KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çalışma ve Toplum / 2009 / Cilt: 3 Sayı: 22

Ekonomi Politiğin İnsanı “Kim”dir?

Metin Sarfati(Marmara Ünüversitesi Fransızca Kamu Yönetimi)
Sayfa
57–96
Yayın Tarihi
2009-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In this article, within the frame of these ideas, subject-individual process will be handled within the context of modernization; original approach of the philosophy of political economy which is the work of Scottish tradition to this issue will be presented, and it will be argued that its approach to human is not one-dimensional, and even though words do not coincide with the contents, its individual and society envisagement is different from Heideggerian proposal, which becomes concrete today, when considered the contents

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Political economy has a significant place in the problematic of perception of social reality entirely just like its important role in generation of human sciences.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Political economy has a significant place in the problematic of perception of social reality entirely just like its important role in generation of human sciences.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In this article, within the frame of these ideas, subject-individual process will be handled within the context of modernization; original approach of the philosophy of political economy which is the work of Scottish tradition to this issue will be presented, and it will be argued that its approach to human is not one-dimensional, and even though words do not coincide with the contents, its individual and society envisagement is different from Heideggerian proposal, which becomes concrete today, when considered the contents
🔬Tür:Makale
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Alan Parametreleri

Abstract

Political economy has a significant place in the problematic of perception of social reality entirely just like its important role in generation of human sciences. In this article, within the frame of these ideas, subject-individual process will be handled within the context of modernization; original approach of the philosophy of political economy which is the work of Scottish tradition to this issue will be presented, and it will be argued that its approach to human is not one-dimensional, and even though words do not coincide with the contents, its individual and society envisagement is different from Heideggerian proposal, which becomes concrete today, when considered the contents

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Sarfati, M. (2009). Ekonomi Politiğin İnsanı “Kim”dir?. Çalışma ve Toplum, Cilt: 3 Sayı: 22, 57–96. https://ajindex.com/articles/1198814

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (73)

