Dergiler / Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 01

Changing Pattern of Resistance in Typhoid Fever in An Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: Is It Time to Revisit Treatment Strategies?

Sayfa
1–7
Yayın Tarihi
2021-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):1-7.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Objectives: Multi-drug-resistant Salmonella Typhi is a major concern in the current era of antimicrobial resistance.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:The resistance to ceftriaxone has shown an increase from 0% in 2016 to 11(12.6%) isolates in 2018.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):1-7.
🔬Tür:Literatür & Derleme Çalışması
📍Kapsam:2016 Verileri
⚙️Değişkenler:Ceftriaxone-resistance S. Typhi · MDR S. Typhi · Typhoid fever

Abstract

Objectives: Multi-drug-resistant Salmonella Typhi is a major concern in the current era of antimicrobial resistance. The emergence of ceftriaxone-resistant Salmonella Typhi strains (CRST) has left very few therapeutic options for the treatment of these infections. The objective of this study was to evaluate the typhoid cases diagnosed with CRST and retrospectively analyze the antimicrobial sensitivity pattern of Salmonella Typhi over the past three years. Methods: Laboratory data from our hospital were reviewed for the past three years to examine the trends related to the isolation of Salmonella Typhi from blood and their antimicrobial susceptibility. The case records from the patients whose blood culture detected Ceftriaxone resistant Salmonella Typhi (CRST) were reviewed to assess the clinical condition and outcome. Results: Analysis of the antimicrobial susceptibility of Salmonella Typhi showed a decline in multidrug-resistant strains. Nalidixic acid resistance has remained high during this period. The resistance to ceftriaxone has shown an increase from 0% in 2016 to 11(12.6%) isolates in 2018. Also, azithromycin resistance has shown a steady increase from 0% in 2016, 3 (3.2%) in 2017 to 7 (8.5%) in 2018. There was no clustering of cases by time or space indicating a non-outbreak spread of ceftriaxone resistant strains. Conclusion: Development of resistance to ceftriaxone and azithromycin necessitates revision of therapeutic choices. All this necessitates an approach to do further extensive surveillance at the community level and improvement in hygiene, sanitation, and drinking water supply. Maybe it is time to revisit the older antibiotics such as ampicillin, cotrimoxazole, and chloramphenicol as therapeutic options for uncomplicated typhoid fever. J Microbiol Infect Dis 2021; 11(1):1-7.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

SAXENA, S., KAUR, R., RANDHAWA, V. S. (2021). Changing Pattern of Resistance in Typhoid Fever in An Era of Antimicrobial Resistance: Is It Time to Revisit Treatment Strategies?. Journal of Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 01, 1–7. https://ajindex.com/articles/111275

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (12)

  1. Buckle GC, Walker CL, Black RE Typhoid fever and paratyphoid fever: Systematic review to estimate global morbidity and mortality for 2010. J Glob Health 2012 2: 010401
  2. John J, Van Aart CJC, Grassly NC. The Burden of Typhoid and Paratyphoid in India: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2016;10(4): e0004616
  3. Balaji V, Kapil A, Shastri J, et al. Longitudinal Typhoid Fever Trends in India from 2000 to 2015. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2018; 99(S3):34–40
  4. Performance standards for antimicrobial sensitivity testing. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute M10025S.2015 5. Britto CD, Wong VK, Dougan G, Pollard AJ A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi, the etiological agent of typhoid. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2018;12(10): e0006779
  5. AMR surveillance network Indian Council of Medical Research 2017. Annual report Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance Network January 2017-December 2017. Available at https://www.icmr.nic.in/sites/default/files/reports/annual_report_amr_jan2017-18.pdf. ICMR 2017 7. Chande C, Shrikhande S, Kapale S, Agarwal S, Fule RP. Change in antimicrobial resistance pattern of Salmonella Typhi in central India. Indian J Med Res 2002; 115:46-8
  6. Raveendran R, Datta S, Wattal C. Drug resistance in Salmonella Enterica serotype Typhi and Paratyphi A. JIMSA 2010;23(1): 21-24
  7. Lugito NPH, Cucunawangsih. Antimicrobial Resistance of Salmonella enterica Serovar S. Typhi and Paratyphi Isolates from a General Hospital in Karawaci, Tangerang, Indonesia: A Five-Year Review. Int J Microbiol 2017, 2017:6215136
  8. Zellweger RM, Basnyat B, Shrestha P, et al. (2017) A 23-year retrospective investigation of Salmonella Typhi and Salmonella Paratyphi isolated in a tertiary Kathmandu hospital. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 11(11): e0006051
  9. Punjabi NH, Agtini MD, Ochiai RL, et al. Enteric fever burden in North Jakarta, Indonesia: a prospective, community-based study. J Infect Dev Ctries 2013; 7:781–787
  10. Chiou CS, Lauderdale TL, Phung DC, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi isolates from Bangladesh, Indonesia, Taiwan, and Vietnam Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2014;58(11):6501-7
  11. Alam A Pola resistensi Salmonella enterica Serotipe typhi, departemen Ilmu Kesehatan anak RSHS, Tahun 2006–2010 Sari Pediatri 2011;12(5):296–301
  12. Yaxian J, Hui Z, Hua N, et al. Antimicrobial resistance surveillance of Salmonella isolates from the First People’s Hospital of Yunnan Provin