KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 26 Issue: 1

ÜRETİM SÜREÇLERİNDE KUSUR ORANLARININ SINIFLANDIRILMASI: YENİLİKÇİ KAREKOD DÖNÜŞÜMÜ İLE DERİN ÖĞRENME TABANLI BİR YAKLAŞIM

CLASSIFICATION OF DEFECT RATES IN PRODUCTION PROCESSES: AN APPROACH BASED ON DEEP LEARNING WITH INNOVATIVE QR CODE CONVERSION

Yunus Emre Gür(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0001-6530-0598
Mesut Toğaçar(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8264-3899
Bilal Solak(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7804-2038
Cem Ayden(FIRAT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-7648-7973
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-03-27
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sonuçlar, AlexNet modelinin kusur oranlarını %100 doğrulukla sınıflandırdığını göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, üretim süreçlerindeki kusur oranlarının doğru sınıflandırılması ve kalite kontrol süreçlerinin optimize edilmesi için yenilikçi bir yöntem sunmaktadır.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu yöntem, derin öğrenme modellerinin güçlü desen tanıma yeteneklerinden yararlanarak kusur oranlarını yüksek doğrulukla sınıflandırmayı amaçlamaktadır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sonuçlar, AlexNet modelinin kusur oranlarını %100 doğrulukla sınıflandırdığını göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Defect Rate Classification · Machine Learning · Deep Learning

Özet

Bu çalışma, üretim süreçlerindeki kusur oranlarının doğru sınıflandırılması ve kalite kontrol süreçlerinin optimize edilmesi için yenilikçi bir yöntem sunmaktadır. Çalışmada, sayısal veriler iki boyutlu QR kod görüntülerine dönüştürülerek AlexNet modeli ile analiz edilmiştir. Bu yöntem, derin öğrenme modellerinin güçlü desen tanıma yeteneklerinden yararlanarak kusur oranlarını yüksek doğrulukla sınıflandırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Veri seti, düşük ve yüksek kusur oranları olarak etiketlenmiş ve %80 eğitim, %20 test olarak bölünmüştür. Karar Ağacı, Gradient Boosting, K-En Yakın Komşu, Lojistik Regresyon, Saf Bayes, Rastgele Orman ve Destek Vektör Makinesi gibi çeşitli makine öğrenmesi modelleri ile karşılaştırılmıştır. Sonuçlar, AlexNet modelinin kusur oranlarını %100 doğrulukla sınıflandırdığını göstermektedir. Bu bulgular, derin öğrenme algoritmalarının üretim süreçlerindeki kalite kontrol ve kusur tespiti için son derece etkili olabileceğini vurgulamaktadır. Ayrıca, çalışmanın kısıtlılıkları ve gelecekteki araştırmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur. Bu yenilikçi metodoloji, diğer endüstriyel süreçlerde ve farklı veri setlerinde de geniş bir kullanım potansiyeline sahip olup, üretim verimliliğinin artırılmasına katkı sağlayacaktır.

Abstract

This study presents an innovative method for accurately classifying defect rates in manufacturing processes and optimizing quality control processes. In the study, numerical data are transformed into two-dimensional QR code images and analyzed with the AlexNet model. This method aims to classify defect rates with high accuracy by utilizing the powerful pattern recognition capabilities of deep learning models. The dataset was labeled as low and high defect rates and divided into 80% training and 20% testing. It is compared with various machine learning models such as Decision Tree, Gradient Boosting, K-Nearest Neighbor, Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Random Forest and Support Vector Machine. The results show that the AlexNet model classifies defect rates with 100% accuracy. These findings emphasize that deep learning algorithms can be highly effective for quality control and defect detection in manufacturing processes. Furthermore, limitations of the study and suggestions for future research are presented. This innovative methodology has the potential to be widely used in other industrial processes and different data sets, contributing to the improvement of production efficiency.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Gür, Y. E., Toğaçar, M., Solak, B., Ayden, C. (2025). ÜRETİM SÜREÇLERİNDE KUSUR ORANLARININ SINIFLANDIRILMASI: YENİLİKÇİ KAREKOD DÖNÜŞÜMÜ İLE DERİN ÖĞRENME TABANLI BİR YAKLAŞIM. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 26 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1514908

