KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi / 2026 / Volume: 16 Issue: 81

Relationships Between University Students' Social Media Usage, Attachment Styles, and Self-Concealment Levels

Kamer Asiye Yalçın(Mübeccel Çolakoğlu Ortaokulu)0009-0009-1325-0459
Gamze Ülker Tümlü(Anadolu Üniversitesi)0000-0001-6750-3831
Ergün Kara(Alanya Alaaddin Keykubat Üniversitesi)0000-0002-6129-6787
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-06-29
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Based on these findings, it is recommended that university counseling centers develop interventions focusing on transforming anxious-ambivalent attachment patterns into secure attachment to reduce self-concealment behaviors, and mental health practitioners should consider evaluating clients' use of fake social media accounts as a potential clinical indicator of underlying attachment insecurities.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The primary objective of this study was to examine the interrelationships between fake social media account usage, attachment styles, and self-concealment behaviors among university students.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:To achieve this, data were collected from 598 university students during the 2023-2024 academic years using a Personal Information Form, the Self-Concealment Scale, and the Three-Dimensional Attachment Style Scale.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Based on these findings, it is recommended that university counseling centers develop interventions focusing on transforming anxious-ambivalent attachment patterns into secure attachment to reduce self-concealment behaviors, and mental health practitioners should consider evaluating clients' use of fake social media accounts as a potential clinical indicator of underlying attachment insecurities.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2023-2024 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Social media use · fake account · self-concealment

Abstract

The primary objective of this study was to examine the interrelationships between fake social media account usage, attachment styles, and self-concealment behaviors among university students. To achieve this, data were collected from 598 university students during the 2023-2024 academic years using a Personal Information Form, the Self-Concealment Scale, and the Three-Dimensional Attachment Style Scale. Data were analyzed using correlation analysis, multiple linear regression, and independent sample t-tests. The results revealed that university students who use fake accounts possess significantly higher self-concealment scores compared to those who do not. Additionally, relationships were found between anxious-ambivalent and avoidant attachment styles in fake account use, with users showing higher anxious-ambivalent and avoidant attachment levels. While no significant gender differences were found in general self-concealment and anxious-ambivalent attachment levels, gender played a role in attachment styles regarding fake account use; specifically, women demonstrated higher secure attachment levels, whereas men showed higher avoidant attachment levels. Moreover, self-concealment demonstrated a positive relationship with avoidant and anxious-ambivalent attachment styles, and multiple linear regression analysis identified anxious-ambivalent attachment as the sole significant predictor of self-concealment behavior among individuals using fake accounts. Based on these findings, it is recommended that university counseling centers develop interventions focusing on transforming anxious-ambivalent attachment patterns into secure attachment to reduce self-concealment behaviors, and mental health practitioners should consider evaluating clients' use of fake social media accounts as a potential clinical indicator of underlying attachment insecurities.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Yalçın, K. A., Tümlü, G. Ü., Kara, E., *, K. A. Y. (2026). Relationships Between University Students' Social Media Usage, Attachment Styles, and Self-Concealment Levels. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi, Volume: 16 Issue: 81. https://doi.org/10.17066/tpdrd.1687154

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (58)

