KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Alphanumeric Journal / 2026 / Volume: 14 Issue: 1

Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign

Mustafa Kaya(ANKARA MEDİPOL UNIVERSITY, FACULTY OF ECONOMICS AND SOCIAL SCIENCES, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS, DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT INFORMATION SYSTEMS)0000-0002-3054-3108
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-07-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Improved data sharing between departments, automation-driven process optimization, and financial management integration is expected to contribute to more effective management of institutional workflows.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The primary objective of this study is to analyze the impact of digital transformation on process management in universities and to propose process improvement strategies.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Within this scope, approximately 100 processes carried out in the Strategy Development, Student Affairs, and Information Technologies departments were examined, with specific processes analyzed in detail.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Improved data sharing between departments, automation-driven process optimization, and financial management integration is expected to contribute to more effective management of institutional workflows.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:BPMN · Digital Transformation · Enterprise Architecture

Abstract

The primary objective of this study is to analyze the impact of digital transformation on process management in universities and to propose process improvement strategies. Within this scope, approximately 100 processes carried out in the Strategy Development, Student Affairs, and Information Technologies departments were examined, with specific processes analyzed in detail. The study identified key challenges such as inefficiencies, administrative delays, and lack of financial integration. In the student registration process, while academic and administrative procedures are well-defined, financial components (such as tuition fees, scholarships, and payments) are insufficiently integrated. In the server request process, the absence of procurement, budget planning, and supply chain management may contribute to resource shortages and delays. In the budget distribution process, lengthy approval stages and the absence of strategic performance indicators (KPIs) make it difficult to align budget allocations with institutional goals. As part of the study, process improvement recommendations were developed. Threshold-based approval mechanisms, automated budget tracking systems, and financial process integration are proposed. The use of e-signature systems, electronic document management, and Robotic Process Automation (RPA) can help reduce administrative delays and accelerate processes. Quantitative analyses reveal differences in processes based on processing time, error rate, and efficiency scores. The IT department has a low error rate but a limited efficiency score. The Strategy Development department has a long processing time but a high efficiency score, whereas approval steps in Student Affairs slow down the processes. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that BPMN-based modeling, automation systems, and process integration can enable faster, more transparent, and strategically aligned decision-making mechanisms in universities. Improved data sharing between departments, automation-driven process optimization, and financial management integration is expected to contribute to more effective management of institutional workflows.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kaya, M. (2026). Digital transformation in public universities: BPMN-based process automation and enterprise architecture redesign. Alphanumeric Journal, Volume: 14 Issue: 1. https://doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.1660978

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (29)

