KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 35

TÜKETİCİ ETNOSENTRİZMİNİN YABANCI MARKA DİJİTAL TV PLATFORMU SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ

THE MODERATING ROLE OF CONSUMER INNOVATIVENESS IN THE EFFECT OF CONSUMER ETHNOCENTRISM ON PURCHASE INTENTION TOWARD FOREIGN-BRAND DIGITAL TV PLATFORMS

Ali Köroğlu(TOKAT GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ, TOKAT MESLEK YÜKSEKOKULU)0000-0003-4021-6300
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-05-18
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Dünyada geleneksel medyanın izlenme oranı gittikçe azalırken dijital TV platformlarına abone olanların sayısı her geçen gün artış göstermektedir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Dünyada geleneksel medyanın izlenme oranı gittikçe azalırken dijital TV platformlarına abone olanların sayısı her geçen gün artış göstermektedir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Küresel pazara hakim olan markaların yanı sıra yerel markalar da pazara girerek özellikle kendi ülkelerinde ciddi izlenme oranlarına ulaşmışlardır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Çalışmanın bulguları bölgede faaliyet gösteren veya gelecekte bu bölgeye girmeyi düşünen dijital TV platformları için önemli yönetimsel çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.
🔬Tür:Uygulamalı Anket & Alan Araştırması
📍Kapsam:450 katılımcı
⚙️Değişkenler:Tüketici Etnosentrizmi · Tüketici Yenilikçiliği · Satın Alma Niyeti

Özet

Dünyada geleneksel medyanın izlenme oranı gittikçe azalırken dijital TV platformlarına abone olanların sayısı her geçen gün artış göstermektedir. Küresel pazara hakim olan markaların yanı sıra yerel markalar da pazara girerek özellikle kendi ülkelerinde ciddi izlenme oranlarına ulaşmışlardır. Rekabetin her geçen gün arttığı bu pazarda yabancı markaların tutunabilmesi için tüketicilerin tutum, davranış ve niyetleri üzerinde etkili olan faktörleri bilmeleri gerekmektedir. Bu çalışmanın amacı tüketici yenilikçiliğinin tüketici etnosentrizmi ve yabancı marka dijital TV platformu satın alma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici rolünü incelemektir. Bu amaçla Tokat ilinde yaşayan 450 katılımcı üzerinde araştırma gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmada veri toplama aracı olarak anket formu kullanılmıştır. Araştırma kapsamında dijital TV platformu olarak over-the-top (OTT) medyasına yönelik satın alma niyeti araştırılmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda tüketici etnosentrizminin yabancı marka dijital TV platformu satın alma niyeti üzerinde negatif etkisi olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca tüketici yenilikçiliğinin tüketici etnosentrizmi ve yabancı marka dijital TV platformu satın alma niyeti arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici rolü bulunmaktadır. Katılımcıların yenilikçilik düzeyi arttıkça tüketici etnosentrizminin yabancı marka dijital TV platform satın alma niyeti üzerindeki negatif etkisi azalmaktadır. Çalışmanın bulguları bölgede faaliyet gösteren veya gelecekte bu bölgeye girmeyi düşünen dijital TV platformları için önemli yönetimsel çıkarımlar sunmaktadır.

Abstract

As traditional media viewership declines around the world, the number of subscribers to digital TV platforms has been steadily increasing. In addition to the brands that dominate the global market, local brands have also entered the market and achieved serious viewership, especially in their domestic markets. In order for foreign brands to succeed in this increasingly competitive market, they need to understand the factors that influence consumers' attitudes, behaviors and intentions. The purpose of this study is to examine the moderating role of consumer innovativeness in the relationship between consumer ethnocentrism and the purchase intention of a foreign brand digital TV platform. For this purpose, a research was conducted on 450 participants living in Tokat province. In the study, a questionnaire was used as a data collection tool. Within the scope of the research, the purchase intention towards over-the-top (OTT) media as a digital TV platform was investigated. As a result of the research, it was found that consumer ethnocentrism has a negative effect on purchase intention of foreign brand digital TV platform. In addition, consumer innovativeness plays a moderating role in the relationship between consumer ethnocentrism and purchase intention of foreign brand digital TV platform. As the level of innovativeness of the participants increases, the negative effect of consumer ethnocentrism on purchase intention of foreign brand digital TV platform decreases. The results of the study provide important managerial implications for digital TV platforms operating in the region or considering entering the region in the future.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Köroğlu, A. (2026). TÜKETİCİ ETNOSENTRİZMİNİN YABANCI MARKA DİJİTAL TV PLATFORMU SATIN ALMA NİYETİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİNDE TÜKETİCİ YENİLİKÇİLİĞİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ROLÜ. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 35. https://doi.org/10.35379/cusosbil.1642452

