KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1

KRİZ GÜNDEMİNDE AB GÖÇ POLİTİKASININ YETKİLER, HEDEFLER VE ARAÇLAR İTİBARİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: SINIR YÖNETİMİ ÖRNEĞİ

EVALUATION OF EU MIGRATION POLICY WITH RESPECT TO COMPETENCES, GOALS AND INSTRUMENTS ON THE AGENDA OF CRISIS: THE CASE OF BORDER MANAGEMENT

Sevgi Çilingir(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ, İŞLETME FAKÜLTESİ, ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER BÖLÜMÜ)
Sayfa
19–49
Yayın Tarihi
2018-06-19
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Bağımsız ulusal politikalar izleme taleplerinin geçerliliğini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla, AB göç politikasının hedefleri ile hukuki, mali ve kurumsal araçları, hükümetlerarasılık ve ulusüstülük gerilimi bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:2015 göç krizi ile birlikte Avrupa Birliği (AB) bütünleşmesinin sorgulanmaya başlanması üzerine yürütülen bu çalışma, AB göç politikasını bütüncül olarak incelemektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Göç alanında Birlik yetkilerinin genişlemesine karşılık, kimi üye devletlerde AB şüpheciliği ve AB’den ayrılma veya onu dönüştürme talepleri öne çıkmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Bağımsız ulusal politikalar izleme taleplerinin geçerliliğini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla, AB göç politikasının hedefleri ile hukuki, mali ve kurumsal araçları, hükümetlerarasılık ve ulusüstülük gerilimi bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Göç Politikası · Göç Krizi · Ulus-üstülük

Özet

2015 göç krizi ile birlikte Avrupa Birliği (AB) bütünleşmesinin sorgulanmaya başlanması üzerine yürütülen bu çalışma, AB göç politikasını bütüncül olarak incelemektedir. Göç alanında Birlik yetkilerinin genişlemesine karşılık, kimi üye devletlerde AB şüpheciliği ve AB’den ayrılma veya onu dönüştürme talepleri öne çıkmıştır. Bağımsız ulusal politikalar izleme taleplerinin geçerliliğini ortaya çıkarmak amacıyla, AB göç politikasının hedefleri ile hukuki, mali ve kurumsal araçları, hükümetlerarasılık ve ulusüstülük gerilimi bağlamında değerlendirilmektedir.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Çilingir, S. (2018). KRİZ GÜNDEMİNDE AB GÖÇ POLİTİKASININ YETKİLER, HEDEFLER VE ARAÇLAR İTİBARİYLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: SINIR YÖNETİMİ ÖRNEĞİ. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 1, 19–49. https://doi.org/10.24889/ifede.334138

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (54)

