Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2018 / Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6

Noninvasive treatment of intraperitoneal urinary system perforations with percutaneous placement of a peritoneal drainage catheter

Sayfa
1141–1146
Yayın Tarihi
2018-12-12
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: Our findings and experience may suggest that conservative management of intraperitoneal urinary system perforations occurring during endoscopic urologic surgery by percutaneous drainage catheter under close monitorization is feasible in carefully selected patients.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: : Intraperitoneal urinary system perforation is a rare but serious complication of endoscopic urologic surgery.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: Urinary system perforations had developed in 21 (0.8%) of 2603 patients undergoing endoscopic urologic surgery at our department in 2014-2016.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: Our findings and experience may suggest that conservative management of intraperitoneal urinary system perforations occurring during endoscopic urologic surgery by percutaneous drainage catheter under close monitorization is feasible in carefully selected patients.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2014-2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Urinary system perforation · peritoneal drainage catheter · peritofix

Abstract

Background/aim: : Intraperitoneal urinary system perforation is a rare but serious complication of endoscopic urologic surgery. Percutaneous placement of a peritoneal drainage catheter is already mainly used for diagnostic purposes. We present our experience with percutaneous drainage catheters for conservative management of intraperitoneal urinary system perforations occurring during endoscopic urologic surgery with close monitorization in selected cases. Materials and methods: Urinary system perforations had developed in 21 (0.8%) of 2603 patients undergoing endoscopic urologic surgery at our department in 2014-2016. The perforation was intraperitoneal in only 5 (0.19) of all the patients. A percutaneous peritoneal drainage catheter with the guidance of ultrasonography was placed in four of the patients. Results: Conservative management by draining excess fluid with a drainage catheter percutaneously placed under close monitorization was successful in four out of five patients with urinary system perforation occurring during endoscopic urologic surgery. The remaining patient was treated successfully with open laparotomy because of fulminant evidence of peritonitis. Conclusion: Our findings and experience may suggest that conservative management of intraperitoneal urinary system perforations occurring during endoscopic urologic surgery by percutaneous drainage catheter under close monitorization is feasible in carefully selected patients.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

AYDIN, M., ÖZKAN, A., ÇİLESİZ, N. C., HAZAR, A. İ., BALCI, M. B. C., YANARAL, F., ÖZDEMİR, E. (2018). Noninvasive treatment of intraperitoneal urinary system perforations with percutaneous placement of a peritoneal drainage catheter. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 48 - Sayı: 6, 1141–1146. https://ajindex.com/articles/113859

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (15)

  1. Collado A, Chéchile GE, Salvador J, Vicente J. Early complications of endoscopic treatment for superficial bladder tumors. J Urol 2000; 164: 1529-1532.
  2. Mydlo JH, Weinstein R, Shah S, Solliday M, Macchia RJ. Long- term consequences from bladder perforation and/or violation in the presence of transitional cell carcinoma: results of a small series and a review of the literature. J Urol 1999; 161: 1128-1132.
  3. Summerton DJ, Kitrey ND, Lumen N, Serafetinidis E, Djakovic N. EAU guidelines on iatrogenic trauma. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 628-639.
  4. Pansadoro A, Franco G, Laurenti C, Pansadoro V. Conservative treatment of intraperitoneal bladder perforation during transurethral resection of bladder tumor. Urology 2002; 60: 682-684.
  5. Manikandan R, Lynch N, Grills RJ. Percutaneous peritoneal drainage for intraperitoneal bladder perforations during transurethral resection of bladder tumors. J Endourol 2003; 17: 945-947.
  6. Johnson DB, Pearle MS. Complications of ureteroscopy. Urol Clin North Am 2004; 31: 157-171.
  7. Schimpf MO, Gottenger EE, Wagner JR. Universal ureteral stent placement at hysterectomy to identify ureteral injury: a decision analysis. BJOG 2008; 115: 1151-1158.
  8. Cordon BH, Fracchia JA, Armenakas NA. Iatrogenic nonendoscopic bladder injuries over 24 years: 127 cases at a single institution. Urology 2014; 84: 222-226.
  9. El Hayek OR, Coelho RF, Dall’oglio MF, Murta CB, Ribeiro Filho LA, Nunes RL, Chade D, Menezes M, Srougi M. Evaluation of the incidence of bladder perforation after transurethral bladder tumor resection in a residency setting. J Endourol 2009; 23: 1183-1186.
  10. Golan S, Baniel J, Lask D, Livne PM, Yossepowitch O. Transurethral resection of bladder tumour complicated by perforation requiring open surgical repair - clinical characteristics and oncological outcomes. BJU Int 2011; 107: 1065-1068.
  11. Deibert CM, Spencer BA. The association between operative repair of bladder injury and improved survival: results from the National Trauma Data Bank. J Urol 2011; 186: 151-155.
  12. Gomez RG, Ceballos L, Coburn M, Corriere JN Jr, Dixon CM, Lobel B, McAninch J. Consensus statement on bladder injuries. BJU Int 2004; 94: 27-32.
  13. Tonkin JB, Tisdale BE, Jordan GH. Assessment and initial management of urologic trauma. Med Clin North Am 2011; 95: 245-251.
  14. Wirth GJ, Peter R, Poletti PA, Iselin CE. Advances in the management of blunt traumatic bladder rupture: experience with 36 cases. BJU Int 2010; 106: 1344-1349.
  15. Skolarikos A, Chrisofos M, Ferakis N, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Deliveliotis