Dergiler / Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi / 2025 / Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3

Cihaz Konforundan Sosyal Desteğe: Obstrüktif Uyku Apnesi Hastalarında PAP Tedavisine Uyumun Çok Yönlü Belirleyicileri

From Device Comfort to Social Support: Multidimensional Determinants of PAP Adherence in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Burcu Baran(Erciyes Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6757-3140
Nur Aleyna Yetkin(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-5974-9129
Nuri Tutar(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-3097-4896
Fatma Sema Oymak(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4150-2520
İnci Gülmez(ERCİYES ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-4476-2213
Sayfa
412–423
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç olarak, OUA hastalarında PAP tedavisine uyumu belirleyen çok sayıda faktör bulunduğu gösterilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Obstrüktif uyku apnesi tanısı alan ve pozitif havayolu basıncı tedavisi başlanan hastalarda cihaz kullanımına uyumu etkileyen demografik, klinik, çevresel ve psikososyal faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Ocak 2020–Aralık 2024 tarihleri arasında uyku kliniğine başvuran, polisomnografi ile orta-ağır Obstrüktif uyku apnesi (OUA), tanısı konulan ve Pozitif havayolu basıncı (PAP) tedavisi başlanan hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç olarak, OUA hastalarında PAP tedavisine uyumu belirleyen çok sayıda faktör bulunduğu gösterilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Deneysel Tarla Denemesi
📍Kapsam:2020 · 337 hasta
⚙️Değişkenler:Psikososyal faktörler · sürekli pozitif havayolu basıncı · tedavi uyumu

Özet

Obstrüktif uyku apnesi tanısı alan ve pozitif havayolu basıncı tedavisi başlanan hastalarda cihaz kullanımına uyumu etkileyen demografik, klinik, çevresel ve psikososyal faktörlerin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Ocak 2020–Aralık 2024 tarihleri arasında uyku kliniğine başvuran, polisomnografi ile orta-ağır Obstrüktif uyku apnesi (OUA), tanısı konulan ve Pozitif havayolu basıncı (PAP) tedavisi başlanan hastalar retrospektif olarak incelendi. Toplam 337 hasta telefon ile arandı, 212’sine ulaşıldı ve 117’si onay vererek çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastaların demografik özellikleri, komorbiditeleri, cihaz türü ve kullanım alışkanlıkları kaydedildi. Cihaz uyumu, en az 3 ay düzenli kullanım ve halen aktif kullanım olarak tanımlandı. Anketlerde bireysel, çevresel ve psikososyal faktörler beşli Likert ölçeği ile sorgulandı. Katılımcıların %68’i erkek olup, uyum oranı %67 olarak bulundu. Uyumlu grupta erkek cinsiyet (p=0.034) ve otomatik pozitif hava yolu basıncı (APAP) kullanımı (p<0.01) daha yüksek iken, uyumsuz grupta koroner arter hastalığı, astım ve hipotiroidi daha sık izlendi. Uyumlu hastalarda cihaz günlük ≥4 saat düzenli kullanılmış olup cihaz memnuniyeti, yaşam kalitesi ve hekim ile iletişim daha yüksek bulundu (tümünde p<0.001). Uyumsuz grupta ise cihazla ilişkili şikayetler (basınç intoleransı, hortum rahatsızlığı, uykuya dalma güçlüğü vb.) daha sık rapor edildi. Çevresel faktörlerden oda sıcaklığından rahatsızlık ve kötü hava kalitesi uyumsuzlukla ilişkili bulundu. Semptomatik iyileşme özellikle uyumlu grupta belirgin olup, gündüz aşırı uykululuk, uyku kalitesi ve horlamadan rahatsızlık en anlamlı düzelme sağlanan şikayetlerdi. Sonuç olarak, OUA hastalarında PAP tedavisine uyumu belirleyen çok sayıda faktör bulunduğu gösterilmiştir. Bulgularımız, cihazla ilişkili rahatsızlıkların giderilmesi, erken dönemde yakın değerlendirme ve hekimle düzenli iletişimin tedaviye devamlılık açısından kritik olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate demographic, clinical, environmental, and psychosocial determinants of adherence to positive airway pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea. Patients admitted to the sleep clinic between January 2020 and December 2024, diagnosed with moderate-to-severe Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) by polysomnography, and started on PAP therapy were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 337 patients were contacted, 212 were reached, and 117 consented to participate. Demographics, comorbidities, device type, and usage habits were recorded. Adherence was defined as regular Positive airway pressure (PAP) use for at least three months. Individual, environmental, and psychosocial factors were assessed using a five-point Likert scale. Among participants, 68% were male, and the overall adherence rate was 67%. Male sex (p=0.034) and automatic positive airway pressure (APAP) use (p<0.001) were more common in the adherent group, whereas coronary artery disease, asthma, and hypothyroidism were more frequent in the non-adherent group. Adherent patients used the device ≥4 h/night and reported greater satisfaction and beter physician communication (all p<0.001). Device-related complaints, including pressure intolerance, hose discomfort, and difficulty initiating sleep, were significantly more frequent in the non-adherent group. Environmental factors, such as uncomfortable room temperature and poor air quality, were also linked to non-adherence. Symptom improvement was more evident in the adherent group, particularly in daytime sleepiness, sleep quality, and snoring. In conclusion, adherence to PAP therapy in OSA is influenced by demographic, clinical, and psychosocial factors. Addressing device-related dissues, ensuring early follow-up, and strengthening physician–patient communication are essential to improve adherence and maintain clinical benefit.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Baran, B., Kumsar, M. S., Doğmaz, G., Yetkin, N. A., Rabahoğlu, B., Tutar, N., Oymak, F. S., Gülmez, İ. (2025). Cihaz Konforundan Sosyal Desteğe: Obstrüktif Uyku Apnesi Hastalarında PAP Tedavisine Uyumun Çok Yönlü Belirleyicileri. Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 34 Sayı: 3, 412–423. https://doi.org/10.34108/eujhs.1790064