  1. Ammirato, S., Cutrì, L., Felicetti, A. M., & Di Maio, F. (2024). Business process management and digital transition. The case study of an Italian Public University. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 18(4), 825–855. https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-04-2024-0087
  2. Ardito, C., Caivano, D., Colizzi, L., & Verardi, L. (2020). BPMN Extensions and Semantic Annotation in Public Administration Service Design. In Human-Centered Software Engineering (pp. 118–129). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64266-2_7
  3. Charalabidis, Y., Lachana, Z., Alexopoulos, C., & Loutsaris, M.-A. (2023). An algorithmic method for business process reengineering and service automation in the public sector. Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1145/3614321.3614336
  4. Dijkman, R. M., Dumas, M., & Ouyang, C. (2008). Semantics and analysis of business process models in BPMN. Information and Software Technology, 50(12), 1281–1294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2008.02.006
  5. Hindarto, D. (2023). Supporting University Management System Digital Transformation with Enterprise Architecture. Jurnal JTIK (Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi), 7(4), 696–706. https://doi.org/10.35870/jtik.v7i4.1830
  6. Iswahyudi, I., Hindarto, D., & Indrajit, R. E. (2023). Digital Transformation in University: Enterprise Architecture and Blockchain Technology. Sinkron, 8(4), 2501–2512. https://doi.org/10.33395/sinkron.v8i4.12977
  7. Josay, A. (2018). The TOGAF® standard, version 9.2: A pocket guide. Van Haren.
  8. Kane, G. C., Palmer, D., Phillips, A. N., Kiron, D., & Buckley, N. (2015). Strategy, not Technology, Drives Digital Transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review and Deloitte University Press. https://sloanreview.mit.edu/projects/strategy-drives-digital-transformation/
  9. Lamsin, C., & Tangkeko, M. (2023). Redesigning and Building a Business Process Architecture: The Case of De La Salle University's Digital Transformation Journey. 2023 IEEE 15th International Conference on Humanoid, Nanotechnology, Information Technology, Communication and Control, Environment, And Management (HNICEM), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1109/hnicem60674.2023.10589202
  10. Nalbantoğlu, C. B. (2021). Reflections of digital transformation on organizational culture. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey University Journal of Social and Economic Research, 23(40), 193–207.
  11. Oberhauser, R., & Pogolski, C. (2019). VR-EA: Virtual Reality Visualization of Enterprise Architecture Models with ArchiMate and BPMN. In Business Modeling and Software Design (pp. 170–187). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-24854-3_11
  12. Object Management Group. (2014). Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN), Version 2.0.2. https://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0.2/
  13. Perez Gama, J. A., Vega Vega, A., & Neira Aponte, M. (2018, ). University Digital Transformation Intelligent Architecture: A Dual Model, Methods and Applications. Proceedings of the 16th LACCEI International Multi-Conference for Engineering, Education, And Technology: ``innovation in Education and Inclusion''. https://doi.org/10.18687/laccei2018.1.1.274
  14. Polančič, G., & Orban, B. (2023). An experimental investigation of~BPMN-based corporate communications modeling. Business Process Management Journal, 29(8), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-08-2022-0362
  15. Recker, J. (2010). Opportunities and constraints: the current struggle with BPMN. Business Process Management Journal, 16(1), 181–201. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011018001
  16. Reijers, H. A., & Mendling, J. (2011). A Study Into the Factors That Influence the Understandability of Business Process Models. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, And Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans, 41(3), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1109/tsmca.2010.2087017
  17. Rogers, D. L. (2016). The Digital Transformation Playbook: Rethink Your Business for the Digital Age. Columbia University Press. https://doi.org/10.7312/roge17544
  18. Ross, J. W., Weill, P., & Robertson, D. (2006). Enterprise architecture as strategy: Creating a foundation for business execution. Harvard Business Press.
  19. Silver, B. (2009). BPMN Method and Style. Cody-Cassidy Press.
  20. Tamm, T., Seddon, P. B., Shanks, G., & Reynolds, P. (2011). How Does Enterprise Architecture Add Value to Organisations?. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 28. https://doi.org/10.17705/1cais.02810
  21. Tsakalidis, G., Vergidis, K., Kougka, G., & Gounaris, A. (2019). Eligibility of BPMN Models for Business Process Redesign. Information, 10(7), 225. https://doi.org/10.3390/info10070225
  22. Valdez-de-Leon, O. (2016). A Digital Maturity Model for Telecommunications Service Providers. Technology Innovation Management Review, 6(8), 19–32. https://doi.org/10.22215/timreview/1008
  23. van der Aalst, W. M. P. (2013). Business Process Management: A Comprehensive Survey. ISRN Software Engineering, 2013, 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/507984
  24. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Bichler, M., & Heinzl, A. (2018). Robotic Process Automation. Business & Information Systems Engineering, 60(4), 269–272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-018-0542-4
  25. vom Brocke, J., & Rosemann, M. (2015). Handbook on Business Process Management 1: Introduction, Methods, and Information Systems. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-45100-3
  26. Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., & McAfee, A. (2014). Leading digital: Turning technology into business transformation. Harvard Business Press.
  27. Winter, R., & Fischer, R. (2006). Essential Layers, Artifacts, and Dependencies of Enterprise Architecture. 2006 10th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops (Edocw\ensuremath{'}06), 30. https://doi.org/10.1109/edocw.2006.33
  28. Yıldırım, N., & Tunçalp, D. (2023). A Policy Design Framework on the Roles of S&T Universities in Innovation Ecosystems: Integrating Stakeholders' Voices for Industry 4.0. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 70(7), 2608–2625. https://doi.org/10.1109/tem.2021.3106834
  29. Zachman, J. A. (1987). A framework for information systems architecture. IBM Systems Journal, 26(3), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1147/sj.263.0276