KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Gephyra / 2026 / Volume: 31

Property Transfer to Consecrated Individuals at the Sanctuary of Apollo Lairbenos: Katagraphai 2 and 7 Reconsidered

Hakan Ozlen(University of Wisconsin-Madison)
Dergi
Gephyra
Sayfa
—
Yayın Tarihi
2026-10-04
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

On this reading the sanctuary emerges as the public record through which households settled a dwelling and a livelihood on those they consecrated, a function distinct from that of Macedonian examples.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:The katagraphai of the sanctuary of Apollo Lairbenos record the transfer of enslaved persons and freeborn children to the god.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Since Ricl’s studies and the edition of Ritti, Şimşek, and Yıldız, the answer has been the sanctuary, on the strength of one fragmentary text (K43) and the analogy of the Macedonian corpora.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:On this reading the sanctuary emerges as the public record through which households settled a dwelling and a livelihood on those they consecrated, a function distinct from that of Macedonian examples.
🔬Tür:Research Article
📍Kapsam:2008 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Apollo Lairbenos · katagraphē · hieroi

Abstract

The katagraphai of the sanctuary of Apollo Lairbenos record the transfer of enslaved persons and freeborn children to the god. When property appears in these documents, to whom did it pass? Since Ricl’s studies and the edition of Ritti, Şimşek, and Yıldız, the answer has been the sanctuary, on the strength of one fragmentary text (K43) and the analogy of the Macedonian corpora. This article argues from katagraphai 2 and 7 in Akıncı Öztürk and Tanrıver’s 2008 publication that the personal datives identify the consecrated persons as the immediate beneficiaries of the associated property clauses. In both texts the verb katagraphō governs a dative of the recipient, tō Zēnōni in no. 2 and autō in no. 7. The same instrument that assigns the person to the god, with the god’s name in the dative, assigns the property to the person in a second clause under the same verb. K43, whose lacunae permitted the older interpretation, should be reread in light of the fuller texts. On this reading the sanctuary emerges as the public record through which households settled a dwelling and a livelihood on those they consecrated, a function distinct from that of Macedonian examples.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Ozlen, H. (2026). Property Transfer to Consecrated Individuals at the Sanctuary of Apollo Lairbenos: Katagraphai 2 and 7 Reconsidered. Gephyra, Volume: 31. https://doi.org/10.37095/gephyra.2003915

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (19)

  1. Akıncı Öztürk, E. 2023. Antik Devir’de Güneybatı Phrygia’da İnanç İstismarı: “Apollon Lairbenos Kültü”.
  2. Akıncı Öztürk, E. – Tanrıver, C. 2008. “New Katagraphai and Dedications from the Sanctuary of Apollon Lairbenos.” EA 41: 91-111.
  3. Caneva, S. G. – Delli Pizzi, A. 2015. “Given to a Deity? Religious and Social Reappraisal of Human Consecrations in the Hellenistic and Roman East.” CQ 65/1: 167-191.
  4. Darmezin, L. 1999. Les affranchissements par consécration en Béotie et dans le monde grec hellénistique.
  5. Dignas, B. 2003. “Urban Centres, Rural Centres, Religious Centres in the Greek East. Worlds Apart?” In: E. Schwertheim – E. Winter (edd.), Religion und Region. Götter und Kulte aus dem östlichen Mittelmeerraum. AMS 45, 77-91.
  6. Harper, K. 2011. Slavery in the Late Roman World, AD 275-425.
  7. Hogarth, D. G. 1887. “Apollo Lermenus.” JHS 8: 376-400.
  8. Kamen, D. 2014. “Sale for the Purpose of Freedom: Slave-Prostitutes and Manumission in Ancient Greece.” CJ 109/3: 281-307.
  9. Mirković, M. 1997. “Katagraphe and Consecration of Children.” In: M. Mirković – S. Dušanić – M. Ricl – P. Petrović (edd.), Mélanges d’histoire et d’épigraphie offerts à Fanoula Papazoglou par ses élèves à l’occasion de son quatre-vingtième anniversaire, 1-33.
  10. Parker, R. 2023. Religion in Roman Phrygia: From Polytheism to Christianity.
  11. Potter, D. S. 2015. “Hierodouloi.” In: Oxford Classical Dictionary, online ed. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780 199381135.013.3089.
  12. Ricl, M. 1995. “Les katagraphai du sanctuaire d’Apollon Lairbenos.” Arkeoloji Dergisi 3: 167-195.
  13. Ricl, M. 2001. “Donations of Slaves and Freeborn Children to Deities in Roman Macedonia and Phrygia: A Reconsideration.” Tyche 16: 127-160.
  14. Ricl, M. 2009. “Legal and Social Status of Threptoi and Related Categories in Narrative and Documentary Sources.” In: H. M. Cotton – R. G. Hoyland – J. J. Price – D. J. Wasserstein (edd.), From Hellenism to Islam: Cultural and Linguistic Change in the Roman Near East, 93-114.
  15. Ritti, T. – Şimşek, C. – Yıldız, H. 2000. “Dediche e katagraphai dal santuario frigio di Apollo Lairbenos.” EA 32: 1-88.
  16. Sosin, J. D. 2015. “Manumission with ‘Paramone’: Conditional Freedom?” TAPhA 145/2: 325-381.
  17. Thonemann, P. 2022. The Lives of Ancient Villages: Rural Society in Roman Anatolia.
  18. Westermann, W. L. 1948. “The Freedmen and the Slaves of God.” PAPhS 92/1: 55-64.
  19. Zelnick-Abramovitz, R. 2005. Not Wholly Free: The Concept of Manumission and the Status of Manumitted Slaves in the Ancient Greek World. Mnemosyne Suppl. 266.