Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1

The determination of antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of foodborne lactic acid bacteria against Enterobacter cloacae isolates

Sayfa
59–68
Yayın Tarihi
2020-02-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

These findings indicate that L. lactis, L. fermentum, and L. casei can potentially be developed as novel antibiofilm agents.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of 10 different lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains isolated from local food sources of animal origin against 4 Enterobacter cloacae isolates obtained from clinical cases and determine their adhesion potentials to intestinal epithelial cells.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In this study, all Enterobacter cloacae isolates (P3, P4, P5, P7) identified with the BD Phoenix automation system were detected to form biofilm with both Congo red agar and Microtiter plate methods.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:These findings indicate that L. lactis, L. fermentum, and L. casei can potentially be developed as novel antibiofilm agents.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Enterobacter cloacae · antimicrobial resistance · biofilm

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of 10 different lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains isolated from local food sources of animal origin against 4 Enterobacter cloacae isolates obtained from clinical cases and determine their adhesion potentials to intestinal epithelial cells. In this study, all Enterobacter cloacae isolates (P3, P4, P5, P7) identified with the BD Phoenix automation system were detected to form biofilm with both Congo red agar and Microtiter plate methods. Amoxicillinclavulanate, cefuroxime, and ampicillin resistance was determined in all isolates. It was determined that LAB strains producing exopolysaccharide (EPS) were able to colonize intestinal epithelial cells. It is noteworthy that LAB extracts were effective to inhibit the biofilm formation of P3Ec, which had higher antibiotic resistance than those of other isolates. Antimicrobial effect of LAB extracts on Enterobacter cloacae were also detected by both agar disc diffusion and well diffusion tests. In this study, all of the isolated LAB strains (especially L. lactis, L. fermentum, and L. casei) are good candidates for controlling Enterobacter cloacae biofilm formation. These findings indicate that L. lactis, L. fermentum, and L. casei can potentially be developed as novel antibiofilm agents.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

KENAR, B., ERİK, M., ERDOĞMUŞ, S. F., KÖSE, Z., DURMAZ, G. (2020). The determination of antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities of foodborne lactic acid bacteria against Enterobacter cloacae isolates. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 1, 59–68. https://ajindex.com/articles/117144

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW, Gotz F. The intercellular adhesion [ica] locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infection and Immunity 1999; 67: 5427-33
  2. Roy R, Tiwaria M, Donellib G, Tiwari V. Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: a focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action. Virulence 2018; 9 (1): 522- 554
  3. Rasmussen TB, Givskov M. Quorum sensing inhibitors: a bargain of effects. Microbiology 2006; 152 (4): 895-904
  4. Soares GG, Costa JF, Melo Flávia BS, Mola R, Balbino TCL. Biofilm production and resistance profile of Enterobacter spp. strains isolated from pressure ulcers in Petrolina, Pernambuco, Brazil. Jornal Brasileiro de Patologia e Medicina Laboratorial 2016; 52 (5): 293-298
  5. Sarowska J, Choroszy-Król I, Regulska-Ilow B, Frej-Madrzak M, Jama-Kmiecik A. The therapeutic effect of probiotic bacteria on gastrointestinal diseases. Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine 2013; 22 (5): 759-766
  6. Stewart PS, Costerton JW. Antibiotic resistance of bacteria in biofilms. Lancet 2001; 358 (9276): 135-138
  7. Cui X, Shi Y, Gu S, Yan X, Chen H et al. Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of lactic acid bacteria isolated from traditional artisanal milk cheese from northeast China against enteropathogenic bacteria. Probiotics and Antimicrobial Proteins 2018; 10 (4): 601-610
  8. De Roock S, Van Elk M, Van Dijk ME, Timmerman HM, Rijkers GT et al. Lactic acid bacteria differ in their ability to induce functional regulatory T cells in humans. Clinical and Experimental Allergy 2010; 40 (1): 103-110
  9. Corthésy B, Gaskins HR, Mercenier A. Cross-talk between probiotic bacteria and the host immune system. Journal of Nutrition 2007; 137 (3): 781-790
  10. Servin AL. Antagonistic activities of lactobacilli and bifidobacteria against microbial pathogens. FEMS Microbiology Reviews 2004; 28 (4): 405-440
  11. Freeman DJ, Falkiner FR, Keane CT. New method for detecting slime production by coagulase negative staphylococci. Journal of Clinic Pathology 1989; 42: 872-874
  12. Jain A, Agarwal A. Biofilm production, a marker of pathogenic potential of colonizing and commensal staphylococci. Journal of Microbiological Methods 2009; 76: 88-92
  13. Şahin R. Staphylococcus aureus suşlarında biyofilm üretimi, biyofilm pozitif ve negatif suşların genotipik ve fenotipik karakterlerinin karşılaştırılması. Thesis, Pamukkale University, Denizli, Turkey, 2007 (in Turkish)
  14. Sandberg M, Maat