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (90)

  1. Akram, A., Merunka, D. & Akram, M. (2011). Perceived brand globalness in emerging markets and the moderating role of consumer ethnocentrism. International Journal of Emerging Markets, 6(4), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1108/17468801111170329
  2. Al Ganideh, S. F. & Awudu, I. (2021). Arab-Muslim Americans’ personality riddle and consumer ethnocen trism. Journal of Global Marketing, 34(2), 110–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2020.1817646
  3. Areiza-Padilla, J.A., Cervera-Taulet, A. & Manzi Puertas, M.A. (2020). Ethnocentrism at the coffee shop industry: A study of starbucks in developing countries. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 6(4), 164. doi: 10.3390/joitmc6040164.
  4. Aslan, A. (2025, February 14). Türkiye’de en çok izlenen platform belli oldu! Shift Delete.Net. https://shiftdelete.net/turkiye-en-cok-izlenen-platform-belli-oldu
  5. Avcı, İ. (2020). Yerli markalı otomobil satın alma niyetinde etnosentrizm, ülke imaji ve yenilikçiliğin etkisi: Türkiye’nin otomobili (TOGG) bağlamında bir araştırma. Bingöl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 10(20), 439-466. https://doi.org/10.29029/busbed.731882
  6. Aydoğan, S. (2019). Tüketici etnosentrizmi ve ülke menşei etkisinin yabancı markalı ürün satın alma niyeti üzerine etkisi. Beykoz Akademi Dergisi, 7(1), 89-122. https://doi.org/10.14514/BYK.m.26515393.2019.7/1.89-122
  7. Balabanis, G., & Diamantopoulos, A. (2004). Domestic country bias, country-of-origin effects, and consumer ethnocentrism: a multidimensional unfolding approach. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 80-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303257644
  8. Booth, K. (1979). Strategy and ethnocentrism. Croom-Helm.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2020). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı (27. Baskı). Pegem Akademi.
  10. Büyükuysal, M. Ç., & Öz, İ. İ. (2016). Çoklu doğrusal bağıntı varlığında en küçük karelere alternatif yaklaşım: ridge regresyon. Düzce Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, 6(2), 110-114.
  11. Dash, G., Sharma, K. & Yadav, N. (2023). The diffusion of mobile payments: Profiling the adopters and non-adopters, Roger's way. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 71, 103219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103219
  12. De Nisco, A., Mainolfi, G., Marino, V. & Napolitano, M. R. (2016). Effect of economic animosity on consumer ethnocentrism and product-country images. A binational study on the perception of Germany during the Euro crisis. European Management Journal, 34(1), 59-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.09.003
  13. Dewi, C.K., Mohaidin, Z. & Murshid, M.A. (2020). Determinants of online purchase intention: a PLS-SEM approach: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Asia Business Studies 14(3), 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1108/JABS-03-2019-0086
  14. Dobre, C., Dragomir, A. & Preda, G. (2009). Consumer innovativeness: A marketing approach. Management & Marketing, 4(2), 19-34.
  15. Dogan, M. & Yaprak, A. (2017) Self-construal and willingness to purchase foreign products: the mediating roles of consumer cosmopolitanism and ethnocentrism. M. Stieler (Ed.), Creating Marketing Magic and Innovative Future, Marketing Trends (pp. 1499-1511), Springer.
  16. Eryigit, C. (2020). Consumer innovativeness: A literature review. Marketing and Management of Innovations, 3, 106-119. http://doi.org/10.21272/mmi.2020.3-08
  17. Frimpong, K., Al-Shuridah, O., Wilson, A. & Sarpong, F. A. A. (2017). Effect of inherent innovativeness and consumer readiness on attitudes to mobile banking. Journal of Financial Services Market, 22, 187–201. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41264-017-0037-2
  18. Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
  19. George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 17.0 update (10th ed.), Pearson.
  20. Goldsmith, E. R. & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02726497
  21. Goldsmith, R. E. & Foxall, G. R. (2003). The measurement of innovativeness. L. V. Shavinina (Ed.), The International Handbook on Innovation (pp. 321-330). Pergamon.
  22. Gurhan-Canli, Z. & Maheswaran, D. (2000). Cultural variations in country of origin effects. Journal of Marketing Research, 37(3), 309-318. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.37.3.309.18778
  23. Gürbüz, S. & Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
  24. Habib, S., Hamadneh, N. N. & Hassan, A. (2022). The relationship between digital marketing, customer engagement, and purchase intention via OTT platforms. Journal of Mathematics, 2022(1), 5327626, https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5327626
  25. Hair, J. F., Sarstedt, M., Hopkins, L., & Kuppelwieser, V. G. (2014). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). European Business Review, 26(2), 106-121. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-10-2013-0128
