KaydedilenlerDerginizi ekleyin

Dergiler / Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4

Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Bireylere Sosyal Etkileşim ve İletişim Becerilerinin Öğretiminde İpucunun Giderek Arttırılması: Sistematik Bir Derleme

Least-to-Most Prompting in Teaching Social Interaction and Communication Skills to Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Systematic Review

Burcu Ülke Kürkçüoğlu(ANADOLU ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0187-9742
Dinçer Saral(HACETTEPE ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-0795-255X
Sayfa
969–998
Yayın Tarihi
2021-12-01
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı, yanlışsız öğretim yöntemlerinden olan ipucunun giderek arttırılmasıyla öğretim (İGA) sunularak otizm spektrum bozukluğu (OSB) olan bireylere sosyal etkileşim ve iletişim becerilerinin öğretildiği araştırmaları demografik özellikler, yöntemsel parametreler ve bulgular açısından betimsel olarak analiz etmektir.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı, yanlışsız öğretim yöntemlerinden olan ipucunun giderek arttırılmasıyla öğretim (İGA) sunularak otizm spektrum bozukluğu (OSB) olan bireylere sosyal etkileşim ve iletişim becerilerinin öğretildiği araştırmaları demografik özellikler, yöntemsel parametreler ve bulgular açısından betimsel olarak analiz etmektir.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Yöntem: Çalışma kapsamında, dört farklı veritabanının (EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, Jstor ve SAGE) gelişmiş arama motoruna, ilgili anahtar kelimeler yazılarak elektronik taramalar yapılmıştır.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:Tartışma: Araştırmanın bulguları tartışılarak ileri çalışmalara yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.
🔬Tür:Modelleme & Sayısal Simülasyon
📍Kapsam:2003 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:otizm · sosyal etkileşim · iletişim

Özet

Giriş: Bu çalışmanın amacı, yanlışsız öğretim yöntemlerinden olan ipucunun giderek arttırılmasıyla öğretim (İGA) sunularak otizm spektrum bozukluğu (OSB) olan bireylere sosyal etkileşim ve iletişim becerilerinin öğretildiği araştırmaları demografik özellikler, yöntemsel parametreler ve bulgular açısından betimsel olarak analiz etmektir. Yöntem: Çalışma kapsamında, dört farklı veritabanının (EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, Jstor ve SAGE) gelişmiş arama motoruna, ilgili anahtar kelimeler yazılarak elektronik taramalar yapılmıştır. Tarama sonucunda 390 çalışmaya ulaşılmıştır. Bu çalışmalar dahil etme ölçütleri olarak (a) OSB olan bireylerle yürütülmesi, (b) ipucunun giderek arttırılmasıyla öğretim yönteminin kullanılması, (c) tek denekli araştırma modellerinden biriyle desenlenmesi, (d) bir sosyal etkileşim ve iletişim becerisinin öğretilmesi, (e) Ocak 2003-Mayıs 2020 yılları arasında yürütülmesi ve (f) Türkçe ve/veya İngilizce dilinde hakemli bir dergide yayımlanması açısından incelenmiştir ve toplamda 35 araştırma, kapsama alınarak analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: Araştırma sonucunda, farklı yaş grubundaki OSB olan bireylere İGA sunularak sosyal etkileşim ve iletişim becerilerinin öğretilebildiği görülmüştür. Tartışma: Araştırmanın bulguları tartışılarak ileri çalışmalara yönelik önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this review was to examine the demographic, methodological and outcome measures of the studies using least-to-most prompting (LTM) to teach social interaction and communication skills to the individuals with ASD. Method: Following a thorough literature search in four online databases (EBSCOhost, ScienceDirect, Jstor and SAGE) using multiple search terms, we identified 388 studies. From this identification, 35 empirical studies qualified for the inclusion criteria as follows: (a) including participants with autism, (b) using LTM, (c) employing a single-subject research design, (d) targeting at least one social communication or interaction skill, (e) publication between January 2003 and May 2020, (f) publication in a Turkish and/or English peer-reviewed journal. Findings: Review of the treatment literature suggests that LTM is an effective method for the individuals with ASD who differ in age and gender to acquire the skills. Discussion: Suggestions for further research are provided.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

