KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL) / 2026 / Volume: 10 Issue: 2

The Effect of School Principals' Social Entrepreneurial Leadership Characteristics on Teachers' Motivation

Hamza Öz(YOZGAT BOZOK ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-5214-428X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In line with these findings, various suggestions were made to researchers and policy makers.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Teacher motivation is one of the main elements that directly affect the effectiveness of educational processes.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:This demonstrates the need for new research that will reveal the contribution of social entrepreneurship leadership to teacher motivation in educational management.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In line with these findings, various suggestions were made to researchers and policy makers.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2023-2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Social entrepreneurship · Social entrepreneurial leadership · Motivation

Abstract

Teacher motivation is one of the main elements that directly affect the effectiveness of educational processes. Although the relationship between leadership and teacher motivation in the literature is frequently examined, studies on the impact of social initiative on the motivation of social initiative, including social benefit, innovative and participatory leadership approaches, are very limited. This demonstrates the need for new research that will reveal the contribution of social entrepreneurship leadership to teacher motivation in educational management. This demonstrates the need for new research that will reveal the contribution of social entrepreneurship leadership to teacher motivation in educational management. Based on this need, it is important to examine the effects of social initiative leadership on teacher motivation and to obtain original findings that will contribute to the field of educational management. In this context, in order to determine the effect of school administrators on teacher motivation, the universe of this research, which is designed according to the relationship methods, consists of teachers working in schools in a region of the country in 2023-2024 academic year. According to statistics, the sample of the study consists of 339 teachers determined by simple random sample method. In the study, the “Social Entrepreneurship Leadership Scale” and “Teacher Motivation Scale” were used as data collection tools. In the study, the level of social initiative and motivation perceived by the teachers working in the relevant schools were determined and inter -variable relationships were demonstrated. It is among the most important findings of the research that has a high level of positive relationship between the social interventional leadership characteristics of school administrators and teacher motivation. In line with these findings, various suggestions were made to researchers and policy makers.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Öz, H. (2025). The Effect of School Principals' Social Entrepreneurial Leadership Characteristics on Teachers' Motivation. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership (REAL), Volume: 10 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.30828/real.1659031

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (111)

  1. Ada, Ş., Akan, D., Ayık, A., Yıldırım, İ. & Yalçın, S. (2014). Motivation factors of teachers. Atatürk University Social Sciences Institute Journal, 17(3), 151-166.
  2. Adeagbo, A. (2008). Social enterprise and social entrepreneurship in practice. (PhD Thesis). Bournemouth University, Available at: http://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/10421/1/Adeagbo%2C_Ade_Ph.D._2008.pdf.
  3. Akter, S., Jamal, N., Ashraf, M. M., McCarthy, G., & Varsha, P. (2019). The rise of the social business in emerging economies: A new paradigm of development. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(3), 282–299. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2019.1640772.
  4. Alarifi, G., Robson, P., & Kromidha, E. (2019). The manifestation of entrepreneurial orientation in the social entrepreneurship context. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 10 (3), 307–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1541015.
  5. Anderson, M., & White, S. (2011). Resourcing Change in Small Schools. Australian Journal of Education, 55(1), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/000494411105500106
  6. Bahçabaşı, H. (2020). Comparative analysis of ethical and servant leadership behavior of social entrepreneurs in the context of gender. (Unpublished Master's Thesis). Marmara University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
  7. Baloğlu, N. (2012). Relationships between values-based leadership and distributed leadership: A causal study to evaluate the behavior of the school principal. Educational Sciences in Theory and Practice,12 (2) [Additional Special Issue], Spring, 1367-1378
  8. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  9. Barrett, N., & Harris, D. (2015). Significant changes in the New Orleans teacher workforce. Retrieved [January 20, 2025] from Education Research Alliance for New Orleans. https://educationresearchalliancenola.org/publications/significant-changes-in-the-neworleans-teacher-workforce.