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (49)

  1. Abdallah, M., Joung, B. G., Lee, W. J., Mousoulis, C., Raghunathan, N., Shakouri, A., & Bagchi, S. (2023). Anomaly detection and inter-sensor transfer learning on smart manufacturing datasets. Sensors, 23(1). doi: 10.3390/s23010486
  2. Ademujimi, T. T., Brundage, M. P., & Prabhu, V. V. (2017). A review of current machine learning techniques used in manufacturing diagnosis. In M. F. Zaeh (Ed.), Advances in Production Management Systems. The Path to Intelligent, Collaborative and Sustainable Manufacturing: IFIP WG 5.7 International Conference, APMS 2017, Hamburg, Germany, September 3-7, 2017, Proceedings, Part I (pp. 407-415). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-66923-6_48
  3. Belnoue, J. P., Nixon-Pearson, O. J., Thompson, A. J., Ivanov, D., Potter, K. D., & Hallett, S. R. (2018). Consolidation-driven defect generation in thick composite parts. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 140(7). doi: 10.1115/1.4039555
  4. Blondheim, D. Jr. (2022). Improving manufacturing applications of machine learning by understanding defect classification and the critical error threshold. International Journal of Metalcasting, 16(2), 502-520. doi: 10.1007/s40962-021-00637-0
  5. Borkovskaya, V., & Passmore, D. (2018). Application of failure mode and effects analysis in ecology in Russia. MATEC Web of Conferences, 193, 05026. doi: 10.1051/matecconf/201819305026
  6. Breitenbach, J., Eckert, I., Mahal, V., Baumgartl, H., & Buettner, R. (2022). Automated defect detection of screws in the manufacturing industry using convolutional neural networks. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. doi: 10.24251/hicss.2022.151
  7. Bullejos, M., Cabezas, D., Martín-Martín, M., & Alcalá, F. (2022). A k-nearest neighbors algorithm in Python for visualizing the 3D stratigraphic architecture of the Llobregat River Delta in NE Spain. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10(7). doi: 10.3390/jmse10070986
  8. Burt, J. R., Torosdagli, N., Khosravan, N., RaviPrakash, H., Mortazi, A., Tissavirasingham, F., & Bağcı, U. (2018). Deep learning beyond cats and dogs: Recent advances in diagnosing breast cancer with deep neural networks. The British Journal of Radiology. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20170545
  9. Cao, Y., & Chun-hai, Z. (2012). Algorithm with weighted attributes for unresolved exception in decision tree induction algorithm. 2012 Second International Conference on Business Computing and Global Informatization. doi: 10.1109/bcgin.2012.140
  10. Chen, Y., Peng, X., Kong, L., Dong, G., Remani, A., & Leach, R. (2021). Defect inspection technologies for additive manufacturing. International Journal of Extreme Manufacturing, 3(2). doi: 10.1088/2631-7990/abe0d0
  11. Chien, C. F., Hung, W. T., & Liao, E. T. Y. (2022). Redefining monitoring rules for intelligent fault detection and classification via CNN transfer learning for smart manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 35(2), 158-165. doi: 10.1109/TSM.2022.3164904
  12. Demetgul, M. (2013). Fault diagnosis on production systems with support vector machine and decision trees algorithms. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 67, 2183-2194. doi: 10.1007/s00170-012-4639-5
  13. Dudyrev, E., & Kuznetsov, S. O. (2021). Decision concept lattice vs. decision trees and random forests. In Formal Concept Analysis: 16th International Conference, ICFCA 2021, Strasbourg, France, June 29–July 2, 2021, Proceedings 16 (pp. 252-260). Springer International Publishing. doi: 10.48550/arxiv.2106.00387
  14. Escobar, C. A., & Morales-Menendez, R. (2018). Machine learning techniques for quality control in high conformance manufacturing environment. Advances in Mechanical Engineering, 10(2), 1687814018755519. doi: 10.1177/1687814018755519
  15. Essid, O., Laga, H., & Samir, C. (2018). Automatic detection and classification of manufacturing defects in metal boxes using deep neural networks. PLOS ONE, 13(11), e0203192. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0203192