Kürkçüoğlu, B. Ü., Saral, D. (2021). Otizm Spektrum Bozukluğu Olan Bireylere Sosyal Etkileşim ve İletişim Becerilerinin Öğretiminde İpucunun Giderek Arttırılması: Sistematik Bir Derleme. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 22 Sayı: 4, 969–998. https://doi.org/10.21565/ozelegitimdergisi.697976

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (71)

  1. Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Browder, D. M., ve & Wood, L. (2014). Effects of systematic instruction and an augmentative communication deyvice on phonics skills acquisition for students with moderate intellectual disability who are nonverbal. Education and Training in Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 49(4), 517-532.
  2. Aljehany, M. S., & Bennet, K. (2019). A comparison of video prompting to least-to-most prompting among children with autism and intellectual disability. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1-11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-03929-x.
  3. Alzrayer, N. M., Banda, D. R., & Koul, R. (2017). Teaching children with autism spectrum disorder and other developmental disabilities to perform multistep requesting using an iPad. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 33(2), 65-76. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07434618.2017.1306881
  4. Alzrayer, N. M., Muharib, R., & Wood, C. (2020). Effects of a behavior intervention package on augmented and vocal mands by children with developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 32(1), 57-74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-019-09681-5.
  5. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. American Psychiatric Pub.
  6. Armendariz, V., & Hahs, A. D. (2019). Teaching Leisure Activities with Social Initiations Through Video Prompting. Journal of Behavioral Education, 28(4), 479-492. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10864-019-09320-1.
  7. Ault, M. J., &ve G riffen, A. K. (2013). Teaching with the system of least prompts: An easy method for monitoring progress. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45, 46-53.
  8. Ault, M. J., Wolery,M., Doyle, P. M., ve & Gast, D. L. (1989). Review of comparative studies in instruction of students with moderate and severe handicaps. Exceptional Children, 55, 346-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298905500410
  9. Barton, E. E. (2015). Teaching Generalized Pretend Play and Related Behaviors to Young Children with Disabilities. Exceptional Children, 81(4), 489-506. DOI: 10.1177/0014402914563694.
  10. Barton, E. E., ve & Pavilanis, R. (2012). Teaching pretend play to young children with autism. Young Exceptional Children, 15, 5-17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1096250611424106
  11. Barton, E. E., Gossett, S., Waters, M. C., Murray, R., & Francis, R. (2019). Increasing Play Complexity in a Young Child With Autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 34(2), 81-90. DOI: 10.1177/108835761880049
  12. Barton, E. E., Pokorski, E. A., Sweeney, E. M., Velez, M., Gossett, S., Qiu, J.,. & Domingo, M. (2018). An empirical examination of effective practices for teaching board game play to young children. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 138-148. DOI: 10.1177/1098300717753833
  13. Barton, E.E., ve & Wolery, M. (2008). Teaching pretend play to children with disabilities: A review of the literature. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 28,109–125. DOI: 10.1177/0271121408318799
  14. Barton, E.E., ve & Wolery, M. (2010). Training teachers to promote pretend play in young children with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 77(1), 85-106. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007700104
  15. Bilmez, H. (2014). Otizm spektrum bozukluğu olan çocuklara ortak dikkate tepki verme becerisinin öğretimi. Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  16. Bouck, E. C., Savage, M., Meyer, N. K., Taber-Doughty, T., ve & Hunley M. (2014). High-tech or low-tech? Comparing self-monitoring systems to increase task independence for students with autism. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 29(3), 156-167. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1088357614528797
  17. Browder, D. M., Jimenez, B. A., Spooner, F., Saunders, A., Hudson, M., ve & Bethune, K. S. (2012). Early numeracy instruction for students with moderate and severe developmental disabilities. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities, 37(4), 308-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2511/027494813805327205
  18. Cannella-Malone, H. I., Chan, J. M., & Jimenez, E. D. (2017). Comparing self-directed video prompting to least-to-most prompting in post-secondary students with moderate intellectual disabilities. International Journal of Developmental Disabilities, 63, 211-220. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/20473869.2017.1301695
