KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 26 Issue: 2

ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES IN TÜRKİYE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST THEORY: THE EXAMPLE OF BANKING REGULATION AND SUPERVISION AGENCY

Ahmet Kavaklı(TC İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi)0000-0002-5713-3950
Ali Osman Gürbüz(İSTANBUL TİCARET ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0230-5839
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Since the BRSA's regulatory and supervisory activities contribute to the S-Score, the study concludes that the BRSA's efforts align with the Public Interest Theory, as they promote financial stability and attract investment, thereby serving the public interest.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Public Interest Theory argues that public regulations should be implemented for the purpose of maximizing social welfare.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:For this purpose, in the first stage, S-Score calculations for the banking sector were made for the sector total and for different segments of deposit banks (at year-ends for the 1989-2000 and 2001-2023 periods, and quarterly for the 2007-2023 period).
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Since the BRSA's regulatory and supervisory activities contribute to the S-Score, the study concludes that the BRSA's efforts align with the Public Interest Theory, as they promote financial stability and attract investment, thereby serving the public interest.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2000 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Public Interest Theory · Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency · Bankometer Score

Abstract

Public Interest Theory argues that public regulations should be implemented for the purpose of maximizing social welfare. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effects of the BRSA's activity results on the Turkish banking sector and some macroeconomic aggregates, vis-à-vis the Theory, by using the Bankometer Score (S-Score), which is a discriminant analysis method and Granger Causality Test. For this purpose, in the first stage, S-Score calculations for the banking sector were made for the sector total and for different segments of deposit banks (at year-ends for the 1989-2000 and 2001-2023 periods, and quarterly for the 2007-2023 period). In the pre-BRSA period (1989-2000), it was observed that the S-Score figure in all segments generally tended to deteriorate over the years. After BRSA became operational in 2000, S-Score results on a sectoral basis in the calculations made since 2001 have yielded much better results than before 2000. Then the quarterly results were made, together with Foreign Direct Investment (FDI), Real Sector Confidence Index (RSCI) and Capacity Utilization Rate (CUR), were used as a variable for the created model and Granger Causality Test was performed. According to the results of the Granger Causality analysis conducted on EViews, it was concluded that the S-Score, which measures the soundness of the banking sector, is the cause of FDI, which is a common opinion in the literature that it has positive effects on the country's economy. Since the BRSA's regulatory and supervisory activities contribute to the S-Score, the study concludes that the BRSA's efforts align with the Public Interest Theory, as they promote financial stability and attract investment, thereby serving the public interest.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kavaklı, A., Gürbüz, A. O. (2025). ANALYSIS OF ECONOMIC SUPERVISORY AND REGULATORY AUTHORITIES IN TÜRKİYE FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF PUBLIC INTEREST THEORY: THE EXAMPLE OF BANKING REGULATION AND SUPERVISION AGENCY. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 26 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1622229

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (45)