  1. Ainsworth, M. D. S., Blehar, M. C., Waters, E., & Wall, S. (1978). Patterns of attachment: A psychological study of the strange situation. Erlbaum.
  2. Aksoy, Ö. N. (2019). Social media usage habits Balıkesir example. Anadolu Akademi Social Sciences Journal, 2(1), 9–24.
  3. Altunbaş, F. & Kul, M. (2015). A research on university students' social media habits: A case study of Van Yüzüncü Yıl University. Academic Perspective: International Peer-Reviewed Journal of Social Sciences, 51, 414–423.
  4. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., Wainapel, G., & Fox, S. (2002). On the internet no one knows I’m an introvert: Extroversion, neuroticism, and internet interaction. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 5(2), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310275377050
  5. Bargh, J. A., McKenna, K. Y., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2002). Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-4560.00247
  6. Baştürk-Akca, E., Sayımer, İ., & Ergül, S. (2015). Middle school students' social media use and their cyberbullying experience: A case study from Ankara. Global Media Journal, 5(10), 71–86.
  7. Baz, F. Ç. (2018). Social media addiction: Study on university students. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 9(16), 276–295. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.470118
  8. Bozkur, B. & Gündoğdu, M. (2017). The relationship between shyness, self-concealing and social media attitudes in adolescents. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 14(37), 147-159.
  9. Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic İnternet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30(6), 625-648. https://doi.org/10.1177/00936502032578
  10. D’Arienzo, M. C., Boursier, V., & Griffiths, M. D. (2019). Addiction to social media and attachment styles: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, 17, 1094–1118. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11469-019-00082-5
  11. Demir, Ü. (2016). Using social media and family communication: A study on the high school students in Çanakkale. Journal of Selçuk Communication, 9(2), 27–50.
  12. Diren, F. & Kör, H. (2019). Investigation of cyber bullying behavior on university students: Sungurlu Vocational High School and Osmancık Ömer Derindere Vocational High School. International Journal of Social and Humanities Science Research, 6(40), 2057–2065. https://doi.org/10.26450/jshsr.1310
  13. Doğan, A. (2021). Digital identity presentation in the context of anonymous identity use in social media; Twitter example [Unpublished master thesis]. Kocaeli University.
  14. Doğan, U. & Çolak, T. S. (2016). Self-concealment, social network sites usage, social appearance anxiety, loneliness of high school students: A model testing. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4(6), 176–183. http://doi.org/10.11114/jets.v4i6.1420
  15. Düvenci, A. (2012). Investigation of social media effect on internet usage of network generations with social deviation approach [Unpublished master thesis]. Marmara University.
  16. Erdayı, G. S. (2019). Willingness level of psychological help seeking of adolescents who are studying for university entrance exam [Unpublished master thesis]. Gazi University.
  17. Erzen, E. (2016). Three dimensional attachment style scale. İnönü University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 17(3), 1–21.
  18. Fox, J. & Tokunaga, R. S. (2015). Romantic partner monitoring after breakups: Attachment, dependence, distress, and post-dissolution online surveillance. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 18(9), 491-498. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2015.0123
  19. Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
  20. George, D. & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 17.0 update (10th ed.). Pearson.
  21. Gil-Or, O., Levi-Belz, Y., & Turel, O. (2015). The “Facebook-self”: Characteristics and psychological predictors of false self-presentation on Facebook. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 126331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00099
  22. Göksel, A. G. (2018). The examination of using social media by sport science faculty students as a communication tool in terms of some variables. Spormetre, 16(1), 39–48. https://doi.org/10.1501/Sporm_0000000340
  23. Gölcü, A., Balcı, Ş., & Gölcü, A. A. (2019). Is there a connection between social media use and self-concealment and life satisfaction? Afyon Kocatepe University Journal of Social Sciences, 21(1), 173–190. https://doi.org/10.32709/akusosbil.511318
  24. Griffiths, M. (2005). A components model of addiction within a biopsychosocial framework. Journal of Substance Use, 10(4), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359
  25. Hong, F. Y., Huang, D. H., Lin, H. Y., & Chiu, S. L. (2014). Analysis of the psychological traits, Facebook usage, and Facebook addiction model. Telematics and Informatics, 31, 597–606. https://doi.org/10.1080/14659890500114359
  26. IBM Corp. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 25.0) [Computer software]. IBM Corp.
  27. İnsan ve Toplum Teknoloji Derneği. (2016). Research project on university students’ tendency to use fake accounts on social networks. http://docplayer.biz.tr/19310541-universite-ogrencilerinin-sosyal-aglarda-sahte- hesap-kullanim-egilimi-arastirma-projesi.html
  28. Jourard, S. M. (1971). Influence of an interviewer’s disclosure on the self-disclosing behavior of interviewees. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 18(6), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029197
  29. Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. (2007). Family, self, and human development across cultures, theory and applications (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  30. Karasar, N. (2016). Scientific research methods: Concepts, principles, and techniques (30th ed.). Nobel.
  31. Kelly, A. E. & Achter, S. A. (1995). Self-concealment and attitudes toward counseling in university students. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 42(1), 40-46. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.42.1.40