  19. Cannella-Malone, H. I., Fant, J. L., & Tullis, C. A. (2010). Using the picture exchange communication system to increase the social communication of two individuals with severe developmental disabilities. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 22(2), 149-163. DOI: 10.1007/s10882-009-9174-4
  20. Charlop, M. H., & Greenberg, A. L. (2009). Implementing visual strategies during play groups: The promising effects on social communication skills for children with autism. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 3(3), 168-173. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17489530903343382
  21. Copple, K., Koul, R., Banda, D., ve & Frye, E. (2015). An examination of the effectiveness of video modelling intervention using a speech-generating device in preschool children at risk for autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 18(2), 104-112. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2014.880079
  22. Curiel, E. S., Sainato, D. M., & Goldstein, H. (2016). Matrix training of receptive language skills with a toddler with autism spectrum disorder: A case study. Education and Treatment of Children, 39(1), 95-109.
  23. D’Agostino, S. R., Dueñas, A. D., & Plavnick, J. B. (2018). Increasing Social Initiations During Shared Book Reading: An Intervention for Preschoolers With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 0271121418816422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121418816422
  24. DiCarlo, C. F., ve & Reid, D. H. (2004). Increasing pretend toy play of toddlers with disabilities in an inclusive setting. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 37, 197–207. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2004.37-197
  25. Division for Early Childhood of the Council for Exceptional Children. (2014). DEC recommended practices in early intervention/early childhood special education. http://www.dec-sped.org/dec-recommended-practices adresinden elde edilmiştir.
  26. Doyle, P. M., Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & Gast, D. L. (1988). System of least prompts: A literature review of procedural parameters. Journal of the Association for Persons with Severe Handicaps, 13(1), 28-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/154079698801300104
  27. Filla, A., Wolery, M., &ve Anthony, L. (1999). Promoting children’s conversations during play with adult prompts. Journal of Early Intervention, 22, 93-108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/105381519902200201
  28. Finke, E. H., Davis, J. M., Benedict, M., Goga, L., Kelly, J., Palumbo, L.,. & Waters, S. (2017). Effects of a least-to-most prompting procedure on multisymbol message production in children with autism spectrum disorder who use augmentative and alternative communication. American journal of speech-language pathology, 26(1), 81-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0187
  29. Hansen, S. G., Raulston, T. J., Machalicek, W., & Frantz, R. (2018). Caregiver‐mediated joint attention intervention. Behavioral Interventions, 33(2), 205-211. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1523
  30. Hansen, S. G., Raulston, T. J., Machalicek, W., Frantz, R., Drew, C., Erturk, B., & Squires, J. (2019). Peer-mediated joint attention intervention in the preschool classroom. The Journal of Special Education, 53(2), 96-107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466918807464
  31. Huskens, B., Verschuur, R., Gillesen, J., Didden, R., & Barakova, E. (2013). Promoting question-asking in school-aged children with autism spectrum disorders: Effectiveness of a robot intervention compared to a human-trainer intervention. Developmental neurorehabilitation, 16(5), 345-356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17518423.2012.739212
  32. Kern, P., Wolery, M., & Aldridge, D. (2007). Use of songs to promote independence in morning greeting routines for young children with autism. Journal of autism and developmental disorders, 37(7), 1264-1271. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-006-0272-1
  33. Kourassanis, J., Jones, E. A., & Fienup, D. M. (2015). Peer-video modeling: Teaching chained social game behaviors to children with ASD. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27(1), 25-36. DOI: 10.1007/s10882-014-9399-8
  34. Kurnaz, E. (2018). Otizmli bireylere karşılıklı konuşma sırasında kullanılan ortak dikkat davranışlarının öğretiminde ipucunun giderek artırılmasıyla öğretimin etkililiği. Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi, Anadolu Üniversitesi, Eskişehir.
  35. Lane, J. D., Ledford, J. R., Shepley, C., Mataras, T. K., Ayres, K. M., & ve Davis, A. B. (2016). A brief coaching intervention for teaching naturalistic strategies to parents. Journal of Early Intervention, 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815116663178
  36. Lane, J. D., Shepley, C., & ve Lieberman-Betz, R. (2016) Promoting expressive language in young children with or at-risk for autism spectrum disorder in a preschool classroom. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 46, 3216-3231. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-016-2856-8
