KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2005 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2

The Effect of Mad Cow (BSE) Scare on Beef Demand and Sales Loss: The Case of İzmir

Bülent MİRAN
Sayfa
225–231
Yayın Tarihi
2005-02-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The annual individual willingness to pay is 0.5224 per year to avoid consuming BSE contaminated meat.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper investigates the effect of the BSE scare on beef consumption due to the intense media coverage.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using monthly data, a beef demand model for January 1995-February 1997 period is estimated for İzmir Province.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The annual individual willingness to pay is 0.5224 per year to avoid consuming BSE contaminated meat.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Health risk · demand model · mad cow (BSE)

Özet

This paper investigates the effect of the BSE scare on beef consumption due to the intense media coverage. Using monthly data, a beef demand model for January 1995-February 1997 period is estimated for İzmir Province. Beef sales dropped immediately after the media coverage on BSE in April 1996 and continued through June 1996 when the intense media coverage stopped. The econometric model reveals that beef sales in İzmir would have been 36.4% higher if the BSE crisis never occurred. The annual individual willingness to pay is 0.5224 per year to avoid consuming BSE contaminated meat.

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of the BSE scare on beef consumption due to the intense media coverage. Using monthly data, a beef demand model for January 1995-February 1997 period is estimated for İzmir Province. Beef sales dropped immediately after the media coverage on BSE in April 1996 and continued through June 1996 when the intense media coverage stopped. The econometric model reveals that beef sales in İzmir would have been 36.4% higher if the BSE crisis never occurred. The annual individual willingness to pay is 0.5224 per year to avoid consuming BSE contaminated meat.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

MİRAN, B. (2005). The Effect of Mad Cow (BSE) Scare on Beef Demand and Sales Loss: The Case of İzmir. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 2, 225–231. https://ajindex.com/articles/122187

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (7)

  1. Viscusi, W. K.: Prospective Reference Theory: Toward an Explanation of Paradoxes. J. Risk Uncertainty, 1989; 2: 235- 264. Hausman, A.: Specification Tests in Econometrics. Econometrica, 1978; 6: 1251-1271.
  2. Akgüngor, S.: The Economics of Consumer Response to Health- Risk Information in Food. Ph.D. Dissertation. East Lansing: Michigan State University. USA. 1992.
  3. Smith, M., E. O van Ravenswaay, Thompson, S. R.: Sales Loss Determination in Food Contamination Incidents: An Application to Milk Bans in Hawaii. Am. J. Agricul. Econ., 1988; 70: 513-520.
  4. Willig, R. D.: Consumer Surplus without Apology. Am. Econ. Rev., 1976; 589-597.
  5. Verbeke, W., Ward, R. W.: A Fresh Meat Almost Ideal Demand System Incorporating Negative TV Press and Advertising Impact. Agricul. Econ., 2001; 25: 359–374
  6. Smed, S., Jensen, J.D.: Food Safety Information and Food Demand – Effects of Temporary and Permanent News. Workshop on Environment, Information and Consumer Behaviour. Denmark. 28-29 April 2003.
  7. Pickelsimer, C., Wahl, T.I.: Mad Cow Disease: Implications for World Beef Trade. Washington State University Impact Center Information Series. USA, 2002; 20p. Smith, A.P., Young, J.A., Gibson, J.: How now, mad-cow? Consumer Confidence and Source Credibility During the 1996 BSE Scare. Eur. J. Market., 1999; 33: 1107-1122.