Dergiler / Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4

Genotoxic Effects of Aluminium Acetate by Micronucleus Assay

Sayfa
919–923
Yayın Tarihi
2017-12-29
DOI
—
🏛️Bu makalenin bibliyografik verileri ve tam metin bağlantısı DergiPark üzerinden sağlanmıştır.
DergiPark Kaydı ↗
✨

Yapay Zeka Hızlı Bakış & Çıkarımlar

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(1 Cümlede Hızlı Çıkarım)

This research showed that used concentrations did not produce significant MN frequency but significantly reduced the NDI value when compared to MMC.

📌 3 Maddede Bu Makale

🎯
Amaç & Hipotez:Aluminium, the mostly used element in the world, and its usage is increasing in many applications.
📊
Temel Bulgular & Veri:Control, Negative control (1% DMSO), positive control (MMC, 0.20 µg/ml), 1250, 2500, 5000, 10000, and 15000 ppm doses of AA were used in this assay.
💡
Sonuç & Katkı:This research showed that used concentrations did not produce significant MN frequency but significantly reduced the NDI value when compared to MMC.
🔬Tür:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Kapsam:Genişletilmiş Akademik Örneklem
⚙️Değişkenler:Aluminium acetate · MN assay · MNBC

Abstract

Aluminium, the mostly used element in the world, and its usage is increasing in many applications. Aluminium acetate (AA) has been used in many therapeutical applications, too. Because of widely usage of AA in medicine, its safety must be clearly defined. This research evaluated the genotoxic effects of AA. It has been known that aluminium had very important toxic effect in long time exposures. It was aimed to determine if AA had same genotoxic effects or not. Genotoxic effects of AA were determined with human lymphocytes MN assay. Control, Negative control (1% DMSO), positive control (MMC, 0.20 µg/ml), 1250, 2500, 5000, 10000, and 15000 ppm doses of AA were used in this assay. MNBC % and NDI values of AA were compared with negative control group. 15000 ppm of AA were observed as EC50 concentration that reduced the mitotic index about 50 %. As a result of MNBC %, there was statistically significant increase in MN frequency at 5000 and 10000 ppm doses. Dose-dependent cytotoxicity were obtained from NDI study. The highest MN frequency and the lowest NDI frequency were obtained from 10000 ppm at 48 h treatment while the lowest MN and the highest NDI frequencies were determined in 1250 ppm at 24 h treatment. This research showed that used concentrations did not produce significant MN frequency but significantly reduced the NDI value when compared to MMC.

🔖

Bu Makaleye Atıf Yap

EREN, Y., AKYIL, D., ÖZKARA, A. (2017). Genotoxic Effects of Aluminium Acetate by Micronucleus Assay. Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 4, 919–923. https://ajindex.com/articles/111224

📄 Tam Metin PDF Okuyucu

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

Kaynakça (14)

  1. Zatta, P.; Lain, E.; Cagnolini, C. Effect of aluminium on activityof kreb’s cycle enzymes and glutamate dehydrogenase in rat brain homogenate. European Journal of Biochemistry. 2000; 267, 3049─3055
  2. Ferrer, A. Metal poisoning. Anales del Sistema Sani-tario De Navarra. 2003; 26, 141─153
  3. Lima, P.D.L.; Vasconcellos, M.C.; Montenegro, R.C.; Bahia, M.O.; Costa, E.T.; Antunes, L.M.G.; Burbano, R.R. Genotoxic effects of aluminum, iron and manganese in human cells and experimental systems: A review of the literature. Human and Experimental Toxicology. 2011; 30(10), 1435–1444
  4. Exley, C.; Burgess, E.; Day, J.P.; Jeffery, E.H., Melethil, S., Yokel, R.A. Aluminum toxicokinetics. Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health. 1996; 48, 569–584
  5. Becaria, A.; Campbell, A.; Bondy, S.C. Aluminum as a toxicant. Toxicology and Industrial Health. 2002; 18, 309–320
  6. Wedrychowski, A.; Schmidt, W.N.; Hnilica, L.S. The in-vivo crosslinking of proteins and DNA by heavy metals. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 1986; 261, 3370─3376
  7. Migliore, L.; Cocchi, L.; Nesti, C.; Sabbioni, E. Micro-nuclei assay and FISH analysis in human lymphocytes treated with six metal salts. Environmental and Mole-cular Mutagenesis. 1999; 34, 279─284
  8. Banasik, A.; Lankoff, A.; Piskulak, A.; Adamowska, K.; Lisowska, H.; Wojcik, A. Aluminum-induced micro-nuclei and apoptosis in human peripheral-blood lymphocytes treated during diff erent phases of the cell cycle. Environmental Toxicology. 2005; 20, 402─406
  9. Geyikoğlu, F.; Türkez, H.; Keles, M.S. The role of fruit juices in the prevention of aluminum sulphate toxicity in human blood in vitro. Fresenius Environmental Bul-letin. 2005; 14, 878─883
  10. Ribes, D.; Colomina, M.T.; Vicens, P.; Domingo, J.L. Effects of oral aluminum exposure on behavior and neurogenesis in a transgenic mouse model of Alzhei-mer's disease. Experimental Neurology. 2008; 214(2), 293─300
  11. Hirsch, E.C.; Brandel, J.P.; Galle, P.; Javoyagid, F.; Agid, Y. Iron and aluminum increase in the Substantia-Nigra of patients with Parkinson's-Disease An X-raymicroanalysis. Journal of Neurochemistry. 1991; 56, 446─451
  12. Ganrot, P.O. Metabolism and possible health effects of aluminium. Environmental Health Perspectives. 1986; 65, 363-441
  13. Matsumoto, H. Changes of the structure of pea chromatin by aluminum. Plant and Cell Physiology. 1988; 29, 281-287
  14. WHO. Guidelines for drinking–water quality re-commendations. Geneva, Italy: WHO. 1996