Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2

Cranial size and shape sexual dimorphism in the Kangal dog from Turkey

Sayfa
396–403
Yayın Tarihi
2020-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Although the sample was comparatively small in number, being the first geometric morphometric approach applied on the Kangal dog, the obtained results will add vital information particularly to understand the cranial shape sexual dimorphism of this unique dog breed in Turkey.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:This study has so far been the first attempt to characterize and quantify skull sexual variation in Kangal dog, by means of geometric morphometric techniques.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:A sample of 16 adult Kangal crania has been analyzed with this purpose.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Although the sample was comparatively small in number, being the first geometric morphometric approach applied on the Kangal dog, the obtained results will add vital information particularly to understand the cranial shape sexual dimorphism of this unique dog breed in Turkey.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Geometric morphometrics · sexual dimorphism · skull morphometry

Abstract

This study has so far been the first attempt to characterize and quantify skull sexual variation in Kangal dog, by means of geometric morphometric techniques. A sample of 16 adult Kangal crania has been analyzed with this purpose. To obtain a full image of morphological pattern, digital pictures were taken from the ventral, left lateral, and dorsal sides of each skull, and a total of 16, 15, and 16 landmarks respectively were obtained on each image. Skull size and shape differed significantly in all aspects among different sexes, male skulls being bigger. Shape differences were observed mainly on zygomatic arch and muzzle on the dorsal view, pterygoid bone and articular surface to mandibular condyle in the lateral aspect, and cranial width and maxillary bone on the ventral view. Although the sample was comparatively small in number, being the first geometric morphometric approach applied on the Kangal dog, the obtained results will add vital information particularly to understand the cranial shape sexual dimorphism of this unique dog breed in Turkey.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

PARÉS-CASANOVA, P. M., SIDDIQ, A. B., ONAR, V. (2020). Cranial size and shape sexual dimorphism in the Kangal dog from Turkey. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 2, 396–403. https://ajindex.com/articles/116814

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (4)

  1. Evans HE, de Lahunta A. Miller’s Anatomy of the Dog. China: Elsevier, 2013
  2. Thuller MAO, Jangarelli M, do Couto DM, Araújo AHB. Sexual dimorphism of labrador retriever dogs by morphometry. Bioscience Journal 2015; 31 (5): 1475-1487. doi: 10.14393/BJv31n5a2015-26496 3. Abdel-Rahman EH, Taylor PJ, Contrafatto G, Lamb JM, Bloomer P et al. Geometric craniometric analysis of sexual dimorphism and ontogenetic variation: A case study based on two geographically disparate species, Aethomys ineptus from southern Africa and Arvicanthis niloticus from Sudan (Rodentia: Muridae). Mammalian Biology 2009; 74 (5): 361- 373. doi: 10.1016/j.mambio.2008.06.002 4. Bidau CJ, Martinez PA. Sexual size dimorphism and Rensch’s rule in Canidae. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2016; 119 (4): 816-830. doi: 10.1111/bij.12848 5. Yazdi FT, Alhajeri BH. Sexual dimorphism, allometry, and interspecific variation in the cranial morphology of seven Meriones species (Gerbillinae, Rodentia). Hystrix, the Italian Journal of Mammalogy 2018; 29 (2): 162-167. doi: 10.4404/ hystrix-00018-2017 6. Brehm VH, Loeffler K, Komeyli H. Schädelformen beim Hund. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 1985; 14 (4): 324-331 (in German). doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.1985.tb00828.x 7. Onar V. A morphometric study on the skull of the German shepherd dog (Alsatian). Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 1999; 28 (4): 253-256. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0264.1999.00202.x 8. Onar V, Özcan S, Pazvant G. Skull typology of adult male Kangal dogs. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 2001; 30 (1): 41-48. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0264.2001.00292.x 9. Drake AG, Klingenberg CP. Large‐scale diversification of skull shape in domestic dogs: disparity and modularity. The American Naturalist 2010; 175 (3): 289-301. doi: 10.1086/650372 10. Onar V, Cakirlar C, Janeczek M, Kiziltan Z. Skull typology of Byzantine dogs from the Theodosius Harbour at Yenikapı, Istanbul. Anatomia, Histologia, Embryologia 2012; 41 (5): 341- 352. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0264.2012.01143.x 11. Andrews K, Lowe J, McCormick WD. Skull morphology of the domestic dog in relation to cephalic index. 69th AVTRW Annual Conference, London, UK: Royal Veterinary College; 2015
  3. Igado OO. Skull typology and morphometrics of the Nigerian local dog (Canis lupus familiaris). Nigerian Journal of Physiological Sciences 2017; 32 (2): 153-158
  4. Mitteroecker P, Gunz P. Advances in geometric morphometrics. Evolutionary Biology 2009; 36 (2): 235-247. doi: 10.1007/ s11692-009-9055-x 14. A