KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çalışma ve Toplum / 2026 / Cilt: 1 Sayı: 88

Dijital Girişimcilikte Kadınlık ve Cinsiyet Normları: Sosyal Medya Temelli Netnografik Bir İnceleme

Femininity and Gender Norms in Digital Entrepreneurship: A Netnographic Study Based on Social Media

Damla Köroğlu Ünver(ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY)0000-0001-9749-3152
Sayfa
411–448
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuç olarak, kadın girişimciler Instagram’da hem girişimci hem bakım veren hem de aktivist rollerini bir arada taşıyan hibrit kimlikler kurmaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, dijitalleşmenin kadın girişimciliği üzerindeki etkilerini ve sosyal medya platformlarının, özellikle Instagram’ın, kadınların girişimcilik pratiklerinde nasıl bir rol oynadığını derinlemesine incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırma, Türkiye’de farklı sosyo-kültürel geçmişlere sahip dört kadın girişimcinin Instagram hesaplarını nitel netnografik yöntemle analiz ederek gerçekleştirilmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuç olarak, kadın girişimciler Instagram’da hem girişimci hem bakım veren hem de aktivist rollerini bir arada taşıyan hibrit kimlikler kurmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Kadın girişimciliği · Ditijal girişimcilik · Toplumsal cinsiyet

Özet

Bu çalışma, dijitalleşmenin kadın girişimciliği üzerindeki etkilerini ve sosyal medya platformlarının, özellikle Instagram’ın, kadınların girişimcilik pratiklerinde nasıl bir rol oynadığını derinlemesine incelemektedir. Araştırma, Türkiye’de farklı sosyo-kültürel geçmişlere sahip dört kadın girişimcinin Instagram hesaplarını nitel netnografik yöntemle analiz ederek gerçekleştirilmiştir. Kadınların dijital girişimcilik faaliyetleri, yalnızca ekonomik bir faaliyet olarak değil, aynı zamanda toplumsal cinsiyet normlarıyla müzakere edilen, duygusal ve ideolojik bir alan olarak ele alınmaktadır. Çalışma, Judith Butler’ın toplumsal cinsiyet performativitesi kuramı ve siberfeminist yaklaşımlar doğrultusunda kadın girişimcilerin dijital ortamlarda kimliklerini nasıl inşa ettiklerini analiz etmektedir. Kadınlar; duygu paylaşımı, kişisel hikâye anlatımı ve görsel stratejilerle izleyiciyle bağ kurarken bir yandan da ataerkil normlara meydan okuyarak alternatif kadınlık temsilleri üretmektedir. Annelik, dijital kardeşlik, topluluk oluşturma, kolektif iyileşme ve dayanışma gibi unsurlar da önemli temalar arasındadır. Sonuç olarak, kadın girişimciler Instagram’da hem girişimci hem bakım veren hem de aktivist rollerini bir arada taşıyan hibrit kimlikler kurmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, dijital girişimciliğin feminist özneleşme ve direnişin yeni biçimlerini nasıl mümkün kıldığını ortaya koyarak feminist dijital literatüre katkı sağlamaktadır.

Abstract

This study explores the impact of digitalization on female entrepreneurship and examines the role of social media platforms—particularly Instagram—in shaping women's entrepreneurial practices. The research employs a qualitative netnographic method to analyze the Instagram accounts of four female entrepreneurs in Turkey, each from diverse socio-cultural backgrounds. Rather than viewing digital entrepreneurship solely as an economic activity, the study approaches it as a space of emotional, ideological, and gendered negotiation. Drawing on Judith Butler’s theory of gender performativity and cyberfeminist perspectives, the study analyzes how women construct their identities in digital environments. Through emotional expression, personal storytelling, and visual strategies, participants connect with their audiences while simultaneously challenging patriarchal norms and generating alternative representations of femininity. Themes such as motherhood, digital sisterhood, community-building, collective healing, and solidarity also play a central role. In conclusion, female entrepreneurs on Instagram develop hybrid identities—combining roles of entrepreneur, caregiver, and activist. The study contributes to feminist digital scholarship by showing how digital entrepreneurship enables new forms of feminist subjectivity and resistance

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ünver, D. K. (2025). Dijital Girişimcilikte Kadınlık ve Cinsiyet Normları: Sosyal Medya Temelli Netnografik Bir İnceleme. Çalışma ve Toplum, Cilt: 1 Sayı: 88, 411–448. https://doi.org/10.54752/ct.1706963

