KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 75

Exploring Counselor Candidates' Perspectives on Online and Face-to-face Supervision in Individual Counseling Practice: A Comparative Qualitative Study

Sema Yazıcı-kabadayı(RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF EDUCATION)0000-0002-5221-6829
Mehmet Avcı(RECEP TAYYİP ERDOĞAN ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0002-8298-8985
Fedai Kabadayı(RECEP TAYYIP ERDOGAN UNIVERSITY)0000-0003-2486-2337
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2024-12-30
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Sub-themes around the four themes were evaluated, and suggestions for the literature and researchers were provided.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The primary purpose of the present study was to explain the differences between online and face-to-face supervision and explore their benefits, challenges, and potential impact on supervisees' outcomes from counselor candidates' perspectives.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The study group comprised 24 participants, 20 females and 4 males, aged between 19 and 25.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Sub-themes around the four themes were evaluated, and suggestions for the literature and researchers were provided.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Online Supervision · Face-to-Face Supervision · Qualitative

Abstract

The primary purpose of the present study was to explain the differences between online and face-to-face supervision and explore their benefits, challenges, and potential impact on supervisees' outcomes from counselor candidates' perspectives. The present study used a phenomenological pattern and the qualitative research paradigm. The research participants were counselor candidates for a state university's guidance and psychological counseling program. The study group comprised 24 participants, 20 females and 4 males, aged between 19 and 25. The findings were grouped into four themes: counseling process, supervision process, challenges and limitations, and peer opinions. Sub-themes around the four themes were evaluated, and suggestions for the literature and researchers were provided.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yazıcı-kabadayı, S., Avcı, M., Kabadayı, F., *, S. Y. (2024). Exploring Counselor Candidates' Perspectives on Online and Face-to-face Supervision in Individual Counseling Practice: A Comparative Qualitative Study. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 14 Issue: 75. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1420194

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (55)

