KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 35

İNCEL OLGUSUNA DAİR PSİKOLOJİK ARAŞTIRMA VE YAKLAŞIMLAR

PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH AND THEORETICAL APPROACHES TO THE INCEL PHENOMENON

Emir Üzümçeker(DOKUZ EYLÜL ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0969-9770
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-03-11
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Mevcut literatürün sunduğu bulgu ve kuramsal yaklaşımlar tartışılarak kimi önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Kadınlara yönelik şiddet ve ayrımcılık dünyanın her yerinde önemli bir toplumsal sorundur.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:İnceller farklı ırk ve siyasi görüşlerden üyeler barındırmakla birlikte, genelde kadın düşmanı tutumlara sahiplerdir.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Mevcut literatürün sunduğu bulgu ve kuramsal yaklaşımlar tartışılarak kimi önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:incel · psikoloji · kadına yönelik şiddet

Özet

Kadınlara yönelik şiddet ve ayrımcılık dünyanın her yerinde önemli bir toplumsal sorundur. Inceller olarak adlandırılan gönülsüz bekar erkekler, son yıllarda internette yayınladıkları kadın karşıtı söylem ve faili oldukları terör olaylarıyla hem Türkiye’de hem dünyada gündeme gelmiştir. İnceller, manosphere olarak adlandırılan ve çeşitli internet forumları üzerinden organize olan, genellikle kadın karşıtı ideolojiye sahip olan gruplardan biridir. Bu yazıda incellere dair mevcut psikoloji literatürü özetlenmiştir. İncellere dair çalışmaların bir kısmı grubun demografik özelliklerine ve ideolojisine odaklanırken, kimileri incellerin psikolojik sağlığına, bir kısmı da incellerin grup yapısına ve kimlikle kurdukları bağa odaklanmışlardır. İnceller farklı ırk ve siyasi görüşlerden üyeler barındırmakla birlikte, genelde kadın düşmanı tutumlara sahiplerdir. Aynı zamanda grupta depresyon, kaygı, intihar eğilimi gibi psikolojik sorunlar oldukça yüksektir. Literatürde incel olgusunu açıklamayı hedefleyen evrimsel psikolojik, sosyal psikolojik ve psikopatolojik olmak üzere üç çeşit yaklaşım mevcuttur. Mevcut literatürün sunduğu bulgu ve kuramsal yaklaşımlar tartışılarak kimi önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Abstract

Violence and discrimination against women constitute an important social problem all over the world. In recent years, self-identified incels (self-identified involuntary celibate men) have gained public visibility both in Türkiye and globally due to their misogynistic discourse circulated online as well as their involvement in extremist and terror-related acts. Incels are a part of the so-called manosphere, a group organized through various internet forums, characterized by an anti-women ideology. This article provides an overview of the existing psychological literature on incels. Some of the studies on incels have focused on the demographic characteristics and ideology of the group, while others have examined on the psychological well-being of incels, group dynamics and identity construction processes. While incels include members from different races and political views, they generally have misogynistic attitudes. At the same time, psychological problems such as depression, anxiety, and suicidal tendencies are quite high in the group. In the literature, there are three types of approaches that aim to explain the phenomenon of incel: evolutionary psychological, social psychological and psychopathological. The findings and theoretical approaches in the existing literature are discussed, and several recommendations are proposed for future research and interventions.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Üzümçeker, E. (2026). İNCEL OLGUSUNA DAİR PSİKOLOJİK ARAŞTIRMA VE YAKLAŞIMLAR. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1589764

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (32)