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (55)

  1. Ahmed, S. (2013). The cultural politics of emotion. Routledge.
  2. Ahl, H. (2006). Why research on women entrepreneurs needs new directions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(5), 595-621.
  3. Alhajri, R., Aloud, M. E. (2024). Platform empowerment: Facebook’s role in facilitating female micro-entrepreneurship in tourism. Technology in Society, 78, 102331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2023.2215479
  4. Antonizzi, J., Smuts, H. (2020, Nisan). The characteristics of digital entrepreneurship and digital transformation: A systematic literature review. In Conference on E-Business, e-Services and e-Society (ss. 239-251). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44999-5_20
  5. Braidotti, R. (2013). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. John Wiley & Sons.
  6. Bianco, M. E., Lombe, M., Bolis, M. (2017). Challenging gender norms and practices through women’s entrepreneurship. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship, 9(4), 338-358. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-10-2017-0060
  7. Bruni, A., Gherardi, S., Poggio, B. (2004). Doing gender, doing entrepreneurship: An ethnographic account of intertwined practices. Gender, Work and Organization, 11(4), 406–429.
  8. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.
  9. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of "Sex". Routledge.
  10. Carrigan, C. (2018). ‘Different isn’t free’: Gender@ work in a digital world. Ethnography, 19(3), 336-359.
  11. Chasserio, S., Pailot, P., Poroli, C. (2014). When entrepreneurial identity meets multiple social identities: Interplays and identity work of women entrepreneurs. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 20(2), 128–154. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJEBR-11-2011-0157
  12. Crenshaw, K. (2013). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. In Feminist Legal Theories (ss. 23-51). Routledge.
  13. Daniels, J. (2013). Rethinking cyberfeminism (s): Race, gender, and embodiment. In Women, Science, and Technology (ss. 353-369). Routledge.
  14. Dewi, A. S. (2020, July). Investigating the impact of Instagram on women entrepreneurs’ empowerment. In Annual International Conference on Social Sciences and Humanities (AICOSH 2020) (ss. 58-61). Atlantis Press.
  15. Duffy, B. E., Hund, E. (2015). “Having it all” on social media: Entrepreneurial femininity and self-branding among fashion bloggers. Social media + Society, 1(2), 1–11. DOI: 10.1177/2056305115604337
  16. Dy, A. M., Marlow, S., & Martin, L. (2017). A Web of opportunity or the same old story? Women digital entrepreneurs and intersectionality theory. Human Relations, 70(3), 286-311.
  17. Estés, C. P. (2014). Kurtlarla koşan kadınlar: Vahşi kadın arketipine dair mit ve öyküler (Çev. S. Aksan). Ayrıntı Yayınları. (Orijinal eser 1992 yılında yayımlanmıştır)
  18. Fraser, N. (2000). Rethinking recognition. New left review, 3, 107.
  19. Fraser, N. (2014). Justice interruptus: Critical reflections on the" postsocialist" condition. Routledge.
  20. Gill, R., Orgad, S. (2018). The shifting terrain of sex and power: From the ‘sexualization of culture’to# MeToo. Sexualities, 21(8), 1313-1324.
  21. Graeber, D. (2013). The democracy project: A history, a crisis, a movement. Random House.
  22. Hall, K. (2011). Cyberfeminism. In Computer-mediated communication: Linguistic, social, and cross-cultural perspectives (ss. 147-172). John Benjamins publishing company.
  23. Haraway, D. (2013). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge. Hochschild, A. R. (1983). The managed heart: Commerzialization of human feeling. University of California Press.
  24. Hooks, B. (2000). Feminist theory: From margin to center. Pluto Press.
  25. Jiménez-Zarco, A. I., Clemente-Almendros, J. A., González-González, I., Aracil-Jordà, J. (2021). Female micro-entrepreneurs and social networks: Diagnostic analysis of the influence of social-media marketing strategies on brand financial performance. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 630058. Doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630058
  26. Jonsson, J., Roos, A. (2025). Using netnography to explore the entrepreneurship process. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 14657503251341791, ss.1-5. DOI: 10.1177/14657503251341791
  27. Kember, S. (2003). Cyberfeminism and Artificial Life. Routledge.
  28. Kozinets, R. V. (1998). On netnography: Initial reflections on consumer research investigations of cyberculture. Advances in Consumer Research, 25(1).
  29. Kozinets, R. V. (2002). The field behind the screen: Using netnography for marketing research in online communities. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 61-72.