  1. Amanvermez, Y., Zeren, S. G., Erus, S. M., & Genç, A. B. (2020). Supervision and peer supervision in an online setting: Experiences of psychological counselors. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 20(86), 249-268.
  2. Aladağ, M. (2014). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminin farklı düzeylerinde bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulaması süpervizyonunda kritik olaylar. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 15(2), 428-475. https://doi.org/10.12984/eed.82217
  3. Atik, Z. E., Arıcı, F., & Ergene, T. (2014). Süpervizyon modelleri ve modellere ilişkin değerlendirmeler. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Journal, 5(42), 305-317.
  4. Bender, S., & Dykeman, C. (2016). Supervisees’ perceptions of effective supervision: A comparison of fully synchronous cybersupervision to traditional methods. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 34(4), 326-337. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228835.2016.1250026
  5. Bender, S., Rubel, D. J., & Dykeman, C. (2018). An interpretive phenomenological analysis of doctoral counselor education students’ experience of receiving cybersupervision. The Journal of Counselor Preparation and Supervision, 11(1). https://digitalcommons.sacredheart.edu/jcps/vol11/iss1/7/
  6. Bengtsen, S. S., & Jensen, G. S. (2015). Online supervision at the university-A comparative study of supervision on student assignments face-to-face and online. Tidsskriftet Læring og Medier (LOM), 8(13), 1-23.
  7. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2019). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (6th ed.). Pearson Education. Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education Inc.
  8. Bernhard, P. A., & Camins, J. S. (2021). Supervision from afar: Trainees’ perspectives on telesupervision. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 34(3-4), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515070.2020.1770697
  9. Butler, S. K., & Constantine, M. G. (2006). Web-based peer supervision, collective self-esteem, and case conceptualization ability in school counselor trainees. Professional School Counseling, 10(2), 146-152. https://doi.org/10.1177/2156759X0601000205
  10. Büyüköztürk, S., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, S., & Demirel, F. (2017). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  11. Carlisle, R. M., III. (2015). An examination of supervisory working alliance, supervisee demographics, and delivery methods in synchronous distance supervision. [Doctoral dissertation, Old Dominion University]. https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/chs_etds/36
  12. Chapman, R. A., Baker, S. B., Nassar‐McMillan, S. C., & Gerler, E. R., Jr. (2011). Cybersupervision: Further examination of synchronous and asynchronous modalities in counseling practicum supervision. Counselor Education and Supervision, 50(5), 298–313. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2011.tb01917.x
  13. Chen, E. C., & Bernstein, B. L. (2000). Relations of complementarity and supervisory issues to supervisory working alliance: A comparative analysis of two cases. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 47(4), 485–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.47.4.485
  14. Clark, A. T. (2004). An exploration of combined distance and direct supervision experiences. [Doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University]. https://www.proquest.com/dissertations-theses/exploration-combined-distance-direct-supervision/docview/305143702/se-2
  15. Coker, J. K., & Schooley, A. (2009). Investigating the effectiveness of clinical supervision in a CACREP accredited online counseling program. Paper presented at the 2009 ACES Conference, San Diego, CA.
  16. Creswell, J. W. (2017). Nitel araştırmacılar için 30 temel beceri (H. Özcan, Çev.), Ankara: Anı.
  17. Crockett, S., & Hays, D. G. (2015). The influence of supervisor multicultural competence on the supervisory working alliance, supervisee counseling self-efficacy, and supervisee satisfaction with supervision: A mediation model. Counselor Education & Supervision, 54, 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1002/ceas.12025
  18. De Beer, M., & Mason, R. B. (2009). Using a blended approach to facilitate postgraduate supervision. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 46(2), 213–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290902843984
  19. Deane, F. P., Gonsalvez, C., Blackman, R., Saffioti, D., & Andresen, R. (2015). Issues in the development of e‐supervision in professional psychology: A review. Australian Psychologist, 50(3), 241–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/ap.12107
  20. Dickens, A. D. H. (2009). Satisfaction of supervisory working alliance: Distance versus face-to-face (Publication No. 3400640) [Doctoral dissertation, Regent University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/205438001?pqorigsite=gscholar &fromopenview=true
  21. Eman, S. (2021). Shifting from face-to-face learning to zoom online teaching, research, and internship supervision in a technologically developing' female students' university in Pakistan: A psychology teacher's and students' perspective. Psychology Teaching Review, 27(1), 42–55.
  22. Erbaş, M. M., Koç, İ., & Esen, E. (2020). Psikolojik danışman adaylarının süpervizyon sürecine ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi: Manisa Celal Bayar Üniversitesi örneği. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, (53), 183-205. https://doi.org/10.21764/maeuefd.607215
  23. Frye, W. S., Feldman, M., Katzenstein, J., & Gardner, L. (2022). Modified training experiences for psychology interns and fellows during COVID-19: Use of telepsychology and telesupervision by child and adolescent training programs. Journal of Clinical Psychology in Medical Settings, 29(4), 840–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10880-021-09839-4
  24. Gainor, K. A., & Constantine, M. G. (2002). Multicultural group supervision: A comparison of in-person versus web-based formats. Professional School Counseling, 6(2), 104-111. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42732399
  25. Günlü, A., & Uz Baş, A. (2023). Pandemi döneminde bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulaması dersi deneyimi: Fenomenolojik bir araştırma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(4), 1211-1232. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.1075498
  26. Jordan, S. E., & Shearer, E. M. (2019). An exploration of supervision delivered via clinical video telehealth (CVT). Training and Education in Professional Psychology, 13(4), 323. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/tep0000245
  27. Koçyiğit-Özyiğit, M. (2022). Challenges and ethical issues in counseling supervision from faculty supervisors’ perspective. Participatory Educational Research, 9(5), 305–329. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.22.116.9.5