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (34)

  1. Senaratna CV, Perret JL, Lodge CJ, et al. Prevalence of obstructive sleep apnea in the general population: A systematic review. Sleep Med Rev. 2017; 34:70-81. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2016.07.002.
  2. deBatlle J, Gracia-Lavedán E, Escarrabill J, et al. Effect of CPAP Treatment on Cardiovascular Outcomes. Arch Bronconeumol. 2024;60(10): 627-633.doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2024.05.029.
  3. Abuzaid A, Ashry H, Elbadawi A, et al. Meta-Analysis of Cardiovascular Outcomes With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Patients With Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Am. J. Cardiol. 2017;120(4):693-699. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.05.042.
  4. McEvoy RD, Antic NA, Heeley E, et al. SAVE Investigators and Coordinators. CPAP for Prevention of Cardiovascular Events in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. N Engl J Med. 2016;375(10):919-931. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1606599.
  5. Rotenberg BW, Murariu D, Pang KP. Trends in CPAP adherence over twenty years of data collection: a flattened curve. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;45(1):43. doi:10.1186/s40463-016-0156-0.
  6. Benjafield AV, Pepin JL, Cistulli PA, et al. Positive airway pressure therapy and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in people with obstructive sleep apnoea: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials and confounder-adjusted, non-randomised controlled studies. Lancet Respir Med. 2025;13(5):403-413. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(25)00002-5.
  7. Hussain S, Irfan M, Waheed Z, Alam N, Mansoor S, Islam M. Compliance with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnea among privately paying patients—A cross sectional study. BMC Pulm Med. 2014; 14:188. doi:10.1186/1471-2466-14-188.
  8. Bakker JP, Weaver TE, Parthasarathy S, Aloia MS. Adherence to CPAP: What Should We Be Aiming For, and How Can We Get There? Chest. 2019;155(6):1272-1287. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2019.01.012.
  9. Sawyer AM, Gooneratne NS, Marcus CL, Ofer D, Richards KC, Weaver TE A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions. Sleep Med Rev. 2011;15(6):343-356. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.003.
  10. Sawyer AM, Deatrick JA, Kuna ST, Weaver TE. Differences in perceptions of the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy among adherers and non adherers. Qual Health Res. 2010;20(7):873-892. doi:10.1177/1049732310365502.
  11. Heinzer R, Vat S, Marques-Vidal P, et al. Prevalence of sleep-disordered breathing in the general population: the Hypno Laus study. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3(4):310-318. doi:10.1016/S2213-2600(15)00043-0.
  12. Milinovic K, Pavlinac Dodig I, Lusic Kalcina L, et al. Adherence to CPAP Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Prospective Study on Quality of Life and Determinants of Use. Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2024;14(9):2463-2475. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe14090163.
  13. Lykouras D, Zarkadi E, Koulousousa E, et al. Factors Affecting CPAP Adherence in an OSA Population during the First Two Years of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Healthcare (Basel). 2024;12(17):1772. doi:10.3390/healthcare12171772
  14. Georgoulis M, Yiannakouris N, Kechribari I, et al. Dose-response relationship between weight loss and improvements in obstructive sleep apnea severity after a diet/lifestyle interventions: secondary analyses of the "MIMOSA" randomized clinical trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2022;18(5):1251-1261. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.9834.
  15. Palm A, Midgren B, Theorell-Haglöw J, et al. Factors influencing adherence to continuous positive air way pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea and mortality associated with treatment failure - a national registry-based cohort study. Sleep Med. 2018; 51:85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2018.07.007.
  16. Zampogna E, Spanevello A, Lucioni AM, et al. Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure in patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnoea. A ten year real life study. Respir Med. 2019; 150:95-100. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.02.017.
