Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3

Use of a gracilis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of a perineal defect in a dog: case report

Sayfa
366–368
Yayın Tarihi
2013-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on the outcome of the present case, it is proposed that transposition of the GMCF can be an effective alternative for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the perineal area.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:A male Beagle dog was referred with a perineal wound after perineal herniorrhaphy.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Open wound management was performed, using wet-to-dry contact dressing with daily debridement and lavage for 7 days.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on the outcome of the present case, it is proposed that transposition of the GMCF can be an effective alternative for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the perineal area.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Perineal skin defect · gracilis myocutaneous flap · dog

Özet

A male Beagle dog was referred with a perineal wound after perineal herniorrhaphy. Open wound management was performed, using wet-to-dry contact dressing with daily debridement and lavage for 7 days. The wound was reconstructed with an island gracilis myocutaneous flap (GMCF). The wound healed without any complications, while limb and pelvic function were uncompromised. Based on the outcome of the present case, it is proposed that transposition of the GMCF can be an effective alternative for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the perineal area.

Abstract

A male Beagle dog was referred with a perineal wound after perineal herniorrhaphy. Open wound management was performed, using wet-to-dry contact dressing with daily debridement and lavage for 7 days. The wound was reconstructed with an island gracilis myocutaneous flap (GMCF). The wound healed without any complications, while limb and pelvic function were uncompromised. Based on the outcome of the present case, it is proposed that transposition of the GMCF can be an effective alternative for reconstruction of soft tissue defects in the perineal area.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

HEO, S., LEE, H., KIM, N. S. (2013). Use of a gracilis myocutaneous flap for reconstruction of a perineal defect in a dog: case report. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 37 - Sayı: 3, 366–368. https://ajindex.com/articles/121798

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (6)

  1. Hosgood, G., Hedlund, C.S., Pechman, R.D., Dean, P.W.: Perineal herniorrhaphy: perioperative data from 100 dogs. J. Am. Anim. Hosp. Assoc., 1995; 31: 331–342.
  2. Pavletic, M.M.: Atlas of Small Animal Wound Management and Reconstructive Surgery. 3nd edn., Wiley-Blackwell, Ames, IA, USA. 2010.
  3. Juricic, M., Vaysse, P.H., Guitard, J., Moscovici, J., Becue, J., Juskiewenski, S.: Anatomic basis for use of a gracilis muscle flap. Surg. Radiol. Anat., 1993; 15: 163–168.
  4. Gregory, C.R., Gourley, I.M., Koblik, P.D., Patz, J.D.: Experimental definition of latissimus dorsi, gracilis, and rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flaps in the dog. Am. J. Vet. Res., 1988; 49: 878–884.
  5. Gregory, C.R., Gourley, I.M., Snyder, J.R., Ilkiw, J.: Definition of the gracilis musculocutaneous flap for distant transfer in cats. Am. J. Vet. Res., 1992; 53: 153–156. Pavletic M.M.: Pedicle grafts. In: Slatter, D., Ed. Textbook of Small Animal Surgery. 3rd edn., Vol. 1, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, USA. 2003; 292–321.
  6. Sjollema, B.E., van Sluijs, F.J.: Perineal hernia repair in the dog by transposition of the internal obturator muscle. II. Complications and results in 100 patients. Vet. Q., 1989; 11: 18– Chambers, J.N., Purinton, P.T., Allen, S.W., Moore, J.L.: Identification and anatomic categorization of the vascular patterns to the pelvic limb muscles of dogs. Am. J. Vet. Res., 1990; 51: 305–313.