KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences / 2020 / Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4

Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding

Hong YANG
Chen PAN
Qı LIU
Yan WANG
Zhe LIU
Xıan CAO
Jıngjıng LEI
Sayfa
706–712
Yayın Tarihi
2020-08-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

The GlasgowBlatchford score was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIc/III P

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Background/aim: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding PUB .
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Materials and methods: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well as the Forrest classification based on their gastroscopy results.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:The GlasgowBlatchford score was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIc/III P
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Peptic ulcer hemorrhage · Glasgow-Blatchford score · shock index

Abstract

Background/aim: To investigate the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding PUB . Materials and methods: A total of 955 patients with PUB were assessed using the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index, as well as the Forrest classification based on their gastroscopy results. The correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index was determined using scatter plot analysis, and the correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score or shock index and Forrest classification was determined using Spearman's analysis. Results: Both the Glasgow-Blatchford score and shock index showed the highest values in patients with Forrest class IIa. The GlasgowBlatchford score was significantly higher than patients with Forrest class Ib/IIc/III P

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

YANG, H., PAN, C., LIU, Q., WANG, Y., LIU, Z., CAO, X., LEI, J. (2020). Correlation between the Glasgow-Blatchford score, shock index, and Forrest classification in patients with peptic ulcer bleeding. Turkish Journal of Medical Sciences, Cilt: 50 - Sayı: 4, 706–712. https://ajindex.com/articles/113162

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Khamaysi I, Gralnek IM. Acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB)-initial evaluation and management. Best Practice and Research Clinical Gastroenterology 2013
  2. 27 (5): 633-638. doi: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.09.002 2. Klein A, Gralnek IM. Acute, nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Current Opinion in Critical Care 2015
  3. 21 (2): 154- 162. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0000000000000185 3. Blatchford O, Murray WR, Blatchford M. A risk score to predict need for treatment for upper-gastrointestinal haemorrhage. Lancet 2000
  4. 356 (9238): 1318-1321. doi: 10.1016/S0140- 6736(00)02816-6 4. Stanley AJ, Ashley D, Dalton HR, Mowat C, Gaya DR et al. Outpatient management of patients with low-risk uppergastrointestinal haemorrhage: multicentre validation and prospective evaluation. Lancet 2009
  5. 373 (9657): 42-47. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61769-9 5. Waddell KM, Stanley AJ. Risk assessment scores for patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and their use in clinical practice. Hospital Practice (1995) 2015
  6. 43 (5): 290-298. doi: 10.1080/21548331.2015.1103636 6. Laursen SB, Dalton HR, Murray IA, Michell N, Johnston MR et al. Performance of new thresholds of the Glasgow Blatchford score in managing patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology 2015
  7. 13 (1): 115- 121.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.023 7. Ratra A, Rassameehiran S, Parupudi S, Nugent K. Utility of the shock index and other risk-scoring tools in patients with gastrointestinal bleeding. Southern Medical Journal 2016
  8. 109 (3): 178-184. doi: 10.14423/SMJ.0000000000000427 8. Kim KB, Yoon SM, Youn SJ. Endoscopy for nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Clinical Endoscopy 2014
  9. 47 (4): 315- 319. doi: 10.5946/ce.2014.47.4.315 9. Gralnek IM, Barkun AN, Bardou M. Management of acute bleeding from a peptic ulcer. The New England Journal of Medicine 2008
  10. 359 (9): 928-937. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra0706113 10. Kim JS, Park SM, Kim BW. Endoscopic management of peptic ulcer bleeding. Clinical Endoscopy 2015
  11. 48 (2): 106-111. doi: 10.5946/ce.2015.48.2.106 11. De Groot NL, Van Oijen MG, Kessels K, Hemmink M, Weusten BL et al. Reassessment of the predictive value of the Forrest classification for peptic ulcer rebleeding and mortality: can classification be simplified? Endoscopy 2014
  12. 46 (1): 46-52. doi: 10.1055/s-0033-1344884 12. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guide