Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2013 / Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1

Neurocognitive functioning in young high-risk offspring having a parent with bipolar I disorder

Sayfa
110–117
Yayın Tarihi
2013-01-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Divided attention, information processing, and working memory seem to be important in evaluating the cognitive pathology before the onset of affective psychopathology.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:To investigate attention, memory, verbal-linguistic ability, and executive functions in symptom-free young offspring having a parent with bipolar I disorder (BD1O) in comparison with healthy controls (CO).
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: Thirty symptom-free BD1O and 37 CO were recruited.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Divided attention, information processing, and working memory seem to be important in evaluating the cognitive pathology before the onset of affective psychopathology.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Key words: Bipolar I disorder · offspring · high-risk

Özet

To investigate attention, memory, verbal-linguistic ability, and executive functions in symptom-free young offspring having a parent with bipolar I disorder (BD1O) in comparison with healthy controls (CO). Materials and methods: Thirty symptom-free BD1O and 37 CO were recruited. The groups (both all participants and those >=11 years of age) were well-matched for age, sex, IQ, and years of education. The neurocognitive battery included the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning and Memory Test, Controlled Word Association Test, Digit Span Test, Trail Making Test, Auditory Consonant Trigram Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop Test, and Test of Variables of Attention. Results: The BD1O group demonstrated impairments in psychomotor speed, focused attention, verbal attention, phonemic verbal fluency, short-term memory, and learning functions and performed marginally worse in divided attention, information processing, and working memory. No group difference was found in sustained attention, executive functions, or alternating attention. Conclusion: Divided attention, information processing, and working memory seem to be important in evaluating the cognitive pathology before the onset of affective psychopathology.

Abstract

To investigate attention, memory, verbal-linguistic ability, and executive functions in symptom-free young offspring having a parent with bipolar I disorder (BD1O) in comparison with healthy controls (CO). Materials and methods: Thirty symptom-free BD1O and 37 CO were recruited. The groups (both all participants and those >=11 years of age) were well-matched for age, sex, IQ, and years of education. The neurocognitive battery included the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning and Memory Test, Controlled Word Association Test, Digit Span Test, Trail Making Test, Auditory Consonant Trigram Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Stroop Test, and Test of Variables of Attention. Results: The BD1O group demonstrated impairments in psychomotor speed, focused attention, verbal attention, phonemic verbal fluency, short-term memory, and learning functions and performed marginally worse in divided attention, information processing, and working memory. No group difference was found in sustained attention, executive functions, or alternating attention. Conclusion: Divided attention, information processing, and working memory seem to be important in evaluating the cognitive pathology before the onset of affective psychopathology.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

DEVECİ, E., OZAN, E., KIRPINAR, İ., ORAL, M., DALOĞLU, A. G., AYDIN, N., -, A. Ö. (2013). Neurocognitive functioning in young high-risk offspring having a parent with bipolar I disorder. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 43 - Sayı: 1, 110–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/114076

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Balanzá-Martínez V, Rubio C, Selva-Vera G, Martinez-Aran A, Sánchez-Moreno J, Salazar-Fraile J et al. Neurocognitive endophenotypes (endophenocognitypes) from studies of relatives of bipolar disorder subjects: a systematic review. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2008; 32: 1426–38.
  2. Szatmari P, Maziade M, Zwaigenbaum L, Mérette C, Roy MA, Joober R et al. Informative phenotypes for genetic studies of psychiatric disorders. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2007; 144B: 581–8.
  3. Gottesman II, Shields J. Genetic theorizing and schizophrenia. Br J Psychiatry 1973; 122: 15–30.
  4. Gottesman II, Gould TD. The endophenotype concept in psychiatry: etymology and strategic intentions. Am J Psychiatry 2003; 160: 636–45.
  5. Ozan E, Yıldırım S, Tatar A, Canpolat S, Yazıcı AB, Yüksel S et al. Sex- and diagnosis-related differences in nostril dominance may be associated with hemisphere dysfunction in affective disorders. Turk J Med Sci 2012; 42: 25–30.
  6. Murphy FC, Sahakian BJ, Rubinsztein JS, Michael A, Rogers RD, Robbins TW et al. Emotional bias and inhibitory control processes in mania and depression. Psychol Med 1999; 29: 1307–21.
  7. Rossi A, Arduini L, Daneluzzo E, Bustini M, Prosperini P, Stratta P. Cognitive function in euthymic bipolar patients, stabilized schizophrenic patients, and healthy controls. J Psychiatr Res 2000; 34: 333–9.
  8. Sigurdsson E, Fombonne E, Sayal K, Checkley S. Neurodevelopmental antecedents of early-onset bipolar affective disorder. Br J Psychiatry 1999; 174: 121–7.
  9. Yurgelun-Todd DA, Gruber SA, Kanayama G, Killgore WD, Baird AA, Young AD. fMRI during affect discrimination in bipolar affective disorder. Bipolar Disord 2000; 2: 237–48. Martínez-Arán A, Vieta E, Colom F, Torrent C, SánchezMoreno J, Reinares M et al. Cognitive impairment in euthymic bipolar patients: implications for clinical and functional outcome. Bipolar Disord 2004; 6: 224–32.
  10. Robinson LJ, Ferrier IN. Evolution of cognitive impairment in bipolar disorder: a systematic review of cross-sectional evidence. Bipolar Disord 2006; 8: 103–16. Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Balanzá-Martínez V, Sánchez-Moreno J, Martinez-Aran A, Salazar-Fraile J, Selva-Vera G et al. Neurocognitive and clinical predictors of functional outcome in patients with schizophrenia and bipolar I disorder at oneyear follow-up. J Affect Disord 2008; 109: 286–99.
  11. Savitz J, Solms M, Ramesar R. Neuropsychological dysfunction in bipolar affective disorder: a critical opinion. Bipolar Disord 2005; 7: 216–35.
  12. Cornblatt B, Obuchowski M. Update of high-r