  17. Heraganahally SS, Zaw KK, Tip S, et al. Obstructive sleep apnoea and adherence to continuous positive airway therapy among Australian women. Intern Med J. 2022;52(3):440-450. doi:10.1111/imj.15076.
  18. Baratta F, Pastori D, Bucci T, et al. Long-term prediction of adherence to continuous positive air pressure therapy for the treatment of moderate/severe obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. Sleep Med. 2018; 43:66-70. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2017.09.032
  19. Choi JH, Lee Y, Shin S, Ha TK, Suh S. Demographic and Sleep Study Factors Influencing Short-Term Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea. J Clin Med. 2025;14(11):3988. doi:10.3390/jcm14113988
  20. Gagnadoux F, Le Vaillant M, Goupil F, et al. Influence of marital status and socio-economic status on long-term adherence to continuous positive airway pressure in sleep apnea syndrome. Chest. 2011;139(6):1269-1276. doi:10.1378/chest.10-1816
  21. Rapelli G, Caloni C, Cattaneo F, et al. Three in a Bed: Can Partner Support Improve CPAP Adherence? A Systematic Review and Intervention Recommendations. J Pers Med. 2025;15(5):192. doi:10.3390/jpm15050192
  22. Berg KA, Marbury M, Whaley MA, Perzynski AT, Patel SR, Thornton JD. Experiences with Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Among African American Patients and their Bed Partners. Behav Sleep Med. 2023;21(3):242-253. doi:10.1080/15402002.2022.2075365
  23. Luyster FS. Impact of obstructive sleep apnea and its treatments on partners: a literature review. J Clin Sleep Med. 2017;13(3):467-477. doi:10.5664/jcsm.6504.
  24. Ozlem Akbay M, Saraç S. The effects of frequent follow-up on compliance in patients receiving PAP therapy due to OSA. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2023;27(12):5453-5458. doi:10.26355/eurrev_202306_32781
  25. Van Ryswyk E, Anderson CS, Antic NA, et al. Predictors of long-term adherence to continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnea and cardiovascular disease. Sleep. 2019;42(10): zsz152. doi:10.1093/sleep/zsz152
  26. Patil SP, Ayappa IA, Caples SM, Kimoff RJ, Patel SR, Harrod CG. Treatment of Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea With Positive Airway Pressure: An American Academy of Sleep Medicine Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis, and GRADE Assessment. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(2):301-334. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.7638.
  27. Ip S, D'Ambrosio C, Patel K, et al. Auto-titrating versus fixed continuous positive airway pressure for the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea: a systematic review with meta-analyses. Syst Rev. 2012; 1:20. doi:10.1186/2046-4053-1-20
  28. Pandey A, Mereddy S, Combs D, et al. Socioeconomic Inequities in Adherence to Positive Airway Pressure Therapy in Population-Level Analysis. J Clin Med. 2020;9(2):442. doi:10.3390/jcm9020442
  29. Palm A, Grote L, Theorell-Haglöw J, et al. Socioeconomic Factors and Adherence to CPAP: The Population-Based Course of Disease in Patients Reported to the Swedish CPAP Oxygen and Ventilator Registry Study. Chest. 2021;160(4):1481-1491. doi: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.04.064.
  30. Bengtsson C, Grote L, Ljunggren M, Ekström M, Palm A. Nasal polyposis is a risk factor for non adherence to CPAP treatment in sleep apnea: the population-based DISCOVERY study. J Clin Sleep Med. 2023;19(3):573-579. doi:10.5664/jcsm.10390
  31. Qiao M, Xie Y, Wolff A, Kwon J. Long term adherence to continuous positive Airway pressure in mild obstructive sleep apnea. BMC Pulm Med. 2023;23(1):320. doi: 10.1186/s12890-023-02612-3.
  32. Broström A, Nilsen P, Johansson P, et al. Putative facilitators and barriers for adherence to CPAP treatment in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome: a qualitative content analysis. Sleep Med. 2010;11(2):126-130. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2009.04.010
  33. Seixas AA, Trinh-Shevrin C, Ravenell J, Ogedegbe G, Zizi F, Jean-Louis G. Culturally tailored, peer-based sleep health education and social support to increase obstructive sleep apnea assessment and treatment adherence among a community sample of blacks: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2018;19(1):519. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2835-9.
  34. Antic NA, Catcheside P, Buchan C, et al. The effect of CPAP in normalizing daytime sleepiness, quality of life, and neurocognitive function in patients with moderate to severe OSA. Sleep. 2011;34(1):111-119. doi:10.1093/sleep/34.1.111