KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2025 / Volume: 26 Issue: 4

THE CHANGING GROUND OF ORGANISATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: STATE POLICIES AND ORGANISATIONAL DISCOURSE IN THE BEER SECTOR IN TÜRKIYE

Kemal Demir(YALOVA UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-4734-1999
Hakan Baltacı(YALOVA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0276-2781
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2025-12-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

By analyzing these interactions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between structure, agency, and discourse in the process of legitimacy construction.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Organizations strive to achieve objectives such as survival, growth, and profitability, and being perceived as legitimate by their institutional environment significantly facilitates these goals.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using archival data from Cumhuriyet and Milliyet newspapers, the study explores how both firms and the state engaged in discursive strategies through fundamental institutions such as the state, religion, health, and family.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:By analyzing these interactions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between structure, agency, and discourse in the process of legitimacy construction.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Social Institutions · State and Government · Discourse

Abstract

Organizations strive to achieve objectives such as survival, growth, and profitability, and being perceived as legitimate by their institutional environment significantly facilitates these goals. Organizations that lack legitimacy often encounter operational pressures and constraints. One of the key tools organizations use to gain and sustain legitimacy is organizational discourse. This study examines how firms in the brewing sector in Türkiye have historically constructed and adapted their discourses to strengthen their legitimacy, particularly in response to shifting regulatory and societal pressures. Using archival data from Cumhuriyet and Milliyet newspapers, the study explores how both firms and the state engaged in discursive strategies through fundamental institutions such as the state, religion, health, and family. The findings highlight the state’s dominant role in shaping market dynamics, as well as the reciprocal relationship between institutional structures and corporate discourse. By analyzing these interactions, the study contributes to a deeper understanding of the interplay between structure, agency, and discourse in the process of legitimacy construction.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Demir, K., Baltacı, H. (2025). THE CHANGING GROUND OF ORGANISATIONAL LEGITIMACY IN HISTORICAL PERSPECTIVE: STATE POLICIES AND ORGANISATIONAL DISCOURSE IN THE BEER SECTOR IN TÜRKIYE. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 26 Issue: 4. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1695361

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (54)