  10. Bıçakçılar, H. (2021). The relationship between positive school management and teacher motivation. (Master's Thesis), Istanbul Sebahattin Zaim University, Institute of Graduate Education.
  11. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom Learning. Assessment in eEucation: Principles, Policy & Practice, 5 (1), 7–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969595980050102 Bornstein, D. & Davis, S. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: What everyone needs to know. Oxford University Press.
  12. Brauckmann-Sajkiewicz, S., & Pashiardis, P. (2020). Entrepreneurial leadership in schools: linking creativity with accountability. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 25(5), 787–801. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603124.2020.1804624
  13. Brereton, P. (2019). Teacher low points: A qualitative study into experiences of demotivation in ELT. International Association of Teachers for English Foreign Language (IATEFL) ELT Research, 34, 29–32.
  14. Brunelli, M. de Q., & Cavazotte, F. (2024). Effective leadership in social businesses: an integrative framework grounded on experiences in Brazilian social ventures. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2024.2326125
  15. Buluç, B. (2009). The relationship between leadership styles of school principals and organizational commitment according to the perceptions of classroom teachers. Educational Administration in Theory and Practice, 15(57), 5-34.
  16. Canrinus, ET, Helms-Lorenz, M., Beijaard, D., Jaap Buitink & Adriaan Hofman (2012) Self-efficacy, job satisfaction, motivation and commitment: exploring the relationships between indicators of teachers' professional identity. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 27, 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-011-0069-2
  17. Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2020). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 82, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2020.01.002
  18. Cemaloglu, N. (2007). The relationship between school administrators' leadership styles and bullying. Hacettepe University Journal Of Education, 33,77-87.
  19. Chang, T.-J., & Sung, Y.-T. (2024). Does teacher motivation really matter? Exploring the mediating role of teachers' self-efficacy in the relationship between motivation and job satisfaction. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 33(6), 1315-1325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-023-00803-4
  20. Clandinin, D.J., Long, J., Schaefer, L., Downey, C.A., Steeves, P., & Pinnegar, E. (2015). Early career teacher attrition: Intentions of teachers beginning. Teaching Education, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2014.996746
  21. Cuevas, R., Ntoumanis, N., Fernandez-Bustos, J. G., & Bartholomew, K. (2018). Does teacher evaluation based on student performance predict motivation, well-being, and ill-being? Journal of School Psychology, 68-162. https://doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.005.
  22. Dacin, M. T., Dacin, P. A. & Tracey, P. (2011). Social entrepreneurship: A critique and future directions. Organization Science, 22(5), 1203-1213. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0620
  23. Daniëls, E., Hondeghem, A., & Dochy, F. (2019). A review on leadership and leadership development in educationalsettings. Educational Research Review, 27, 110–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2019.02.003
  24. Dasci Sonmez, E., Cemaloglu, N., & Kahraman, G. (2024). Teachers' professional learning: Do instructional leadership and teacher leadership make a difference in Turkey? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432241280124. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241280124
  25. Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2009). Teacher emotions: Wellbeing and effectiveness. In P. A. Schutz & M. Zembylas (Eds.), Advances in teacher emotion research (15–31). Springer.
  26. Deci, E.L., Olafsen, A.H., & Ryan, R.M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 19–43. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113108 Dee, T. S., & Wyckoff, J. (2015). Incentives, selection, and teacher performance: Evidence from IMPACT. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 34(2), 267–297. https://doi:10.1002/pam.21818.
  27. Demir, O. (2023). Investigation of the relationship between teachers' professional autonomy and professional motivations. Education and Science, 48 (213). http://dx.doi.org/10.15390/EB.2023.11700
  28. Demir, S. (2018). The relationship between motivational language used by school administrators and teacher motivation. Anemon Muş Alparslan University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 633-638. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.395472.