  30. Kozinets, R. V. (2010). Doing ethnographic research online. Kozinets, Netnography: The Essential Guide to Qualitative Social Media Research.
  31. Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Redefined. SAGE Publications.
  32. Langer, R., Beckmann, S. C. (2005). Sensitive research topics: Netnography revisited. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8(2), 189–203. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750510592454
  33. Le Loarne-Lemaire, S., Bertrand, G., Maalaoui, A., Kraus, S., Schiavone, F. (2024). Shaping entrepreneurial gender play: Intersubjectivity and performativity among female entrepreneurs. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 40, 101316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2023.101316
  34. Makola, Z. S. (2022). Mumpreneurs' experiences of combining motherhood and entrepreneurship: A netnographic study. Journal of Contemporary Management, 19(si1), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.35683/jcm20129.139
  35. Marlow, S., Martinez Dy, A. (2018). Annual review article: is it time to rethink the gender agenda in entrepreneurship research?. International Small Business Journal, 36(1), 3-22.
  36. Mauksch, S. (2018). ‘(It) is exactly what it was in me’: the performativity of social entrepreneurship. In Social Entrepreneurship (ss. 137-158). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  37. Harrison, R. T., Leitch, C. M., McAdam, M. (2020). Woman’s entrepreneurship as a gendered niche: the implications for regional development policy. Journal of Economic Geography, 20(4), 1041-1067. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbz035
  38. Mouffe, C. (2000). The democratic paradox. Verso.
  39. Mulvey, L. (2013). Visual pleasure and narrative cinema. In The Sexual Subject (ss. 22-34). Routledge.
  40. Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital entrepreneurship: Toward a digital technology perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12254
  41. Paasonen, S. (2011). Carnal Resonance: Affect and Online Pornography. MIT Press.
  42. Paul, J., Alhassan, I., Binsaif, N., & Singh, P. (2023). Digital entrepreneurship research: A systematic review. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113507
  43. Phillips, M., Knowles, D. (2012). Performance and performativity: Undoing fictions of women business owners. Gender, Work and Organization, 19(4), 416-437.
  44. Plant, S. (1997). Zeros and ones: Digital women and the new technoculture (Vol. 4). London.
  45. Poggesi, S., Mari, M., De Vita, L. (2016). What’s new in female entrepreneurship research? Answers from the literature. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(3), 735-764.
  46. Pereira Caldeira, A. S., & Van Bauwel, S. (2019). Researching young women’s self-representation on Instagram: a critical reflection on the challenges and possibilities of a multi-methodological feminist approach. In DIGITAL⇌ CULTURE 2019.
  47. Sahut, J. M., Iandoli, L., Teulon, F. (2019). The age of digital entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 56, 1159–1169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00260-8
  48. Shen, K. N. (2018). Digital entrepreneurship. Information Systems Journal, 28(6), 1125–1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12187
  49. Suseno, Y., Abbott, L. (2021). Women entrepreneurs' digital social innovation: Linking gender, entrepreneurship, social innovation and information systems. Information Systems Journal, 31(5), 717-744. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12327
  50. Toupin, S. (2014). Feminist hackerspaces: The synthesis of feminist and hacker cultures. Journal of Peer Production, 5(2014), 1-11.
  51. Trott, B. (2022). ‘Gillette: The best a beta can get’: Networking hegemonic masculinity in the digital sphere. New Media & Society, 24(6), 1417-1434. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444820978293
  52. Ughetto, E., Rossi, M., Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E. (2020). Female entrepreneurship in the digital era. Small Business Economics, 55(2), 305–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00298-8
  53. West, C., Zimmerman, D. H. (1987). Doing gender. Gender & Society, 1(2), 125–151.
  54. Wilding, F. (1998). Where is feminism in cyberfeminism? In M. Kennedy & S. Hans (Eds.), Switch Journal, 4(3). Erişildi: 23.09.2025 https://www.ktpress.co.uk/pdf/vol2_npara_6_13_Wilding.pdf
  55. Zhao, F., Collier, A. (2020). Digital entrepreneurship: Research and practice. In 9th Annual conference of the EuroMed academy of business (ss. 2173-2182). EuroMed Academy of Business.