  1. Aiolfi, I., Palena, N., Ó Ciardha, C. ve Caso, L. (2024). The incel phenomenon: A systematic scoping review. Current Psychology, 43(32), 26264-26278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-06236-6
  2. Bachaud, L. ve Johns, S. E. (2023). The use and misuse of evolutionary psychology in online manosphere communities: The case of female mating strategies. Evolutionary Human Sciences, 5. https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2023.22
  3. Baselice, K. A. (2023). Analyzing Incels through the lens of evolutionary psychology. Culture and Evolution. https://doi.org/10.1556/2055.2022.00016
  4. Burns, L. M. ve Boislard, M. A. (2024). “I’m Better Than This”: A Qualitative Analysis of the Turning Points Leading to Exiting Inceldom. Journal of Sex Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2024.2340110
  5. Carian, E. K., DiBranco, A. ve Kelly, M. (2023). Intervening in Problematic Research Approaches to Incel Violence. Men and Masculinities. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X231200825
  6. Cetin, I. (2015). Defining recent femicide in modern Turkey: Revolt killing. Journal of International Women’s Studies, 16(2), 346-360.
  7. Costello, W. ve Buss, D. M. (2023). Why isn’t there more incel violence? Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 9(3), 252-259.
  8. Costello, W., Daly, S. E., Sparks, B. ve Thomas, A. G. (2024). More than Misogyny: The Merit of a Mental Health Perspective in Incel Research. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/92fhr
  9. Costello, W., Rolon, V., Thomas, A. G. ve Schmitt, D. P. (2023). The Mating Psychology of Incels (Involuntary Celibates): Misfortunes, Misperceptions, and Misrepresentations. Journal of Sex Research, 61(7), 989-1000. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2248096
  10. Costello, W., Whittaker, J. ve Thomas, A. G. (2024, April 8). Predicting Harmful Attitudes and Beliefs Among Incels (Involuntary Celibates): How Potent is the Black-Pill?. https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/avhnf
  11. Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K. ve Lewis, R. (2004). Not an ordinary killer - Just an ordinary guy: When men murder an intimate woman partner. Violence Against Women, 10(6), 577-605. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801204265015
  12. Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K. ve Medina-Ariza, J. (2007). Lethal and Nonlethal Violence Against an Intimate Female Partner. Violence Against Women, 13(4), 329-353. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801207299204
  13. Ellenberg, M., Speckhard, A. ve Kruglanski, A. W. (2023). Beyond Violent Extremism: A 3N Perspective of Inceldom. Psychology of Men and Masculinity. https://doi.org/10.1037/men0000439
  14. Flood, M. ve Pease, B. (2009). Factors influencing attitudes to violence against women. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 10(2), 125-142. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334131
  15. Fontanesi, L., Marchetti, D., Cosi, G., Limoncin, E., Jannini, E. A., Verrocchio, M. C. ve Ciocca, G. (2024). What Does It Take to Make an Incel: The Role of Paranoid Thinking, Depression, Anxiety, and Attachment Patterns. Depression and Anxiety, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/5512878
  16. Furl, K. (2022). Denigrating Women, Venerating “Chad”: Ingroup and Outgroup Evaluations among Male Supremacists on Reddit. Social Psychology Quarterly, 85(3), 279-299. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725221090907
  17. Garcia-Moreno, C., Heise, L., Jansen, H. A., Ellsberg, M. ve Watts, C. (2005). Violence against women. Science, 310(5752), 1282-1283.
  18. Ging, D. (2019). Alphas, Betas, and Incels: Theorizing the Masculinities of the Manosphere. Men and Masculinities, 22(4), 638-657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X17706401
  19. Gosse, M., Halpin, M. ve Maguire, F. (2024). Stochastic Gender-Based Violence: How Incels Justify and Encourage Sexualized Violence Against Women. Violence Against Women. https://doi.org/10.1177/10778012241279816
  20. Gracia, E. (2014). Intimate partner violence against women and victim-blaming attitudes among Europeans. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 92(5), 380-381. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.13.131391
  21. Grunau, K., Bieselt, H. E., Gul, P. ve Kupfer, T. R. (2022). Unwanted celibacy is associated with misogynistic attitudes even after controlling for personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111860
  22. Matter, D., Schirmer, M., Grinberg, N. ve Pfeffer, J. (2024). Investigating the increase of violent speech in Incel communities with human-guided GPT-4 prompt iteration. Frontiers in Social Psychology, 2. https://doi.org/10.3389/frsps.2024.1383152
  23. Moskalenko, S., González, J. F.-G., Kates, N. ve Morton, J. (2022). Incel ideology, radicalization and mental health: A survey study. Journal of Intelligence, Conflict, and Warfare, 4(3), 1-28.
  24. Renström, E. A. (2024). Exploring the role of entitlement, social dominance orientation, right-wing authoritarianism, and the moderating role of being single on misogynistic attitudes. Nordic Psychology, 76(2), 250-266.
  25. Rouda, B. C. (2024). Towards a resentment-driven model of intergroup conflict: using the incel phenomenon to conceptualize resentment as the driving factor for ideologically motivated extremism. Behavioral Sciences of Terrorism and Political Aggression. https://doi.org/10.1080/19434472.2024.2370770
  26. Rousis, G. J., Martel, F. A., Bosson, J. K. ve Swann, W. B. (2023). Behind the Blackpill: Self-Verification and Identity Fusion Predict Endorsement of Violence Against Women Among Self-Identified Incels. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672231166481
  27. Sakallı-Uğurlu, N. ve Türkoğlu, B. (2019). "Erkek” Olmak ya da Olmamak: Sosyal Psikolojik Açıdan Erkeksilik/Erkeklik Çalışmaları. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 22(44). https://doi.org/10.31828/tpy1301996120190516m000014
  28. Sparks, B., Zidenberg, A. M. ve Olver, M. E. (2024). An Exploratory Study of Incels’ Dating App Experiences, Mental Health, and Relational Well-Being. Journal of Sex Research, 61(7), 1001-1012. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2023.2249775
  29. Tajfel, H. ve Turner, J. C. (1979). An Integrative Theory of Intergroup Conflict. W. G. Austin ve S. Worchel (Ed.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (ss. 33-47). Brooks Cole.
  30. Uzun, B. ve Tiryaki, S. (2024). The construction of hegemonic masculinity and misogyny by Turkish Incels on YouTube. Gender, Technology and Development, 28(3), 428-445.
  31. Whittaker, J., Costello, W. ve Thomas, A. G. (2024). Predicting Harm Among Incels (Involuntary Celibates): The Roles of Mental Health, Ideological Belief and Social Networking.
  32. Williams, D. J., Arntfield, M., Schaal, K. ve Vincent, J. (2021). Wanting sex and willing to kill: Examining demographic and cognitive characteristics of violent “involuntary celibates”. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 39(4), 386-401. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2512