Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2015 / Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6

Paclitaxel-loaded niosomes for intravenous administration: pharmacokineticsand tissue distribution in rats

Sayfa
1403–1412
Yayın Tarihi
2015-12-04
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The findings of this study show that niosomal formulation might be a useful drug delivery system for intravenous administration of paclitaxel.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the pharmacokinetic behavior and tissue distribution of paclitaxel, delivered as commercial preparation Taxol or through Span 40 niosomes, after intravenous injection to rats.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: Paclitaxel-loaded Span 40 niosomes were prepared using the thin-film method.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The findings of this study show that niosomal formulation might be a useful drug delivery system for intravenous administration of paclitaxel.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Niosomes · Span 40 · paclitaxel

Özet

Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the pharmacokinetic behavior and tissue distribution of paclitaxel, delivered as commercial preparation Taxol or through Span 40 niosomes, after intravenous injection to rats. Materials and methods: Paclitaxel-loaded Span 40 niosomes were prepared using the thin-film method. An HPLC method was developed and validated for paclitaxel determination in rat plasma and tissues. Results: The area under the curve value of the niosome-recipient group (3.22 ± 0.255 μg h/mL) was significantly higher compared to that of the Taxol group (0.725 ± 0.163 μg h/mL). The mean residence time and the elimination half-life of paclitaxel were 1.66 ± 0.133 h and 1.15 ± 0.085 h for Taxol administration, respectively. The elimination half-life (7.63 ± 0.380 h) and the mean residence time (11.0 ± 0.6 h) of paclitaxel were significantly increased, and a pronounced delay was observed in general excretion of paclitaxel from plasma (0.0925 ± 0.00490 h-1) after niosomal administration. The spleen was the main tissue that accumulated paclitaxel from both niosomes and Taxol. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that niosomal formulation might be a useful drug delivery system for intravenous administration of paclitaxel.

Abstract

Background/aim: The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the pharmacokinetic behavior and tissue distribution of paclitaxel, delivered as commercial preparation Taxol or through Span 40 niosomes, after intravenous injection to rats. Materials and methods: Paclitaxel-loaded Span 40 niosomes were prepared using the thin-film method. An HPLC method was developed and validated for paclitaxel determination in rat plasma and tissues. Results: The area under the curve value of the niosome-recipient group (3.22 ± 0.255 μg h/mL) was significantly higher compared to that of the Taxol group (0.725 ± 0.163 μg h/mL). The mean residence time and the elimination half-life of paclitaxel were 1.66 ± 0.133 h and 1.15 ± 0.085 h for Taxol administration, respectively. The elimination half-life (7.63 ± 0.380 h) and the mean residence time (11.0 ± 0.6 h) of paclitaxel were significantly increased, and a pronounced delay was observed in general excretion of paclitaxel from plasma (0.0925 ± 0.00490 h-1) after niosomal administration. The spleen was the main tissue that accumulated paclitaxel from both niosomes and Taxol. Conclusion: The findings of this study show that niosomal formulation might be a useful drug delivery system for intravenous administration of paclitaxel.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

BAYINDIR, Z. S., BEŞİKCİ, A., YÜKSEL, N. (2015). Paclitaxel-loaded niosomes for intravenous administration: pharmacokineticsand tissue distribution in rats. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 45 - Sayı: 6, 1403–1412. https://ajindex.com/articles/113774

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (10)

  1. Katragadda U, Fan W, Wang Y, Teng Q, Tan C. Combined delivery of paclitaxel and tanespimycin via micellar nanocarriers: pharmacokinetics, efficacy and metabolomic analysis. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e58619. Jang SH, Wientjes MG, Au JLS. Enhancement of paclitaxel delivery to solid tumors by apoptosis-inducing pretreatment: effect of treatment schedule. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 2001; 296: 1035–1042.
  2. Gelderblom H, Verweij K, Nooter, K, Sparreboom A. Cremephor EL. The drawbacks and advantages of vehicle selection for drug formulation. Eur J Cancer 2001; 37: 1590– 1598. 4. Tuma RS. Improving paclitaxel delivery. Oncology Times 2003; 25: 51–52.
  3. Sezgin-Bayindir Z, Yuksel N. Characterization of niosomes prepared with various nonionic surfactants for paclitaxel oral delivery. J Pharm Sci 2010; 99: 2049–2060.
  4. Green MR, Manikhas GM, Orlov S, Afanasyev B, Makhson AM, Bhar P, Hawkins MJ. Abraxane®, a novel Cremophor®- free, albumin-bound particle form of paclitaxel for the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2006; 17: 1263–1268. 7. European Medicine Agency. Assessment Report for Abraxane. London, UK: EMEA; 2008.
  5. Zhang Z, Mei L, Feng SS. Paclitaxel drug delivery systems. Expert Opin Drug Deliv 2013; 10: 325–340. Kaudelka Š, Turánek J. Liposomal paclitaxel formulations. J Control Release 2012; 163: 322–334.
  6. Lim WT, Tan EH, Toh CK, Hee SW, Leong SS, Anq PC, Wong NS, Chowbay B. Phase I pharmacokinetic study of a weekly liposomal paclitaxel formulation (Genexol®-PM) in patients with solid tumors. Ann Oncol 2010; 21: 382–388. Yokoyama M. Clinical applications of polymeric micelle carrier systems in chemotherapy and image diagnosis of solid tumors. J Exp Clin Med 2011; 3: 151–158.
  7. Li C, Wallace S. Polymer-drug conjugates: recent development in clinical oncology. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2008; 60: 886–898.
  8. Xu W, Lim SJ, Lee MK. Cellular uptake and antitumour activity of paclitaxel incorporated into trilaurin-based solid lipid nanoparticles in ovarian cancer. J Microencapsul 2013; 30: 755–761.
  9. He H, Chen S, Zhou J, Dou Y, Song L, Che L, Zhou X, Chen X, Jia Y, Zhang J et al. Cyclodextrin-derived pH-responsive nanoparticles for delivery of paclitaxel. Biomaterials 2013; 34: S344–S358. Lu J, Huang Y, Zhao W, Marquez RT, Meng X, Li J, Gao X, Venkataramanan R, Wang Z, Li S. PEG-derivatized embelin as a nanomicellar carrier for delivery of paclitaxel to breast and prostate cancers. Biomaterials 2013; 34: 1591–1600.
  10. Wang F, Shen Y, Xu X, Lv L, Li Y, Liu J, Li M, Guo A, Guo S, Ji