  29. ElNaggar, R., & Hammad, R. (2024). Determinants of online social entrepreneurs' brand loyalty: A value creation model. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 21(1), 155-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-023-00365-7
  30. Elzahiri, S.A. (2010). Impact of principal's leadership style on teacher motivation. (PhD Thesis). University of Phoenix.
  31. Ereş, F. (2011). Relationship between teacher motivation and transformational leadership characteristics of school principals. International Journal of Education, 3(2), 1-17. https://doi:10.5296/ije.v3i2.798.
  32. Eyal, O. & Roth, G. (2011), "Principals' leadership and teachers' motivation: Self‐determination theory analysis", Journal of Educational Administration, 49(3), 256-275. https://doi.org/10.1108/09578231111129055
  33. Fernet, C., Trepanier, S.G., Austin, S., & Levesque-Côté, J. (2016). Committed, inspiring, and healthy teachers: How do school environment and motivational factors facilitate optimal functioning at career start? Teaching and Teacher Education, 59, 481–491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2016.07.019
  34. Finnigan, K. S. (2010). Principal leadership and teacher motivation under high-stakes accountability policies. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 9(2), 161–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700760903216174
  35. Fraenkel, J.R., Wallen, N.E., & Hyun, H.H. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education (7th Ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  36. Frentz, J., Brauckmann-Sajkiewicz, S., Bellibas, M. Ş., Pashiardis, P., & Pietsch, M. (2025). Revealing Entrepreneurial Acting and Thinking Among School Leaders in the K-12 Setting – A Scoping Review. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/15700763.2025.2471373
  37. Ghamrawi, N., & Jammal, K. (2013). Teacher turnover: Impact of school leadership and other factors. International Journal of Education Research and Technology, 4(1), 68-78.
  38. Göloğlu Demir, C., Demir, C. & Bolat, Y. (2017). The relationship between motivation and personality traits of classroom teachers. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(37), 73-87.
  39. Guay, F., Chanal, J., Ratelle, C.F., Marsh, H.W., Larose, S. & Boivin, M. (2010). Intrinsic, identified, and controlled types of motivation for school subjects in young elementary school children. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 711-735. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X499084
  40. Gul, M. (2019). A research on the effect of personality and entrepreneur personality traits on social entrepreneurship orientation: the example of university students. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Gaziantep University, Institute of Social Sciences, Gaziantep.
  41. Guzmán, C., Santos, F. J., & Savall, T. (2024). How to explain social innovation in elderly care services: The role of for-profit and non-profit social enterprises. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 20(3), 1849-1877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-023-00942-6
  42. Han, J., & Yin, H. (2016). Teacher motivation: Definition, research development and implications for teachers. Cogent Education, 3, 1–18. https://doi:10.1080/2331186X.2016.1217819.
  43. Hassanzadeh, M., & Jafari, M. (2019). Investigating factors underlying Iranian high school English teachers' (de)motivation. Journal of Modern Research in English Language Studies, 5(2), 77–100. https://doi:10.30479/jmrels.2019.10317.1283.
  44. Huster, K., C. Petrillo, G. O'Malley, D. Glassman, J. Rush, & J. Wasserheit. (2017). Global social entrepreneurship competitions: incubators for innovations in global health? Journal of Management Education, 41 (2): 249–271. https://doi.org/10.1177/1052562916669965
  45. Ingersoll, R. M. (2001). Teacher turnover and teacher shortages: an organizational analysis. American Educational Research Journal, 38(3), 499-534. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038003499
  46. Ingvarson, L. (2009). Developing and rewarding excellent teachers: the Scottish Chartered Teacher Scheme. Professional Development in Education, 35(3), 451–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415250903016707
  47. Kaçar, T., & Şahin, S. (2023). Views of school principals on entrepreneurial leadership approaches. Western Anatolian Journal of Educational Sciences, 14 (1), 453-481. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1285799
  48. Kanfer, R., & Chen, G. (2016). Motivation in organizational behavior: History, advances, and prospects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 136, 6–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.obhdp.2016.06.002
  49. Katı, B. G., & Toker, K. (2021). Social entrepreneurship as a social change catalyst. Istanbul Commerce University Entrepreneurship Journal, 5 (10), 145-164.