  26. Handarkho, Y. D. & Harjoseputro, Y. (2019). Intention to adopt mobile payment in physical stores: Individual switching behavior perspective based on Push–Pull–Mooring (PPM) theory. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 33(2), 285–308. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEIM-06-2019-0179
  27. Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2th Edition). The Guilford Press.
  28. Henseler, J., Ringle C. M., Roldán, J. L., & Cepeda, G. (2015). Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on partial least squares path modeling. Universiteit Twente.
  29. Hirschman, E. C. (1980). Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity. Journal of Consumer Research, 7(3), 283-295. https://doi.org/10.1086/208816
  30. Hirschman, E. C. (1984). Experience seeking - A subjectivist perspective of consumption. Journal of Business Research, 12(1), 115-136. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(84)90042-0
  31. Hwang, J., Choe, J.Y., Choi, Y.G. & Kim, J.J. (2021). A comparative study on the motivated consumer innovativeness of drone food delivery services before and after the outbreak of COVID-19. Journal of Travel & Tourism Marketing, 38(4), 368-382. https://doi.org/10.1080/10548408.2021.1921671
  32. Hwang, J., Park, S. & Kim, I. (2020). Understanding motivated consumer innovativeness in the context of a robotic restaurant: the moderating role of product knowledge. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 44, 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2020.06.003
  33. IMDb. (2025 February 17). Leyla ile mecnun. https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1831164/
  34. Jalilvand, M. R., Samiei, N., & Mahdavinia, S. H. (2011). The effect of brand equity components on purchase intention. International Business and Management, 2(2), 149-158.
  35. Jackson, J. D., Mun, Y. Y. & Park, J. S. (2013). An empirical test of three mediation models for the relationship between personal innovativeness and user acceptance of technology. Information & Management, 50(4), 154-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2013.02.006
  36. Jaffe, E. D. & Nebenzahl, I. D. (2001). National image and competitive advantage: the theory and practice of country-of-origin. Copenhagen Business School Press.
  37. Kalaycı, Ş. (2018). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik değişkenleri. Asil Yayın Dağıtım.
  38. Karagöz, Y. (2019). SPSS-AMOS-META uygulamalı istatistiksel analizler (2. Baskı). Nobel.
  39. Kaynak, E. & Kara, A. (2001). An examination of the rela tionship among consumer lifestyles, ethnocentrism, knowledge structures, attitudes and behavioural tenden cies: A comparative study in two CIS states. International Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 455-482. https://doi.org/10.1080/02650487.2001.11104906
  40. Khraisat, S. A. & Karadas, G. (2024). Exploring cultural intelligence, brand globalness, and consumer ethnocentrism: unveiling purchase intentions in the fast food ındustry in Jordan. Journal of Global Marketing, 37(5), 379-396. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2024.2381222
  41. Klein, J. G. (2002). US versus them, or us versus everyone? Delineating consumer aversion to foreign goods. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(2), 345-63. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491020
  42. Klein, J. G., Ettenson, R., & Morris, M. D. (1998). The animosity model of foreign product purchase: An empirical test in the People's Republic of China. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224299806200108
  43. Koçyiğit Bayniş, İ. & Geçti, F. (2022). Yabancı ürün satın alma niyeti üzerinde tüketici etnosentrizmi ve tüketici zenosentrizminin etkisinin incelenmesi. Pazarlama ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15(3), 867-900.
  44. Köroğlu, A., & Avcı, İ. (2023). Investigation of consumers' purchase intentions to digital platforms in terms of demographic characteristics [Tam Metin]. Africa 2nd International Conference on New Horizons in Sciences, Cairo, Academy Global Publishing House, p. 422-433, https://www.africaconferences.org/_files/ugd/797a84_09d3f40855a74244a4bf9d98f09110d2.pdf
  45. Köroğlu, A. & Yıldız, S. (2022). Ülke imajının yabancı ürün satın alma istekliliği üzerindeki etkisinde tüketici etnosentrizmi ve ürün yargılarının rolü. The Journal of International Scientific Researches, 7(1), 57-74. https://doi.org/10.23834/isrjournal.995239
  46. Kwak, H., Jaju, A. & Larson, T. (2006). Consumer ethnocentrism offline and online: The mediating role of marketing efforts and personality traits in the United States, South Korea, and India. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 367-385. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070304270140
  47. Lang, M. (2020). Consumer acceptance of blending plant-based ingredients into traditional meat-based foods: evidence from the meat-mushroom blend. Food Quality and Preference, 79, 103758. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2019.103758.