  16. Gemert, J., Snoek, C., Veenman, C., & Smeulders, A. (2006). The influence of cross-validation on video classification performance. Proceedings of the ACM International Conference on Multimedia. doi: 10.1145/1180639.1180786
  17. Goel, E., & Abhilasha, E. (2017). Random forest: A review. International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 7(1), 251-257. doi: 10.23956/ijarcsse/v7i1/01113
  18. Herzog, T., Brandt, M., Trinchi, A., Sola, A., & Molotnikov, A. (2024). Process monitoring and machine learning for defect detection in laser-based metal additive manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 35(4), 1407-1437. doi: 10.1007/s10845-023-02119-y
  19. Hidayaturrohman, Q. A., Clarke, H. G., Taflan, G. Y., & Sancaktar, I. (2023). A comparative study of machine learning approaches to heart disease prediction: An empirical analysis. Preprint version. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3098962/v1
  20. Karthikeyan, T., & Thangaraju, P. (2013). Analysis of classification algorithms applied to hepatitis patients. International Journal of Computer Applications, 62(15), 25-30. doi: 10.5120/10157-5032
  21. Kharoua, R. E. (2024). Predicting manufacturing defects dataset. Kaggle. https://www.kaggle.com/datasets/rabieelkharoua/predicting-manufacturing-defects-dataset adresinden erişildi.
  22. Kim, A., Oh, K., Jung, J. Y., & Kim, B. (2018). Imbalanced classification of manufacturing quality conditions using cost-sensitive decision tree ensembles. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 31(8), 701-717. doi: 10.1080/0951192X.2017.1407447
  23. Kotsiopoulos, T., Sarigiannidis, P., Ioannidis, D., & Tzovaras, D. (2021). Machine learning and deep learning in smart manufacturing: The smart grid paradigm. Computer Science Review, 40. doi: 10.1016/j.cosrev.2020.100341
  24. Lee, K. B., Cheon, S., & Kim, C. O. (2017). A convolutional neural network for fault classification and diagnosis in semiconductor manufacturing processes. IEEE Transactions on Semiconductor Manufacturing, 30(2), 135-142. doi: 10.1109/TSM.2017.2676245
  25. Liu, J., Cui, J., & Chen, C. (2023). Online efficient secure logistic regression based on function secret sharing. Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. doi: 10.1145/3583780.3614998
  26. Lv, M., Zhou, G., He, M., Chen, A., Zhang, W., & Hu, Y. (2020). Maize leaf disease identification based on feature enhancement and DMS-robust AlexNet. IEEE Access, 8, 57952-57966. doi: 10.1109/access.2020.2982443
  27. Mai, J., Chen, Z., Yi, C., & Ding, Z. (2021). Human activity recognition of exoskeleton robot with supervised learning techniques. Preprint version. doi: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-1161576/v1
  28. Natekin, A., & Knoll, A. (2013). Gradient boosting machines: A tutorial. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 7. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2013.00021
  29. Nuhu, A. A., Zeeshan, Q., Safaei, B., & Shahzad, M. A. (2023). Machine learning-based techniques for fault diagnosis in the semiconductor manufacturing process: A comparative study. The Journal of Supercomputing, 79(2), 2031-2081. doi: 10.1007/s11227-022-04730-x
  30. Oktaria, A. S., Prakasa, E., & Suhartono, E. (2019). Wood species identification using convolutional neural network (CNN) architectures on macroscopic images. Journal of Information Technology and Computer Science, 4(3), 274-283. doi: 10.25126/jitecs.201943155
  31. Olorunlambe, K. A., Hua, Z., Shepherd, D. E. T., & Dearn, K. D. (2021). Towards a diagnostic tool for diagnosing joint pathologies: Supervised learning of acoustic emission signals. Sensors, 21(23), 8091. doi: 10.3390/s21238091
  32. Papageorgiou, Κ., Theodosiou, T., Rapti, A., Papageorgiou, E. I., Dimitriou, N., Tzovaras, D., & Margetis, G. (2022). A systematic review on machine learning methods for root cause analysis towards zero-defect manufacturing. Frontiers in Manufacturing Technology, 2. doi: 10.3389/fmtec.2022.972712
