KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 3

Spatial Data Model for Rural Planning and Land Management in Turkey

Halil İbrahim İnan(GUMUSHANE UNIVERSITY)0000-0002-2835-9600
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2021-09-04
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

It has also the potential to be an example for the implementation of laws related to spatial data both in Turkey and also worldwide.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:In Turkey, in the areas of rural planning and land management, problems regarding data retrieval, data quality, implementation scenario and legal base (law or regulation) have long been experienced.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, in order to contribute to resolving such problems, a conceptual/semantic data model was designed which focuses on the definition of required data, determination of their basic qualities and also their relations.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:It has also the potential to be an example for the implementation of laws related to spatial data both in Turkey and also worldwide.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Land use planning · Agricultural land use planning · Standardization

Abstract

In Turkey, in the areas of rural planning and land management, problems regarding data retrieval, data quality, implementation scenario and legal base (law or regulation) have long been experienced. In this study, in order to contribute to resolving such problems, a conceptual/semantic data model was designed which focuses on the definition of required data, determination of their basic qualities and also their relations. As the preparation step for the model development, interviews, and discussions with authorized people were carried out. In addition, for the definitions of the data in the model, the Land Parcel Identification System and Infrastructure for Spatial Information in the European Community (INSPIRE) are considered. For the model design, an object-oriented modelling method with the Unified Modelling Language (UML) notation was used. In the model, planning activities were focused on. It is envisaged that the model will guide work for the preparation of a technical regulation which may enable a standardized implementation throughout Turkey. It has also the potential to be an example for the implementation of laws related to spatial data both in Turkey and also worldwide.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

İnan, H. İ. (2021). Spatial Data Model for Rural Planning and Land Management in Turkey. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, Volume: 27 Issue: 3. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.983096

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (55)