  37. Libby, Weiss, Bancroft, & ve Ahearn, (2008). A comparison of most-to-least and least-to-most prompting on the acqusition of solitary play skills. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 1, 37-43.
  38. Lund, S. K., & Troha, J. M. (2008). Teaching young people who are blind and have autism to make requests using a variation on the Picture Exchange Communication System with tactile symbols: A preliminary investigation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(4), 719-730. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-007-0439-4
  39. Matson, J. L., Matson, M. L., & Rivet, T. T. (2007). Social-skills treatments for children with autism spectrum disorders: An overview. Behavior Modification, 31 (5), 682-707. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145445507301650
  40. McMahon, D. D., Smith, C. C., Cihak, D. F., Wright, R., & Gibbons, M. M. (2015). Effects of digital navigation aids on adults with intellectual disabilities: Comparison of paper map, Google maps, and augmented reality. Journal of Special Education Technology, 30(3), 157-165. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0162643415618927
  41. Ninci, J., Rispoli, M., Neely, L. C., & Guz, S. (2018). Transferring picture exchange requests to receptive identification for children with ASD. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 21(3), 178-187. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17518423.2018.1437840
  42. Quigley, J., Griffith, A. K., & Kates-McElrath, K. (2018). A comparison of modeling, prompting, and a multi-component intervention for teaching play skills to children with developmental disabilities. Behavior Analysis in Practice, 11(4), 315-326. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40617-018-0225-0
  43. Raulston, T. J., Hansen, S. G., Frantz, R., Machalicek, W., & Bhana, N. (2019). A Parent-Implemented Playdate Intervention for Young Children With Autism and Their Peers. Journal of Early Intervention, 1053815119880943. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1053815119880943
  44. Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D.,. & Marschik, P. B. (2014). Comparing tangible symbols, picture exchange, and a direct selection response for enabling two boys with developmental disabilities to access preferred stimuli. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(3), 249-261. DOI: 10.1007/s10882-013-9361-1
  45. Schaefer Whitby, P. J., Kucharczyk, S., & Lorah, E. (2019). Teaching Object Exchange for Communication to a Young Girl with Autism Spectrum Disorder and Visual Impairment. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 113(4), 372-380. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0145482X19869521
  46. Seaver, J. L., & Ve Bourret, J. C. (2014). An evaluation of response prompts for teaching behavior chains. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 47, 777-792. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jaba.159
  47. Shepley, C., Lane, J. D., & Ault, M. J. (2019). A review and critical examination of the system of least prompts. Remedial and Special Education, 40(5), 313-327. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517751213
  48. Shillingsburg, M. A., & Cariveau, T. (2016). Responding to conversational partners’ behavior: Teaching children with autism strategies to recapture the interest of others. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 10(3-4), 143-147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2016.1268671
  49. Taylor, B. A., & ve Hoch, H. (2008). Teaching children with autism to respond to and initiate bids for joint attention. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 41(3), 377–391. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1901/jaba.2008.41-377
  50. Tekin-İftar, E., & ve Kırcaali-İftar, G. (2013). Özel Eğitimde Yanlışsız Öğretim Yöntemleri (3. baskı). Ankara: Nobel Yayın Dağıtım.
  51. Tetreault, A. S., & Lerman, D. C. (2010). Teaching social skills to children with autism using point-of-view video modeling. Education and Treatment of Children, 33(3), 395-419. DOI: 10.1353/etc.0.0105
  52. Thiemann-Bourque, K., Brady, N., McGuff, S., Stump, K., & Naylor, A. (2016). Picture exchange communication system and pals: A peer-mediated augmentative and alternative communication intervention for minimally verbal preschoolers with autism. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59(5), 1133-1145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-15-0313
  53. Thiemann, K. S., & Goldstein, H. (2004). Effects of peer training and written text cueing on social communication of school-age children with pervasive developmental disorder. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/1092-4388(2004/012)