  50. Kılıç, G. N., Karabay, A., & Kocabaş, İ. (2023). Examining the relationship between school administrators' leadership styles and teachers' organizational happiness. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12(1), 91-112.
  51. Kılıç, Y. (2019). The influence of school administrators' taking personal initiative and leadership behaviors on teacher motivation. (Ph.D. Thesis), Selcuk University, Konya.
  52. Kırılmaz, K.S. (2013). A research to determine the perceptions of entrepreneurship and transformative leadership of social entrepreneurs. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 8 (1), 103-128
  53. Kızılöz, Ö., Günay, G. Y., & Durgut, A. İ. (2021). The relationship between entrepreneurs' leadership behavior with the perpetrators of social capital and entrepreneurial self -competence: A research on the owners of the company in technoparks. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Development, 16 (2), 116-133.
  54. Kimakwa, S., Gonzalez, J., & Kaynak, H. (2023). Social entrepreneur servant leadership and social venture performance: How are they related? Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04986-y
  55. Klassen, R. M., & Durksen, T. L. (2018). Weekly self-efficacy and work stress during teaching practicum: A mixed methods study. Learning and Instruction, 58, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.05.005
  56. Korkmaz, M. (2007). The effects of leadership styles on organization health. Education Research Quarterly, 30(3), 22-55.
  57. Kowalski, M. J., & Johnson, M. T. (2024). Enhancing novice teacher motivation through professional conferences. Teachers and Teaching, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2024.2320161
  58. Köse, M., Köse, E., & Özdemir, S. (2024). Leadership and teacher motivation: A comparative analysis on different types and levels of leadership in schools. Education and Science, 49(219), 225-240. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2024.12146
  59. Kurt, E. (2015). Examining the motivation of leaders on those led in an educational institution. (Master's Thesis), Maltepe University Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
  60. Leithwood, K., & Sun, J. (2019). Student engagement and leadership: The role of school leadership in student motivation. Educational Administration Quarterly, 55(1), 64–95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X18769048
  61. Lekamge, D. (2010). Leadership roles played by school principals: An analysis of cases. Journal of Emerging Trends in Educational Research and Policy Studies, 1(2), 43-49. https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC135750
  62. Lynch, J. M. (2012). Responsibilities of today’s principal: Implications for principal preparation programs and principal certification policies. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(2), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1177/875687051203100205
  63. Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2018). Does motivation matter? – The relationship between teachers' self-efficacy and enthusiasm and students' performance. PLoS ONE 13(11), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207252
  64. Mair, J. & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002.
  65. Malinen, O. P., & Savolainen, H. (2022). Inclusive education and teacher motivation: A study in Finnish and Chinese contexts. Teaching and Teacher Education, 109, 103570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103570
  66. Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S., & Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research-based strategies for every teacher. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
  67. Mesri, G., Sameri, M., & Keyhan, J. (2024). The relationship between active work behaviors, work values, transformational and interactive leadership style, and work engagement: The mediating role of innovation culture and autonomous motivation. Current Psychology, 43(28), 23916-23930. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06088-0
  68. Mintrop, R., & Ordenes, M. (2017). Teacher work motivation in the era of extrinsic incentives: Performance goals and pro-social commitments in the service of equity. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25,1-44. https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.25.2482
  69. Nicholls, A. (2006). Social entrepreneursih: New modls of sustainable social change. Oxford University Press. Nunez, M. V. (2020). Social entrepreneurial leadership: A case study exploring the leadership actions of a social entrepreneurial venture during its start-up phase. (PhD Thesis). Northeastern University.