  1. AFAD (2017). Suriyeli Sığınmacılara Yapılan Yardımlar (31 Temmuz 2017 İtibariyle). https://www.afad.gov.tr/upload/Node/2373/files/Suriyeli_Siginmacilara_Yapilan_Yardimlar+6.pdf (06.08.2017)
  2. Amnesty International (2017a). Europe: A Perfect Storm: The Failure of European Policies in the Central Mediterranean. EUR 03/6655/2017, 06.06.2017, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur03/6655/2017/en/ (06.08.2017)
  3. Amnesty International (2017b). Human Rights Risks of External Migration Policies. POL 30/6200/2017, 13.06.2017, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/pol30/6200/2017/en/ (06.08.2017)
  4. Amnesty International (2017c). Poland: EU Should Tackle Unsafe Returns to Belarus. Poland Blocks Asylum Seekers at Border in Defiance of European Court Rulings. EUR 37/6662/2017, 05.06.2017, https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/eur37/6662/2017/en/ (06.08.2017)
  5. Bale, T. (2008). Turning Around the Telescope: Centre-Right Parties and Immigration and Integration Policy in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(3), 315-330.
  6. Boswell, C. (2003). European Migration Policies in Flux: Changing Patterns of Inclusion and Exclusion. London: Blackwell Publishing.
  7. Boswell, C. (2007). Theorizing Migration Policy: Is There a Third Way?. International Migration Review, 41(1), 75-100.
  8. Brexit: Theresa May Prioritises Immigration Curbs over Single Market (2016). The Guardian, 02.10.2016, https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/02/brexit-theresa-may-prioritises-immigration-curbs-over-free-movement (06.08.2017)
  9. Council of the European Union (2009). The Stockholm Programme - An Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting the Citizens. 17024/09, Brussels, 02.12.2009.
  10. Council of the European Union (2014). 26/27 June Conclusions. EUCO 79/14, Brussels, 27.06.2014. http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2079%202014%20INIT#page=2 (06.08.2017)
  11. Council of the European Union (2016). Conclusions of The Council and the Representatives of the Governments of the Member States on the Integration of Third-Country Nationals Legally Residing in the EU. 15312/16, Brussels, 09.12.2016.
  12. De Bellis, M. (2017). A Radical Change is Needed to Failing EU Migration Policy, 22.06.2017, https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2017/06/a-radical-change-is-needed-to-failing-eu-migration-policy/ (06.08.2017)
  13. European Commission (2006a). Overviews of the European Union Activities: Justice, Freedom and Security. http://www.europa.eu.int/pol/justice/overview_en.htm (20.04.2006)
  14. European Commission (2006b). Towards a Common European Union Immigration Policy. http://www.europa.eu.int/comm/justice_home/fsj/immigration/fsj_immigration_intro_en.htm (20.04.2006)
  15. European Commission (2010). Delivering an Area of Freedom, Security and Justice for Europe's Citizens: Action Plan Implementing the Stockholm Programme. COM(2010) 171, Brussels, 20.04.2010.
  16. European Commission (2012). The EU Strategy towards the Eradication of Trafficking in Human Beings: 2012–2016. COM(2012) 286, Brussels, 19.6.2012.
  17. European Commission (2014). The Future EU Justice and Home Affairs Agendas: ¬ Questions and Answers. MEMO, Strasbourg, 11.03.2014. http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_MEMO-14-174_en.htm (06.08.2017)
  18. European Commission (2015a). A European Agenda on Migration. COM(2015) 240, Brussels, 13.05.2015.
  19. European Commission (2015b). Refugee Crisis: European Commission Takes Decisive Action. Strasbourg, 09.09.2015, http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-155596_en.htm (06.08.2017)
  20. European Commission (2017a). Asylum, Migration, Integration. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/financing/fundings/migration-asylum-borders (06.08.2017)
  21. European Commission (2017b). External Borders Fund. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/financing/fundings/migration-asylum-borders/external-borders-fund_en (06.08.2017)
  22. European Commission (2017c). Policies. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/what-we-do/policies_en (10.08.2017)
  23. European Commission (2017d). Relocation and Resettlement. 26.07.2017. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20170726_factsheet_relocation_and_resettlement_en.pdf (06.08.2017)
  24. European Commission (2017e). Security, Borders, Police. https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/financing/fundings/security-and-safeguarding-liberties (06.08.2017)
  25. European Commission Directorate-General for Research (2009). Moving Europe: EU Research on Migration and Policy Needs. EUR 23859 EN, Brussels.
  26. European Parliament (2017). Tampere European Council 15 And 16 October 1999 Presidency Conclusions. http://www.europarl.europa.eu/summits/tam_en.htm (06.08.2017)