  33. Papernot, N. (2018). Deep k-nearest neighbors: Towards confident, interpretable and robust deep learning. Preprint version. doi: 10.48550/arxiv.1803.04765
  34. Rafdi, A., Mawengkang, H., & Efendi, S. (2021). Sentiment analysis using Naïve Bayes algorithm with feature selection particle swarm optimization (PSO) and genetic algorithm. International Journal of Advances in Data and Information Systems, 2(2). doi: 10.25008/ijadis.v2i2.1224
  35. Rizal, R. A., Purba, N. O., Siregar, L. A., Sinaga, K. P., & Azizah, N. (2020). Analysis of tuberculosis (TB) on X-ray images using SURF feature extraction and the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) classification method. Journal of Applied Information and Communication Technologies, 5(2). doi: 10.32497/jaict.v5i2.1979
  36. Ruiz, L., Torres, M., Gómez, A., Díaz, S., González, J. M., & Cavas, F. (2020). Detection and classification of aircraft fixation elements during manufacturing processes using a convolutional neural network. Applied Sciences, 10(19). doi: 10.3390/app10196856
  37. Safavian, S., & Landgrebe, D. A. (1991). A survey of decision tree classifier methodology. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 21(3), 660-674. doi: 10.1109/21.97458
  38. Singh, S. A., & Desai, K. A. (2023). Automated surface defect detection framework using machine vision and convolutional neural networks. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 34(4), 1995-2011. doi: 10.1007/s10845-021-01878-w
  39. Singh, S. A., Kumar, A. S., & Desai, K. A. (2023). Comparative assessment of common pre-trained CNNs for vision-based surface defect detection of machined components. Expert Systems with Applications, 218. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.119623
  40. Tran, H., Friendship, R., & Poljak, Z. (2023). Classification of group A rotavirus VP7 and VP4 genotypes using random forest. Frontiers in Genetics, 14. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2023.1029185
  41. Wakayama, R., Murata, R., Kimura, A., Yamashita, T., Yamauchi, Y., & Fujiyoshi, H. (2015). Distributed forests for MapReduce-based machine learning. 2015 3rd IAPR Asian Conference on Pattern Recognition (ACPR). doi: 10.1109/acpr.2015.7486509
  42. Wang, L., Wang, X., & Li, X. (2007). Inference and learning in hybrid probabilistic network. Frontiers of Computer Science in China, 1(4), 429-435. doi: 10.1007/s11704-007-0041-0
  43. Wang, R., & Chen, N. (2020). Defect pattern recognition on wafers using convolutional neural networks. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 36(4), 1245-1257. doi: 10.1002/qre.2627
  44. Wang, W., Li, T., & Tu, Z. (2019). Multiple fingerprints-based indoor localization via GBDT: Subspace and RSSI. IEEE Access, 7, 80519-80529. doi: 10.1109/access.2019.2922995
  45. Wen, L., Wang, W., & Huo, W. (2020). RegBoost: A gradient boosted multivariate regression algorithm. International Journal of Crowd Science, 4(1), 60-72. doi: 10.1108/ijcs-10-2019-0029
  46. Wermelinger, J. (2023). Opportunities and challenges of supervised machine learning for the classification of motor evoked potentials according to muscles. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 23(1). doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02276-3
  47. Xue-jun, S., & Yang, G. (2006). Linear programming approach for the inverse problem of support vector machines. Proceedings of the 2006 International Conference on Machine Learning and Cybernetics. doi: 10.1109/icmlc.2006.258544
  48. Yang, J., Li, S., Wang, Z., Dong, H., Wang, J., & Tang, S. (2020). Using deep learning to detect defects in manufacturing: A comprehensive survey and current challenges. Materials, 13(24). doi: 10.3390/ma13245755
  49. Yoshida, K., Iwasawa, T., Sano, N., Tanaka, M., & Suzuki, T. (2017). Construction of defect detection system for image data using machine learning and image processing. Total Quality Science, 3(2), 46-58. doi: 10.17929/tqs.3.46