KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1

Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlıkları: Eğitim ve Mühendislik Fakültesi Öğrencileri Arasında Bir Karşılaştırma

Artificial Intelligence Literacy among University Students: A Comparison Between Students in the Faculties of Education and Engineering

Neslihan Köse(BARTIN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-4941-9331
Sayfa
184–203
Yayın Tarihi
2026-04-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bu sonuçlar, üniversite öğrencilerinin yapay zekâ bilgilerini ve becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik eğitim programlarının farklı lisans programlarında farklı ihtiyaçlara göre zenginleştirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:İçinde yaşadığımız yüzyılda yapay zekâ birçok alanda dönüştürücü bir güç haline gelmiş ve bu durum, kısa bir sürede yapay zekâ okuryazarlığını kritik bir beceri haline getirmiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Bu doğrultuda bu araştırmanın amacı, eğitim ve mühendislik fakültelerinde öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin yapay zekâ okuryazarlık düzeylerini belirlemek; yapay zekâ okuryazarlık düzeylerinin farklı değişkenlerine göre anlamlı olarak farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını tespit etmektir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bu sonuçlar, üniversite öğrencilerinin yapay zekâ bilgilerini ve becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik eğitim programlarının farklı lisans programlarında farklı ihtiyaçlara göre zenginleştirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2025 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı · Yükseköğretim · Karşılaştırmalı araştırma

Özet

İçinde yaşadığımız yüzyılda yapay zekâ birçok alanda dönüştürücü bir güç haline gelmiş ve bu durum, kısa bir sürede yapay zekâ okuryazarlığını kritik bir beceri haline getirmiştir. Bu doğrultuda bu araştırmanın amacı, eğitim ve mühendislik fakültelerinde öğrenim gören üniversite öğrencilerinin yapay zekâ okuryazarlık düzeylerini belirlemek; yapay zekâ okuryazarlık düzeylerinin farklı değişkenlerine göre anlamlı olarak farklılaşıp farklılaşmadığını tespit etmektir. Araştırma, nicel araştırma desenlerinden betimsel tarama modeli ile yürütülmüş; veriler 2025 yılı bahar döneminde 344 lisans öğrencisinden toplanmıştır. Araştırma sonuçları, öğrencilerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlık düzeylerinin orta seviyede olduğunu, cinsiyete göre bakıldığında genel yapay zekâ okuryazarlık düzeylerinin ve teknik anlama boyutundaki okuryazarlık düzeylerinin kadın ve erkek öğrenciler arasında erkek öğrenciler lehine anlamlı olarak farklılaştığını, mühendislik fakültesi öğrencilerinin puanlarının teknik anlama boyutunda eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerine göre anlamlı olarak daha yüksek olduğunu, sınıf düzeyinde ise herhangi bir farklılık olmadığını göstermiştir. Bu sonuçlar, üniversite öğrencilerinin yapay zekâ bilgilerini ve becerilerini geliştirmeye yönelik eğitim programlarının farklı lisans programlarında farklı ihtiyaçlara göre zenginleştirilmesi gerektiğini göstermektedir.

Abstract

In today’s world, artificial intelligence has emerged as a transformative factor across numerous areas, thereby making artificial intelligence literacy a critical competency within a remarkably short period of time. Accordingly, the purpose of this study is to determine the artificial intelligence literacy levels of students studying at the faculties of education and engineering and to examine whether these levels differ by various demographic variables. The research was designed as quantitative research with a descriptive survey model and data were collected from 344 undergraduate students during the spring semester of 2025. The results revealed that students’ artificial intelligence literacy levels were at a moderate level; male students had significantly higher scores in overall artificial intelligence literacy and in the technical understanding dimension compared to female students; and students from the faculty of engineering scored significantly higher in technical understanding than those from the faculty of education. No significant difference was found across grade levels. These findings suggest that curricula aimed at enhancing university students’ artificial intelligence-related knowledge and skills should be enriched based on the diverse needs of students enrolled in different undergraduate programs.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Köse, N. (2026). Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlıkları: Eğitim ve Mühendislik Fakültesi Öğrencileri Arasında Bir Karşılaştırma. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 1, 184–203. https://doi.org/10.37217/tebd.1782832

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (50)

