KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2014 / Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 6

Survivability of caprine oocytes vitrified in conventional and open pulled straws

Rameez ALI
Waquar RAZZAQUE
Utsav SHARMA
Anil PANDEY
Kafil HUSSAIN
Sayfa
707–711
Yayın Tarihi
2014-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The results indicate that open pulled straw vitrification is better than conventional straw vitrification for rapid freezing of immature goat COCs in terms of both morphological survival and viability.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional straw vitrification with open pulled straw vitrification in terms of cryosurvivability and damages caused to the oocytes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Two hundred immature goat cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were vitrified in a solution of ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide, and sucrose using either conventional straws (100 COCs) or open pulled straws (100 COCs).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The results indicate that open pulled straw vitrification is better than conventional straw vitrification for rapid freezing of immature goat COCs in terms of both morphological survival and viability.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Vitrification · oocytes · caprine

Özet

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional straw vitrification with open pulled straw vitrification in terms of cryosurvivability and damages caused to the oocytes. Two hundred immature goat cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were vitrified in a solution of ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide, and sucrose using either conventional straws (100 COCs) or open pulled straws (100 COCs). The COCs were warmed and observed for morphological damages and viability after 7 days of preservation in liquid nitrogen. Among the 100 COCs cryopreserved in each case, only 83 COCs were recovered after warming in conventional straw vitrification as compared to 94 COCs in open pulled straw vitrification. In terms of morphological survivability, the percentage of morphologically normal oocytes was greater (P < 0.01) in the case of open pulled straw vitrification (86.2%) as compared to conventional straw vitrification (59.0%). Viability percentage of live oocytes was greater (P < 0.01) in the case of open pulled straw vitrification (90.4%) as compared to conventional straw vitrification (66.3%). The results indicate that open pulled straw vitrification is better than conventional straw vitrification for rapid freezing of immature goat COCs in terms of both morphological survival and viability.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of conventional straw vitrification with open pulled straw vitrification in terms of cryosurvivability and damages caused to the oocytes. Two hundred immature goat cumulus oocyte complexes (COCs) were vitrified in a solution of ethylene glycol, dimethyl sulfoxide, and sucrose using either conventional straws (100 COCs) or open pulled straws (100 COCs). The COCs were warmed and observed for morphological damages and viability after 7 days of preservation in liquid nitrogen. Among the 100 COCs cryopreserved in each case, only 83 COCs were recovered after warming in conventional straw vitrification as compared to 94 COCs in open pulled straw vitrification. In terms of morphological survivability, the percentage of morphologically normal oocytes was greater (P < 0.01) in the case of open pulled straw vitrification (86.2%) as compared to conventional straw vitrification (59.0%). Viability percentage of live oocytes was greater (P < 0.01) in the case of open pulled straw vitrification (90.4%) as compared to conventional straw vitrification (66.3%). The results indicate that open pulled straw vitrification is better than conventional straw vitrification for rapid freezing of immature goat COCs in terms of both morphological survival and viability.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ALI, R., RAZZAQUE, W., SHARMA, U., PANDEY, A., HUSSAIN, K. (2014). Survivability of caprine oocytes vitrified in conventional and open pulled straws. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 38 - Sayı: 6, 707–711. https://ajindex.com/articles/121577

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Gupta MK, Lee HT. Cryopreservation of oocytes and embryos by vitrification. Korean J Reprod Med 2010; 37: 267–291.
  2. Sherman JK, Lin TP. Survival of unfertilized mouse eggs during freezing and thawing. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med 1958; 98: 902–905.
  3. Larman MG, Sheehan CB, Gardner DK. Calcium-free vitrification reduces cryoprotectant-induced zona pellucida hardening and increases fertilization rate in mouse oocytes. Reproduction 2006; 131: 53–61.
  4. Kohaya N, Fujiwra K, Ito J, Kashiwazaki N. Generation of live offspring from vitrified mouse oocytes of C57BL/6J strain. PLoS One 2013; 8: e58063. Lee H, Elmoazzen H, Wright D, Biggers J, Rueda BR, Heo YS, Toner M, Toth TL. Ultra-rapid vitrification of mouse oocytes in low cryoprotectant concentrations. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20: 201–208.
  5. Morato R, Izquierdo D, Paramio MT, Mogas T. Cryotops versus open-pulled straws (OPS) as carriers for the cryopreservation of bovine oocytes: effects on spindle and chromosome configuration and embryo development. Cryobiology 2008; 57: 137–141.
  6. Zhou XL, Al Naib A, Sun DW, Lonergan P. Bovine oocyte vitrification using the Cryotop method: effect of cumulus cells and vitrification protocol on survival and subsequent development. Cryobiology 2010; 61: 66–72.
  7. Dalvit G, Gutnisky C, Alvarez G, Cetica P. Vitrification of bovine oocytes and embryos. Cryobiology 2012; 65: 341–342.
  8. Dhali A, Manik RS, Das SK, Singla SK, Palta P. Vitrification of buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) oocytes. Theriogenology 2000; 53: 1295–1303.
  9. Sharma A, Purohit GN. Vitrification of immature bubaline cumulus oocyte complexes by the open-pulled straw and conventional straw methods and their subsequent in vitro fertilization. Vet Med-Czech 2008; 53: 427–433.
  10. Liang Y, Rakwongrit D, Somfai T, Nagai T. Parnpai R. Cryopreservation of immature buffalo oocytes: effects of cytochalasin B pretreatment on the efficiency of cryotop and solid surface vitrification methods. Anim Sci J 2012; 83: 630– 638. Ebrahimi B, Valojerdi MR, Eftekhari-Yazdi P, Baharvand H, Farrokhi A. IVM and gene expression of sheep cumulus– oocyte complexes following different methods of vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online 2010; 20: 26–34.
  11. Bhat MH, Yaqoob SH, Khan FA, Waheed SM, Sharma V, Vajta G, Ganai NA, Shah RA. Open pulled straw vitrification of in vitro matured sheep oocytes using different cryoprotectants. Small Ruminant Res 2013; 112: 136–140.
  12. Huang WT, Holtz W. Effects of meiotic stages, cryoprotectants, cooling and vitrification on the cryopreservation of po