KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2024 / Sayı: 28

TÜRKİYE’DE HANEHALKI KREDİLERİNİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMEYE ETKİSİNİN ANALİZİ

ANALYSING THE EFFECT OF HOUSEHOLD CREDIT ON ECONOMIC GROWTH IN TÜRKİYE

Fatih Ceylan(UŞAK ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ)0000-0002-3685-2032
Sayfa
226–242
Yayın Tarihi
2024-10-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Ampirik analizde uzun ve kısa dönem bulgular doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan ARDL modellerine dayanmaktadır. 2008Q3-2023Q2 dönem aralığı kullanılan çalışmada, Türkiye'de hanehalkı kredilerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğu; ancak hanehalkı kredilerinin azaldığı (düşük oynaklık) dönemlerde bu etkinin pozitif ve daha büyük olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Küresel finans krizi sonrası krizin etkilerini azaltmak amacıyla birçok ülkede kredi kısıtlamaları uygulanmış; ancak son dönemde özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkelerde krediye erişimi kolaylaştıran gelişmeler ve politika teşvikleri ile hanehalkı kredilerinde artışlar yaşanmıştır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu dönemde hanehalkı kredilerinin ön plana çıkması ile ekonomik etkileri de tartışmaları beraberinde getirmiştir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Ampirik analizde uzun ve kısa dönem bulgular doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan ARDL modellerine dayanmaktadır. 2008Q3-2023Q2 dönem aralığı kullanılan çalışmada, Türkiye'de hanehalkı kredilerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğu; ancak hanehalkı kredilerinin azaldığı (düşük oynaklık) dönemlerde bu etkinin pozitif ve daha büyük olduğu tespit edilmiştir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Hanehalkı Kredileri · Ekonomik Büyüme · Türkiye

Özet

Küresel finans krizi sonrası krizin etkilerini azaltmak amacıyla birçok ülkede kredi kısıtlamaları uygulanmış; ancak son dönemde özellikle gelişmekte olan ülkelerde krediye erişimi kolaylaştıran gelişmeler ve politika teşvikleri ile hanehalkı kredilerinde artışlar yaşanmıştır. Bu dönemde hanehalkı kredilerinin ön plana çıkması ile ekonomik etkileri de tartışmaları beraberinde getirmiştir. Bu nedenle çalışma Türkiye’de hanehalkı kredilerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerindeki etkilerini ampirik olarak değerlendirmeyi amaçlamıştır. Ampirik analizde uzun ve kısa dönem bulgular doğrusal ve doğrusal olmayan ARDL modellerine dayanmaktadır. 2008Q3-2023Q2 dönem aralığı kullanılan çalışmada, Türkiye'de hanehalkı kredilerinin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğu; ancak hanehalkı kredilerinin azaldığı (düşük oynaklık) dönemlerde bu etkinin pozitif ve daha büyük olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bulgular Türkiye’de hanehalkı kredi büyümesinin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde olumlu etkisinin olduğunu; ancak kredi büyümesinin kontrollü olması gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Abstract

Credit restrictions were imposed in many countries in the aftermath of the global financial crisis in order to mitigate the effects of the crisis, but recently, especially in developing countries, there has been an increase in household credit due to developments facilitating access to credit and policy incentives. In this period, household credit has come to the forefront and its economic effects have brought along debates. Therefore, this study aims to empirically evaluate the effects of household credit on economic growth in Turkey. In the empirical analysis, long and short-run findings are based on linear and non-linear ARDL models. Using the period range 2008Q3-2023Q2, the study finds that household credit has a positive effect on economic growth in Turkey, but this effect is positive and larger in periods of decreasing household credit (low volatility). The findings suggest that household credit growth has a positive impact on economic growth in Turkey, but credit growth should be controlled.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ceylan, F. (2024). TÜRKİYE’DE HANEHALKI KREDİLERİNİN EKONOMİK BÜYÜMEYE ETKİSİNİN ANALİZİ. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı: 28, 226–242. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.1482233

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (49)