  1. Alamäki, A., Nyberg, C., Kimberley, A., & Salonen, A. O. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy in sustainable development: A learning experiment in higher education. Frontiers in Education, 9, 1343406. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2024.1343406
  2. Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Lee, H. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy conceptualization, constructs, and implementation and assessment efforts (2019–2023). Computers and Education Open, 6, 100173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100173
  3. Al-Zahrani, A. M. & Alasmari, T. (2024). Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education: The dynamics of ethical, social, and educational implications. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-024-03432-4
  4. Biagini, G. (2025). Towards an AI-literate future: A systematic literature review exploring education, ethics, and applications. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 35, 2616-2666. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00466-w
  5. Brown, R., Sillence, E., & Branley-Bell, D. (2025). AcademAI: Investigating AI usage, attitudes, and literacy in higher education and research. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 54(1), 6-33. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395251347304
  6. Bui, T. T., Do, S. H., & Dinh, L. D. (2025). Skills and AI literacy of engineering students. IFLA Journal, 51(3), 615-628. https://doi.org/10.1177/03400352241310495
  7. Capinding, A. T. & Dumayas, F. T. (2024). Transformative pedagogy in the digital age: unraveling the impact of artificial intelligence on higher education students. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 82(5), 630-657. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/24.82.630
  8. Cerný, M. (2024). University students’ conceptualisation of AI literacy: Theory and empirical evidence. Social Sciences, 13(3), 129-155. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13030129
  9. Chee, H., Ahn, S., & Lee, J. (2024). A competency framework for aı literacy: Variations by different learner groups and an ımplied learning pathway. British Journal of Educational Technology, 56(5), 2146-2182. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13556
  10. Chiu, T. K. F., Ahmad, Z., Ismailov, M., & Sanusi, I. T. (2024). What are artificial intelligence literacy and competency? A comprehensive framework to support them. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100171
  11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. b.). Erlbaum.
  12. Costello, E., Brunton, J., Otrel-Cass, K., Lyngdorf, N. E. R., & Brown, M. (2024). Hacking Happier Futures: An AI-augmented student hackathon to address affective and ethical digital learning challenges. EDEN Yıllık Konferansı’nda sunulmuş tam metin bildiri, Haziran, University of Graz, Austria. https://local.forskningsportal.dk/local/dki-cgi/ws/cris-link?src=aau&id=aau-40fe5df2-680d-4e0a-8285-69066ff15b33 sayfasından erişilmiştir.
  13. Çelebi, C., Demir, U., & Karakuş, F. (2023). Examining studies on artificial ıntelligence literacy using the systematic review method. Journal of Necmettin Erbakan University Ereğli Faculty of Education, 5(2), 535-560. https://doi.org/ 10.51119/ereegf.2023.67
  14. Çelebi, C., Yılmaz, F., Demir, U., & Karakuş, F. (2023). Artificial intelligence literacy: An adaptation study. Instructional Technology and Lifelong Learning, 4(2), 291–306. https://doi.org/10.52911/itall.1401740
  15. Çetin, M., Karakuş, A., & Geçgel, Ş. (2024). Gelişen bir paradigma: Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı. International Journal of Active Learning, 8(1), 50-63. https://doi.org/10.48067/ijal.1422876
  16. Güler, A. & Polatgil, M. (2025). Bilişim alanında öğrenim gören öğrencilerin yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı düzeylerinin ölçülmesi. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(25), 30–53. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1549267
  17. Harari, Y. (2017). Reboot for the AI revolution. Nature, 550, 324–327. https://doi.org/10.1038/550324a
  18. Hazari, S. (2024). Justification and roadmap for artificial ıntelligence (AI) literacy courses in higher education. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 14(1), 106-118. https://doi.org/10.5590/jerap.2024.14.1.07
  19. Hornberger, M., Bewersdorff, A., Schiff, D. S., & Nerdel, C. (2025). A multinational assessment of AI literacy among university students in Germany, the UK, and the US. Computers in Human Behavior: Artificial Humans, 4, 100132. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbah.2025.100132
  20. Kahraman, H., Akutay, S., Yüceler-Kaçmaz, H., & Taşci, S. (2025). Artificial ıntelligence literacy levels of perioperative nurses: The case of Türkiye. Nursing & Health Sciences, 27(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/nhs.70059
  21. Kaplan, R. & Meylani, R. (2025). Dimensions of artificial ıntelligence literacy: A qualitative synthesis of contemporary research literature. Journal of Computer and Education Research, 13(26), 790-825. https://doi.org/10.18009/jcer.1648380
  22. Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., Yılmaz, R., Üstün, A. B., & Keser, H. (2019). Examination of critical thinking standards and academic self-efficacy of teacher candidates as a predictor of metacognitive thinking skills through structural equation modelling. Journal of Theoretical Educational Sciences, 12(4), 1239-1256. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.467435
  23. Karaoğlan-Yılmaz, F. G., & Yılmaz, R. (2023). Yapay zekâ okuryazarlığı ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Bilgi ve İletişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 5(2), 172–190. https://doi.org/10.53694/bited.1376831
  24. Kasinidou, M., Kleanthoys, S., & Otterbacher, J. (2025). Cypriot teachers’ digital skills and attitudes towards AI. Discover Education, 4, 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-024-00390-6
  25. Kim, J., Yu, S., Detrick, R., & Li, N. (2024). Exploring students’ perspectives on Generative AI-assisted academic writing. Education and Information Technologies, 30, 1265-1300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-12878-7
  26. Kim, S. K., Kim, T. Y., & Kim, K. (2025). Development and effectiveness verification of AI education data sets based on constructivist learning principles for enhancing AI literacy. Scientific Reports, 15, 10725. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95802-4
