KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 17 Sayı: 67

TÜRKİYE’DE ARSA SPEKÜLASYONU VE KENTSEL RANT

LAND SPECULATION AND URBAN RENT IN TURKEY

Seçil Gül Meydan Yıldız0000-0001-9869-4159
Semih Halil Emür0000-0001-9869-4159
Sayfa
1222–1233
Yayın Tarihi
2018-07-20
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Anahtar Kelimeler: Rant, Kentsel Toprak, Kentsel Toprağın Özellikleri, Türkiye.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The content and impact of rent is increasingly seen as related with the historical period that shaped urban structure depending on the rent relations, changing of life requirements and the scientific and technological developments.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:As a natural result of urbanization and being urbanized, the specification of urban land and gainings to the owners are changing due to the increase of social, economic, political and spatial requirements.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Anahtar Kelimeler: Rant, Kentsel Toprak, Kentsel Toprağın Özellikleri, Türkiye.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Rant · Kentsel Toprak · Kentsel Toprağın Özellikleri

Özet

The content and impact of rent is increasingly seen as related with the historical period that shaped urban structure depending on the rent relations, changing of life requirements and the scientific and technological developments. The land speculation which is a result of private property is an important factor in the selection of land use decisions and defining the direction of urban development growth. As a natural result of urbanization and being urbanized, the specification of urban land and gainings to the owners are changing due to the increase of social, economic, political and spatial requirements. Attitudes and behaviors contrary to reconstruction (planning) decisions increase the land speculation. In this case, land can become a tool for the storage of wealth depending on the relative position of land in the urban area or being on the direction of urban development. In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between the urban, land and the rent in Turkey, and the role of land speculation that is influenced in this process is described. Anahtar Kelimeler: Rant, Kentsel Toprak, Kentsel Toprağın Özellikleri, Türkiye.

Abstract

The content and impact of rent is increasingly seen as related with the historical period that shaped urban structure depending on the rent relations, changing of life requirements and the scientific and technological developments. The land speculation which is a result of private property, is an important factor in the selection of land use decisions and defining the direction of urban development growth. As a natural result of urbanization and being urbanized, the specification of urban land and gainings to the owners are changing due to the increase of social, economic, political and spatial requirements. Attitudes and behaviors contrary to reconstruction (planning) decisions increase the land speculation. In this case, land can become a tool for the storage of wealth depending on the relative position of land in the urban area or being on the direction of urban development. In this study, it is aimed to determine the relationship between the city (urban), land and the rent in Turkey, and the role of land speculation that is influenced in this process is described.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yıldız, S. G. M., Emür, S. H. (2018). TÜRKİYE’DE ARSA SPEKÜLASYONU VE KENTSEL RANT. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 67, 1222–1233. https://doi.org/10.17755/esosder.395082

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Akın, E. (2008). “Rents and Reconciliation Planning: Local Government, Participation in Local Government”, Mimarlık Dosya Dergisi, 64: 50-53.Aktan, Coşkun C., (1993). “In politics Rent-Seeking”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, (December), 26 (4): 119-136.Alkan, A. (1991). “City, Urbanization and Family”, Türk Aile Ansiklopedisi, Türkiye Yazarlar Birliği Vakfı, Birim Basın-Yayın Organizasyon, Ankara, 3: 960-967.AnaBritannica Genel Kültür Ansiklopedisi, Volume: 16.AnaBritannica Genel Kültür Ansiklopedisi, Volume: 26.Campbell, Heather, Marsall, Robert (2000). “Moral Obligations, Planning And The Public İnterest: A Commentary On Current British Practice”, Environment And Planning, 27: 297-312.
  2. Dinler, Z. (2008). İktisada Giriş, 14. Edition,
  3. Ekin Publishing, Bursa.Eceral, T., Varol, Ç., Alkan, L. (2010). “Urban Land Valuation Process: The Case of Ankara, Mustafa Kemal Mahallesi”, pp. 307-325, Toprak Mülkiyeti Sempozyum Bildirileri, Memleket Publishing, Ankara.Ertürk, H. (1995). Urban Economics, 1.Edition,
  4. Bursa.Genel Ekonomi Ansiklopedisi (1998). Milliyet Publishing, 2: 950. Genel Türkçe Sözlük, Türk Dil Kurumu Publishing (2007).Harvey, D. (1996).
  5. Social Justice and the City, Translated: Mehmet Moralı, Metis Publishing, İstanbul.Kartal, S. Kemal. (1977). “Problems of Arising from the Urban Land of Private Property Rights”, Amme İdaresi Dergisi, (June), 10 (2):17-48.Keleş, R. (2014). 100 Questions on Urbanization, Housing and Slum In Turkey, Cem Publishing, 1. Edition, (February), İstanbul.Keleş, R. (2004).
  6. Policy of Urbanization, İmge Kitabevi,
  7. Ankara.Keleş, R., Mengi, A. (2014).
  8. Introduction to Construction Law, İmge Kitabevi, 2. Edition, (May), Ankara.Keleş, R. (1998).
  9. Urban Glossary, İmge Kitabevi,
  10. Ankara.Keleş, R., Geray, C., Emre, C., Mengi, A. (1999).
  11. Gaining Public Urban Land Rent, Öteki Publishing, Ankara.Kılınçaslan, İ. (2010).
  12. Urban Economics, Sectoral Development, Economic Geography, Applied Economics, Structural Analysis, Ninova Publishing, İstanbul.Marx, K. (1978).
  13. Capital, Çev. Alaattin Bilgi, Sol Publishing, Ankara.Meydan Larousse Büyük Lugat ve Ansiklopedi, 16: 487-492.Meydan, S. G., (2011). Kentsel Toprakta Değer Artış Süreci Kentleşme ve Kentsel Rant İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği, Erciyes Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Kayseri.Meydan, S. G., Emür, S. H. (2013). “Kentleşme ve Kentsel Rant İlişkisi: Kayseri Örneği”, Çağdaş Yerel Yönetimler Dergisi, 22 (4): 51-73.Müderrisoğlu, B. (2006). The Transformation of Urban Rent and Local Government, Marmara Universities, Institute of Social Sciences, Unpublished M.A Thesis, İstanbul.Tekeli, İ. (2009).
  14. Urban Land, Infrastructure and Services, Türk Tarih Vakfı Yurt Publishing, İstanbul.Turan, M. (2009). Urban Rent in Turkey, the State Property of Private Property, Tan Publishing.Yurtsever, H. (2010). “Taxation of Rent”, pp. 385-399, Toprak Mülkiyeti Sempozyum Bildirileri, Memleket Publishing, Ankara.