KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 27 Issue: 2

ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INFLATION AND TRADE OPENNESS IN TÜRKİYE: EVIDENCE FROM THE HIDDEN COINTEGRATION TEST FOR THE PERIOD 1975-2024

Ümit Yıldız(BAYBURT ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İKTİSADİ VE İDARİ BİLİMLER FAKÜLTESİ, İKTİSAT BÖLÜMÜ, İKTİSAT PR.)0000-0002-2677-2098
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In general, the findings indicate that increases in inflation during the relevant period reduced the contraction in trade openness in Türkiye, while decreases deepened it.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study analyzes the long-term relationships between inflation and trade openness in Türkiye.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Using annual data from 1975 to 2024, the study employs annual percentage change in the consumer price index to represent inflation, and the share of total trade in gross domestic product to represent trade openness.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In general, the findings indicate that increases in inflation during the relevant period reduced the contraction in trade openness in Türkiye, while decreases deepened it.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Inflation · Trade Openness · Hidden Cointegration

Abstract

This study analyzes the long-term relationships between inflation and trade openness in Türkiye. Using annual data from 1975 to 2024, the study employs annual percentage change in the consumer price index to represent inflation, and the share of total trade in gross domestic product to represent trade openness. Long-term cointegration relationships between the variables are examined using the Engle & Granger (1987) cointegration method and the Granger & Yoon (2002) hidden cointegration method. The findings from the Engle & Granger (1987) test reveal a long-term cointegration relationship from inflation to trade openness in Türkiye during the relevant period. Meanwhile, the Granger & Yoon (2002) test detects hidden cointegration relationships from the positive and negative components of inflation to the negative components of trade openness. Following the identification of hidden cointegration relationships, long-term coefficients are estimated using FMOLS, DOLS, and CCR estimators. According to the estimation results, a 1-unit increase in the positive components of inflation causes a decrease of approximately 0.26 units in the negative components of trade openness. Conversely, a 1-unit increase in the negative components of inflation increases the negative components of trade openness by approximately 0.22 units. In general, the findings indicate that increases in inflation during the relevant period reduced the contraction in trade openness in Türkiye, while decreases deepened it.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yıldız, Ü. (2026). ANALYSIS OF ASYMMETRIC RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN INFLATION AND TRADE OPENNESS IN TÜRKİYE: EVIDENCE FROM THE HIDDEN COINTEGRATION TEST FOR THE PERIOD 1975-2024. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Volume: 27 Issue: 2. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1852444

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (20)

  1. Ata, A. Y., & Dallı, T. (2022). Ticari dışa açıklık ve enflasyon ilişkisinin ampirik analizi: Türkiye örneği. Journal of Economics and Research, 3(2), 61–74. https://doi.org/10.53280/jer.1158934
  2. Atabay, R. (2016). The relationship between trade openness and inflation in Turkey. International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science, 5(3), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v5i3.464
  3. Atgür, M. (2021). Türkiye'de ticari açıklık ve enflasyon ilişkisi: Romer Hipotezi Türkiye'de geçerli midir? Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 30(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.759390
  4. Bošnjak, M., Novak, I., & Bašić, M. (2022). Openness and inflation nexus: The case of European post-transition countries. Proceedings of FEB Zagreb International Odyssey Conference on Economics and Business, 4(1), 181–191.
  5. Chhabra, M., Giri, A. K., & Kumar, A. (2024). Do trade openness and output gap affect inflation? Empirical evidence from BRICS Nations. Millennial Asia, 15(3), 359–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996221116586
  6. Çelik, H., Alev, N., & Erdemli, M. (2024). Is the Romer Hypothesis valid for Newly Industrialized Countries? Evidence from panel ARDL. Economic Journal of Emerging Markets, 16(2), 124–135. https://doi.org/10.20885/ejem.vol16.iss2.art3
  7. Çoban, M. N. (2020). Romer hipotezi kapsamında ticari dışa açıklık ve enflasyon ilişkisi: Next 11 ülkeleri için panel ARDL analizi. Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.36362/gumus.647844
  8. Doru, Ö., & Düşünceli, F. (2021). Türkiye’de ticari dışa açıklık ve enflasyon ilişkisi: ARDL sınır testi ve nedensellik analizi. Kafkas Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 12(23), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.36543/kauiibfd.2021.003
  9. Engle, R. F., & Granger, C. W. (1987). Co-integration and error correction: Representation, estimation, and testing. Econometrica, 55(2), 251–276. https://doi.org/10.2307/1913236
  10. Gökce, C. (2023). Dışa açıklık, döviz kuru ve enflasyon: Türkiye için asimetrik bir analiz. Anadolu Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 24(1), 518–534. https://doi.org/10.53443/anadoluibfd.1245291
  11. Granger, C. W., & Yoon, G. (2002). Hidden cointegration [Working paper]. University of California, Department of Economics.
  12. Grossman, G. M., & Helpman, E. (1991). Trade, knowledge spillovers, and growth. European Economic Review, 35, 517–526. https://doi.org/10.1016/0014-2921(91)90153-A
  13. Güneş, Ş., & Konur, F. (2013). Türkiye ekonomisinde dışa açıklık ve enflasyon ilişkisi üzerine ampirik bir analiz. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 7–20.
  14. Kızılgöl, Ö. A., & İpek, E. (2015). Türkiye’de enflasyon ile ticaret açıklığı arasındaki ilişki. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 15(4), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.18037/ausbd.83116
  15. Lin, H. Y. (2010). Openness and inflation revisited. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 37, 40–45.
  16. Lotfalipour, M. R., Montazeri, S., & Sedighi, S. (2013). Trade openness and inflation: Evidence from MENA region countries. Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Technical Series, 65(2), 1–11.
  17. Özçağ, M., & Bölükbaş, M. (2018). Ticari dışa açıklık ve enflasyon ilişkisi: Romer Hipotezi çerçevesinde Türkiye için bir analiz. Maliye Dergisi, 174, 112–130.
  18. Romer, D. (1993). Openness and inflation: Theory and evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(4), 869–903. https://doi.org/10.2307/2118453
  19. Şimşek, D., & Hepaktan, C. E. (2019). Ticari açıklık, istihdam ve enflasyon ilişkisi: Türkiye örneği. Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 17(4), 316–336. https://doi.org/10.18026/cbayarsos.585776
  20. Taşçı, M., Esener, S. Ç., & Darıcı, B. (2009). The effects of openness on inflation: Panel data estimates from selected developing countries. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, 6(4), 28–32.