Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 22 Issue: 2

Nem İçeriğinin Sarı Mercimeğin Bazı Fiziksel Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi

Effects of Moisture Content on Some Physical Properties of the Yellow Lentil

Eşref Işık(Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Görükle Campus, Nilüfer, Bursa, TURKEY)
Nazmi İzli(Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Görükle Campus, Nilüfer, Bursa, TURKEY)
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2016-03-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bütün nem değerlerinde en yüksek sürtünme katsayısı kauçuk yüzey kullanıldığında elde edilmiştir, bunu alüminyum, galvanizli sac, çelik, kontrplak ve cam yüzeyleri takip etmiştir

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma değişen nem oranlarına bağlı olarak sarı mercimek tohumlarının bazı fiziksel özelliklerini belirlemeye odaklanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Nem oranı % 15.6’dan % 22.5 d.b kuru baz ’a arttığında, hacim ağırlığı 750.27’ dan 625 kg m-3’e, özgül ağırlık 1200.5’dan 1334 kg m-3’e ve kırılma kuvveti 22.5’dan 16.2 N’a azalmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bütün nem değerlerinde en yüksek sürtünme katsayısı kauçuk yüzey kullanıldığında elde edilmiştir, bunu alüminyum, galvanizli sac, çelik, kontrplak ve cam yüzeyleri takip etmiştir
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Yellow lentils · Physical properties · Moisture

Özet

Bu çalışma değişen nem oranlarına bağlı olarak sarı mercimek tohumlarının bazı fiziksel özelliklerini belirlemeye odaklanmıştır. Hasat, işleme, nakliye, katagorize etme, sınıflandırma ve paketlemede kullanılan makinalar bu fiziksel özelliklerine göre tasarlanmaktadır. Nem oranı % 15.6’dan % 22.5 d.b kuru baz ’a arttığında, hacim ağırlığı 750.27’ dan 625 kg m-3’e, özgül ağırlık 1200.5’dan 1334 kg m-3’e ve kırılma kuvveti 22.5’dan 16.2 N’a azalmıştır. Aynı koşullar altında ortalama kalınlık, çap, aritmetik ortalama çap, geometrik ortalama çap, küresellik, yüzey alanı, projeksiyon alanı, bindane ağırlığı, gözeneklilik ve kritik hız değerleri sırasıyla 4.29-4.6 mm, 1.22-1.42 mm, 3.26-3.53 mm, 2.82-3.1 mm, 0.66-0.67, 24.93-30.15 mm2, 15.33-17.66 mm2, 15.1-18.01 g, % 37.49-53.18 ve 1.5-2.09 m s-1 aralığında değişmiştir. Bütün nem değerlerinde en yüksek sürtünme katsayısı kauçuk yüzey kullanıldığında elde edilmiştir, bunu alüminyum, galvanizli sac, çelik, kontrplak ve cam yüzeyleri takip etmiştir

Abstract

This research focuses on yellow lentil seeds and determining the effects of moisture content on some of their physical properties. The various types of machinery used in gathering crops, processing, shipping, categorizing, sorting, and packaging are designed according to the physical properties of the specific crops. When the moisture content increased from 15.6% to 22.5% d.b., the bulk density decreased from 750.27 to 625 kg m-3, the true density increased from 1200.5 to 1334 kg m-3, and the rupture force decreased from 2.5 to 16.2 N. Under the same conditions, the measurements of the average thickness, diameter, arithmetic mean diameter, geometric mean diameter, projected area, surface area, sphericity, thousand seed mass, porosity, and terminal velocity values varied as follows: from 1.22 to 1.42 mm, 4.29 to 4.6 mm, 3.26 to 3.53 mm, 2.82 to 3.1 mm, 15.33 to 17.66 mm2, 24.93 to 30.15 mm2, 0.66 to 0.67, 15.33 to 17.66 mm2, 15.1 to 18.01 g, 37.49 to 53.18% and 1.5 to 2.09 m s-1, respectively. For all moisture content levels, rubber had the greatest static coefficient of friction, followed by aluminum, galvanized iron, stainless steel, plywood and glass

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Işık, E., İzli, N. (2016). Nem İçeriğinin Sarı Mercimeğin Bazı Fiziksel Özellikleri Üzerine Etkisi. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 22 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001389

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (38)