  32. Küçüktığlı, M. S. (2020). Internet and social media in coronavirus days. Journal Of Academic Social Science Studies, 13(81), 573-593. http://dx.doi.org/10.29228/JASSS.45881
  33. Larson, D. G. & Chastain, R. L. (1990). Self-concealment: Conceptualization, measurement, and health implications. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 9(4), 439–455. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.1990.9.4.439
  34. Larson, D. G., Chastain, R. L., Hoyt, W. T., & Ayzenberg, R. (2015). Self-concealment: Integrative review and working model. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 34(8), 705–774. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2015.34.8.705
  35. Magsamen-Conrad, K., Checton, M. G. & Venetis, M. K. (2013). Privacy and disclosure at work: The implications of self-concealment and anonymity. 2nd Annual International Conference on Journalism & Mass Communications (JMComm 2013), 118-123. https://doi.org/10.5176/2301-3710_JMComm13.51.
  36. Marino, C., Finos, L., Vieno, A., Lenzi, M., & Spada, M. M. (2017). Objective Facebook behavior: Differences between problematic and non-problematic users. Computers in Human Behavior, 73, 541–546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.04.015
  37. Marshall, T. C. (2012). Facebook surveillance of former romantic partners: Associations with post breakup recovery and personal growth. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 15(10), 521-526. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2012.0130
  38. McKenna, K. Y. A. & Bargh, J. A. (2000). Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the Internet for personality and social psychology. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4(1), 57–75.
  39. Mikulincer, M. & Shaver, P. R. (2003). The attachment behavioral system in adulthood: Activation, psychodynamics, and interpersonal processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 35, 53–152.
  40. Pantic, I. (2014). Online social networking and mental health. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 17(10), 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.00
  41. Pohan, S. & Lbs, M. A. H. (2022). Use of anonymous social media accounts as self-disclosure media for generation z on postmodernism. Bricolage. Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi, 8(2), 163-174. http://dx.doi.org/10.30813/bricolage.v8i2.3351
  42. Protalinski, E. (2014, January 29). Facebook passes 1.23 billion monthly active users, 945 million mobile users, and 757 million daily users. VentureBeat. https://venturebeat.com/social/facebook-passes-1-23-billion-monthly-active-users-945-million-mobile-users-and-757-million-daily-users/
  43. Rasco, D. & Warner, R. M. (2017). Relationship authenticity partially mediates the effects ofattachment. The Journal of Social Psychology, 157(4), 445–457. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2016.1229253
  44. Rice, L. & Markey, P. M. (2009). The role of extraversion and neuroticism in influencing anxiety following computer-mediated interactions. Personality and Individual Differences, 46(1), 35-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2008.08.022
  45. Suler, J. (2004). The online disinhibition effect. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(3), 321-326. https://doi.org/10.1089/10949310412912
  46. Tabachnick, B. & Fidell, L. (2013). Using multivariate statistics. (6th ed.). Pearson Education Ltd
  47. Terzi, Ş., Güngör, H. C., & Erdayı, G. S. (2010). Adaptation of the self-concealment scale: A validity and reliability study. Turkish Journal of Educational Sciences, 8(3), 645–660.
  48. Trub, L. (2017). A portrait of the self in the digital age: Attachment, splitting, and self-concealment in online and offline self-presentation. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 34(1), 78-86. https://doi.org/10.1037/pap0000123
  49. Tunçbilek, M. M. & Uz, A. (2019). An ethical analysis of university students’ social media posts. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 7(4), 1334-1360. https://doi.org/10.15295/bmij.v7i4.1178
  50. Türkoğlu, T. (2010). Digital culture. Beyaz.
  51. Uysal, A., Lin, H. L., & Knee, C. R. (2010). The role of need satisfaction in self-concealment and wellbeing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36 (2), 187-199. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672093545
  52. Vrij, A., Paterson, B., Nunkoosing, K., Soukara, S., & Oosterwegel, A. (2003). Perceived advantages and disadvantages of secrets disclosure. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 593-602. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0191-8869 (02)00221-0
  53. Vural, Z. B. A. & Bat, M. (2010). Social media as a new communication environment: A research on Ege University Faculty of Communication. Journal of Yaşar University, 20(5), 3348–3382.
  54. Wang, Y. C., Burke, M., & Kraut, R. E. (2016). Modeling self-disclosure in social networking sites. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (pp. 74–85). https://doi.org/10.1145/2818048.2819949
  55. We Are Social & Meltwater. (2025). Digital 2025: Global overview report. https://wearesocial.com/reports/digital-2025-global-overview-report.
  56. Yıldırım, N. & Varol, A. (2013). Security on social network: A case study done at Bitlis Eren and Fırat Universities. Journal of Computer Science and Engineering of the Turkish Informatics Foundation, 6(1).
  57. Yıldırım, O. & İdil, İ. (2020). Internet and social media use in the period of social isolation and voluntary quarantine which comes to the agenda due to the new coronavirus outbreak. Journal of Communication Theory and Research, 2020(52), 69-94. https://doi.org/10.47998/ikad.788255
  58. Yukawa, S., Tokuda, H., & Sato, J. (2007). Attachment style, self concealment, and interpersonal distance among Japanese undergraduates. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 104(3), 1255-1261. https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.104.4.1255-12