In situ degradation of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) hulls, a potential feed material for ruminants

Amaç & Hipotez:The nutritive values of almond hulls (Ahs), alfalfa (ALF), and sugar beet pulp (SBP) were determined using the in situ nylon bag technique.

📊

Temel Bulgular & Veri:The ruminal dry matter (DM) degradation kinetics of 4 varieties of Ahs were compared with ALF and SBP.

💡

Sonuç & Katkı:The results showed that Ahs are potential feed materials for ruminants.

🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi

📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem

⚙️Değişkenler:Agricultural byproduct · almond hulls · almond varieties

Özet

The nutritive values of almond hulls (Ahs), alfalfa (ALF), and sugar beet pulp (SBP) were determined using the in situ nylon bag technique. The ruminal dry matter (DM) degradation kinetics of 4 varieties of Ahs were compared with ALF and SBP. The almond varieties tested were Rabbi (RAB), Mamaii (MAM), Shahrud 15 (SH15), and Shokufe (SH). Samples were incubated in triplicate at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h in 3 rumen-fistulated steers. The average total degradability fraction (TDF) of DM in Ahs was 89.00%. Although the TDF of Ahs (86.50%) was lower than that of SBP (98.00%), it was higher (P < 0.05) than that of ALF (67.00%). The soluble (a) fraction in Ahs (55.00%) was higher than in both ALF (20.00%) and SBP (26.00%). This high (a) fraction of Ahs was attributed to their relatively higher nonfibrous carbohydrate and lower neutral detergent fiber content than ALF and SBP. The degradation rate of ALF (0.14%) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to the other samples, whereas that of SBP (0.05%) was not significantly different (P > 0.05) from those in Ahs. The results showed that Ahs are potential feed materials for ruminants.

Abstract

The nutritive values of almond hulls (Ahs), alfalfa (ALF), and sugar beet pulp (SBP) were determined using the in situ nylon bag technique. The ruminal dry matter (DM) degradation kinetics of 4 varieties of Ahs were compared with ALF and SBP. The almond varieties tested were Rabbi (RAB), Mamaii (MAM), Shahrud 15 (SH15), and Shokufe (SH). Samples were incubated in triplicate at 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h in 3 rumen-fistulated steers. The average total degradability fraction (TDF) of DM in Ahs was 89.00%. Although the TDF of Ahs (86.50%) was lower than that of SBP (98.00%), it was higher (P < 0.05) than that of ALF (67.00%). The soluble (a) fraction in Ahs (55.00%) was higher than in both ALF (20.00%) and SBP (26.00%). This high (a) fraction of Ahs was attributed to their relatively higher nonfibrous carbohydrate and lower neutral detergent fiber content than ALF and SBP. The degradation rate of ALF (0.14%) was significantly higher (P < 0.05) compared to the other samples, whereas that of SBP (0.05%) was not significantly different (P > 0.05) from those in Ahs. The results showed that Ahs are potential feed materials for ruminants.

Anahtar kelimeler

Agricultural byproduct almond hulls almond varieties in situ degradability

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

JAFARI, S., ALIZADEH, A., IMNI, A., MENG, G. Y., RAJION, M. A., EBRAHIMI, M. (2015). In situ degradation of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) hulls, a potential feed material for ruminants. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 6, 676–681. https://ajindex.com/articles/121339

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

Yeni Sekmede Aç ↗

↗Yeni Sekme

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (9)

Jafari S, Alizadeh A, Imani A. Nutritive value of different varieties of almond (Prunus dulcis) hulls. J Res Opin Anim Vet Sci 2011; 11: 734–738. Yalchi T. Determination of digestibility of almond hull in sheep. Afri J Biotechnol 2011; 15: 3022–3026. Fadel JG. Quantitative analyses of selected plant by-product feedstuffs, a global perspective. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1999; 79: 225–268.
Aguilar AA, Smith NE, Baldwin RL. Nutritional value of almond hulls for dairy cows. J Dairy Sci 1984; 67: 97–103. 5. FAO. FAOSTAT Statistics. Rome, Italy: FAO; 2008. 6. Velasco J, Schoner JRC, Lofgreen GP. Composition and feeding value of almond hulls and hull-shell meal. Calif Agri 1965; 19: 12–14. Alibés X, Maestre MR, Muñoz F, Combellas J, Rodriguez J. Nutritive value of almond hulls for sheep. Anim Feed Sci Tech 1983; 8: 63–67.
Norollahi H, Kamalzadeh A, Karimi A. Determination of chemical composition and digestibility of almond hull. Acta Horti 2005; 726: 591–594.
Reed BA, Brown DL. Almond hulls in diet for lactating goats (effects on yield and composition of milk, feed intake and digestibility). J Dairy Sci 1988; 71: 530–533.
Clutter SH, Rodiek AV. Feeding value of diet containing almond hulls. Equine Nutri Physiol Society 1992; 12. Homedes MJ. Almond hulls in swine diet reduce body fat. Calif Agri 1985; 3: 47. Getachew G, Robinson PH, DePeters EJ, Taylor SJ. Relationship between chemical composition, dry matter degradation and in vitro gas production of several ruminant feeds. Anim Feed Sci Tech 2004; 111: 57–71.
Stern MD, Bach A, Calsamiglia S. Alternative techniques for measuring nutrient digestion in ruminants. J Anim Sci 1977; 75: 2256–2276. Shem MN, Ørskov ER, Kimambo AE. Prediction of voluntary dry-matter intake, digestibility dry-matter intake and growth rate of cattle from the degradation characteristics of tropical foods. Anim Sci 1995; 60: 65–74. AOAC. Official Method of Analysis. 15th ed. Arlington, VA, USA: Association of Analytical Chemists; 1990.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci 1991; 74: 3583–3597. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th ed. Washington, DC, USA: National Research Council; 2001.
Makkar HPS, Becker K. Nutritional value of whole and ethanol antinutritional components of extracted Moringa oleifera leaves. Anim Feed Sci Technol 2003; 63: 211–228.
Mehrez AZ, Qrskov ER. A study of artificial fiber bag technique