  1. Alada, A. D., (2000), İktisat Felsefesi ve Belirsizlik, Bağlam Yayınları, İstanbul
  2. Arosio, E. Malherbe M., (2007), Philosophie Française et philosophie écossaise, Vrin, Paris.
  3. Bréhier, E., (2004), Histoire de la philosophie, Ed Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris
  4. Burke, E., (1989), Réflexions sur la Révolution de la France, Hachette, Paris
  5. Chauvier, S.(2001), Dire “Je”, Vrin, Paris
  6. Constant, B., (1997), Ecrits Politiques, Gallimard, Paris
  7. Deleule, D., (1979), Hume et la Naissance du libéralisme économique, Aubier Montaigne, Paris.
  8. Descartes, (2000), Discours de la méthode, Flammarion, Paris
  9. Diatkine, D., (1991), “Presentation de”, Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la Richesse des nations, Smith, A., Flammarion, Paris
  10. Dumont L., (1977), Homo aequalis, Gallimard, Paris.
  11. Dumont L., (1983), Essais sur l’individualisme, Ed.Sevil, Paris.
  12. Dupuy, J.P., (1992), Le sacrifice et l'envie, Ed Calmann-Lévy, Paris
  13. Ferguson, A., (1992), Essai sur I’histoire de la société civile, Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris
  14. Ferry, L.-Renaut, A., (1987), 68-86 Itinéraires de l’individu, Gallimard, Paris.
  15. Ferry, L., (1999), “L’émergence du couple Ėtat/société”, Les critiques de la modernité politique, Calmann-Lévy, Paris.
  16. Finkielkraut, A., (2000), Nous autres modernes, Ellipses, Paris.
  17. Frank, M., (1986), L’ultime raison du sujet, Actes sud, Paris
  18. Gauchet, M., (2007a), La revolution moderne, Gallimard, Paris.
  19. Gauchet, M., (2007b), Un Monde desenchantè, Editions de l’Atelier, Paris.
  20. Gautier, C., (1996), ”L’individu” Dictionnaire d’éthique et de philosophie morale, Sperber, M.C., Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris.
  21. Gautier, C., (2001), “peut-on parler de chez David Hume?” Hume et le concept de société civile, Gautier, C., FPresse Universitaire de Paris, Paris.
  22. Gusdorf, G., (1993a), Le Romantisme I, Editions Payot, Paris.
  23. Gusdorf, G., (1993b), Le Romantisme II, Editions Payot, Paris.
  24. Halevy, E., (1995), La formation du radicalisme philosophique I,II,III, Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris
  25. Hazard, P., (1961), La crise de la conscience europèènne, Fayard, Paris.
  26. Hazard, P., (1963), La pensée europèènne au XVIII e siècle, Fayard, Paris.
  27. Heidegger, (1962), Chemins qui ne ménent nulle part, Gallimard, Paris.
  28. Hume, D., (1947), Enquéte sur les principes de la morale. Editions Aubier Montaigne, Paris.
  29. Hume, D., (1983), Enquéte sur l’entendement humain, Flammarion
  30. Hume, D., (1995), L’entendement, Traité de la nature humaine, Livre I, Flammarion. Paris.
  31. Hume, D., (2002), Essais et traités sur plusieurs sujets, Enquete sur les principes de la morale, Histoire naturelle de la religion, Vrin, Paris.
  32. Hurtado, J., Pignol, C., (2007), “Rousseau philosophie et économie”, Cahiers d’économie politique No:53, L’Harmattan, Lille.
  33. Hutcheson, F. S., (1991), Recherche sur l’origine de nos idées de la beauté et de la vertu, Vrin, Paris.
  34. Jaffro, L., (2000), ”La formation de la doctrine du sens moral. Burnet, Shaftesbury,Hutcheson”, Le sens moral, Une histoire de la philosophie morale de Locke à Kant, Ed PUF, Paris
  35. Jaume, L., (2000), La liberté et la loi, Fayard
  36. Kennington, R., (1987), “René Descartes”, Histoire de la philosophie politique, Strauss,l. Et Cropsey, J., Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris
  37. Keppler, J. H., (2008), L’économie des passions selon Adam Smith, Editions Kimé, Paris.
  38. Kramnıck, I., (1995), Enlıghtenment Reader, Penguin Boks, USA
  39. Latouche, S., (2001), “De Boisguilbert (1646-1714) aux physiocrates: de la politisation de l’économie á l’économisation du politique”, Histoire raisonnée de la philosophie morale et politique, Caillé, A., Lazeri, C. Senellart, M., Ed La Découverte, Paris.
  40. Laval, C., (2007), L’homme économique, Gallimard, Paris.
  41. Leibniz, (1969), Essais de Théodicée, Flammarion.
  42. Leibniz, (1880), La Monadologie, Delagrave, Paris
  43. Locke, J., (1992), Traité du gouvernement civil, Flammarion, Paris.
  44. Maclntyre, A., (1993), Quelle justice?Quelle rationalité, Ed Presse Universitaire de Paris,Paris
  45. Manent P., (2001), Les libéraux, Gallimard, Paris.
  46. Marouby, C., (2004), L'Économie de la nature, Ed du Seuil, Paris
  47. Mathiot, J., (1990), Adam Smith philosophie et économie, Ed Presse Universitaire de Paris, Paris
  48. Mill, J. S., (1988), Système de logique, Pierre Mardaga èditeur, Paris.
  49. Mill, J. S., (2000), Özgürlük üstüne, Belge Yayınları, İstanbul
  50. Montaigne, (2006), Denemeler 4 Cilt, Cem Yayınevi, İstanbul
  51. Ökten, K.H., (2008), Varlık ve Zaman Kılavuzu, Agora Kitaplığı, İstanbul.
  52. Pascal, (2000), Pensèes, Le livre de Poche, Paris.
  53. Pelluchon, C., (2005), Leo Strauss une autre raison d’autres lumiéres, Vrin, Paris.
  54. Perrot, J.C., (1992), Une histoire intellectuelle de I’économie politique, Ed. De I’école des hautes etudes Ed Sciences sociales, Paris
  55. Pocock, J.G.A., (1985), Vertu,Commerce et histoire, Presses universitaires de France, Paris.
  56. Rawls, J. (2002), Leçons sur l'histoire de la philosophie morale, Ed La Découverte, Paris
  57. Renaut, A., (1989), L’ ére de l’individu, Gallimard.
  58. Renaut, A., (1999a), ”Liberté, égalité, subjectivité”, Naissances de la modernité, Renaut, A., Calmann Levy, Paris.
  59. Renaut, A., (1999b), “Représentation moderne du monde et humanisme”, Naissances de la modernité, Renaut, A., Calmann Levy, Paris.
  60. Rosanvallon, P., (1999), Le capitalisme utopique, Ed. Du Seuil
  61. Sarfati, M., (2007), “Smith’te bütünlük sorunu”, İktisat Dergisi, Sayı 490, İstanbul.
  62. Sarfati, M., (2008) “Görünmez El”, Ekonomik Yaklaşım, Gazi Üniversitesi, Cilt 19, Sayı 66, Ankara.
  63. Smith, A., (1976), Théorie des sentiments moraux, Ed PUF, Paris
  64. Smith, A., (2000), Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations, Livre I et II, Ed Economica, Paris
  65. Smith, A., (2002), Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations, Livre III et IV, Ed Economica, Paris
  66. Smith, A., (2005), Recherche sur la nature et les causes de la richesse des nations, Livre V, Ed Economica, Paris
  67. Smith, A., (2006), Essais Philosophique, Ed Code, Paris
  68. Smith, A., (2007), Milletlerin Zenginliği, Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları, İstanbul
  69. Snow C.P., (2007), The two Cultures, Cambridge University Press, Paris
  70. Steiner, P., (1992), “L’émergence des catégories économiques”, Nouvelle Histoire de la Pensée économique, Béraud, A. et Faccarello. G., La Découverte, Paris.
  71. Todorov T.,(2006) L’esprit des Lumiéres, Robert Laffont, Paris.
  72. Vergara F., (2001), “Les Erreurs et Confusions de Louis Dumont”, L’èconomie politique No:11, Paris.
  73. Hume, D., (2002), Essais et traités sur plusieurs sujets, Enquete sur les principes de la morale, Histoire naturelle de la religion, Vrin, Paris.