KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 35

ETNOMATEMATİK ETKİNLİĞİ TASARLAMA SÜRECİNDE CHATGPT: MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ GÖRÜŞLERİ

CHATGPT IN THE ETHNOMATHEMATICS ACTIVITY DESIGN PROCESS: PRE-SERVICE MATHEMATICS TEACHERS’ PERSPECTIVES

Gülzade Karacı Yaşa(ZONGULDAK BÜLENT ECEVİT ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-3830-569X
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-06
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Araştırma bulguları, ChatGPT ile etkinlik tasarımında zaman tasarrufu ve yaratıcı fikir üretimi gibi avantajların yanı sıra bazı pedagojik ve teknik sınırlılıklar gibi zorlukları da ortaya koymaktadır.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Bu çalışma, öğretmen adaylarının deneyimleri doğrultusunda ChatGPT’nin etnomatematik etkinlik tasarımındaki etkinliğini incelemiştir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Araştırmada, öğretmen adaylarının ChatGPT ile etkinlik tasarlarken karşılaştıkları avantajlar ve zorluklar ele alınmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Araştırma bulguları, ChatGPT ile etkinlik tasarımında zaman tasarrufu ve yaratıcı fikir üretimi gibi avantajların yanı sıra bazı pedagojik ve teknik sınırlılıklar gibi zorlukları da ortaya koymaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:ChatGPT · Etkinlik tasarlama · Etnomatematik

Özet

Bu çalışma, öğretmen adaylarının deneyimleri doğrultusunda ChatGPT’nin etnomatematik etkinlik tasarımındaki etkinliğini incelemiştir. Araştırmada, öğretmen adaylarının ChatGPT ile etkinlik tasarlarken karşılaştıkları avantajlar ve zorluklar ele alınmıştır. Katılımcılar, bir devlet üniversitesinde ilköğretim matematik öğretmenliği programı dördüncü sınıfta öğrenim gören 37 öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Çalışmanın verileri, katılımcıların yapay zekâ araçları, etkinlik tasarım süreci ve etnomatematik konusundaki ön bilgilerini değerlendiren bir ön bilgi formu ile ChatGPT'nin etkinlik tasarımında kullanımına ilişkin düşüncelerini almayı amaçlayan bir görüş formu aracılığıyla toplanmıştır. Nitel veriler, katılımcıların her iki formda verdikleri yazılı yanıtların içerik analizi ile incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, tüm katılımcıların yapay zekâ araçlarına ve etkinlik tasarlama süreci hakkında yeterli bilgiye sahip oldukları fakat etnomatematik kavramına ilişkin ön bilgilerinin yeterli olmadığı görülmüştür. Araştırma bulguları, ChatGPT ile etkinlik tasarımında zaman tasarrufu ve yaratıcı fikir üretimi gibi avantajların yanı sıra bazı pedagojik ve teknik sınırlılıklar gibi zorlukları da ortaya koymaktadır. Bu sonuçlar, ChatGPT’nin öğretmenlerin bilgi ve becerilerinin yerine geçen bir sistem olarak değil, bir destek aracı olarak görülmesi gerektiğini vurgulamaktadır.

Abstract

This study explored the effectiveness of ChatGPT in designing ethnomathematics activities based on pre-service mathematics teachers’ experiences, considering the benefits and challenges faced by pre-service teachers during the ethnomathematics task design process using ChatGPT. The participants were 37 senior pre-service mathematics teachers enrolled in elementary mathematics teacher education program at a public university. Data were gathered using a pre-information form assessing participants' prior knowledge of artificial intelligence tools, the activity design process, and ethnomathematics concept, as well as an opinionform to elicit their views on using ChatGPT for task design. The qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis of the participants' written responses on both forms. The findings indicated that all participants had sufficient prior knowledge of artificial intelligence tools and the activity design process, whereas their prior knowledge of ethnomathematics was limited. The findings highlight the benefits of using ChatGPT in activity design process, such as time efficiency and creative idea generation, as well as the challenges, including some pedagogical and technical limitations. These results emphasize that ChatGPT should be seen as a supportive tool rather than as a substitute for teachers’ skills and knowledge.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yaşa, G. K. (2026). ETNOMATEMATİK ETKİNLİĞİ TASARLAMA SÜRECİNDE CHATGPT: MATEMATİK ÖĞRETMENİ ADAYLARININ GÖRÜŞLERİ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1695936

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (56)