  48. Lee, Y. L., Jung, M., Nathan, R. J. & Chung, J. E. (2020). Cross-national study on the perception of the Korean wave and cultural hybridity in Indonesia and Malaysia using discourse on social media. Sustainability, 12(15), 6072, https://doi.org/10.3390/su12156072
  49. Leicht, T., Chtourou, A., & Youssef, K. B. (2018). Consumer innovativeness and intentioned autonomous car adoption. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 29(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hitech.2018.04.001
  50. Li, G., Zhang, R. & Wang, C. (2015). The role of product originality, usefulness and motivated consumer innovativeness in new product adoption intentions. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32(2), 214-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12169
  51. Liu, C. & Hong, J. (2020). The effects of consumer cosmopolitanism and consumer ethnocentrism on cross-border E-commerce in China. Journal of International Trade and Commerce, 16(3), 43-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.16980/jitc.16.3.202006.43
  52. Makri, K., Schlegelmilch, B., Mai, R. & Dinhof, K. (2020). What we know about anti consumption: An attempt to nail jelly to the wall. Psychology & Marketing, 37(2), 177-215. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.21319
  53. Midgley, D. F. & Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229-242. https://doi.org/10.1086/208701
  54. Morton, C., Anable, J. & Nelson, J. D. (2016). Exploring consumer preferences towards electric vehicles: The influence of consumer innovativeness. Research in Transportation Business and Management, 18, 18-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2016.01.007
  55. Mutlu, H. M. & Mahli, M. (2023). Kahve zincir mağazalarında etnik kimlik algısı ve tüketici etnosentrizmin satın alma niyeti üzerine etkisi. Uluslararası Ticaret ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 47-54. https://doi.org/10.30711/utead.1395629
  56. Narang, R. (2016). Understanding purchase intention towards Chinese products: Role of ethnocentrism, animosity, status and self-esteem. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 32, 253-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2016.05.010
  57. Nguyen, N. H., Dao, T. K., Duong, T. T., Nguyen, T. T., Nguyen, V. K. & Dao, T. L. (2023). Role of consumer ethnocentrism on purchase intention toward foreign products: Evidence from data of Vietnamese consumers with Chinese products. Heliyon, 9(2), e13069, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e13069
  58. Nikou, S. (2019). Factors driving the adoption of smart home technology: An empirical assessment. Telematics and Informatics, 45, 101283, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2019.101283
  59. OGGUSTO (2024, February 14). BluTV’de izlemeniz gereken en iyi diziler. https://www.oggusto.com/lifestyle/film-ve-dizi-onerileri/blutvde-izlemeniz-gereken-en-iyi-diziler
  60. Olshavsky, R. W. & Granbois, D. H. (1979). Consumer decision making-fact or fiction? Journal of Consumer Research, 6(2), 93-100. https://doi.org/10.1086/208753
  61. Rawwas, M. Y., Rajendran, K. N. & Wuehrer, G. A. (1996). The influence of worldmindedness and nationalism on consumer evaluation of domestic and foreign products. International Marketing Review, 13(2), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339610115746
  62. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. The Free Press.
  63. Sekaran, U. (2003), Research methods for business: A skill building approach. John Wiley.
  64. Sharma, P. (2015). Consumer ethnocentrism: Reconceptualization and cross-cultural validation. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 381-389. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.42
  65. Sharma, S., Shimp, T. A. & Shin, J. (1995). Consumer ethnocentrism: A test of antecedents and moderators. Journal of The Academy of Marketing Science, 23(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070395231004
  66. Shimp, T. & Sharma, S. (1987). Consumer ethnocentrism: Construction and validation of the CETSCALE. Journal of Marketing Research, 24(3), 280-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378702400304
  67. Shoham, A. & Brenčič, M. M. (2003). Consumer ethnocentrism, attitudes, and purchase behavior: An Israeli study. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 15(4), 67-86. https://doi.org/10.1300/J046v15n04_04
  68. Siamagka, N. T. & Balabanis, G. (2015). Revisiting consumer ethnocentrism: review, reconceptualization, and empirical testing. Journal of International Marketing, 23(3), 66–86. https://doi.org/10.1509/jim.14.0085
  69. Slade, E. L., Dwivedi, Y. K., Piercy, N. C. & Williams, M. D. (2015). Modeling consumers' adoption intentions of remote mobile payments in the United Kingdom: Extending UTAUT with innovativeness, risk, and trust. Psychology & Marketing, 32(8), 860-873. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20823
