Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2

Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus natto) on broiler muscle development and meat quality

Sayfa
203–210
Yayın Tarihi
2015-08-13
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

In conclusion, diets supplemented with 200 or 400 mg/kg probiotics could promote muscular development and meat quality of broilers in the late stage of growth.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This paper aims to evaluate the effects of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus natto) on muscle development and meat quality of broilers.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, 480 broilers (1 day old) were randomly divided into 4 groups.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:In conclusion, diets supplemented with 200 or 400 mg/kg probiotics could promote muscular development and meat quality of broilers in the late stage of growth.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Probiotics · broiler · muscle development

Özet

This paper aims to evaluate the effects of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus natto) on muscle development and meat quality of broilers. In this study, 480 broilers (1 day old) were randomly divided into 4 groups. Group A was fed with a basal diet. The basal diets of Group B, Group C, and Group D were respectively supplemented with 50 mg/kg chlortetracycline, 200 mg/kg probiotics, and 400 mg/kg probiotics. On day 21 and day 42, in each group, 18 randomly selected broilers were tested to determine muscle performances. On day 21, compared with Group A, Group C and Group D showed no significant difference in muscle weight, muscle fiber diameter, meat color, drip loss, shear loss, or cooking loss (P > 0.05). On day 42, compared with Group A, Group C and Group D showed significant increases in muscle weight and muscle fiber diameter and significant decreases in b* value, drip loss, cooking loss, and shear force (P < 0.05). Compared with Group A and Group B, Group C and Group D showed obviously improved muscle microstructure. In conclusion, diets supplemented with 200 or 400 mg/kg probiotics could promote muscular development and meat quality of broilers in the late stage of growth.

Abstract

This paper aims to evaluate the effects of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus natto) on muscle development and meat quality of broilers. In this study, 480 broilers (1 day old) were randomly divided into 4 groups. Group A was fed with a basal diet. The basal diets of Group B, Group C, and Group D were respectively supplemented with 50 mg/kg chlortetracycline, 200 mg/kg probiotics, and 400 mg/kg probiotics. On day 21 and day 42, in each group, 18 randomly selected broilers were tested to determine muscle performances. On day 21, compared with Group A, Group C and Group D showed no significant difference in muscle weight, muscle fiber diameter, meat color, drip loss, shear loss, or cooking loss (P > 0.05). On day 42, compared with Group A, Group C and Group D showed significant increases in muscle weight and muscle fiber diameter and significant decreases in b* value, drip loss, cooking loss, and shear force (P < 0.05). Compared with Group A and Group B, Group C and Group D showed obviously improved muscle microstructure. In conclusion, diets supplemented with 200 or 400 mg/kg probiotics could promote muscular development and meat quality of broilers in the late stage of growth.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

ZHOU, X., JIN, E., LI, S., WANG, C., QIAO, E., WU, G. (2015). Effects of dietary supplementation of probiotics (Bacillus subtilis, Bacillus licheniformis, and Bacillus natto) on broiler muscle development and meat quality. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 39 - Sayı: 2, 203–210. https://ajindex.com/articles/117886

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (11)

  1. Griggs JP, Jacob JP. Alternatives to antibiotics for organic poultry production. J Appl Poult Res 2005; 14: 750–756.
  2. Nava GM, Bielke LR, Callaway TR, Castañeda MP. Probiotic alternatives to reduce gastrointestinal infections: the poultry experience. Anim Health Res Rev 2005; 6: 105–118.
  3. Anjum MI, Khan AG, Azim A, Afzal M. Effect of dietary supplementation of multi-strain probiotic on broiler growth performance. J Pakistan Vet 2005; 25: 25–29.
  4. Taras D, Vahjen W, Macha M, Simon O. Response of performance characteristics and fecal consistency to long- lasting dietary supplementation with the probiotic strain Bacillus cereus var. toyoi to sows and piglets. Arch Anim Nutr 2005; 59: 405–417.
  5. Kalavathy R, Abdullah N, Jalaludin S, Ho YW. Effects of Lactobacillus cultures on growth performance, abdominal fat deposition, serum lipids and weight of organs of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 2003; 44: 139–144. Molnár AK, Podmaniczky B, Kürti P, Tenk I, Glávits R, Virág GY, Szabó ZS. Effect of different concentrations of Bacillus subtilis on growth performance, carcase quality, gut microflora and immune response of broiler chickens. Br Poult Sci 2011; 52: 658–665.
  6. Remignon H, Gardahaut MF, Marche G, Ricard FH. Selection for rapid growth increases the number and the size of muscles fibres without changing their typing in chickens. J Muscle Res Cell Motil 1995; 16: 95–102.
  7. Pennings B, Groen B, de Lange A, Gijsen AP, Zorenc AH, Senden JM, van Loon LJ. Amino acid absorption and subsequent muscle protein accretion following graded intakes of whey protein in elderly men. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab 2012; 302: E992–999. Huang JM, La Ragione RM, Nunez A, Cutting SM. Immunostimulatory activity of Bacillus spores. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol 2008; 5: 195–203.
  8. Gong J, Forster RJ, Yu H, Chambers JR, Sabour PM, Wheatcroft R, Chen S. Diversity and phylogenetic analysis of bacteria in the mucosa of chicken ceca and comparison with bacteria in the cecal lumen. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2002; 208: 1–7.
  9. Yurong Y, Ruiping S, Shimin Z, Yibao J. Effect of probiotics on intestinal immunity and ultrastructure of cecal tonsils of chickens. Arch Anim Nutr 2005; 59: 237–246.
  10. Li K, Zheng TL, Tian Y, Xi F, Yuan JJ, Zhang GZ, Hong HH. Beneficial effects of Bacillus licheniformis on the intestinal microflora and immunity of the white shrimp, Litopenaeus vannamei. Biotechnol Lett 2007; 29: 525–530.
  11. Hosoi T, Ametani A, Kiuchi K, Kaminogawa S. Improved growth and viability of lactobacilli in the presence of