAŞTIRMA ENSTİTÜSÜ)0000-0002-0237-4060
M. Sait Adak(ANKARA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-0154-3328
Baran Aras0000-0002-3319-6826
Recep Kodaş0000-0001-5459-5749
Gökhan Kılıç0000-0002-3587-7449
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-31
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It was determined that the basal fertilization (Nitrogen) and non-fertilized production models did not significantly affect days to emergence, days to flowering, harvest maturity, weed population, and soil moisture content in either year of the study.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research was conducted under dry farming conditions in the Research and Application Farm fields of the Central Research Institute for Field Crops Directorate (TARM) in 2020 and 2021.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study investigated the effects of three different tillage methods [traditional tillage (T1), conservation tillage (T2), and no-till (T3)] and four different fertilizer applications [no fertilizer (G0), DAP (G1), 20-20-0 conventional compound fertilizer (G2), and 15-20-0 organomineral fertilizer (G3)] on emergence days, flowering days, harvest maturity, plant density per square meter, weed population, and soil moisture content in chickpea cultivation.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It was determined that the basal fertilization (Nitrogen) and non-fertilized production models did not significantly affect days to emergence, days to flowering, harvest maturity, weed population, and soil moisture content in either year of the study.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2020 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · Tillage · Fertilization

Abstract

This research was conducted under dry farming conditions in the Research and Application Farm fields of the Central Research Institute for Field Crops Directorate (TARM) in 2020 and 2021. The study investigated the effects of three different tillage methods [traditional tillage (T1), conservation tillage (T2), and no-till (T3)] and four different fertilizer applications [no fertilizer (G0), DAP (G1), 20-20-0 conventional compound fertilizer (G2), and 15-20-0 organomineral fertilizer (G3)] on emergence days, flowering days, harvest maturity, plant density per square meter, weed population, and soil moisture content in chickpea cultivation. According to tillage methods, the results for the first and second years were as follows: Days to emergence ranged from 22 to 37 and from 15 to 20, respectively. Days to flowering ranged from 44 to 53 and from 59 to 63. Days to harvest maturity varied between 113 and 117 days and 107 and108 days. Plant density per square meter ranged from 16.67 to37.3 and from 24.82 to 30.60 plants.Weed population ranged from 18.37 to43.95 weeds m-² and from 11.56 to34.44 weeds m-². Soil moisture content ranged from 14.99% to 16.87% and from 12.55% to 14.17%. It was determined that the basal fertilization (Nitrogen) and non-fertilized production models did not significantly affect days to emergence, days to flowering, harvest maturity, weed population, and soil moisture content in either year of the study.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Balaban, M., Adak, M. S., Aras, B., Kodaş, R., Kılıç, G. (2026). Effects of Different Seedbed Preparation on Some Phenological Characteristics and Weed Count in Chickpea. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.29133/yyutbd.1704837

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (31)

