KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Journal of Travel and Tourism Research / 2026 / Cilt: 28 Sayı: 28

Social Conformity in Experiential Consumption: Evidence from Secondary Data and Scale Development

Zhuofan Zhang(Texas A&M University - Kingsville)0000-0003-3501-2039
Sayfa
121–134
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-28
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Together, the studies advance theoretical understanding of experiential consumption by highlighting conformity as a need-driven process rooted in competence and relatedness, with implications for consumer motivation and social influence research.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This research explores a dimension of experiential consumption that stems not from hedonic pursuit but from social conformity motives.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Study 1 utilized secondary data from Airbnb virtual experiences to examine group-based activities conducive to conformity, revealing positive associations between conformity, competence, and relatedness, but not autonomy.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Together, the studies advance theoretical understanding of experiential consumption by highlighting conformity as a need-driven process rooted in competence and relatedness, with implications for consumer motivation and social influence research.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key Words: Experiential Consumption · Social Conformity · Virtual Experiences

Özet

This research explores a dimension of experiential consumption that stems not from hedonic pursuit but from social conformity motives. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which identifies competence, relatedness, and autonomy as fundamental psychological needs, the current work contends that conformity in experiential contexts arises from the desire to feel effective (competence) and socially connected (relatedness), while the need for autonomy is relatively diminished. A two-study mixed-method design was implemented. Study 1 utilized secondary data from Airbnb virtual experiences to examine group-based activities conducive to conformity, revealing positive associations between conformity, competence, and relatedness, but not autonomy. Study 2, composed of three sub-studies using primary survey data and validated scales, replicated these findings. Together, the studies advance theoretical understanding of experiential consumption by highlighting conformity as a need-driven process rooted in competence and relatedness, with implications for consumer motivation and social influence research.

Abstract

This research explores a dimension of experiential consumption that stems not from hedonic pursuit but from social conformity motives. Grounded in Self-Determination Theory (SDT), which identifies competence, relatedness, and autonomy as fundamental psychological needs, the current work contends that conformity in experiential contexts arises from the desire to feel effective (competence) and socially connected (relatedness), while the need for autonomy is relatively diminished. A two-study mixed-method design was implemented. Study 1 utilized secondary data from Airbnb virtual experiences to examine group-based activities conducive to conformity, revealing positive associations between conformity, competence, and relatedness, but not autonomy. Study 2, composed of three sub-studies using primary survey data and validated scales, replicated these findings. Together, the studies advance theoretical understanding of experiential consumption by highlighting conformity as a need-driven process rooted in competence and relatedness, with implications for consumer motivation and social influence research.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Zhang, Z. (2026). Social Conformity in Experiential Consumption: Evidence from Secondary Data and Scale Development. Journal of Travel and Tourism Research, Cilt: 28 Sayı: 28, 121–134. https://ajindex.com/articles/1169688

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (28)

  1. Ali, M. A., Ting, D. H., Ahmad-ur-Rahman, M., Ali, S., Shear, F., & Mazhar, M. (2021). The effect of online reviews and crowd cues on restaurant choice: The moderating role of gender and perceived crowding. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 780863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.780863
  2. Asch, S. E. (1955). Opinions and social pressure. Scientific American, 193(5), 31–35.
  3. Asch, S. E. (2016). Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In Organizational influence processes (pp. 295–303). Routledge.
  4. Bikhchandani, S., Hirshleifer, D., & Welch, I. (1992). A theory of fads, fashion, custom, and cultural change as informational cascades. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 992–1026.
  5. Burkhardt, H. A., Alexopoulos, G. S., Pullmann, M. D., Hull, T. D., Areán, P. A., & Cohen, T. (2021). Behavioral activation and depression symptomatology: Longitudinal assessment of linguistic indicators in text-based therapy sessions. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 23(7), e28244. https://doi.org/10.2196/28244
  6. Caprariello, P. A., & Reis, H. T. (2013). To do, to have, or to share? Valuing experiences over material possessions depends on the involvement of others. Journal of personality and social psychology, 104(2), 199.
  7. Carter, T. J., & Gilovich, T. (2012). I am what I do, not what I have: The differential centrality of experiential and material purchases to the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(6), 1304–1317.
  8. Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621.
  9. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). The general causality orientations scale: Self-determination in personality. Journal of Research in Personality, 19(2), 109–134.
  10. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
  11. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
  12. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629–636.
  13. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.
  14. Geiger, N., & Brick, C. (2023). Core social motives explain responses to collective action issues. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 17(3), e12732. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12732
  15. Guan, D., Wan, Y., Ma, Q., Zhang, R., & Zhang, F. (2023). The impact of popularity cues on consumer effort for making experiential purchases: A study within the context of hospitality services. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56, 8–17.
  16. Hirschman, E. C., & Holbrook, M. B. (1982). Hedonic consumption: Emerging concepts, methods and propositions. Journal of Marketing, 46(3), 92–101.
  17. Hu, L.-T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.
  18. Kumar, A., Mann, T. C., & Gilovich, T. (2024). The aptly buried “I” in experience: Experiential purchases promote more social connection than material purchases. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 37(2), e2376. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.2376
  19. Oliver, E. J., Markland, D., Hardy, J., & Petherick, C. M. (2008). The effects of autonomy-supportive versus controlling environments on self-talk. Motivation and Emotion, 32(3), 200–212.
  20. Pennebaker, J. W., Chung, C. K., Ireland, M., Gonzales, A., & Booth, R. J. (2007). The development and psychometric properties of LIWC2007. LIWC.net.
  21. Ponizovskiy, V., Ardag, M., Grigoryan, L., Boyd, R., Dobewall, H., & Holtz, P. (2020). Development and validation of the Personal Value Dictionary: A theory-driven tool for investigating references to basic human values in text. European Journal of Personality. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2294
  22. Pressman, S. D., & Cohen, S. (2007). Use of social words in autobiographies and longevity. Psychosomatic Medicine, 69(3), 262–269.
  23. Ryan, R. M. (1995). Psychological needs and the facilitation of integrative processes. Journal of Personality, 63(3), 397–427.
  24. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
  25. Van Boven, L., & Gilovich, T. (2003). To do or to have? That is the question. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1193–1202.
  26. Vlachopoulos, S. P., & Michailidou, S. (2006). Development and initial validation of a measure of autonomy, competence, and relatedness in exercise: The Basic Psychological Needs in Exercise Scale. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 10(3), 179–201.
  27. Zhang, Z. (2023). Validation of self-determination scale: An experiential consumption perspective. Journal of Business and Management, 28(2), 89–119.
  28. Zhang, Z., Jiménez, F. R., & Cicala, J. E. (2020). Fear of missing out scale: A self-concept perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 37(11), 1619–1634.