  54. Topuz, C., & Ulke-Kurkcuoglu, B. (2019). Increasing Verbal Interaction in Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders Using Audio Script Procedure. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 49(12), 4847-4861. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-019-04203-w
  55. Ülke-Kürkçüoğlu, B. (2015). A comparison of least-to-most prompting and video modeling for teaching pretend play skills to children with autism spectrum disorder. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 15(2), 499-517. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2015.2.2541
  56. Van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Roche, L., Sutherland, D., Balandin, S., Green, V. A.,. & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(3), 222-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.815801
  57. Vuran, S., & ve Usluer, C. (2012). Sosyal Öyküler. S. Vuran (Ed.). Sosyal yeterliklerin geliştirilmesi (ss. 167-182). Ankara: Vize Yayıncılık.
  58. Waddington, H., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Van der Meer, L., Carnett, A.,. & Sutherland, D. (2014). Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 59-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.001
  59. Walsh, E., Holloway, J., & Lydon, H. (2018). An evaluation of a social skills intervention for adults with autism spectrum disorder and intellectual disabilities preparing for employment in Ireland: A pilot study. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 48(5), 1727-1741. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-017-3441-5
  60. West, E. A., & ve Billingsley, F. (2005). Improving the system of least prompts: a comparison of procedural variations. Education and Training in Developmental Disabilities, 40(2), 131-144.
  61. Wilson, E. R., Wine, B., & Fitterer, K. (2017). An investigation of the matrix training approach to teach social play skills. Behavioral Interventions, 32(3), 278-284. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/bin.1473
  62. Wolery, M., & Aldridge, D. (2007). Use of songs to promote independence in morning greeting routines for young children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(7), 1264-1271. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-006-0272-1
  63. Wolery, M., Ault, M. J., & ve Doyle, P. M. (1992). Teaching students with moderate to severe disabilities. White Plains, NY: Longman.
  64. Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., Brock, M. E., Plavnick, J. B., Fleury, V. P., & ve Schultz, T. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: a comprehensive review. Journal of Developmental Disorders, 45, 1951- 1966. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-014-2351-z
  65. Xin, J. F., & Ve Leonard, D. A. (2015). Using iPads to teach communication skills of students with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disabilities, 45, 4154-4164. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-014-2266-8
  66. Yanardag, M., Birkan, B., Yılmaz, I., Konukman, F., Agbuga, B., & Lieberman, L. (2011). The effects of least-tomost prompting procedure in teaching basic tennis skills to children with autism. Kinesiology, 43, 44-55.
  67. Barton, E. E., Pokorski, E. A., Sweeney, E. M., Velez, M., Gossett, S., Qiu, J.,. & Domingo, M. (2018). An empirical examination of effective practices for teaching board game play to young children. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 20(3), 138-148. DOI: 10.1177/1098300717753833
  68. Finke, E. H., Davis, J. M., Benedict, M., Goga, L., Kelly, J., Palumbo, L.,. & Waters, S. (2017). Effects of a least-to-most prompting procedure on multisymbol message production in children with autism spectrum disorder who use augmentative and alternative communication. American journal of speech-language pathology, 26(1), 81-98. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-14-0187
  69. Roche, L., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., van der Meer, L., Achmadi, D.,. & Marschik, P. B. (2014). Comparing tangible symbols, picture exchange, and a direct selection response for enabling two boys with developmental disabilities to access preferred stimuli. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 26(3), 249-261. DOI: 10.1007/s10882-013-9361-1
  70. Van der Meer, L., Kagohara, D., Roche, L., Sutherland, D., Balandin, S., Green, V. A.,. & Sigafoos, J. (2013). Teaching multi-step requesting and social communication to two children with autism spectrum disorders with three AAC options. Augmentative and Alternative Communication, 29(3), 222-234. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/07434618.2013.815801
  71. Waddington, H., Sigafoos, J., Lancioni, G. E., O’Reilly, M. F., Van der Meer, L., Carnett, A.,. & Sutherland, D. (2014). Three children with autism spectrum disorder learn to perform a three-step communication sequence using an iPad®-based speech-generating device. International Journal of Developmental Neuroscience, 39, 59-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdevneu.2014.05.001