  1. Ascher, M. (2005). Etnomatematik: Matematik dünyasına çok kültürlü bir bakış. (B. Ercan, Çev.), Okyanus Yayıncılık.
  2. Ascher, M. ve Ascher, R. (1986). Ethnomathematics. History of Science, 24, 125-144.
  3. Ball, D. L., Thames, M.H., & Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: What makes it special? Journal of Teacher Education, 59(5), 389–407. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108324554
  4. Bishop, J. M. (2021). Artificial intelligence is stupid and causal reasoning will not fix it. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 513474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.513474
  5. Breuss, M. (2023). Prompt engineering: A practical example. Retrieved from https://realpython.com/practical-promptengineering/
  6. Chen, L., Chen, P., & Lin, Z. (2020). Artificial intelligence in education: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 75264-75278. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2988510
  7. Cooper, G. (2023). Examining science education in ChatGPT: An exploratory study of generative artificial intelligence. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 32(3), 444-452.
  8. Creswell, J. W. (2013). Nitel araştırma yöntemleri. [Qualitative research methods]. M. Bütün & SB Demir, Trans.(Eds.). Siyasal Kitabevi.
  9. D’ Ambrosio, U. (1985). Ethnomathematics and its place in the history and pedagogy of mathematics. For the Learning of Mathematics, 5(1), 44–48.
  10. Dasari, D., Hendriyanto, A., Sahara, S., Suryadi, D., Muhaimin, L. H., Chao, T., & Fitriana, L. (2024, January). ChatGPT in didactical tetrahedron, does it make an exception? A case study in mathematics teaching and learning. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1295413). Frontiers.
  11. Demir, G. (2024). Pre-service Mathematics Teachers' Experiences of Preparing Lesson Plans in Accordance with the 5E Learning Model through ChatGPT [Master’s Thesis]. Eskişehir Osmangazi University.
  12. Drushlyak, M., Lukashova, T., Shamonia, V., & Semenikhina, O. (2025). ChatGPT-based simulation helps to develop the pre-service mathematics teachers’ critical thinking. International Journal of Instruction, 18(1), 153-172. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2025.1819a
  13. Ergene, Ö., Çaylan Ergene, B., & Yazıcı, E. (2020). Ethnomathematics activities: Reflections from the design and implementation process. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 11(2), 402-437. https://doi.org/10.16949/turkbilmat.688780
  14. Estrella, S., Zakaryan, D., Olfos, R., & Espinoza, G. (2020). How teachers learn to maintain the cognitive demand of tasks through lesson Study. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 23(3), 293-310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10857-018-09423-y
  15. Gay, J. ve Cole, M. (1967). The new mathematics and an old culture: A study of learning among the Kpelle in Liberia. Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
  16. George, N. R., & Oringanje, S. C. (2025). Artificial intelligence in the study of fractal patterns in ethnomathematics. FNAS Journal of Mathematics and Science Education, 7(2), 110–115. https://doi.org/10.63561/fnas-jmse.v7i2.1129
  17. Gerdes, P. (1994). On mathematics in the history of Sub-Saharan Africa. Historia Mathematica, 21, 345-376.
  18. Gerdes, P. (1995). Ethnomathematics and Education in Africa. University of Stockholm Institute of International Education.
  19. Halaweh, M. (2023). ChatGPT in education: Strategies for responsible implementation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 15(2), 421. https://doi.org/10.30935/ced-tech/13036
  20. Jacob, E. E., & Dike, J. W. (2023). Ethnomathematics and culturally responsive pedagogy in mathematics learning. Journal of Education in Developing Areas, 31(3), 380-389.
  21. Kasneci, E., Seßler, K., Küchemann, S., Bannert, M., Dementieva, D., Fischer, F., Kasneci, G. (2023). ChatGPT for good? On opportunities and challenges of large language models for education. Learning and Individual Differences, 103, Article 102274. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2023.102274
  22. Kelly, S. M. (2022). This AI chatbot is dominating social media with its frighteningly good essays. Retrieved from https://web.archive.org/web/20221210112243/https://www.cnn.com/2022/12/05/tech/chatgpt-trnd/index.html
  23. Korkmaz, N., & Tarım, K. (2025). Investigating the effects of prompt engineering in STEM activities designed with ChatGPT-4o. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 54(3), 1247-1298.
  24. Kurniawan, H., Kurniasih, N., Jumasa, M. H., & Smita, M. K. (2026). Enhancing mathematical critical thinking skills through the integration of ethnomathematics, augmented Reality, artificial Intelligence, and deep learning: A mixed-methods study. Jurnal Iqra': Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 11(1), 134-147.
  25. Küçük, A. (2013). Ethnomathematics in Anatolia (In Türkiye): Mathematical thoughts in multi- culturalism. Revista Latinoamericana de Etnomatemática, 7(1), 171-184.
  26. Kyeremeh, P., Kwadwo Awuah, F., & Clark Orey, D. (2025). Challenges regarding the integration of ethnomathematical perspectives into geometry teaching: The faculty reflection. Asian Journal for Mathematics Education, 4(3), 416-430. https://doi.org/10.1177/27527263251326330
  27. Liang, Y., Zou, D., Xie, H. & Wang, F. L. (2023). Exploring the potential of using ChatGPT in physics education. Smart Learning Environments, 10(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00273-7