  1. Akça, H. (2007). Regülasyon ekonomisi. Adana: Nobel Kitabevi
  2. Akın Aksoy, E. E., & Kandil Göker, İ. E. (2018). Bankacılık sektöründe finansal risklerin z-skor ve bankometer metodları ile tespiti, BİST’te işlem gören ticari bankalar üzerine bir araştırma. Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi, 20(2), 418- 438. https://doi.org/10.31460/mbdd.377424
  3. Aktan, C. C., & Yay, S. (2016a). Regülasyon iktisadına giriş. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(1), 116-135.
  4. Aktan, C. C., & Yay, S. (2016b). Regülasyonların politik iktisadı: Regülasyonların etkileri, fayda ve maliyetleri. Ekonomi Bilimleri Dergisi, 8(2), 82-102.
  5. Aktan, C. C., & Karaaslan Y. T. (2009). Regülasyon ekonomisi ve kamusal regülasyon teorisi. In C. C. Aktan & D. Dileyici (Eds.), Kamu ekonomisi (pp 79-100). İzmir.
  6. Alagöz, M., Erdoğan, S., & Topallı, N. (2008). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye yatırımları ve ekonomik büyüme: Türkiye deneyimi 1992-2007. Gaziantep Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 79-89.
  7. Baliamoune-Lutz, M. N. (2004). Does FDI contribute to economic growth? Business Economics, 39(2), 49-56
  8. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. (2005). Annual Report 2005.
  9. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. (2023). Annual Report 2023.
  10. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. (2021). Pandemi Döneminde Alınan Kararlar Hk Kurul Kararı. Retrieved from https://www.bddk.org.tr/Home/ShowAll_Mevzuat?metin=pandemi
  11. Banking Regulation and Supervision Agency. (2001). Bankacılık sektörü yeniden yapılandırma programı. Retrieved from https://www.bddk.org.tr/Duyuru/Detay/8
  12. Bella, F, ED Radianto, W, ED. (2020). Bankruptcy prediction of the banking sector using bankometer: Comparative study based on company size. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, 175, 327-334. 10.2991/aebmr.k.210510.051
  13. Brownbridge, M., & Kirkpatrick C. (1999). Financial sector regulation: The lessons of the Asian Crisis. Development Policy Review, 17(3), 243-266. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-7679.00086
  14. Budiman, T., Herwany, A., & Kritanty, F. T. (2017). An evaluation of financial stress for Islamic banks in Indonesia using a bankometer model. Journal of Finance and Banking Review, 2(3), 14-20
  15. Çalış, N., Kevser, M. & Sakarya, Ş. (2022). Katılım bankalarının finansal sağlamlığının bankometer ve z-skor yöntemleriyle analizi. Adam Akademi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 12(2), 301-32. https://doi.org/10.31679/adamakademi.1065747
  16. Çevik, S. & Demir, M. (2005). Devletin düzenleyici rolü ve regülasyon teorileri. Öneri, 6(23), 249-257.
  17. Çinko, L. (2009). Doğrudan yabancı sermaye hareketlerinin makroekonomik etkileri. Marmara Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 26(1), 117-131.
  18. Eleni, M., Agoraki, K., Delis, M. D., & Pasiouras, F. (2011). Regulations, competition and bank risk-taking in transition countries. Journal of Financial Stability, 7(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2009.08.002
  19. Erben Yavuz, A. (2023). Finansal sağlamlık: Türk bankacılık sektörünün bankometer ile incelenmesi. Uluslararası Akademik Birikim Dergisi, 6(Özel Sayı), 317-331.
  20. Erol, M. (2003). Doğal tekellerin düzenlenmesi ve telekomünikasyon sektöründe düzenleyici kurum. (Unpublished expertise thesis). State Planning Organization.
  21. Fayed, M. E. (2013). Comparative performance study of conventional and Islamic banking in Egypt. Journal of Applied Finance & Banking, 3(2), 1792-6580.
  22. Granger, C. W. J. (1969). Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross spectral methods. Econometrica, 37(3), 424-438. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912791
  23. Hantke Domas, M. (2003). The public interest theory of regulation: Non existence or misinterpretation? European Journal of Law and Economics, 15, 165-194. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021814416688
  24. Karakaş, M. (2008). Devletin düzenleyici rolü ve Türkiye'de bağımsız idari otoriteler. Maliye Dergisi, 154 (Ocak-Haziran), 99-120.
  25. Kattel, I. K. (2014). Evaluating the financial solvency of selected commercial banks of Nepal. An application of bankometer. Journal of Advanced Economic Research, 1, 2362-1303.
  26. Khatir, A, Q. (2023). The effect of foreign direct investments, workers’ remittances and foreign aids on the economic growth: Case of SAAR, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  27. Kurtaran, A. (2007). Doğrudan yabancı yatırım kararları ve belirleyicileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(2), 367-382.
  28. Mensah, C. (2018). Trends, challenges and prospects: The impact of FDI, imports, and remittances on economic growth; The role of institutions on growth in Sub-saharan Africa (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Anadolu University, Graduate School of Social Sciences.
  29. Nagami, M., & Abirami, K. (2017). Performance of public sector banks in India: An analytical study. International Journal of Research in Commerce, Economics & Management, 7(5).
  30. Nimalathasan, B., Balaputhıran, S., & Priya, K. (2012). Evaluating the financial soundness of selected commercial banks in Sri Lanka: An application of bankometer model. International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 3(11), 12-14.
  31. Oğuz, F. (2011). Devlet ve piyasa: Regülasyon ekonomisine giriş. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık
  32. Özbek, Ö. E., Hazar, A., & Babuşçu, Ş. (2021). COVID-19 öncesi ve sonrası Türk bankacılık sektörünün bankometer yöntemi ile analizi. Ufuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(20), 7-26.
  33. Polanyi, K. (2001). The great transformation, the political and economic origins of our time. Beacon Press.
  34. Polanyi, K. (2016). Büyük dönüşüm çağımızın siyasal ve ekonomik kökenleri (Trans: A. Buğra) (13th editition). İletişim Yayınları.
  35. Posner, R. (1974). Theories of economic regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 5(2), 335-358. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003113
  36. Sakarya, Ş. & Karakaş, F. (2021). Türkiye’de bankacılık sektörünün finansal performansının Camels ve bankometer yöntemleriyle incelenmesi. Uluslararası İşletme, Ekonomi ve Yönetim Perspektifleri Dergisi, 5(Prof. Dr. Fikret OTLU Özel Sayısı). 10.29228/ijbemp.52629
  37. Shar, A. H., Shah, A. M. & Jamali, H. (2010). Performance evaluation of banking sector in Pakistan: An application of bankometer. International Journal of Business and Management, 5(9), 81-86.
  38. Shleifer, A. (2005). Understanding regulation. European Financial Management, 11(4), 439-451.
  39. Stigler, G. (1971). The theory of economic regulation. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3-21. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
  40. Uslu, K., & Tufaner, M. B. (2015). Regülasyon teorilerinin finansal krizler üzerindeki etkileri. International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 398-405.
  41. Yameen, İ. Y., & Ali, M. S. (2016). Evaluating the financial soundness of the Jordanian commercial banks by applying bankometer’s model. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 7(2), 124-130.
  42. Yavuz, S. (2009). Hataları ardışık bağımlı (otokorelasyonlu) olan regresyon modellerinin tahmin edilmesi. Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 23(3), 123-140.
  43. Yıldırım, S., & Akyol, S. (2022). Covid-19 aşısına maliye teorisinden bakmak: Erdemli mallar bağlamında bir inceleme. Politik Ekonomik Kuram, 6(2), 473-499. https://doi.org/10.30586/pek.1164519
  44. Zülfüoğlu, Ö. (2013). Kamusal bir mal olarak finansal sistemin regülasyonu: Türk bankacılık sektörü örneği, (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Marmara Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü.
  45. Eleni, M., Agoraki, K., Delis, M. D., & Pasiouras, F. (2011). Regulations, competition and bank risk-taking in transition countries. Journal of Financial Stability, 7(1), 38-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2009.08.002