  70. Öz, H. & Baloglu, N. (2023). Validity and reliability study of the social entrepreneurial leadership scale (SGLO). International Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 11(21), 588-615. https://doi.org/10.46778/goputeb.1268093
  71. Öz, H. (2022). Social interventional leadership: The sustainable way of creating social value in educational institutions. Journal of National Education, 51 (236), 3693-3716. https://doi.org/10.37669/milliegitim.940654.
  72. Özdemir, Ş. S. (2007). Factors affecting the motivation of visual arts (painting) teachers, (Master Thesis), Konya: Selçuk University.
  73. Özdoğru, M., & Aydın, B. (2016). The relationship between primary school teachers' decision-making status and willingness and motivation levels. Abant İzzet Baysal University Journal of Education Faculty, 12(2), 357-367.
  74. Pan, H.-L.W., & Chen, W.-Y. (2021). How principal leadership facilitates teacher learning through teacher leadership: Determining the critical path. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220913553
  75. Pazarcık, Y. (2016). Can our universities train entrepreneurs? A conclusive evaluation of studies measuring the entrepreneurship perception/tendency/characteristics of university students. Journal of Social and Human Sciences Research, 17 (37 Entrepreneurship Special Issue), 140-169.
  76. Pisapia, J. (2009). The strategic leader: new tactics for a globalizing world. Charlotte, North Carolina: Information Age Publishing.
  77. Prabhu, G. (1999). Social entrepreneurial leadership. Career Development International, 4, 140-145. https://doi:10.1108/13620439910262796.
  78. Recepoğlu, E. (2013). Examining teachers' job motivation in terms of different variables. Kastamonu Education Journal, 21(2), 575-588.
  79. Renko, M., El Tarabishy, A., Carsrud, A.L., & Brännback, M. (2015). Understanding and measuring entrepreneurial leadership style. Journal of Small Business Management, 53 (1), 54-74. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12086.
  80. Rey, J., Portela-Pino, I., Domínguez-Alonso, J., & Pino-Juste, M. (2024). Assessment of teacher motivation, psychometric properties of the work tasks motivation scale for teachers (WTMST) in spanish teachers. Educational Sciences, 14 (3). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14030212
  81. Rey-Martí, A., Ribeiro-Soriano, D., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016).A bibliometric analysis of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Research, 69(5), 1651–1655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.10.033 Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2018). Essential of organizational behavior (14th ed.). Pearson Education. Publisher Parson.
  82. Rojas, R., Jaimes, GIB, Gómez, CAP, Ramírez Osorio, D. M., & Rubiano Rios, DC (2024). Assessing Social Entrepreneurship Competencies in Higher Education. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2023.2301029
  83. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
  84. Shaw, E. ve Carter, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship. Journal of small business and enterprise development. 14 (3), 418-438. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626000710773529
  85. Shen, B., McCaughtry, N., Martin, J., Garn, A., Kulik, N., & Fahlman, M. (2015). The relationship between teacher burnout and student motivation. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 519–532. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12089
  86. Sucuoğlu, E., & Uluğ, M. (2022). The effects of leadership behaviors of secondary school administrators on staff job satisfaction in TRNC. Sustainability, 14(21), 13989.
  87. Sullivan-Mort, G., Weerawardena, J.,& Carnegie, K. (2003). Social entrepreneurship: towards conceptualisation. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing. 8(1), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1002/nvsm.202
  88. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S., (2013). Using multivariate statistics (6th Ed.), 497-516. Boston, MA: Pearson.
  89. Tehseen, S., & Hadi, N.U. (2015). factors influencing teachers’ performance and retention. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 6(1), 233–244. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n1p233
  90. Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school’s climate research. Journal of Sage Pub, 83(3), 357–385.
  91. Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. D. (2012). Building school-wide capacity for improvement: the role of leadership, school organizational conditions, and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 441–460. https://doi.org/10.1080/09243453.2012.678867
  92. Thoonen, E. E. J., Sleegers, P. J. C., Oort, F. J., Peetsma, T. T. D., & Geijsel, F. P. (2011). How to improve teaching practices: the role of teacher motivation, organizational factors, and leadership practices. Educational Administration Quarterly, 47(3), 496-536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X11400185
  93. Türker, A. (2020). Creating social value in the conceptual dimensions of social entrepreneurship and social responsibility: an application. (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Istanbul Okan University, Institute of Social Sciences, Istanbul.