  28. Mariyati, I., Darmawan, M. S., & Romeo, N. (2026). Strengthening prospective mathematics teachers’ geometry understanding through ethnomathematics integrated with generative artificial intelligence. Pasundan Journal of Mathematics Education: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 16(1), 12-24.
  29. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Sage.
  30. Ministry of National Education (2024). Türkiye Yüzyılı Maarif Modeli ortaokul matematik dersi (5, 6, 7 ve 8. sınıflar) öğretim programı. [Elementary mathematics curriculum for 5, 6, 7, and 8th grades].
  31. Mumu, J., Prahmana, R. C. I., & Tanujaya, B. (2026). Ethnomathematics in elementary education: A systematic review of pedagogical approaches, technological innovation, and global implementations. Jurnal Elemen, 12(2), 330-355. https://doi.org/10.29408/jel.v12i2.34695
  32. Murphy, K. P. (2022). Probabilistic machine learning: An introduction. MIT Press.
  33. Neuendorf, K. A. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. Sage.
  34. Nur, A. S., Waluya, S., Rochmad, R., & Wardono, W. (2020). Contextual learning with ethnomathematics in enhancing the problem solving based on thinking levels. Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education, 5(3), 331-344. https://doi.org/10.23917/jramathedu.v5i3.11679
  35. Patton, M. Q. (1990). How to use qualitative methods in evaluation. Sage.
  36. Pelton, T., & Pelton, L. F. (2023, March). Adapting ChatGPT to support teacher education in mathematics. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1662-1670). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  37. Pişkin Tunç, M. (2024). Examining pre-service mathematics teachers' purposes of using ChatGPT in lesson plan development. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 14(2), 391-406. https://doi.org/10.19126/suje.1476326
  38. Radmehr, F. (2023). Toward a theoretical framework for task design in mathematics education. Journal on Mathematics Education, 14(2), 189-204. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i2.
  39. Scharth, M. (2022). The ChatGPT chatbot is blowing people away with its writing skills. The University of Sydney. Retrieved from https://www.sydney.edu.au/news-opinion/news/2022/12/08/the-chatgpt-chatbot-is-blowing-people-away-with-its-writing-skil.html
  40. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
  41. Smith, M. S., & Stein, M. K. (1998). Reflections on practice: Selecting and creating mathematical tasks: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(5), 344–350. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41180423
  42. Stein, M. K., & Smith, M. S. (1998). Mathematical tasks as a framework for reflection: From research to practice. Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School, 3(4), 268-275. https://doi.org/10.5951/MTMS.3.4.0268
  43. Stein, M. K., Grover, B. W., & Henningsen, M. (1996). Building student capacity for mathematical thinking and reasoning: An analysis of mathematical tasks used in reform classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 455-488. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312033002455
  44. Stojanov, A. (2023). Learning with ChatGPT 3.5 as a more knowledgeable other: An autoethnographic study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 20(1), 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-023-00404-7
  45. Sunzuma, G., & Maharaj, A. (2019). Teacher-related challenges affecting the integration of ethnomathematics approaches into the teaching of geometry. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(9), em1744. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/108457
  46. Tapan-Broutin, M. S. (2023). Examination of questions asked by pre-service mathematics teachers in their initial experiences with ChatGPT. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Education, 36(2), 707–732. https://doi.org/10.19171/uefad.1299680
  47. Tlili, A., Shehata, B., Adarkwah, M. A., Bozkurt, A., Hickey, D. T., Huang, R., & Agyemang, B. (2023). What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education. Smart learning environments, 10(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-023-00237-x
  48. Trubić, M. Š., & Črnjarić, N. (2024). New challenges in maths teaching - exploring the potential of ChatGPT. In INTED2024 Proceedings (pp. 4110-4118). IATED.
  49. Yanar, A. N. & Ergene, Ö. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence in education: How pre-service mathematics teachers use ChatGPT for 5E lesson plan design. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 9(2), 158-176. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.202533163
  50. Yeşildere-İmre, S. (2020). Etkinlik tasarlama ilkeleri. Y. Dede, M. F. Doğan ve F. Aslan-Tutak (Ed.). Matematik eğitiminde etkinlikler ve uygulamaları içinde (s. 165-188). Pegem Akademi.
  51. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  52. Yin, R. K. (2017). Durum çalışması araştırması uygulamaları (İ. Günbayı, Çev.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık.
  53. Yin, R.K. (1994). Case study research: design and methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
  54. Zaslavsky, O. (2005). Seizing the opportunity to create uncertainty in learning mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 60, 297–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-005-0606-5
  55. Zhai, X. (2022). ChatGPT user experience: Implications for education. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4312418
  56. Zhang, K., & Aslan, A. B. (2021). AI technologies for education: Recent research & future directions. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 2, 100025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2021.100025