  1. Aghion, P., Angeletos, G. M., Banerjee, A., & Manova, K. (2010). Volatility and growth: Credit constraints and the composition of investment. Journal of Monetary Economics, 57(3), 246-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2010.02.005
  2. Akinsola, F. A., & Odhiambo, N. M. (2017). Inflation and economic growth: A review of the international literature. Comparative Economic Research. Central and Eastern Europe, 20(3), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.1515/cer-2017-0019
  3. Alessi, L., & Detken, C. (2018). Identifying excessive credit growth and leverage. Journal of Financial Stability, 35, 215-225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2017.06.005
  4. Alp, E., & Seven, Ü. (2019). The dynamics of household final consumption: The role of wealth channel. Central Bank Review, 19(1), 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2019.03.002
  5. Arcand, J. L., Berkes, E., & Panizza, U. (2015). Too much finance? Journal of Economic Growth, 20, 105-148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-015-9115-2
  6. Bahadır, B., & Gümüş, I. (2016). Credit decomposition and business cycles in emerging market economies. Journal of International Economics, 103, 250-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.10.003
  7. Bahadır, B., & Valev, N. (2020). Institutions, household credit composition, and the business cycle. Economic Inquiry, 58(3), 1401-1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecin.12885
  8. Beck, T., Büyükkarabacak, B., Rioja, F. K., & Valev, N. T. (2012). Who gets the credit? And does it matter? Household vs. firm lending across countries. The BE Journal of Macroeconomics, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1596/1813-9450-4661
  9. Beck, T., Levine, R. & Loayza, N. (2000). Finance and the sources of growth. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 261-300. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(00)00072-6
  10. Benczúr, P., Karagiannis, S., & Kvedaras, V. (2019). Finance and economic growth: Financing structure and non-linear impact. Journal of Macroeconomics, 62, 103048. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2018.08.001
  11. Çayır, B. (2021). The impacts of international capital flows on household credits. Central Bank Review, 21(4), 131-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2021.12.001.
  12. Çepni, O., Hacıhasanoğlu, Y. S., & Yılmaz, M. H. (2020). Credit decomposition and economic activity in Turkey: A wavelet-based approach. Central Bank Review, 20(3), 109-131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2020.06.001
  13. De Gregorio, J. (1996). Borrowing constraints, human capital accumulation, and growth. Journal of Monetary Economics, 37(1), 49-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3932(95)01234-6
  14. Dembiermont, C., Drehmann, M., & Muksakunratana, S. (2013). How much does the private sector really borrow? A new database for total credit to the private non-financial sector. BIS Quarterly Review March. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2248501
  15. Demirgüç-Kunt, Aslı & Maksimovic, V. (1998). Law, finance and firm growth. Journal of Finance, 53, 2107-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.139825.
  16. Dickey, D. A., & Fuller, W. A. (1979). Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 74(366a), 427-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1979.10482531
  17. Ekinci, M. F., & Omay, T. (2020). Current account and credit growth: The role of household credit and financial depth. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 54, 101244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.najef.2020.101244
  18. Ekinci, M. F., Erdem, F. P., & Kilinc, Z. (2015). Credit growth, current account and financial depth. Applied Economics, 47(17), 1809-1821. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2014.1002897
  19. Enders, W., & Lee, J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196-199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
  20. Galor, O., & Zeira, J. (1993). Income distribution and macroeconomics. The Review of Economic Studies, 60(1), 35-52. https://doi.org/10.2307/2297811
  21. Goaied, M., & Gasmi, A. (2021). The effects of household and firm credit on growth: New evidence from a panel of developed and developing countries. Australian Economic Papers, 60(3), 544-561. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12218
  22. Hegerty, S. W. (2019). Do capital flows drive credit growth and consumption in Central and Eastern Europe? Post-Communist Economies, 31(1), 36-51. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2018.1461516
  23. Jappelli, T., & Pagano, M. (1994). Saving, growth, and liquidity constraints. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(1), 83-109. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118429
  24. Kara, H. (2016). A brief assessment of Turkey's macroprudential policy approach: 2011–2015. Central Bank Review, 16(3), 85-92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbrev.2016.08.001
  25. Karaçimen, E. (2014). Financialization in Turkey: The case of consumer debt. Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, 16(2), 161-180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19448953.2014.910393