  28. Koçyiğit-Özyiğit, M., & Atik, Z. E. (2021). Covid-19 sürecinde psikolojik danışma ve süpervizyon:#evdekal deneyimi. Başkent University Journal of Education, 8(1), 253-274.
  29. Lahey, S. (2008). A quantitative examination of distance and traditional counselor education supervision modalities. [Doctoral dissertation, Regent University]. ProQuest. https://www.proquest.com/docview/304818701?pqorigsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true
  30. Lundgren-Resenterra, M., & Crosta, L. (2019). Beyond personal expectations: Research supervision framed as a collective Endeavour in online structured doctoral programmes. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 14, 703. https://doi.org/10.28945/4439
  31. Maples, M. F., & Han, S. (2008). Online counseling in the United States and South Korea: Implications for counseling college students of the millennial generation and the networked generation. Journal of Counseling & Development, 86(2), 178–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6678.2008.tb00495.x
  32. McAdams III, C. R., & Wyatt, K. L. (2010). The regulation of technology‐assisted distance counseling and supervision in the United States: An analysis of current extent, trends, and implications. Counselor Education and Supervision, 49(3), 179–192. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1556-6978.2010.tb00097.x
  33. Merriam, S. B. (2013). Nitel Araştırma (S. Turan, Çev.). Ankara: Nobel.
  34. Meydan, B., & Koçyiğit-Özyiğit, M. (2016). Süpervizyon ilişkisi: Psikolojik danışma süpervizyonunda kritik bir öğe. Ege Eğitim Dergisi, 17(1), 225–257. https://doi.org/10.12984/eed.74105
  35. Myers, J.E. & Smith, A.W. (1995). A national survey of on-campus clinical training in counselor education. Counselor Education and Supervision, 35(1), 70–81.
  36. Myrick, R. D., & Sabella, R. A. (1995). Cyberspace: New place for counselor supervision. Elementary School Guidance & Counseling, 30(1), 35–44. https://www.jstor.org/stable/42871190
  37. Özteke-Kozan, H. İ. (2018). Psikolojik danışman adaylarının danışma uygulamasına yönelik kaygıları: Nitel bir yaklaşım. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 9(16), 109-137. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.476077
  38. Pamukçu, B., Meydan, B., Koçyiğit-Özyiğit, M., Pehlivan, Y. & Akkaya, M. S. (2023). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminde süpervizör geri bildirimi. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi (AUJEF), 7(1), 202–226. https://doi.org/10.34056/aujef.1182374
  39. Peacock, S., Cowan, J., Irvine, L., & Williams, J. (2020). An exploration into the importance of a sense of belonging for online learners. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 21(2), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4539
  40. Pepper, N. G. (1996). Supervision: A positive learning experience or an anxiety provoking exercise? Australian Social Work, 49(3), 55–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03124079608415690
  41. Perry, C. W. (2012). Constructing professional identity in an online graduate clinical training program: Possibilities for online supervision. Journal of systemic Therapies, 31(3), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1521/jsyt.2012.31.3.53
  42. Ratcliffe, K., & Kaluzeviciute-Moreton, G. (2024). Telesupervision in counselling and psychotherapy: A systematic review of the literature. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 52(5), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.1080/03069885.2023.2264480
  43. Reese, R. J., Aldarondo, F., Anderson, C. R., Lee, S. J., Miller, T. W., & Burton, D. (2009). Telehealth in clinical supervision: A comparison of supervision formats. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 15(7), 356–361. https://doi.org/10.1258/jtt.2009.090401
  44. Rosenfield, L. (2012). Web-based supervisor training: Real relationships in cyberspace. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 82(2-3), 216–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/00377317.2012.693025
  45. Rousmaniere, T., Abbass, A., & Frederickson, J. (2014). New developments in technology‐assisted supervision and training: A practical overview. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 70(11), 1082–1093. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.22129
  46. Schmittel, E. M., Lettenberger-Klein, C., Oliver, T., Butterfras, R. F., & Adamson, D. W. (2023). Intentionality in academic telesupervision: A phenomenological study of faculty telesupervisors’ experiences. Contemporary Family Therapy, 45, 61–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-021-09601-w
  47. Sørlie, T., Gammon, D., Bergvik, S., & Sexton, H. (1999). Psychotherapy supervision face-to-face and by videoconferencing: A comparative study. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 15(4), 452–462. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1111/j.1752- 0118.1999.tb00475.x
  48. Tan, S. Y. (2009). Developing integration skills: The role of clinical supervision. Journal of Psychology and Theology, 37(1), 54-61. https://doi.org/10.1177/009164710903700106
  49. Tarlow, K. R., McCord, C. E., Nelon, J. L., & Bernhard, P. A. (2020). Comparing in-person supervision and telesupervision: A multiple baseline single-case study. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 30(2), 383–393. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/int0000210
  50. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance Association (2023). Bireyle psikolojik danışma uygulaması ve süpervizyonu: En iyi uygulamalar kılavuzu. Türk PDR Derneği Press. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NmfCISR9n66b0mUnDXRxKYoKpFPDP/view
  51. Twist, M. L., Hertlein, K. M., & Haider, A. (2016). Electronic communication in supervisory relationships: A mixed data survey. Contemporary Family Therapy, 38, 424–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-016-9391-9
  52. Woo, H., Bang, N. M., Lee, J., & Berghuis, K. (2020). A meta-analysis of the counseling literature on technology-assisted distance supervision. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 42, 424–438. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10447-020-09410-0
  53. Worthington, E. L. (1987). Changes in supervision as counselors and supervisors gain experience: A review. Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 18(3), 189–208. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0735-7028.18.3.189
  54. Yılmaz, O., Voltan Acar, N. (2015). Psikolojik danışman eğitiminde süpervizyonun önemi ve grupla psikolojik danışmadaki rolü. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), 342–356. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2015.15.1-5000128610
  55. Yüksel-Sahin, F. (2021). Psikolojik Danışmanların Covid-19’a, Yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi psikolojik danışma yapmaya, yüz yüze ve çevrimiçi eğitim almaya ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. IBAD Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi(9), 496-522. https://doi.org/10.21733/ibad.799721