  1. Amir, S. (2007). Nationalist rhetoric and technological development: The Indonesian aircraft industry in the New Order regime. Technology in Society, 29(3), 283–293. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2007.04.010
  2. Arslan, S., & Coşkun, R. (2017). Kurumsal kuram açısından örgütsel dil ile örgütsel meşruiyet ilişkisi: Örgütler dil aracılığıyla meşruiyeti nasıl elde eder? Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 12(3), 137–164. https://doi.org/10.17153/oguiibf.333919
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organizational legitimation. Organization Science, 1(2), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1.2.177
  4. Brown, A. D. (1997). Narcissism, identity, and legitimacy. Academy of Management Review, 22(3), 643–686. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9708210722
  5. Buğra, A. (2016). Devlet ve işadamları (10. bs.). İletişim Yayınları.
  6. Çelik, C. (2010). Değişim sürecinde Türk aile yapısı ve din. Karadeniz Uluslararası Bilimsel Dergi, 8, 25–35.
  7. Coşkun, R. (2009). Yönetim-örgüt ders kitaplarında biçim ve ideoloji. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İİBF Dergisi, 4(1), 239–258.
  8. Cumhurbaşkanlığı Strateji ve Bütçe Başkanlığı. (2022). İçki Sanayii OIK Raporu. https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Icki-Sanayii-OIK-Raporu.pdf
  9. Cumhuriyet e-Gazete. (n.d.). Cumhuriyet e-Gazete Yayınları. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://egazete.cumhuriyet.com.tr/yayinlar
  10. Deephouse, D. L., & Suchman, M. (2008). Legitimacy in organizational institutionalism. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 49–77). SAGE.
  11. Demir, Ö. (2009). Bilim felsefesi (4. bs.). Vadi Yayınları.
  12. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095101
  13. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı. (n.d.). Bakara Suresi 219. ayet tefsiri. Retrieved June 7, 2023, from https://kuran.diyanet.gov.tr/tefsir/Bakara-suresi/226/219-ayet-tefsiri
  14. Diyanet İşleri Başkanlığı. (n.d.). Hadislerle İslam. https://hadislerleislam.diyanet.gov.tr/
  15. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organizational legitimacy: Social values and organizational behavior. Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136. https://doi.org/10.2307/1388226
  16. Ertin, G. (1998). Türkiye’de sanayi. Türkiye Coğrafyası, 20, 163–183.
  17. Etzion, D., & Ferraro, F. (2010). The role of analogy in the institutionalization of sustainability reporting. Organization Science, 21(5), 1092–1107. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0494
  18. Fidan, T. (2017). Talcott Parsons ve Niklas Luhmann’da meşruiyet düşüncesi: Örgütsel ve işlemsel meşruiyet. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 9(20), 265–282. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.315487
  19. Fıkırkoca, A. (2020). Makrokurumsal kuram. In H. C. Sözen & H. N. Basım (Eds.), Örgüt kuramları (ss. 271–301). Beta.
  20. Gazete Arşivi Milliyet. (n.d.). Milliyet Gazete Arşivi. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from http://gazetearsivi.milliyet.com.tr/
  21. Giddens, A., & Sutton, P. W. (2019). Sosyoloji. Kırmızı Yayınları.
  22. Grant, D., Keenoy, T., & Oswick, C. (2001). Organizational discourse: Key contributions and challenges. International Studies of Management & Organization, 31(3), 5–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00208825.2001.11656818
  23. Grant, D., Oswick, C., & Hardy, C. (2004). The SAGE handbook of organizational discourse. Sage Publications.
  24. Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069285
  25. Haack, P., Schilke, O., & Zucker, L. (2021). Legitimacy revisited: Disentangling propriety, validity, and consensus. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 749–781. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12615
  26. Hardy, C., Palmer, I., & Phillips, N. (2000). Discourse as a strategic resource. Human Relations, 53(9), 1227–1248. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726700539006
  27. İmamoğlu, Ş. Ö. (2011). AB üyesi ülkelerde alkollü içkiler sektörüne ilişkin bazı düzenlemeler. https://www.ab.gov.tr/files/tprb/ab_alkollu_ickiler.pdf
  28. Kasapoğlu, A. (2011). Sosyolojik yaklaşımlar temelinde aile kuramları. In A. Kasapoğlu & N. Karkıner (Eds.), Aile sosyolojisi (pp. 2–26). Anadolu Üniversitesi.
  29. Keskin, U., Büyük, K., & Koç, U. (2013). Yönetsel ve örgütsel açıdan retorik. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(1), 27–39.
  30. Lawrence, T. B., & Suddaby, R. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. B. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (2nd ed., pp. 215–254). Sage Publications.
  31. Lisovskaya, E., & Karpov, V. (1999). New ideologies in postcommunist Russian textbooks. Comparative Education Review, 43(4), 522–543. https://doi.org/10.1086/447582
  32. Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2009). Discourse and deinstitutionalization: The decline of DDT. Academy of Management Journal, 52(1), 148–178. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2009.36461993
  33. Maguire, S., Hardy, C., & Lawrence, T. B. (2004). Institutional entrepreneurship in emerging fields: HIV/AIDS treatment advocacy in Canada. Academy of Management Journal, 47(5), 657–679. https://doi.org/10.5465/20159610
  34. Mercan, S., Onaran, Ö. İ., İlbak, A., Atasoy, H., Teloğlu, E. Ş., Torun, P., … Hayran, O. (2018). Alkol tüketim kültürü ve alkol araştırmaları ile alkol kontrol politikaları konusunda görüşler: Nitel bir araştırma. Addicta: The Turkish Journal on Addictions, 5(3), 495–505. https://doi.org/10.15805/addicta.2018.5.3.0027
  35. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi.org/10.1086/226550
  36. Meyer, J. W., & Scott, W. R. (1983). Organizational environments: Ritual and rationality. Sage Publications.
  37. O’Connor, C., & Joffe, H. (2020). Nitel araştırmada kodlayıcılar arası güvenilirlik: Tartışmalar ve pratik kılavuzlar. Uluslararası Nitel Yöntemler Dergisi, 19. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919899220
  38. Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279002
  39. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. (n.d.). Alcohol consumption (indicator). Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://data.oecd.org/healthrisk/alcohol-consumption.htm
  40. Reast, J., Maon, F., Lindgreen, A., & Vanhamme, J. (2013). Legitimacy-seeking organizational strategies in controversial industries: A case study analysis and a bidirectional model. Journal of Business Ethics, 118(1), 139–153. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1577-4
  41. Sanders, W. G., & Tuschke, A. (2007). The adoption of institutionally contested organizational practices: The emergence of stock option pay in Germany. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.24160889
  42. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9508080331
  43. Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2005). Rhetorical strategies of legitimacy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(1), 35–67. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.2005.50.1.35
  44. Suddaby, R., Bitektine, A., & Haack, P. (2017). Legitimacy. Academy of Management Annals, 11(1), 451–478. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2015.0101
  45. Tang, Y. (2017). A summary of studies on organizational legitimacy. Open Journal of Business and Management, 5(3), 487–500. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2017.53042
  46. Tanyeli, G., & İkiz, D. (2009). İstanbul'da bir endüstriyel miras örneği: Bomonti Bira Fabrikası. TÜBA-KED Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi Kültür Envanteri Dergisi, 7, 109–121.
  47. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. (n.d.). Alkol ve Alkollü İçkiler Daire Başkanlığı. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/TADB/Menu/23/Alkol-VeAlkolluIckiler-Daire-Baskanligi
  48. Tate, P. (2024). Beer in world history. In In the land of Ninkasi: A history of beer in ancient Mesopotamia (online ed.). Oxford Academic. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197682449.003.0001
  49. Thornton, P. H., Ocasio, W., & Lounsbury, M. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure, and process. Oxford University Press.
  50. Türk Dil Kurumu. (n.d.). Türkçe Sözlük. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
  51. Türkiye Gıda ve İçecek Sanayii Dernekleri Federasyonu. (n.d.). TGDF: 2023 yılına doğru alkollü içki sektörü. https://www.tgdf.org.tr/wp-content/uploads/2022/01/TGDF-2023-yilina-dogru-alkollu-icki-sektoru.pdf
  52. Weber, M. (2017). Protestan ahlakı ve kapitalizm ruhu. BilgeSu Yayıncılık.
  53. Yalçınkaya, A., & Taşcı, D. (2017). Bir kurumsal girişimci olarak devlet: Yeni kurumsal kuram bağlamında bir değerlendirme. Yönetim ve Organizasyon Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 71–90. https://doi.org/10.15659/yoad.2.1.003
  54. Yeşilay. (n.d.). Alkol bağımlılığı. Retrieved April 17, 2023, from https://www.yesilay.org.tr/tr/bagimlilik/alkol-bagimliligi