  26. Kılınç, M., & Ulussever, T. (2024). Changing landscape of the finance-growth nexus: Industry growth, credit types, and external financial dependence. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 101961. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intfin.2024.101961
  27. Kneller, R., Bleaney, M. F., & Gemmell, N. (1999). Fiscal policy and growth: evidence from OECD countries. Journal of Public Economics, 74(2), 171-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0047-2727(99)00022-5
  28. Levine, R. (2005) Finance and growth: theory and evidence. In P. Aghion and S.N. Durlauf (eds.), Handbook of Economic Growth, Vol. 1A (pp. 865–933). Amsterdam: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01012-9.
  29. MacKinnon, J. G. (1996). Numerical distribution functions for unit root and cointegration tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 11(6), 601-618. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1255(199611)11:6 3.0.CO;2-T
  30. McNown, R., Sam, C. Y., & Goh, S. K. (2018). Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Applied Economics, 50(13), 1509-1521. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2017.1366643
  31. Mian, A., Sufi, A., & Verner, E. (2017). Household debt and business cycles worldwide. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1755-1817.
  32. Mian, A., Sufi, A., & Verner, E. (2020). How does credit supply expansion affect the real economy? the productive capacity and household demand channels. The Journal of Finance, 75(2), 949-994. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12869.
  33. Müller, K. (2018). Credit markets around the world, 1910-2014. Available at SSRN 3259636. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3259636
  34. Narayan, P. K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979-1990. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500278103
  35. Pal, D., & Mitra, S. K. (2015). Asymmetric impact of crude price on oil product pricing in the United States: An application of multiple threshold nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag model. Economic Modelling, 51, 436-443. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2015.08.026
  36. Pal, D., & Mitra, S. K. (2016). Asymmetric oil product pricing in India: Evidence from a multiple threshold nonlinear ARDL model. Economic Modelling, 59, 314-328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.08.003
  37. Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., & Smith, R. J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289-326. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.616
  38. Phillips, P. C., & Perron, P. (1988). Testing for a unit root in time series regression. Biometrika, 75(2), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/75.2.335
  39. Sam, C. Y., McNown, R., & Goh, S. K. (2019). An augmented autoregressive distributed lag bounds test for cointegration. Economic Modelling, 80, 130-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.001
  40. Sassi, S., & Gasmi, A. (2014). The effect of enterprise and household credit on economic growth: New evidence from European Union countries. Journal of Macroeconomics, 39, 226-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmacro.2013.12.001.
  41. Schumpeter, J.A., (1911). The Theory of Economic Development. Cambridge, Mass.
  42. Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric methods and applications, 281-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9
  43. Şen, S., & İsmiç, B. (2023). The effect of household versus enterprise credit on economic growth in Türkiye. Cumhuriyet Universitesi Journal of Economics & Administrative Sciences (JEAS), 24(4). https://doi.org/10.37880/cumuiibf.1331347
  44. Uğurlu, E. N. (2023). Sectoral implications of policy induced household credit expansions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 67, 14-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2023.06.002.
  45. Verner, E. (2019). Private debt booms and the real economy: do the benefits outweigh the costs?. Available at SSRN 3441608. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3441608
  46. Vieira, F. V., & da Silva, C. G. (2023). Looking for asymmetries between credit and output in the BRICS countries. The Quarterly Review of Economics and Finance, 88, 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.qref.2022.12.010
  47. Yılmaz, İ. (2023). Finansal tablo kullanıcıları açısından enflasyon muhasebesinin önemi: BİST enerji sektörü üzerine örnek bir uygulama, KMÜ Sosyal ve Ekonomik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25(45), 930-944.
  48. Yılancı, V., Bozoklu, S., & Görüş, M. S. (2020). Are BRICS countries pollution havens? Evidence from a bootstrap ARDL bounds testing approach with a Fourier function. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102035
  49. Shin, Y., Yu, B., & Greenwood-Nimmo, M. (2014). Modelling asymmetric cointegration and dynamic multipliers in a nonlinear ARDL framework. Festschrift in honor of Peter Schmidt: Econometric methods and applications, 281-314. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-8008-3_9