Microbiological and parasitological quality of honey produced in İstanbul

Temel Bulgular & Veri:According to the results, 80 samples (16%) tested positive for coliforms, 18 samples (3.6%) for E. coli, 67 samples (13.4%) for S. aureus, 51 samples (10.2%) for A. apis, 22 samples (4.4%) for A. flavus, 32 samples (6.4%) for A. fumigatus, 16 samples (3.2%) for P. larvae, 29 samples (5.8%) for M. pluton, and 39 samples (7.8%) for Nosema spp.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, no significant relations were determined between parasitological and microbiological parameters.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:80 samples

⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Honey · foodborne pathogens · foodborne parasites

Özet

In this study, 500 honey samples (with combs) were collected directly from the hives in various parts of İstanbul. The presence and the interactions of different microbiological and parasitological parameters (coliforms, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Ascosphaera apis, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Paenibacillus larvae, Melissococcus pluton, and Nosema spp.) were investigated. According to the results, 80 samples (16%) tested positive for coliforms, 18 samples (3.6%) for E. coli, 67 samples (13.4%) for S. aureus, 51 samples (10.2%) for A. apis, 22 samples (4.4%) for A. flavus, 32 samples (6.4%) for A. fumigatus, 16 samples (3.2%) for P. larvae, 29 samples (5.8%) for M. pluton, and 39 samples (7.8%) for Nosema spp. The results showed that there were significant correlations among all the binary relationships of microbiological parameters (coliforms, E. coli, S. aureus, P. larvae, and M. pluton), while no interactions were detected among the parasitological parameters (A. apis, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, and Nosema spp.). Additionally, no significant relations were determined between parasitological and microbiological parameters.

Abstract

In this study, 500 honey samples (with combs) were collected directly from the hives in various parts of İstanbul. The presence and the interactions of different microbiological and parasitological parameters (coliforms, Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Ascosphaera apis, Aspergillus flavus, Aspergillus fumigatus, Paenibacillus larvae, Melissococcus pluton, and Nosema spp.) were investigated. According to the results, 80 samples (16%) tested positive for coliforms, 18 samples (3.6%) for E. coli, 67 samples (13.4%) for S. aureus, 51 samples (10.2%) for A. apis, 22 samples (4.4%) for A. flavus, 32 samples (6.4%) for A. fumigatus, 16 samples (3.2%) for P. larvae, 29 samples (5.8%) for M. pluton, and 39 samples (7.8%) for Nosema spp. The results showed that there were significant correlations among all the binary relationships of microbiological parameters (coliforms, E. coli, S. aureus, P. larvae, and M. pluton), while no interactions were detected among the parasitological parameters (A. apis, A. flavus, A. fumigatus, and Nosema spp.). Additionally, no significant relations were determined between parasitological and microbiological parameters.

Anahtar kelimeler

Key words: Honey foodborne pathogens foodborne parasites

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DÜMEN, E., AKKAYA, H., ÖZ, G. M., SEZGİN, F. H. (2013). Microbiological and parasitological quality of honey produced in İstanbul. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 5, 602–607. https://ajindex.com/articles/121909

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

Kahraman T, Buyukunal SK, Vural A, Sandıkcı Altunatmaz S. Physico-chemical properties of honey from different regions of Turkey. Food Chem 2010; 123: 41–44.
Snowdon JA, Cliver DO. Microorganisms in honey. Int J Food Microbiol 1996; 31: 1–26.
Finola MS, Lasagno MC, Marioli JM. Microbiological and chemical characterization of honey from central Argentina. Food Chem 2007; 100: 1649–1653.
Joshi SR, Pechhacker H, William A, Ohe WVD. Physicochemical characteristics of Apis dorsata, A. cerana and A. mellifera honey from Chitwan district, central Nepal. Apidologie 2000; 31: 367–375.
Kalabova K, Borkovcova I, Smutna M, Vecerek V. Hydroxymethylfurfural in Czech honeys. Czech J Anim Sci 2003; 48: 551–557. US Food and Drug Administration. Bacteriological Analytical Manual. Washington: US FDA, 2001. Also available at http:// www.cfsan.fda.gov/~ebam/bam-toc.html. Shimanuki H, Knox DA. Diagnosis of Honey Bee Diseases. Agriculture Handbook No. AH–690. Washington: US Department of Agriculture, 2000.
James RR, Skinner JS. PCR diagnostic methods for Ascosphaera infections in bees. J Invertebr Pathol 2005; 90: 98–103.
Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. Biometry. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company, 1995.
Gomes S, Dias L, Moreira L, Rodrigues P, Estevinho L. Physicochemical, microbiological and antimicrobial properties of commercial honeys from Portugal. Food Chem Toxicol 2010; 48: 544–548.
Kokubo Y, Jinbo K, Kaneko S, Matsumoto M. Prevalence of spore-forming bacteria in commercial honey. Ann Rep Tokyo Metr Res Lab Pub Health 1984; 35: 192– 196. Dixon B. Bacteria can’t resist honey. Lancet Inf Des 2003; 3: Packer JM, Irish J, Herbert BR, Hill C, Padula M, Blair SE, Carter DA, Harry EJ. Specific non-peroxide antibacterial effect of manuka honey on the Staphylococcus aureus proteome. Int J Antimicrobial Agents 2012; 40: 43–50.
Borum AE, Ülgen M. Predisposing factors for chalkbrood (Ascosphaera apis) infection in honey bees in northwest Turkey. Uludağ Arıcılık Derg 2010; 10: 56–69 (article in Turkish with an English abstract). Kırpık MA, Aydoğan MN, Örtücü S, Hasenekoğlu İ. Determining microfungus flora of body surface and intestinal system of Caucasian race bees (Apis mellifera caucasica Pollmann, 1889) (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Kafkas Univ Vet Fak Derg 2010; 16: 347–352 (article in Turkish with an English abstract). Erol İ. Gıda Hijyeni ve Mikrobiyolojisi. Ankara: Pozitif Matbaacılık, 2007 (book in Turkish). Zaghloul OA, Mourad AK, El Kady MB, Nemat FM, Morsy ME. Assessment of losses in honey yi