  1. Açıkgöz, N. (1998). Agricultural research and experiment methods (Textbook No. 478). Ege University Faculty of Agriculture.
  2. Adak, M. S. (2021). Edible legumes (Publication No. 1652, Textbook No. 603). Ankara University Publications.
  3. Balaban, M. (2023). Effects of different seedbed preparations and fertilizer applications on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) (PhD), Ankara University, Ankara, Türkiye.
  4. Balaban, M., & Adak, M. S. (2024). Effects of different seedbed preparations and base fertilizers on chickpea yield and yield components. Turkish Journal of Agricultural and Natural Sciences, 11(1), 36–48. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.1378021
  5. Basha, S. J., Lakshmi, V. J., Reddy, A. T., Kamakshi, N., & Ahammed, S. K. (2018). Conservation agricultural practices for enhancing productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in rainfed areas. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry, 7(5), 1748–1750.
  6. Bayram, L, Gürsoy, S, Özaslan, C, (2024). Effects of Various Soil Tillage and Herbicide Applications on Yield and Weeds in Chickpea Production. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 34(4): 690-700.
  7. Çarman, K., & Marakoğlu, T. (2007). Comparison of reduced tillage and direct seeding practices in chickpea production. Workshop on Protective Tillage and Direct Seeding, 93–104.
  8. Dekemati, I., Simon, B., Vinogradov, S., & Birkás, M. (2019). The effects of various tillage treatments on soil physical properties, earthworm abundance and crop yield in Hungary. Soil and Tillage Research, 194, 104334.
  9. Düzgüneş, O., Kesici, O., Kavuncu, F., & Gürbüz, İ. (1987). Research and experiment methods (Statistical methods-2) (Textbook No. 1021). Ankara University Faculty of Agriculture.
  10. Göktepe, O. (2016). Identification of problem weeds, their densities, and frequency of occurrence in chickpea fields in Usak province [Master's thesis, Suleyman Demirel University].
  11. Guan, D., Zhang, Y., Al-Kaisi, M. M., Wang, Q., Zhang, M., & Li, Z. (2015). Tillage practices effect on root distribution and water use efficiency of winter wheat under rain-fed condition in the North China Plain. Soil and Tillage Research, 146, 286–295.
  12. Jan, A., Daur, I., Ali, K., & Khan, I. A. (2010). Effects of tillage and seed rates on weed biomass, grain, and biological yield of dryland chickpea. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 42(6), 4011–4016.
  13. Kasap, A., & Dursun, M. (2013). Effects of different tillage methods on yield and yield components in chickpea farming. Journal of Gaziosmanpaşa University Faculty of Agriculture, 30(1), 70–83.
  14. Kayan, N., Kutlu, İ., Ayter, N. G., & Adak, M. S. (2017). Effects of different tillage systems and soil residual nitrogen on chickpea yield and yield components in rotation with wheat under dry farming areas. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 19, 517–522.
  15. Khattak, M. K., & Khan, M. J. (2005). Effects of different tillage practices on weeds and yield of chickpeas under sandy loam soil condition. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science Research, 11(3-4), 67–74.
  16. Küçük, H. (2018). Investigation of different tillage and sowing methods in safflower cultivation [Master's thesis, Isparta University of Applied Sciences].
  17. Küçükalbay, M., & Akbolat, D. (2015). Investigation of different tillage and planting methods in chickpea cultivation. Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Agriculture, 10(2), 1–10.
  18. Mas, M. T., & Verdu, A. (2003). Tillage system effects on weed communities in a 4-year crop rotation under Mediterranean dryland conditions. Soil and Tillage Research, 74(1), 15–24.
  19. Modiba, M. M., Ocansey, C. M., Ibrahim, H. T. M., Birkás, M., Dekemati, I., & Simon, B. (2024). Assessing the impact of tillage methods on soil moisture content and crop yield in Hungary. Agronomy, 14(8), 1606.
  20. Muñoz-Romero, V., Lopez-Bellido, L., & Lopez-Bellido, R. J. (2015). Effect of tillage system on soil temperature in a rainfed Mediterranean vertisol. International Agrophysics, 29, 467–473. https://doi.org/10.1515/intag-2015-0052
  21. Onyari, C. A. N., Ouma, J. P., & Kibe, A. M. (2010). Effects of tillage method and sowing time on phenology, yield, and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under semi-arid conditions in Kenya. Journal of Applied Biosciences, 34, 2156–2165.
  22. Özpınar, S., & Özpınar, A. (2015). Tillage effects on soil properties and maize productivity in western Turkey. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 61(7), 1029–1040.
  23. Schlüter, S., Großmann, C., Diel, J., Wu, G., Tischer, S., Deubel, A., & Rücknagel, J. (2018). Long-term effects of conventional and reduced tillage on soil structure, soil ecological and soil hydraulic properties. Geoderma, 332, 10–19.
  24. Sprague, M. A., & Triplett, G. B. (1986). Overviews. In M. A. Sprague & G. B. Triplett (Eds.), No-tillage and surface-tillage agriculture (pp. 2–18). John Wiley and Sons.
  25. Stevenson, F. C., Légère, A., Simard, R. R., Angers, D. A., Pangeau, D., & Lafond, J. (1997). Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Science, 45, 798–806.
  26. Şanlı, A., & Kaya, M. (2008). Effects of different sowing times and seed treatments on some agronomic properties of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Suleyman Demirel University Journal of Agriculture, 3(2), 42–51.
  27. Tao, Z., Li, C., Li, J., Ding, Z., Xu, J., Sun, X., Zhou, P., & Zhao, M. (2015). Tillage and straw mulching impacts on grain yield and water use efficiency of spring maize in Northern Huang–Huai–Hai Valley. The Crop Journal, 3, 445–450.
  28. Unger, P. W., & Kaspar, T. C. (2014). Soil compaction and root growth: A review. ResearchGate.
  29. Üyetürk, A.S. (2020). The effect of different tillage, phosphorus fertilizer and bacterial applications on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). (PhD), Eskişehir Osmangazi University, Institute of Science, Eskişehir,Türkiye.
  30. Yau, S. K., Sidahmed, M., & Haidar, M. (2010). Conservation versus conventional tillage on the performance of three different crops. Agronomy Journal, 102, 269–276.
  31. Yılar, M., Bayar, Y., & Akan, K. (2021). Determination of weed species prevalence and density in chickpea production areas of Kirsehir Province. Turkish Journal of Weed Science, 24(2), 83–90.