  27. Köse, N., Şimşek, E., & Demir, M. C. (2025). Adaptation of Artificial Intelligence Attitude Scale (AIAS-4) into Turkish: A validity and reliability study. Current Psychology, 44, 8096–8105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-025-07418-6
  28. Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Schirch, J., & Raupach, T. (2022). Artificial intelligence literacy in higher and adult education: A scoping literature review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100101
  29. Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Haverkamp, N., & Raupach, T. (2023). Development of the “scale for the assessment of non-experts’ AI literacy”–An exploratory factor analysis. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 12, 100338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2023.100338
  30. Laupichler, M. C., Aster, A., Meyerheim, M., Raupach, T., & Mergen, M. (2024). Medical students’ AI literacy and attitudes towards AI: A cross-sectional two-center study using pre-validated assessment instruments. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 401. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05400-7
  31. Lintner, T. (2024). A systematic review of AI literacy scales. NPJ Science of Learning, 9, 50. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-024-00264-4
  32. Long, D. & Magerko, B. (2020). What is AI literacy? Competencies and design considerations. 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Konferansı’nda sunulmuş tam metin bildiri, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, United States. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376727
  33. Mah, C., Walker, H., Phalen, L., Levine, S., Beck, S. W., & Pittman, J. (2024). Beyond CheatBots: Examining tensions in teachers’ and students’ perceptions of cheating and learning with ChatGPT. Education Sciences, 14(5), 500. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050500
  34. Mansoor, H. M. H., Bawazir, A., Alsabri, M. A., Alharbi, A., & Okela, A. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence literacy among university students—a comparative transnational survey. Frontiers in Communication, 9, 1478476. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2024.1478476
  35. Moosa, D., Bozkurt, V., Reesha, A., & Shina, A. (2025). The effects of artificial ıntelligence (AI) literacy and use on students’ perceptions of academic performance in the Maldives. Bilgi Ekonomisi ve Yönetimi Dergisi, 19(2), 163–174.
  36. Mouta, A., Llorente, A. M. P., & Sánchez, E. M. T. (2023). Uncovering blind spots in education ethics: ınsights from a systematic literature review on artificial ıntelligence in education. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 34, 1166–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-023-00384-9
  37. Møgelvang, A., Bjelland, C., Grassini, S., & Ludvigsen, K. (2024). Gender differences in the use of generative artificial intelligence chatbots in higher education: Characteristics and consequences. Education Sciences, 14(12), 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14121363
  38. Ng, D. T. K., Leung, J. K. L., Chu, S. K. W., & Qiao, M. S. (2021). Conceptualizing AI literacy: An exploratory review. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100041. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100041
  39. Nyaaba, M., Kyeremeh, P., Majialuwe, E. K., Owusu-Fordjour, C., Asebiga, E., & A-ingkonge, B. (2024). Generative AI in academic research: A descriptive study on awareness, gender usage, and views among pre-service teachers. Journal of AI, 8(1), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.61969/jai.1400867
  40. OECD. (2025). Bridging the AI skills gap: Is training keeping up? OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/7600d16d-en
  41. Polatgil, M. & Güler, A. (2023). Yapay Zekâ Okuryazarlığı Ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması. Sosyal Bilimlerde Nicel Araştırmalar Dergisi, 3(2), 99-114.
  42. Russo, C. C., Romano, L., Clemente, D., Iacovone, L., Gladwin, T. E., & Panno, A. (2025). Gender differences in artificial intelligence: The role of artificial intelligence anxiety. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1559457. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1559457
  43. Salhab, R. (2024). AI literacy across curriculum design: Investigating college ınstructor’s perspectives. Online Learning, 28(2), 22-47. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4426
  44. Shi, J., Liu, W., & Hu, K. (2025). Exploring how aı literacy and self-regulated learning relate to student writing performance and well-being in generative aı-supported higher education. Behavioral Sciences, 15(5), 705. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs15050705
  45. Southworth, J., Migliaccio, K. W., Glover, J., Reed, D. M., McCarty, C., Brendemuhl, J. H., & Thomas, A. (2023). Developing a model for AI Across the curriculum: Transforming the higher education landscape via innovation in AI literacy. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 4, 100127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100127
  46. Stöhr, C., Ou, A. W., & Malmström, H. (2024). Perceptions and usage of AI chatbots among students in higher education across genders, academic levels and fields of study. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100259
  47. Toker-Gökçe, A., Topal, A. D., Geçer, A., & Eren, C. D. (2025). Investigating the level of artificial intelligence literacy of university students using decision trees. Education and Information Technologies, 30(5), 6765–6784. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-024-13081-4
  48. Torres-Guijarro, S. & Bengoechea, M. (2017). Gender differential in self-assessment: A fact neglected in higher education peer and self-assessment techniques. Higher Education Research & Development, 36(5), 1072–1084. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1264372
  49. Tzirides, A. O., Zapata, G. C., Kastania, N. P., Saini, A. K., Castro, V., Ismael, S. A., …, & Kalantzis, M. (2024). Combining human and artificial intelligence for enhanced AI literacy in higher education. Computers and Education Open, 6, 100184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2024.100184
  50. Yang, Y., Zhang, Y., Sun, D., He, W., & Wei, Y. (2025). Navigating the landscape of AI literacy education: insights from a decade of research (2014–2024). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 12(1), 374. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-025-04583-8