  1. Aghkhani M H, Ashtiani S H M, Motie J B & Abbaspour- Fard M H (2012). Physical properties of christmas lima bean at different moisture content. International Agrophysics 26(4): 341-346
  2. Altuntas E & Demirtola H (2007). Effect of moisture content on physical properties of some grain legume seeds. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science 35(4): 423-433
  3. Altuntas E & Yildiz M (2007). Effect of moisture content on some physical and mechanical properties of faba bean (Vicia faba L.) grains. Journal of Food Engineering 78(1): 174-183
  4. Amin M N, Hossain M A & Roy K C (2004). Effects of moisture content on some physical properties of lentil seeds. Journal of Food Engineering 65(1): 83-87
  5. Araghi H A, Sadeghi M & Hemmat A (2010). Physical properties of two rough rice varieties affected by moisture content. International Agrophysics 24(2): 205-207
  6. Aviara A N, Power P P & Abbas T (2013). Moisture- dependent physical properties of Moringa oleifera seed relevant in bulk handling and mechanical processing. Industrial Crops and Products 42: 96-104
  7. Bagherpour H, Minaei S & Khoshtaghaza M H (2010). Selected physico-mechanical properties of lentil seed. International Agrophysics 24(1): 81-84
  8. Balasubramanian S, Singh K K & Kumar R (2012). Physical properties of coriander seeds at different moisture content. International Agrophysics 26(4): 419-422
  9. Barnwal P, Kadam D M & Singh K K (2012). Influence of moisture content on physical properties of maize. International Agrophysics 26(3): 331-334
  10. Baümler E, Cuniberti A, Nolasco S M & Riccobene I C (2006). Moisture dependent physical and compression properties of safflower seed. Journal of Food Engineering 72(2): 134-140
  11. Carman K (1996). Some physical properties of lentil seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 63(2): 87-92
  12. Davies R M (2010). Some physical properties of arigo seeds. International Agrophysics 24(1): 89-92
  13. Dursun E & Dursun I (2005). Some physical properties of caper seed. Biosystems Engineering 92(2): 237-245
  14. FAO (2013). FAOSTAT Agricultural Database Web Page Retrieved in December, 23, 2013 from. http://faostat. fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor
  15. Fathollahzadeh H, Mobli H, Jafari A, Rafiee S & Mohammadi A (2008). Some physical properties of tabarzeh apricot kernel. Pakistan Journal of Nutrition 7(5): 645-651
  16. Garnayak D K, Pradhan R C, Naik S N & Bhatnagar N (2008). Moisture-dependent physical properties of jatropha seed (Jatropha curcas L.). Industrial Crops and Products 27(1): 123-129
  17. Gharibzahedi S M T, Ghasemlou M, Razavi S H, Jafarii S M & Faraji K (2011). Moisture-dependent physical properties and biochemical composition of red lentil seeds. International Agrophysics 25(4): 343-347
  18. Gharibzahedi S M T, Emam-Djomeh Z, Razavi S H & Jafari S M (2014). Mechanical behavior of lentil seeds in relation to their physicochemical and microstructural characteristics. International Journal of Food Properties 17(3): 545-558
  19. Işık E (2007). Moisture Dependent physical and mechanical properties of green laird lentil (Lens culinaris) grains. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 10(3): 474-480
  20. Kara M, Bastaban S, Öztürk I, Kalkan F & Yildiz C (2012). Moisture-dependent frictional and aerodynamic properties of safflower seeds. International Agrophysics 26(1): 203-205
  21. Karababa E & Coşkuner E (2013). Physical properties of carob bean (Ceratonia siliqua L.): An industrial gum yielding crop. Industrial Crops and Products 42: 440- 446
  22. Kibar H, Öztürk T & Esen B (2010). The effect of moisture content on physical and mechanical properties of rice (Oryza sativa L.) Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research 8(3): 741-749
  23. Kouvoutsakis G, Mitsi C, Tarantilis P A, Polissiou M G & Pappas C S (2014). Geographical differentiation of dried lentil seed (Lens culinaris) samples using diffuse reflectance fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (DRIFTS) and discriminant analysis. Food Chemistry 145: 1011-1014
  24. Mohsenin N N (1986). Physical properties of plant and animals materials (2nd ed.). Gordon and Breach Science Publishers New York. 891 pp
  25. Paksoy M & Aydin C (2004). Some physical properties of edible squash (Cucurbita pepo L.) seeds. Journal of Food Engineering 65(2): 225-231
  26. Sacilik K, Ozturk R & Keskin R (2003). Some physical properties of hemp seed. Biosystems Engineering 86(2): 213-215
  27. Shirkole S S, Kenghe R N & Nimkar P M (2011). Moisture dependent physical properties of soybean. International Journal of Engineering Science and Technology 3(5): 3807-3815
  28. Singh K K, Mridula D, Barnwal P & Rehal J (2012). Physical and chemical properties of flaxseed. International Agrophysics 26(4): 423-426
  29. Sobukola O P & Onwuka V I (2011). Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of locust bean seed (Parkia fillicoidea L.). Journal of Food Process Engineering 34(6): 1946-1964
  30. Sologubik C A, Campanone L A, Pagano A M & Gely M C (2013). Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of barley. Industrial Crops and Products 43: 762-767
  31. Solomon W K & Zewdu A D (2009). Moisture-dependent physical properties of Niger (Guizotia abyssinica Cass.) seed. Industrial Crops and Products 29(1): 165-170
  32. Szot B, Horabik J & Rusinek R (2003). Physical properties characteristic of Polish and Canadian lentil seeds. International Agrophysics 17: 123-129
  33. Taheri-Garavand A, Nassiri A & Gharibzahedi S M T (2012). Physical and mechanical properties of hemp seed. International Agrophysics 26(2): 211-215
  34. Vilche C, Gely M & Santalla E (2003). Physical properties of quinoa seeds. Biosystems Engineering 86(1): 59-65
  35. Yalcin I & Ozarslan C (2004). Physical properties of vetch seed. Biosystems Engineering 88(4): 507-512
  36. Yalcin I (2007). Physical properties of cowpea (Vigna sinensis L.) seed. Journal of Food Engineering 79(1): 57-62
  37. Yurtlu Y B, Yeşiloğlu E & Arslanoğlu F (2010). Physical properties of bay laurel seeds. International Agrophysics 24(3): 325-328
  38. Zewdu A D & Solomon W K (2007). Moisture- dependent physical properties of tef seed. Biosystems Engineering 96(1): 57-63