  94. Türkeş, N., & Özgeldi, M. (2023). What are the motivation factors of social entrepreneurs? Review of studies conducted in different countries. Doğuş University Journal, 24(2), 435-456. https://doi.org/10.31671/doujournal.1229786
  95. Uslu, T. (2018). University students' perceptions of leadership, academic self-efficacy and alienation from school (Erzincan University example). (PhD Thesis). Inonu University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Educational Administration and Supervision, Malatya.
  96. Viseu, J., De Jesus, S.N., Rus, C., & Şansro, J.M. (2016). Teacher motivation, work satisfaction, and positive psychological capital: A literature review. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 14(2), 439–461. https://doi:10.14204/ejrep.39.15102.
  97. Woolfolk, A. (2007). Educational psychology (10th ed.). Pearson.
  98. Wronka-Pośpiech, M. (2016). The identification of skills and competencies for effective management in social enterprises. A managerial perspective. Management, 20(1), 40-57.
  99. Xiang, B., Xin, M., Fan, X., & Xin, Z. (2024). How does career calling influence teacher innovation? The chain mediation roles of organizational identification and work engagement. Psychology in the Schools, 61(12), 4672-4687. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.23302
  100. Yalçınkaya, S., Dağlı, G., Altınay, F., Altınay, Z. & Kalkan, Ü. (2021). The effect of leadership styles and initiative behaviors of school principals on teacher motivation. Sustainability, 13(5), 2711. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052711
  101. Ye, W., Ding, Y., Han, X., & Ye, W. (2024). Pre-service teachers' teaching motivation and perceptions of teacher morality in China. Educational Studies, 50 (2), 243-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2022.2037406
  102. Yemini, M., Addi-Raccah, A., & Katarivas, K. (2015). I have a dream: School principals as entrepreneurs. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 43(4), 526-540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143214523018
  103. Yıldız, V.A, & Taşgın, A. (2020). Teacher motivation scale: validity and reliability study. International Turkish Literature Culture Education (TEKE) Journal, 9 (4), 1741-1754.
  104. Cemaloglu, N. (2007). The relationship between school administrators' leadership styles and bullying. Hacettepe University Journal Of Education, 33,77-87.
  105. Clandinin, D.J., Long, J., Schaefer, L., Downey, C.A., Steeves, P., & Pinnegar, E. (2015). Early career teacher attrition: Intentions of teachers beginning. Teaching Education, 26(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2014.996746
  106. Dasci Sonmez, E., Cemaloglu, N., & Kahraman, G. (2024). Teachers' professional learning: Do instructional leadership and teacher leadership make a difference in Turkey? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 17411432241280124. https://doi.org/10.1177/17411432241280124
  107. Demir, S. (2018). The relationship between motivational language used by school administrators and teacher motivation. Anemon Muş Alparslan University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(5), 633-638. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.395472.
  108. Kaçar, T., & Şahin, S. (2023). Views of school principals on entrepreneurial leadership approaches. Western Anatolian Journal of Educational Sciences, 14 (1), 453-481. https://doi.org/10.51460/baebd.1285799
  109. Kimakwa, S., Gonzalez, J., & Kaynak, H. (2023). Social entrepreneur servant leadership and social venture performance: How are they related? Journal of Business Ethics, 182(1), 95-118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04986-y
  110. Özdemir, Ş. S. (2007). Factors affecting the motivation of visual arts (painting) teachers, (Master Thesis), Konya: Selçuk University.
  111. Pan, H.-L.W., & Chen, W.-Y. (2021). How principal leadership facilitates teacher learning through teacher leadership: Determining the critical path. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 49(3), 454-470. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143220913553