  70. Stoll, J. (2025, 27 Kasım). Traditional and OTT pay TV penetration rate in Europe 2021-2027. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/1383172/pay-tv-penetration-europe/
  71. Stoll, J. (2025b, 27 Kasım). OTT TV and video revenue worldwide 2029, by source. Statista. https://www.statista.com/statistics/260179/over-the-top-revenue-worldwide/
  72. Sousa, A., Nobre, H. & Farhangmehr, M. (2018). The influence of consumer cosmopolitanism and ethnocentrism tendencies on the purchase and visit intentions towards a foreign country. International Journal of Digital Culture and Electronic Tourism, 2(3), 175-184. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJDCET.2018.090388
  73. Sun, Y., Gonzalez-Jimenez, H. & Wang, S. (2021). Examining the relationships between e-WOM, consumer ethnocentrism and brand equity. Journal of Business Research, 130, 564-573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.040
  74. Supphellen, M. & Rittenburg, T. L. (2001). Consumer ethnocentrism when foreign products are better. Psychology & Marketing, 18, 907-927. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.1035
  75. Şahin, F. & Söylemez, C. (2021). Güdülenmiş tüketici yenilikçiliğinin dijital medya platformlarının algılanan tüketici temelli marka değeri ve marka tutumu üzerine etkisi: Covid-19 döneminde Netflix üzerine bir inceleme. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 58, 301-331. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.854211
  76. Tavşancıl, E. (2002). Tutumların ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile veri analizi. Nobel Akademi Yayıncılık.
  77. Teng, W. (2020). Importance of corporate image for domestic brands moderated by consumer ethnocentrism. Journal of Product and Brand Management, 29(3), 257-272. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-09-2018-2020
  78. Vandecasteele, B. & Geuens, M. (2010). Motivated consumer innovativeness: Concept, measurement, and validation. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 27(4), 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2010.08.004
  79. Venkatraman, M. P. (1991). The impact of innovativeness and innovation type on adoption. Journal of Retailing, 67(1), 51-67.
  80. Venkatraman, M. P. & MacInnis, D. J. (1985). The epistemic and sensory exploratory behavior of hedonic and cognitive consumers. Advances in Consumer Research, 12, 102-107.
  81. Voss, K. E., Spangenberg, E. R. & Grohmann, B. (2003). Measuring the hedonic and utilitarian dimensions of consumer attitude. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(3), 310-320. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.40.3.310.19238
  82. Wall, M. & Heslop, L. (1986). Consumer attitudes toward Canadian-made versus imported products. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 14(2), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722154
  83. Wang, C. L. & Xiong Chen, Z. (2004). Consumer ethnocentrism and willingness to buy domestic products in a developing country setting: Testing moderating effects. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 21(6), 391-400. https://doi.org/10.1108/07363760410558663
  84. We Are Social (2024, February 14). Digital 2024: 5 billion social media users. https://wearesocial.com/uk/blog/2024/01/digital-2024-5-billion-social-media-users/
  85. Wilson, T. D., Lindsey, S., & Schooler, T. Y. (2000). A model of dual attitudes. Psychological Review, 107(1), 101-126. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.1.101
  86. Woo, J., Shin, J., Kim, H. & Moon, H. (2022). Which consumers are willing to pay for smart car healthcare services? A discrete choice experiment approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 69, 103084, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2022.103084
  87. Xie, Y., (2008). Consumer innovativeness and consumer acceptance of brand extensions. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 17(4), 235–243. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420810887581
  88. Zeren, D., Kara, A. & Arango Gil, A. (2020). Consumer ethnocentrism and willingness to buy foreign products in emerging markets: evidence from Turkey and Colombia. Latin American Business Review, 21(2), 145-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/10978526.2019.1697186
  89. Zhang, X., Wen, H. & Shao, X. (2024). Understanding consumers’ acceptance of edible food packaging: The role of consumer innovativeness. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 80, 103903, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103903
  90. Zhao, Z., Haikel-Elsabeh, M., Baudier, P., Renard, D. & Brem, A. (2024). Functional, hedonic, and social motivated consumer innovativeness as a driver of word-of-mouth in smart object early adoptions: an empirical examination in two product categories. International Journal of Technology Management, 95(1-2), 226-252. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2024.137028