  1. Apaydin H, Sonmez F K & Yildirim Y E (2004). Spatial interpolation techniques for climate data in the GAP region in Turkey. Climate Research 28 (2004): 31-40 https://doi.org/10.3354/cr028031
  2. Bamber J L, Ekholm S & Krabill W B (2001). A new, high-resolution digital elevation model of Greenland fully validated with airborne laser altimeter data. Journal of Geophysical Research 106(B04): 6733-6745 https://doi.org/10.1029/2000jb900365
  3. Banks J & Marsden T (2000). Integrating agri-environment policy, farming systems and rural development: Tir Cymen in Wales. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 466-480 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00161
  4. Bossard M, Feranec J & Otahel J (2000). CORINE land cover technical guide - addendum 2000. European Environment Agency, Technical Report No 40. Retrieved in August, 11, 2011 from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/tech40add
  5. Burrough P A, van Gaans P F M & Hootsmans R (1997). Continuous classification in soil survey: spatial correlation, confusion and boundaries. Geoderma 77(1997): 115-135 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(97)00018-9
  6. Büttner G, Feranec J & Jaffrain G (2002). CORINE land cover update 2000. European Environment Agency, Technical Report No 89. Retrieved in August, 12, 2011 from http://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/technical_report_2002_89
  7. Cay T & Iscan F (2011). Land consolidation software algorithm for agricultural reform in Turkey. Asian Journal of Rural Development 1(1): 70-86 https://doi.org/10.3923/ajrd.2011.70.86
  8. Cete M (2008). A land administration system approach for Turkey. PhD Thesis (in Turkish with English abstract), Karadeniz Technical University (Unpublished), Turkey
  9. Dinc U, Senol S, Cangir C, Dinc A O, Akca E, Dingil M, Oztekin E, Kapur B & Kapur S (2005). Soil survey and soil database of Turkey. In: R J A Jones, B Houskova, P Bullock & L Montanarella (Eds), Soil resources of Europe, 2nd Ed., European Soil Bureau, JRC, Institute for Environment and Sustainability, Ispra, pp. 371-375. Retrieved in August, 12, 2011 from http://eusoils.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ESDB_Archive/eusoils_docs/esb_rr/n09_EUR20559.pdf
  10. EC (European Commission) (2012). INSPIRE data specifications. Retrieved in June, 29, 2012 from http://inspire.ec.europa.eu/index.cfm/pageid/ 2 EEA (the European Environment Agency) (2010). Corine Land Cover 2000 seamless vector data - version 13 (02/2010). Retrieved in August, 12, 2011 from http://www.eea.europa.eu/data-and-maps/data/corine-land-cover-2000-clc2000-seamless-vector-database-2
  11. Elands B H M & Wiersum K F (2001). Forestry and rural development in Europe: An exploration of socio-political discourses. Forest Policy and Economics 3: 5-16 https://doi.org/10.1016/s1389-9341(00)00027-7
  12. Fabris M & Pesci A (2005). Automated DEM extraction in digital aerial photogrammetry: Precisions and validation for mass movement monitoring. Annals of Geophysics 48(6): 973-988 https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-3247
  13. GDLRC (General Directorate of Land Registry and Cadastre) (2005). Preliminary work report for the establishment of Turkish national geographical information system – Action 47(in Turkish). Retrieved in June, 29, 2012 from http://www.bilgitoplumu.gov.tr/Documents/1/KDEP/050100_Eylem47.pdf
  14. GDLRC (2006). Report on the initial preparation work for the establishment of Turkish national geographical information system (in Turkish). Retrieved in June, 29, 2012 from http://www.turksatglobe.com/Views/Projects/Contents/Files/Eylem36_raporu.pdf
  15. Goeman D, Kantor C, Printzios V, Zloty A & Mercimek E (2007). Final report for technical assistance for the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs for the design of a functioning Integrated Administration and Control System (IACS) and a Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS) in Turkey, The European Union’s TR0402.08/002 Programme for Turkey. Ankara, Turkey, 162 pp
  16. Gun S (2003). Legal state of land consolidation in Turkey and problems in implementation. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 6(15): 1380-1383 https://doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2003.1380.1383
  17. ISO (2003). ISO 19107 (2003) Spatial Schema. ISO TC211 – Geographic Information/Geomatics, Switzerland
  18. ISO (2019). ISO 19107 (2003) Spatial Schema. ISO TC211 – Geographic Information/Geomatics, Switzerland
  19. Inan H I (2010). Developing spatial data model as agricultural component of land administration system. PhD Thesis (in Turkish with English abstract), Karadeniz Technical University (Unpublished), Turkey
  20. Inan H I & Cete M (2007). Agricultural land parcel identification systems and cadastre (in Turkish with English abstract). In: HKMO 11. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 2-6 April, Ankara, Turkey
  21. Inan H I & Yomralioglu T (2011). Geographical information system model for rural land management. In: HKMO 13. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 18-22 April, Ankara, Turkey
  22. Inan H I, Sagris V, Devos W, Milenov P, van Oosterom P & Zevenbergen J (2010). Data model for the collaboration between land administration systems and agricultural land parcel identification systems. Journal of Environmental Management 91 (2010): 2440-2454 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.06.030
  23. INSPIRE (2007). Drafting Team "Data Specifications" - deliverable D2.3: Definition of Annex Themes and Scope, version 2.0 2007-04-06. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/reports/ImplementingRules/inspireDataspecD2_3v2.0.pdf
  24. INSPIRE (2010a). INSPIRE Data Specification on Administrative Units (D2.8.I.4) – Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_AU_v3.0.pdf
  25. INSPIRE (2010b). INSPIRE Data Specification on Cadastral Parcels (D2.8.I.6) – Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_CP_v3.0.pdf
  26. INSPIRE (2010c). INSPIRE Data Specification on Hydrography (D2.8.I.8) – Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_HY_v3.0.pdf
