Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5

The Cuttlefish Backbone: A New Bone Xenograft Material?

Sayfa
1177–1184
Yayın Tarihi
2005-05-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, our preliminary data on callus formation, osteogenic capacity and bone repairing suggest that cuttlefish backbone could be considered an alternative xenograft material in orthopaedic applications.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This experiment was conducted to determine the feasibility of cuttlefish backbone as a new xenograft in the treatment of bone defects and its therapeutic effectiveness.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Following the administration of general anaesthesia to 20 one-year-old male New Zealand rabbits, traumatic defective areas (5 mm in diameter) were experimentally induced at the proximal and distal metaphyses of both femurs.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, our preliminary data on callus formation, osteogenic capacity and bone repairing suggest that cuttlefish backbone could be considered an alternative xenograft material in orthopaedic applications.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Cuttlefish backbone · bone defect · bone xenograft

Özet

This experiment was conducted to determine the feasibility of cuttlefish backbone as a new xenograft in the treatment of bone defects and its therapeutic effectiveness. Following the administration of general anaesthesia to 20 one-year-old male New Zealand rabbits, traumatic defective areas (5 mm in diameter) were experimentally induced at the proximal and distal metaphyses of both femurs. These defective areas (n = 80) were randomly assigned to be filled with cuttlefish backbone, spongious bovine graft (SBG), tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and demineralised bone matrix (DBM) in a complete randomised design. At the end of the 30-day postoperative experimental period, bone defects filled with various graft materials were evaluated using macroscopic, radiographic, MRI, and scintigraphic methods and then the rabbits were subjected to euthanasia for histological examination. In response to the application of these graft materials, callus formation was observed in a similar fashion across all defective areas. Moreover, cuttlefish backbone ranked second after spongious bovine graft with respect to osteogenic capacity and the bone repairing process. In conclusion, our preliminary data on callus formation, osteogenic capacity and bone repairing suggest that cuttlefish backbone could be considered an alternative xenograft material in orthopaedic applications.

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the feasibility of cuttlefish backbone as a new xenograft in the treatment of bone defects and its therapeutic effectiveness. Following the administration of general anaesthesia to 20 one-year-old male New Zealand rabbits, traumatic defective areas (5 mm in diameter) were experimentally induced at the proximal and distal metaphyses of both femurs. These defective areas (n = 80) were randomly assigned to be filled with cuttlefish backbone, spongious bovine graft (SBG), tricalcium phosphate (TCP) and demineralised bone matrix (DBM) in a complete randomised design. At the end of the 30-day postoperative experimental period, bone defects filled with various graft materials were evaluated using macroscopic, radiographic, MRI, and scintigraphic methods and then the rabbits were subjected to euthanasia for histological examination. In response to the application of these graft materials, callus formation was observed in a similar fashion across all defective areas. Moreover, cuttlefish backbone ranked second after spongious bovine graft with respect to osteogenic capacity and the bone repairing process. In conclusion, our preliminary data on callus formation, osteogenic capacity and bone repairing suggest that cuttlefish backbone could be considered an alternative xenograft material in orthopaedic applications.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

OKUMUŞ, Z. (2005). The Cuttlefish Backbone: A New Bone Xenograft Material?. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 5, 1177–1184. https://ajindex.com/articles/122444

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Stevenson, S., Emery, S.E., Goldberg, V.M.: Factors affecting bone graft incorporation. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res., 1996; 324: 66-74.
  2. Walsh, W.R., Chapman-Sheath, P.J., Cain, S., Debes, J., Bruce, W.JM., Svehla, M.J., Gillies, R.M.: A resorbable porous ceramic composite bone graft substitute in a rabbit metaphyseal defect model. J. Orthop. Res., 2003; 21: 655–661.
  3. Bostrom, M.P., Yang, X., Kennan, M., Sandhu, H., Dicarlo, E., Lane, J.M.: An unexpected outcome during testing of commercially available demineralized bone graft materials: How safe are the nonallograft components? Spine, 2001; 26: 1425–1428.
  4. Pekler, R.R., Friedlander, G.E.: Biomechanical aspects of bone autografts and allografts. Orthop. Clin. North Am., 1987; 18: 235-239.
  5. Ohgushi, H., Goldberg, V.M., Caplan, A.I.: Repair of bone defects with marrow cells and porous ceramic. Experiments in rats. Acta Orthop. Scand., 1989; 60: 334-339.
  6. Gunzburg, R., Szpalski, M.: Use of a novel beta-tricalcium phosphate-based bone void filler as a graft extender in spinal fusion surgeries. Orthopedics, 2002; 25: 591-595.
  7. Young, W.F., Rosenwasser, R.H.: An early comparative analysis of the use of fibular allograft versus autologous iliac crest graft for interbody fusion after anterior cervical discectomy. Spine, 1993; 18: 1123–1124.
  8. Kuboki, Y., Takita, T., Kobayashi, D., Tsuruga, E., Inoue, M., Murata, M., Nagai, N., Dohi, Y.: BMP-induced osteogenesis on the surface of hydroxyapatite with geometrically feasible and nonfeasible structures: topology of osteogenesis. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., 1998; 40: 190-199.
  9. Oktar, F.N., Göller, G., Heybeli, N., Varol, R.: Porous bioceramic production using human teeth. J. Arthroplas. Arthroscop. Surg., 2002; 13: 99-104.
  10. Karaismailoğlu, T.N., Tomak, Y., Andaç, A., Ergün, E.: Comparison of autograft, coralline graft, and xenograft in promoting posterior spinal fusion. Acta Orthop. Traumatol. Turc, 2002; 36: 147-154.
  11. Laptikhovsky, V., Salman, A., Onsoy, B., Katagan, T.: Fecundity of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis L. (Cephalopoda, Sepiidae): a new look at an old problem Sci. Mar., 2003; 67: 279-284.
  12. Webber, D.M., Aitken, J.P., O’Dor, R.K.: Costs of locomotion and vertic dynamics of cephalopods and fish. Physiol. Biochem. Zool., 2000; 73: 651-62. National Research Council: Nutritional requirements of laboratory animals. 1995, 4threv. ed., 1-173,
  13. National Academy Press,
  14. Washington, DC. Boyer, M.I., Gilday, D., Kiral, A., Nolan, L., Bowen, C.V.: Can quantitative 99mTc-MDP bone s