Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5

The effects of dry-off therapy on milk somatic cell count in Saanen goats

Sayfa
550–555
Yayın Tarihi
2015-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, intramammary antibiotics administered alone and a combination of intramammary antibiotics and teat sealant reduced milk SCC levels significantly.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of dry-off antibiotic therapy and teat sealant on somatic cell count (SCC) in Saanen goats.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The goats were randomly divided into 3 groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, intramammary antibiotics administered alone and a combination of intramammary antibiotics and teat sealant reduced milk SCC levels significantly.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Dairy goat · dry-off therapy · somatic cell count

Özet

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of dry-off antibiotic therapy and teat sealant on somatic cell count (SCC) in Saanen goats. The goats were randomly divided into 3 groups. In Groups I (n = 50) and II (n = 50), the goats were treated with intramammary antibiotics and a combination of intramammary antibiotics and internal teat sealant at dry-off, respectively. The animals in Group III (n = 50) were designated as the control group. For the SCC analysis and bacteriological examination, milk samples (n = 900) were collected separately from each udder half during routine morning milking, prior to drying off, and at months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of following lactation. The pretreatment prevalence of intramammary infection at dry-off was 4.7% (7/150) for halves. Isolated pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (57.1%) and S. Aureus (42.9%) from infected halves. Dry-off antibiotic and dry-off antibiotic with teat sealant therapy reduced milk SCC levels significantly (P < 0.01) when compared to the control group. On the other hand, the difference in SCC between dry-off antibiotic and dry-off antibiotic with teat sealant therapy groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.01). In conclusion, intramammary antibiotics administered alone and a combination of intramammary antibiotics and teat sealant reduced milk SCC levels significantly.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the effectiveness of dry-off antibiotic therapy and teat sealant on somatic cell count (SCC) in Saanen goats. The goats were randomly divided into 3 groups. In Groups I (n = 50) and II (n = 50), the goats were treated with intramammary antibiotics and a combination of intramammary antibiotics and internal teat sealant at dry-off, respectively. The animals in Group III (n = 50) were designated as the control group. For the SCC analysis and bacteriological examination, milk samples (n = 900) were collected separately from each udder half during routine morning milking, prior to drying off, and at months 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 of following lactation. The pretreatment prevalence of intramammary infection at dry-off was 4.7% (7/150) for halves. Isolated pathogens were coagulase-negative staphylococci (57.1%) and S. Aureus (42.9%) from infected halves. Dry-off antibiotic and dry-off antibiotic with teat sealant therapy reduced milk SCC levels significantly (P < 0.01) when compared to the control group. On the other hand, the difference in SCC between dry-off antibiotic and dry-off antibiotic with teat sealant therapy groups was not statistically significant (P > 0.01). In conclusion, intramammary antibiotics administered alone and a combination of intramammary antibiotics and teat sealant reduced milk SCC levels significantly.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAŞTAN, A., SALAR, S., ACAR, D. B., DEMİREL, M. A., CENGİZ, M., DARBAZ, İ., BULUT, G. (2015). The effects of dry-off therapy on milk somatic cell count in Saanen goats. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 5, 550–555. https://ajindex.com/articles/121405

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Silanikove N, Leitner G, Merin U, Prosser CG. Recent advances in exploiting goat’s milk: quality, safety and production aspects. Small Ruminant Res 2010; 89: 110–124.
  2. Park YW, Juárez M, Ramos M, Haenlein GFW. Physico- chemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Ruminant Res 2007; 68: 88–113. García V, Rovira S, Boutoial K, López MB. Improvements in goat milk quality: a review. Small Ruminant Res 2014; 121: 51–57.
  3. Souza FN, Blagitz MG, Penna CFAM, Della Libera AMMP, Heinemann MB, Cerqueira MMOP. Somatic cell count in small ruminants: friend or foe? Small Ruminant Res 2012; 107: 65–75. Jiménez-Granado R, Sánchez-Rodríguez M, Arce C, Rodríguez-Estévez V. Factors affecting somatic cell count in dairy goats: a review. Span J Agric Res 2014; 12: 133–150. Poutrel B, de Crémoux R, Ducelliez M, Verneau D. Control of intramammary infections in goats: impact on somatic cell counts. J Anim Sci 1997; 75: 566–570.
  4. Shwimmer A, Kenigswald G, Van Straten M, Lavi Y, Merin U, Weisblit L, Leitner G. Dry-off treatment of Assaf sheep: efficacy as a management tool for improving milk quantity and quality. Small Ruminant Res 2008; 74: 45–51.
  5. Harmon RJ, Eberhart RJ, Langlois DE, Wilson RA. Microbiological Procedures for the Diagnosis of Bovine Udder Infection. 3rd ed. Arlington, VA, USA: National Mastitis Council; 1990.
  6. Bergonier D, Berthelot X. New advances in epizootiology and control of ewe mastitis. Livest Prod Sci 2003; 79: 1–16.
  7. Contreras A, Luengo C, Sánchez A, Corrales JC. The role of intramammary pathogens in dairy goats. Livest Prod Sci 2003; 79: 273–283. Baştan A. İneklerde Meme Sağlığı ve Sorunları. 2nd ed. Ankara, Turkey: Kardelen Ofset; 2013 (in Turkish). Raynal-Ljutovac K, Pirisi A, de Crémoux R, Gonzalo C. Somatic cells of goat and sheep milk: analytical, sanitary, productive and technological aspects. Small Ruminant Res 2007; 68: 126–144.
  8. Koop G, Nielen M, van Werven T. Bulk milk somatic cell counts are related to bulk milk total bacterial counts and several herd-level risk factors in dairy goats. J Dairy Sci 2009; 92: 4355–4364.
  9. Paape MJ, Wiggans GR, Bannerman DD, Thomas DL, Sanders AH, Contreras A, Moroni P, Miller RH. Monitoring goat and sheep milk somatic cell counts. Small Ruminant Res 2007; 68: 114–125.
  10. Paape MJ, Poutrel B, Contreras A, Marco JC, Capuco AV. Milk somatic cells and lactation in small ruminants. J Dairy Sci 2001; 84: 237–244.
  11. Berry EA, Hillerton JE. The effect of an intramammary teat seal on new intramammary infections. J Dairy Sci 2