  27. INSPIRE (2010d). INSPIRE Data Specification on Protected Sites (D2.8.I.9) – Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_PS_v3.0.pdf
  28. INSPIRE (2013a). INSPIRE Data Specification on Elevation (D2.8.II.1) – Draft Technical Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_EL_v3.0.pdf
  29. INSPIRE (2013b). Data Specification on Land cover (D2.8.II.2) – Draft Technical Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_LC_v3.0RC2.pdf
  30. INSPIRE (2013c). INSPIRE Data Specification on Orthoimagery (D2.8.III.3) – Draft Technical Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_OI_v3.0rc2.pdf
  31. INSPIRE (2013d). Data Specification on Soil (D2.8.III.3) – Draft Technical Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_SO_v3.0.pdf
  32. INSPIRE (2013e). Data Specification on Agricultural and Aquaculture Facilities (D2.8.III.9) – Draft Technical Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_AF_v3.0.pdf
  33. INSPIRE (2013f). Data Specification on Population Distribution - Demography (D2.8.III.10) – Draft Technical Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_PD_v3.0.pdf
  34. INSPIRE (2013g). Data Specification on Area Management/Restriction/Regulation Zones and Reporting Units (D2.8.III.11) – Draft Technical Guidelines. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://inspire.ec.europa.eu/documents/Data_Specifications/INSPIRE_DataSpecification_AM_v3.0.pdf
  35. Iscan F (2011). The effects of different land reallocation models applied in land consolidation projects on parcel transpositions: Example of Karatepe village, Turkey. Scientific Research and Essays 5(9): 873-882
  36. Jolly W M, Graham J M, Michaelis A, Nemani R & Running S W (2004). A flexible, integrated system for generating meteorological surfaces derived from point sources across multiple geographic scales. Environmental Modelling & Software 20 (2005): 873-882 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2004.05.003
  37. Kay S. (2002). Monitoring and evaluation of IACS implementation for the identification of agricultural parcels in Member States of the EU, Base document 2: synthesis of technical alternatives (working draft). Retrieved in June, 29, 2012 from http://mars.jrc.ec.europa.eu/mars/content/download/994/6107/file/TechAlternativesIACS1994.pdf
  38. Kay S & Milenov P (2007). Status of the implementation of LPIS in the EU Member States. In: Proceedings of 12th MARS PAC Annual Conference, 27-29 November, Toulouse, pp. 41-47
  39. MARA (the Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs) (2006). Rural development report in Turkey. In: International Conference on Agrarian Reform and Rural Development (ICARRD), 7-10 March, Porto Alegre, Brazil, 26 pp
  40. MARA (2011). Rural development plan (2010-2013) (in Turkish). Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://kkp.tarim.gov.tr/KKP20102013.pdf
  41. MARA (2012). Determination of problematic agricultural land and their rehabilitation project. Retrieved in March, 01, 2012 from http://www.tugem.gov.tr/document/statiproje.html
  42. Maras H, Asik O, Yılmaz A & Kisa A (2011). Turkish national orthophoto information system and work conducted. In: HKMO 13. Türkiye Harita Bilimsel ve Teknik Kurultayı, 18-22 April, Ankara, Turkey
  43. Marsden T & Sonnino R (2008). Rural development and the regional state: Denying multifunctional agriculture in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies 24: 422-431 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.04.001
  44. Midgley J L, Shucksmith D M, Birnie R V, Geddes A, Bayfield N & Elston D (2005). Rural development policy and community data needs in Scotland. Land Use Policy 22: 163-174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2003.08.007
  45. Naldi L, Nilsson P, Westlund H & Wixe S (2015). What is smart rural development? Journal of Rural Studies 40: 90-101 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006 O'Geen A T, Southard S B & Southard R J (2008). A revised Storie Index for use with digital soil information. Retrieved in August, 12, 2011 from http://anrcatalog.ucdavis.edu/pdf/8335.pdf
  46. Official Gazette (Turkish Official Gazette) (2005a). Soil Conservation and Land Use Law (in Turkish). No. 25880, 17.07.2005
  47. Official Gazette (2005b). Application Regulation of Soil Conservation and Land Use Law (in Turkish). No. 26024, 15.12.2005
  48. Page-Jones M (2002). Fundamentals of Object-Oriented Design in UML. Addison-Wesley, Dorset House Publishing, New York. ISBN 020169946X
  49. Pasakarnis G & Meliene V (2010). Towards sustainable rural development in Central and Eastern Europe: Applying land consolidation. Land Use Policy 27: 545-549 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.008
  50. Sarisamur F & Kilic S (2011). Potential land use planning and agricultural land suitability classification of Bala Agricultural Farm, Ankara-Turkey. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 6(10): 2586-2592
  51. UN (United Nations), 2019. World urbanization prospects: The 2018 revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs ISBN: 978-92-1-148319-2. Retrieved in June, 16, 2021 from https://population.un.org/wup/Publications/Files/WUP2018-Report.pdf
  52. Unver I H O (1997). South-eastern Anatolia integrated development project (GAP), Turkey: An overview of issues of sustainability. Water Resources Development 14 (2): 187-207 https://doi.org/10.1080/07900629749827
  53. van der Ploeg J D, Renting H, Brunori G, Knickel K, Mannion J, Marsden T, de Roest K, Sevilla-Guzman E & Ventura F (2000). Rural development: From practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4): 391-408 https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9523.00156
  54. Volker K (1997). Local commitment for sustainable rural landscape development. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 63: 107-120 https://doi.org/10.1016/s0167-8809(97)00006-6
  55. Züblin M, Fischer L & Eisenbeiss H (2008). Combining photogrammetry and laser scanning for DEM generation in steep high-mountain areas. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XXXVII(B6b): 37-44