Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Efficacy of the population-based pilot colorectal cancer screening, Csongrád county, Hungary, 2015

Sayfa
756–763
Yayın Tarihi
2020-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Conclusion: The Csongrád county population-based colorectal cancer screening was evidently successful on the short-term considering participation rate, and the changes in CRC incidence and stage, thus its national extension is necessary.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: In Hungary, a nationwide colorectal screening program is about to be introduced in order to improve the high mortality rate of colorectal cancer CRC .
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The aim was to summarize experiences from and assess short-term efficacy of the populationbased pilot colorectal screening program in 2015 in Csongrád county, Hungary.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Conclusion: The Csongrád county population-based colorectal cancer screening was evidently successful on the short-term considering participation rate, and the changes in CRC incidence and stage, thus its national extension is necessary.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:2015 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Colorectal cancer · colon cancer · screening

Abstract

Background/aim: In Hungary, a nationwide colorectal screening program is about to be introduced in order to improve the high mortality rate of colorectal cancer CRC . The aim was to summarize experiences from and assess short-term efficacy of the populationbased pilot colorectal screening program in 2015 in Csongrád county, Hungary. Materials and methods: Asymptomatic individuals between the ages of 50 and 70 with average risk of colorectal cancer participated in the program that was based on the two-step screening method: immune fecal blood test and colonoscopy. The short-term efficacy was assessed as the change in total CRC incidence and initial tumor stage in the screening year 2015 . Results: 22,130 individuals were invited to participate, and the participation rate was 46.4%. Immune fecal blood test proved to be nonnegative in 1,343 cases 13% , screening colonoscopy was performed in 766 of them 7.5% . Total colonoscopy was performed in 711 individuals. Based on the reports, adenoma was detected in 358 50.3% and malignancy in 42 5.9% individuals. In the background population, the incidence of colon cancer was higher 183 vs. 228; P = 0.026 and was diagnosed at earlier stage P = 0.002 , while lymph node involvement was lower in 2015 48.3% vs. 37.1%; P = 0.049 . Conclusion: The Csongrád county population-based colorectal cancer screening was evidently successful on the short-term considering participation rate, and the changes in CRC incidence and stage, thus its national extension is necessary.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

RUTKA, M., BOR, R., MOLNÁR, T., FARKAS, K., FÁBIÁN, A., GYÖRFFY, M., BÁLINT, A., MILASSIN, Á., SZÜCS, M., TISZLAVICZ, L., NAGY, F., SZEPES, Z. (2020). Efficacy of the population-based pilot colorectal cancer screening, Csongrád county, Hungary, 2015. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 756–763. https://ajindex.com/articles/113217

Kaynakça (9)

  1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, Eser S, Mathers C et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. International Journal Cancer 2015
  2. E359–E386. doi: 10.1002/ijc.29210 2. Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J, Rosso S, Coebergh JW et al. Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. European Journal of Cancer 2013
  3. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027 3. Altobelli E, Lattanzi A, Paduano R, Varassi G, Di Orio F et al. Colorectal cancer prevention in Europe: burden of disease and status of screening programs. Preventive Medicine 2014
  4. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.02.010 4. Fitzmaurice C, Abate D, Abbasi N, Abbastabar H, Abd-Allah F et al. Global Burden of Disease Cancer Collaboration (International Agency for Research on Cancer: World Cancer Report). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization
  5. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2996 5. Benson VS, Patnick J, Davies AK, Nadel MR, Smith RA et al. International Colorectal Screening Network. Colorectal cancer screening: a comparison of 35 initiatives in 17 countries. International Journal of Cancer 2008
  6. doi: 10.1002/ijc.23273 6. Council of the European Union. Council recommendation of 2 December 2003 on cancer screening (2003/878/EC). Official Journal of European Union 2003
  7. L327: 34-38. 7. Emberi Erőforrások Minisztériuma. Egészséges Nemzetért Népegészségügyi Program 2001–2010. Egészségügyi Közlöny, 2001/16. szám. 2001. augusztus 21 (in Hungarian). 8. Hari DM, Leung AM, Lee JH, Sim MS, Vuong B et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual 7th edition criteria for colon cancer: do the complex modifications improve prognostic assessment? Journal of the American College of Surgeons 2013
  8. 217 (2): 181-190. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 Jun 12. 9. ÁNTSZ Állami Népegészségügyi és Tisztiorvosi Szolgálat honlap: Vastagbélszűrési alprojekt bemutatása, eredményei (in Hungarian). 10. Pignone M, Saha S, Hoerger T, Mandelblatt J. Cost-effectiveness analyses of colorectal cancer screening: a systematic review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002
  9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-137-2- 200207160-00007 11. Központi Statisztikai Hivatal. Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. 2015. 12. Howlader N, Noone AM, Krapcho M, Miller D, Bishop K et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975–2013. National Cancer