Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3

Effect of Osteopontin gene variants on milk production traits in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala

Sayfa
695–701
Yayın Tarihi
2020-06-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The OPN gene polymorphism g.8514C > T can be suggested for marker assisted selection MAS for future breeding programmes for dairy cattle only after extensive association studies.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Osteopontin gene OPN is located in the quantitative trait loci QTL for milk production traits in bovine chromosome 6.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:In the present study the impact of cytosine to thymine transition in the intron-4 of OPN gene g.8514C > T on milk production traits was analysed in the Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The OPN gene polymorphism g.8514C > T can be suggested for marker assisted selection MAS for future breeding programmes for dairy cattle only after extensive association studies.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Osteopontin gene · milk production traits · single nucleotide polymorphism

Abstract

Osteopontin gene OPN is located in the quantitative trait loci QTL for milk production traits in bovine chromosome 6. In the present study the impact of cytosine to thymine transition in the intron-4 of OPN gene g.8514C > T on milk production traits was analysed in the Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala. Genomic DNA was isolated and a fragment of 290 bp enclosing the polymorphic site was amplified and genotyped by restriction fragment length polymorphism RFLP using endonuclease, BSeN1. The genetic variants were distributed according to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium. The T allele was found to be the major one T/0.76, C/0.24 and the genotype frequencies were TT/0.60, CT/0.32, and CC/0.08. The amplicons of genotypes were sequenced by sangers dideoxy termination technique and confirmed the mutation. Association study using the General Linear Model-Analysis of Variance GLMANOVA considering marker, season of calving, parity and herd as fixed factors and dairy trait as dependent variable revealed that none of the yield traits 305 day milk yield, peak yield, fat yield, protein yield, solids not fat yield, lactose yield, daily milk yield or composition traits fat percent, protein percent, solids not fat percent and lactose percent of milk production analysed were significantly differed between CT and TT genotyped animals. The OPN gene polymorphism g.8514C > T can be suggested for marker assisted selection MAS for future breeding programmes for dairy cattle only after extensive association studies.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

LALI, F. A., ANILKUMAR, K., ARAVINDAKSHAN, T. (2020). Effect of Osteopontin gene variants on milk production traits in Holstein Friesian crossbred cattle of Kerala. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, Cilt: 44 - Sayı: 3, 695–701. https://ajindex.com/articles/115310

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 2001; 157: 1819-1829
  2. Blasco A, Toro MA. A short critical history of the application of genomics to animal breeding. Livestock Science 2014; 166: 4-9
  3. Dekkers JCM. Commercial application of marker- and geneassisted selection in livestock: Strategies and lessons. Journal of Animal Science 2004; 82: 313-328
  4. Schmid M, Bennewitz J. Invited review: Genome-wide association analysis for quantitative traits in livestock–a selective review of statistical models and experimental designs. Archives Animal Breeding 2017; 60: 335-346
  5. Olsen HG, Lien S, Gautier M, Nilsen H, Roseth A et al. Mapping of a milk production quantitative trait locus to a 420-kb region on bovine chromosome 6. Genetics 2005; 169: 275-283
  6. Sodek J, Ganss B, McKee MD. Osteopontin. Critical Reviews in Oral Biology and Medicine 2000; 11: 279-303
  7. Schack L, Lange A, Kelsen J, Agnholt J, Christensen B et al. Considerable variation in the concentration of osteopontin in human milk, bovine milk, and infant formulas. Journal of Dairy Science 2009; 92: 5378-5385
  8. Dudemaine PL, Thibault C, Alain K, Bissonnette N. Genetic variations in the SPP1 promoter affect gene expression and the level of osteopontin secretion into bovine milk. Animal Genetics 2014; 45: 629-640
  9. Bissonnette N. Short communication: Genetic effect of variations in the osteopontin gene (SPP1) with lactation persistency in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 2018; 101: 456-461
  10. Prokesch A, Smorlesi A, Perugini J, Manieri M, Ciarmela P et al. Molecular aspects of adipoepithelial trans-differentiation in mouse mammary gland. Stem Cells 2014; 32: 2756-2766
  11. Lali FA, Anilkumar K. Crossbreeding of cattle population in India. Journal of Indian Veterinary Association 2019; 17: 16- 24
  12. Lali FA, Bindu KA. Microsatellite BM1500 polymorphism and milk production traits in Vechur and crossbred cattle of Kerala. Veterinarski Arhiv 2011; 81: 35-42
  13. The International Committee for Animal Recording. The Global Standard for Livestock Data Procedure 2, Section 2 ICAR Guidelines for Computing Accumulated Lactation Yield. Rome, Italy: ICAR; 2020
  14. Joseph BA. Assessment and alleviation of environmental stress on productive performance of rabbits. PhD, Kerala Veterinary and Animal Sciences University, Pookode, India, 2011
  15. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual. 3rd ed. Ne