Dergiler / Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi / 2017 / Volume: 8 Issue: 4

The Impact of Q-matrix Misspecification and Model Misuse on Classification Accuracy in the Generalized DINA Model

Miao Gao(Nanjing Normal University)0000-0001-6842-5468
Ren Lıu(University of Florida)0000-0002-6708-4996
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2017-12-28
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

More test items had greater positive impact on classification accuracy than more respondents taking the test.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This simulation study explored the impact of Q-matrix misspecification and model misuse on examinees’ classification accuracy within the generalized deterministic input, noisy “and” gate (G-DINA) model framework under the different conditions.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The data was generated by saturated G-DINA model.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:More test items had greater positive impact on classification accuracy than more respondents taking the test.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:classification · cognitive diagnostic assessment · Q-matrix

Özet

This simulation study explored the impact of Q-matrix misspecification and model misuse on examinees’ classification accuracy within the generalized deterministic input, noisy “and” gate (G-DINA) model framework under the different conditions. The data was generated by saturated G-DINA model. Along with the generating model, two reduced models were used to fit the data: the additive CDM (A-CDM) and DINA model. The manipulated conditions included number of respondents, attribute correlations and test length. Two types of classification accuracy were examined: the overall classification accuracy and the class-specific classification accuracy. Results showed that the Q-matrix misspecification influenced classification accuracy more ominously than model misuse. The proportion of examinees classified correctly for each latent class was related to the types of Q-matrix misspecification. More test items had greater positive impact on classification accuracy than more respondents taking the test.

Abstract

This simulation study investigated the impact of Q-matrix misspecification and model misuse on examinees’ classification accuracy within the generalized deterministic input, noisy “and” gate (G-DINA) model framework under various conditions. The data was generated in the saturated G-DINA model. Along with the generating model, t wo reduced models were used to fit the data: the additive CDM (A-CDM) and DINA model. The manipulated conditions included: number of respondents, attribute correlations and test length . Two types of classification accuracy were examined: the overall classification accuracy and the class-specific classification accuracy . Results showed that the Q-matrix misspecification influenced classification accuracy more ominously than model misuse. The proportion of examinees classified correctly for each latent class was related to the types of Q-matrix misspecification. More test items had greater positive impact on classification accuracy than more respondents taking the test.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gao, M. (2017). The Impact of Q-matrix Misspecification and Model Misuse on Classification Accuracy in the Generalized DINA Model. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, Volume: 8 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.332712

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (1)

  1. Henson, R., Roussos, L., Douglas, J., & He, X. (2008). Cognitive diagnostic attribute-level discrimination indices. Applied Psychological Measurement, 32(4), 275-288.