Dergiler / Dicle Tıp Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1

Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis

Tuncay Gündüz(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP FAKÜLTESİ, İSTANBUL TIP PR.)
Gonca Özcan(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)
Arman Çakar(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)
Halil İbrahim Akçay(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)
Ayşe Nur Özdağ Acarlı(İSTANBUL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)
Mefküre Eraksoy(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)
Murat Kürtüncü(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)
Sayfa
29–35
Yayın Tarihi
2022-03-11
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Additionally, Mtx may be more beneficial in MS patients with earlier disease onset.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objective: Mitoxantrone (Mtx) and cyclophosphamide (Cyc) have successfully been used in highly aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Results: Fifty-nine SPMS patients (29 Mtx, 30 Cyc) were included in our study.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Additionally, Mtx may be more beneficial in MS patients with earlier disease onset.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Mitoxantrone · Cyclophosphamide · Multiple Sclerosis

Abstract

Objective: Mitoxantrone (Mtx) and cyclophosphamide (Cyc) have successfully been used in highly aggressive multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. This study aims to compare the efficacy of these drugs in patients with secondary progressive MS (pwSPMS). Method: Clinical data of pwSPMS treated with either Mtx or Cyc were collected retrospectively. The EDSS scores before, during, and after the drug was determined. The efficacy of the drug was evaluated according to the EDSS change after the completion of therapy. The variations in clinical benefit between the two groups were investigated, as well as the factors that influenced them. Results: Fifty-nine SPMS patients (29 Mtx, 30 Cyc) were included in our study. Mean treatment periods were 19.5±9.9 months for Mtx and 9.1±4.1 months for the Cyc group. Mean EDSS in Mtx and Cyc groups at the first dose were 6.2±0.7 and 6.3±0.8, respectively (p=0.42). The percentage of patients who benefited from treatment was 41.6% in the Mtx group and 43.0% in the Cyc group (p=0.54). However, Mtx was more effective in patients with younger age of disease onset (p=0.01). Conclusion: Immunosuppression with intravenous Mtx and Cyc may equally prevent progression in patients with SPMS. Additionally, Mtx may be more beneficial in MS patients with earlier disease onset.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gündüz, T., Özcan, G., Çakar, A., Akçay, H. İ., Acarlı, A. N. Ö., Eraksoy, M., Kürtüncü, M. (2022). Comparison of Mitoxantrone versus Cyclophosphamide Treatment in Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis. Dicle Tıp Dergisi, Cilt: 49 Sayı: 1, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.5798/dicletip.1086113

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (3)

  1. Thompson AJ, Baranzini SE, Geurts J, et al. Multiplesclerosis. The Lancet. 2018;391:1622-36.
  2. Filippi M, Preziosa P, Langdon D, et al. IdentifyingProgression in Multiple Sclerosis: New Perspectives.Ann Neurol. 2020;88:438-52.
  3. Kavaliunas A, Manouchehrinia A, Stawiarz L, et al.Importance of early treatment initiation in theclinical course of multiple sclerosis. MultipleSclerosis. 2017;23:1233-40.