  27. European Union (2014). The EU Justice and Home Affairs Agencies. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  28. Favell, A. (1998). Philosophies of Integration: Immigration and the Idea of Citizenship in France and Britain. London: Mac Millan.
  29. France Election: Macron Says EU Must Reform or Face 'Frexit' (2017). BBC News, 01.05.2017, http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-39766334 (06.08.2017)
  30. Frontex (2017). Origin. http://frontex.europa.eu/about-frontex/origin/ (06.08.2017)
  31. Geddes, A. (2003). The Politics of Migration and Immigration in Europe. London: Sage Publications.
  32. Guiraudon, V. (2000). European Integration and Migration Policy: Vertical Policy-Making as Venue Shopping. Journal of Common Market Studies, 38(2), 251-271.
  33. Guiraudon, V. (2003). The Constitution of a European Immigration Policy Domain: A Political Sociology Approach. Journal of European Public Policy, 10(3), 263-282.
  34. Hansen, R. (2011). Making Cooperation Work: Interests, Incentives, and Action. R. Hansen, J. Koehler ve J.Money (Ed.), Migration, Nation States, and International Cooperation (pp.14-30). London: Routledge.
  35. Hollifield, J.F. (2004). The Emerging Migration State. International Migration Review, 38(3), 885-912.
  36. Joppke, C. ve Morawska, E. (2002). Integrating Immigrants in Liberal Nation – States: Policies and Practices. C. Joppke ve E. Morawska (Ed.), Toward Assimilation and Citizenship: Immigrants in Liberal Nation-States (pp.1-36). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  37. Kastoryano, R. (2002). Negotiating Identities: States and Immigrants in France and Germany. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  38. Lahav, G. ve Messina, A.M. (2005). The Limits of a European Immigration Policy: Elite Opinion and Agendas within the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(4), 851–875.
  39. Lenart, J. (2012). ‘Fortress Europe’: Compliance of the Dublin II Regulation with the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Merkourios: Utrecht Journal of European and International Law, 28(75), 04-19.
  40. Macaristan Başbakanı Orban'dan Mülteci Referandumu Sonrası Zafer İlanı (2016). BBC Türkçe, 03.10.2016, http://www.bbc.com/turkce/haberler-dunya-37533504 (06.08.2017)
  41. McNamara, F. (2009). European Migration: The Impact of EU Member States’ Political and Social Concerns on Migration Law and Policy. Electronic Journal of Comparative Law, 13(3), https://www.ejcl.org/133/art133-7.pdf (06.08.2017)
  42. Migrant Crisis: Migration to Europe Explained in Seven Charts (2016). BBC News, 04.03.2016. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-34131911 (06.08.2017)
  43. Moravcsik, A. ve Schimmelfennig, F. (2009). Liberal Intergovernmentalism. Weiner, A. ve Diez, T. (Ed.), European Integration Theory (pp.67-87). (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  44. Niemann, A. ve Schmitter, P.C. (2009). Neofunctionalism. Weiner, A. ve Diez, T. (Ed.), European Integration Theory (pp.45-66). (2nd Edition). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  45. OECD (2017). Migration Policy Debates. No 13. https://www.oecd.org/els/mig/migration-policy-debates-13.pdf (06.08.2017)
  46. Papagianni G. (2006). Institutional and Policy Dynamics of EU Migration Law. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
  47. Polat, C. (2006). The Immigration Policy and Process of European Integration: Supranationalism versus Intergovernmentalism?. Ankara Review of European Studies, 6(1), 69-80.
  48. Rosamond, B. (2000). Theories of European Integration. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  49. Rutledge, D. ve Roble, A. (2010). The Infrastructure of Migration and the Migration Regime: Human Rights, Race, and the Somali Struggle to Flee Violence. Race/Ethnicity: Multidisciplinary Global Contexts, 3(2), 153-178.
  50. Sasse, G. (2005). Securitization or Securing Rights? Exploring the Conceptual Foundations of Policies towards Minorities and Migrants in Europe. Journal of Common Market Studies, 43(4), 673-693.
  51. Schimmelfennig, F. (2017). European Integration (Theory) in Times of Crisis: Why the Euro Crisis Led to more Integration but the Migrant Crisis Did Not. EUSA, Miami, May 2017, https://www.eustudies.org/conference/papers/download/299 (06.08.2017)
  52. Völkel, J.C. (2017). When Interior Ministers Play Diplomats: Fatal Ambiguities in Europe’s Securitised Migration Policy. A. Jünemann, N. Fromm ve N. Scherer (Ed.), Fortress Europe? Challenges and Failures of Migration and Asylum Policies (pp.83-104). Wiesbaden: Springer VS.
  53. Weiner, M. (1996). Ethics, National Sovereignty and the Control of Immigration. International Migration Review, 30(1), 171-197.
  54. Zalan, E. (2017). EU Reinforces 2017 Budget on Migration and Jobs. EU Observer, 17.11.2016, https://euobserver.com/institutional/135937 (06.08.2017)